Buckle up, Boomers and Gen Xers, because I’m going to serve you up some nostalgia bait. Stop at the concession booth to pick up your complimentary rose-colored glasses, and don’t feel shy.Generation X was born between 1965 and 1980. We are the last generation who experienced the real, physical world the way most humans have experienced it. We came along when generational transitions were gradual. We knew our Boomer parents’ music and movie stars, and we know our Silent Generation grandparents’ music and movie stars. As a kid, I knew who the Andrews Sisters were, and I could sing along because my grandmother played their records.There will be Slant Six engines running in good health long after I’m dead, just as God intended.Compare to today: The average Gen Z kid has no idea who Michael Jackson, Madonna, or Lucille Ball are. Starting with Millennials, a chasm opened up between generations. People a generation younger asked who some of the most world-famous stars were when they were working and alive just 20 years earlier. With Gen Z it’s even starker. They were given digital poison in the form of smartphones in their tender years, and the entire cultural landscape fragmented into a billion bespoke Balkan states.It’s hard to convince young people that some of the technologies from the bad old world of analog were actually superior to what we have today. They don’t believe that phone calls on copper wire were clear and never dropped (it’s true, though). Hilariously, they think film photography was always blurry and little better at capturing detail than an Impressionist painter.Well, some of these things were better. And I want them back.1. Kodachrome film Smith Collection/Gado/Getty ImagesI trained as a photographer in college, and that was going to be my career. But then digital came along. I was in romantic love with the hands-on craft that was film photography. When computers took over, I packed it all away because I was in love with silver gelatin emulsions, not silicon chips.The loss of Kodachrome color slide film was the worst, and I shed real tears when Kodak pulled the plug. There was no color film in history that reproduced color as well as Kodachrome did; there’s a reason Paul Simon wrote the song. He was right.Kodachrome was actually a black-and-white film with no built-in dyes like all other color films. Instead it captured the blue, red, and green light on three layers in the film separately. The color dyes were added during the wet chemical processing, and those dyes were richer and more time-stable than ordinary color film. This is why a Kodachrome slide from the 1940s looks like a high-quality photograph taken today — there’s no fading or washed-out colors like many of us see in old color photos in our family albums.It was also the sharpest film with the highest resolution. A scene taken on Kodachrome was reproduced in such detail that looking at the slide was nearly like looking at real life through a window.Because you’re reading this on a computer screen, you and I can’t see what the slide “really” looks like. It’s mediated by an electronic screen. But you can still see the rich color and fine detail that no other film could achieve.2. Three-strip TechnicolorPeople today talk about bright hues looking like “Technicolor,” but few people understand what that really meant. For decades in Hollywood, the patented Technicolor film process was different from every other color film technology, and it reined supreme. Motion pictures shot in Technicolor were brighter and more vivid than any other process. They made real life look like the Land of Oz.The quality came at a price. Like Kodachrome, Technicolor used black-and-white film, adding stable, rich color dyes later during processing and printing. This made the shooting process difficult. The film was “slow,” requiring so much light on set that actors sometimes got eye damage. They certainly sweat a lot.Technicolor cameras ran three separate strips of black-and-white motion picture film through the camera at the same time. A “beam splitter” separated the light into red, green, and blue, directing one color only to each of the three strips of film. The cameras were heavy and needed to be sound-baffled during a shoot.Striking the final print for projection required precision machines that could line up each of the three strips of film in perfect registration to lay down cyan, yellow, and magenta dyes. It took precision-machining, skill, time, and money. That’s why the process was abandoned when cheaper, easier all-in-one color motion picture film became available.But that’s also why the Technicolor process was so beloved that songs were written about it. This is from the Technicolor production “Silk Stockings” with Janis Paige singing to Fred Astaire. 3. Air-cooled Volkswagen enginesI went outside to play in 1978 and came upon my stepfather on his knees behind the 1967 beige VW bug that was our family car. “God — son of a *@^%!” he cussed as the engine cranked and cranked and wouldn’t fire up. He was trying to gap the points in the distributor, a job he was never good at. I learned to do it decades later from a classic butch lesbian, and it didn’t seem that hard to me.My stepdad was doing this because that’s what normal people did in those days. You tuned up your own car. Most dads had a toolset and the know-how to do car maintenance at home. Repairs were less expensive, and you didn’t have to have a computer technician “scan” your engine to figure out what the bloody computer thought was wrong with it.Sure, the old VWs were simple and had few features. The heaters were so bad that winter driving required an ice scraper for the inside of the windscreen. The bugs were tiny compared to modern cars, but you could get a surprising amount in there if you were clever.Sure, they were light (some people call them death traps), but that was great when my mother went off a snowy road in Upstate New York, and four boys from the local college fraternity just picked it up out of the ditch and set it back on the road.I’d give anything to hear that musical, metallic tinkle of the exhaust pipes on America’s roads today.4. The Chrysler Slant Six engineIf you know, you know. America never built a more durable engine than the famous Chrysler Slant Six. The engine got its name because the designers tilted it 30 degrees to fit the block under the lower, sleeker hoods that became stylish in the early 1960s.This six-cylinder may not have had the raw horsepower of a big block V8, but it produced a surprising amount of oomph for its size, and it was an engine that never died. If you’ve owned one, you can hear the sewing machine-like purr and tick in your mind.We had two Slant Six-powered family cars growing up. As an adult, I’ve had a Dodge Dart and a Plymouth Belvedere powered by this motor. There’s no better way to spend an afternoon than adjusting the valves on a Slant Six while it’s running. I miss how easy it was to work on these engines, made in the days when you could move around under the hood and adjust something without taking off 15 components just to get enough room to put a finger in the engine bay.There will be Slant Six engines running in good health long after I’m dead, just as God intended.RELATED: My 1966 Plymouth Belvedere let her 225 Slant-6 do the talking NBC/Getty Images5. Customer serviceThis is a social technology that needs to make a comeback. My first jobs as a teenager were running the cash register at a Wegman’s grocery store and bringing burgers to tables at a Big Boy restaurant. Friendly, efficient customer service was mandatory. It was expected by every customer and every employer.You were to greet customers with a friendly hello and an offer to help. Smiles were either compulsory or strongly encouraged. If a customer needed to find an item, you found it for them and walked them over to the right aisle.What do you get today when you walk into any retail store? Dead-eyed, silent stares from any staff younger than 35. Need to find a pipe fitting in a big store like Lowe’s? Try asking. You’ll get, “Um … a what? If we had any, they’d be, like, over there,” as “Jonas” waves in a northeasterly direction.Surprisingly, a young clerk at my local McDonald’s reminded me of the good old days of customer service last week. Like so many places, McDonald’s is making its restaurants hostile to humans. In addition to the ugly, gray, brutalist “updated” architecture, the lobbies are crammed with touch-screen kiosks, while the staffed registers have been reduced to one or two maximum. As recently as 15 years ago, McDonald’s had a reputation for employing staff that were neater, tidier, and friendlier than the competition.That’s gone now — except for this one young man at my local McD’s. I walked past the kiosks and up to the register, expecting to be ignored for five minutes as is now McDonald’s standard. “Jeff” was about 22. His shirt was tucked in. He was neatly groomed. He smiled at me and said, “Welcome to McDonald’s; how are you today?” He meant it. He was looking me in the eye. I was so pleasantly surprised I thought I was dreaming, and I made a point to thank him for being human and polite.The other day, I saw this old early ’80s commercial for McDonald’s Shamrock Shake. Take a look, and try not to tear up. If you’re 35 or under, you probably think the chipper and upbeat tone looks “fake.” You may not believe anyone ever acted that way. You might even find this level of cheer “cringe.”Well, it was like that. I was there. And I want it back.
Pa. House Dems Pull Women’s Month Resolution to Escape Having to Define ‘Woman’
To escape having to define “woman” in a resolution honoring women, Pennsylvania House Democrats shelved a vote to designate March as “National Women’s Month” on Tuesday.
“They pulled it because they were scared to define what a woman actually is,” Republican state Rep. Aaron Bernstine said Wednesday, commenting on Democrat House Speaker Joanna McClinton’s decision to table the resolution, rather than address his proposed amendment.
When Speaker McClinton brought up the resolution (HR 390) for a vote, Bernstine offered an amendment to add the definition of who it is they would be honoring. After briefly silencing her microphone and consulting her colleagues, McClinton declared the resolution temporarily “off,” ostensibly to give Democrats time to regroup and devise a strategy to reintroduce it without having to define what constitutes a woman.
Speaker McClinton’s response to the proposed amendment prompted laughter among some in attendance.
“If Democrats want to celebrate what they refuse to define, it is clear they do not take this issue seriously,” a spokesman for the Pennsylvania House Republican Caucus told Fox News Digital.
Berstine said it shouldn’t be controversial to define a woman based on biology (having XX chromosomes).
The resolution was intended to piggyback off March’s “National Women’s History Month” by creating a state-level month “celebrating the extraordinary accomplishments of women,” according to the bill’s sponsor, Democrat state Rep. Carol Hill-Evans.
For America at 250, Some Jewish Wisdom on How to Last 3,000 Years
The scholar of Yiddish Ruth Wisse began her Jefferson Lecture last night at the Trump Kennedy Center in Washington with the observation that “There have been many far more distinguished speakers in this series, but I think none has been older, and no one more grateful.”
Wisse didn’t explicitly make the connection between her age—89—and her topic—”our anxieties about endurance”—but I’m old enough myself to begin to understand what she was talking about. So is America, in its 250th birthday year.
Wisse introduced her talk as “a grateful Jewish message on staying power, in three parts.”
Part one focused on a Yiddish poem by Abraham Sutzkever that asks “Who will last? And what?” It concludes “Who lasts? God abides — isn’t that enough?”
I took Sutzkever—and Wisse—to be suggesting that faith in God is one secret to endurance, and also that the anxiety about endurance is eased by the knowledge that only God is eternal.
As Wisse put it, “To find lastingness, he insisted, you must look to its source. Trust in eternity can be sought only in the eternal.” Or, as she concluded, “Sutzkever, who survived the sacrifice of his formative world—when that’s what it cost to remain a Jew—reminds us to acknowledge before whom we stand. If that secure knowledge could restore him and resurrect the Jewish people, so can it inspire this nation to reach its 2,500th anniversary.”
Part two focused on an essential Jewish prayer, the Shma, which begins, “Hear, O Israel. The Lord is our God, the Lord is One. You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And these words which I command you today shall be upon your heart. You shall teach them thoroughly to your children, and you shall speak of them when you sit in your house and when you walk on the road, when you lie down and when you rise. You shall bind them as a sign upon your hand, and they shall be for a reminder between your eyes. And you shall write them upon the doorposts of your house and upon your gates.” As she put it, the “ratio of content to transmission is about 1:7.”
Transmission, she said, requires teachers who inspire and reinforce rather than only complain. “The absence of insistent, creative intellectual formation, particularly in the humanities, does not just leave a vacuum; it gets filled by adversarial ideas: Marx for Madison, Lenin for Lincoln, and lately the Islamist incursion for the American Revolution. … If there is to be enduring government of, by, and for the people, the people would have to be instructed and reminded to respect and confidently to perpetuate their precious inheritance.”
Part three had to do with military force—appropriate for Wisse. Michael Segal of Harvard Advocates for ROTC wrote me to say that Wisse “was one of the key faculty members supporting return of ROTC to Harvard. … the example of Israel was very much in mind for the importance of having capable people in the military. ”
Wisse said in the Jefferson lecture that “the United States is still this planet’s main hope … and that hope depends on the fighting strength of its armed forces and the fighting spirit of its citizenry. … Jews who represent the principle and practice of coexistence—and who paid the highest price when they’ve tried to endure without self-defense—can testify that soldiering is the mainstay of any society that intends to protect its members.”
Faith, teaching, and soldiering—as Wisse put it, “May these messages from the Blue and White forever help to strengthen and to secure the Red, White, and Blue.”
The full text is up, paywalled, at the Free Press, and YouTube has video. For those fortunate enough to attend in person, it was a large crowd heavy with some of the most prominent American Jewish rabbis, writers, editors, professors, and philanthropists, including some who traveled from Florida, Boston, and New York. The standing ovation for Wisse even before she started speaking “to all my fellow lovers of America out there” attested to the warmth, respect, and affection for a speaker who in the teaching, faith, and soldiering departments hasn’t only lectured but has lived as an example.
The post For America at 250, Some Jewish Wisdom on How to Last 3,000 Years appeared first on .
Choking Hormuz: How Oil’s Journey Has Been Upended by War
Gamio et al., NYT Trade is trickling through the vital artery connecting the Persian Gulf and the world, creating an economic shock thousands of miles away.
Inside Trump’s Daily Video Montage Briefing on Iran War
Doyle et al., NBC News The montage, which typically runs for about two minutes, has raised concerns among some of the president’s allies that he may not be receiving the complete picture of the…
Diplomacy Has Not Stopped, Iran Says, While Vowing To Continue The Fight; Trump Mulls Plan To Deliver ‘Final Blow’
Diplomacy Has Not Stopped, Iran Says, While Vowing To Continue The Fight; Trump Mulls Plan To Deliver ‘Final Blow’
Summary
Iran rejects US plan but says diplomacy continues (indirectly, apparently) – White House, Pentagon reviewing options for ‘final blow’ as Trump tells Iranians ‘get serious’ about talks.
Trump said to want ‘speedy end to war’ (WSJ) while at the same time warning Tehran of ‘no turning back’ if it doesn’t negotiate.
Israel says it has killed Alireza Tangsiri, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps navy.
Iran “laying Traps” & “building up defenses” on Kharg Island; NYT report says 13 US regional bases largely ‘uninhabitable’ in wake of Iran ballistic missile retaliation on Gulf.
* * *
‘Diplomacy has Not Stopped’ – Iran says while saying No Direct Talks
Iran is confirming that only within the last 24 hours it formally received the US ’15-point’ plan via Pakistani mediators, but stated its assessment that it is “one-sided and unfair”. Iran has also slammed the proposals as ‘deceptive’. So in effect little has changed from reports earlier this week.
There is still no arrangement for negotiations, no realistic plan for talks at this moment, state media conveyed further on Thursday. However, there also this from state Tasnim: “Diplomacy has not stopped, if realism prevails within the US, then a way forward could be found.” Previously Tehran media stated “An informed source told Tasnim that Iran’s response to the 15 articles proposed by the US was officially sent last night through intermediaries.” So there’s ‘hope’ for an offramp through what are so far only indirect talks, but then Iran is also vowing to keep fighting, after some reports Tehran leaders are ready for a ‘long war’:
IRAN REJECTS U.S. PROPOSAL DELIVERED VIA MEDIATOR, VOWS TO CONTINUE FIGHTING
Slight dip in oil on the headlines:
‘Final Blow’
President Trump on Thursday is on the one hand calling on Iran “to get serious soon” in negotiations with the US “before it is too late” – while on the other he’s said to be mulling plans for a “final blow” in the military campaign. Axios writes that several possibilities are being considered, all which point toward serious escalation and in some cases even ground troops. All but one of the below “final blow” options carry the potential for US to get stuck in Iran for years:
— Seize or blockade Kharg Island (Iran’s main oil export hub).
— Invade/control Larak Island (key to Strait of Hormuz control).
— Take Abu Musa + nearby islands (strategic entrance to the strait).
— Block or seize Iranian oil tankers in the region.
— Launch massive airstrikes on nuclear/energy sites.
— (More extreme) Ground operations inside Iran to secure nuclear material.
Axios elsewhere reminds: “Trump’s five-day pause on strikes against Iranian energy infrastructure expires Saturday, and a dramatic military escalation will grow more likely if no progress is made in diplomatic talks, particularly if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed.”
Negotiations or ‘No Turning Back’
Meanwhile, below are a couple of the latest Iran-related Truth Social posts by President Trump, at a moment Iran has made clear it will reject direct talks until its ‘five conditions’ are met. Iran has said it won’t be “fooled again” and even though Trump has declared ‘success’ and that Iran has been “militarily obliterated, it’s clear that Tehran has serious strategic leverage given its de facto control of the Hormuz Strait.
Trump threatens in all caps that if Iran doesn’t relent then there is “no turning back” – however, the WSJ is at the same time reporting Trump has told aides he wants a speedy end to the war.
“President Trump has told associates in recent days that he wants to avoid a protracted war in Iran and that he hopes to bring the conflict to an end in the coming weeks,” WSJ writes.
The publication continues, “Nearly one month into the war, the president has privately informed advisers he thinks the conflict is in its final stages, urging them to stick to the four-to-six-week timeline he has outlined publicly, according to people familiar with the matter. White House officials planned a mid-May summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing with the expectation that the war would be concluded before the meeting begins, some of the people said.”
And then it states the obvious which should have been known before Operation Epic Fury was launched: “The problem is Trump has no easy options for ending the war, and peace negotiations are at a nascent stage.” Certainly all of the above-mentioned ‘final blow’ options all carry extreme risk of quagmire (which might make the Iraq and Afghan wars easy by comparison). Path to offramp or more massive escalation coming?
Iran War: We are not watching a path to peace
Three warning signs now visible:
1. “Talks” without a ceasefire
2. Expansion to economic choke points
3. Quiet preparation for ground forces
This is how limited wars become global disasters pic.twitter.com/GTTOc4o4YB
— Robert A. Pape (@ProfessorPape) March 26, 2026
IRGC Navy Commander Killed, Says Israel
Israel says one of its air strike has killed Alireza Tangsiri, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps navy, in another reported top-level death. Defense Minister Israel Katz described the strike was carried out on Wednesday night “in a precise … operation” and targeted other “senior officers of the naval command.” He played a central role in controlling the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz and recently issued direct warnings to Israel and the United States, including threats to close the waterway; however, just like all Iran’s military commanders, he’ll likely soon be replaced.
Overnight and in the last 24 hours, Iran has targeted more key refineries in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, which Gulf states have described as a “brutal aggression” against the global economy. Gulf Cooperation Council officials said the situation is an “international responsibility,” warning that “what is a threat today will grow” and stressing that oil supply chains must be protected.
Reminder: Israel keeps an ‘assassination list’ and has reportedly removed these two men from it, to leave room for negotiations, apparently. Below: Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi
The GCC called for de-escalation, stating their goal is a “diplomatic solution” to end the attacks, at a moment Pakistan, Turkey, and Egypt are said to be seeking mediation to get peace talks off the ground. “Our main message to our partners in the world is to send an international message, a unified message to Iran to stop immediately and unconditionally their attacks against the GCC countries.” They added their objective is not to “destroy” Iran but to build a “good relationship,” warning that “the deterioration of the situation in the Arab Gulf will be a warning that will exceed the Gulf area.”
Casualties in Iran: Iran’s Deputy Health Minister Ali Jafarian said at least 1,937 people have been killed during the war, including 240 women and 212 children. He added that at least 24,800 people have been injured, including around 4,000 women and 1,621 children.
Meanwhile Iran continues to send steady missiles and drones on Israel, with mounting Israeli casualties and much infrastructure, cities, and neighborhoods suffering severe damage.
⚡️ Iranian cluster munition hit in Israel’s Kafr Qasim earlier today pic.twitter.com/jEs6fdK8ON
— War Monitor (@WarMonitors) March 26, 2026
’13 US Regional Bases Uninhabitable’: NYT
…Something analysts suspected was the case over the course of the last weeks of expanding war: “Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage.” This is based on statements by unnamed US defense officials who admit they’ve had to scramble to find ‘alternative’ housing and office solutions for personnel.
The revelation comes on the heels of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) having earlier warned that if American troops are ‘stationed’ in hotels or civilian office complexes, then those hotels and locations effectively become targets.
The Times report suggests that the US saw early fatalities and casualties (CENTCOM figures say 13 dead and some 300 injuries thus far) in part due to lack of preparedness for such a robust Iranian ballistic missile retaliation on US regional bases.
Iran “Laying Traps” & “Building Up Defenses” On Kharg Island
Iranian forces are said to be “laying traps” and “building up defenses” on Kharg Island, in preparation for a possible US ground attack and takeover. Iran has recently bolstered its defenses around Kharg Island, anticipating a possible US move to seize the key oil export hub, CNN reported this week. The island is vital to Iran’s economy, handling roughly 90% of its crude shipments, and has become a focal point in escalating tensions.
There is also growing skepticism among US allies and policymakers about whether capturing the island would achieve its broader objective. Even some Republicans are starting to publicly push back against any possible plans involving ground forces.
* * *
More headlines and latest developments:
Iranian state TV quoted an anonymous official saying Tehran rejected the plan delivered via Pakistan and will “end the war when it decides to do so and when its own conditions are met”.
Iranian FM: “At present, our policy is the continuation of resistance. We do not intend to negotiate – so far, no negotiations have taken place, and I believe our position is completely principled.”
The White House said the US is “very close to meeting the core objectives in Iran” and warned Donald Trump is prepared to “unleash hell” if Iran does not accept defeat.
Trump said negotiations are under way and claimed Iran wants “to make a deal so badly” but that “they’re afraid to say it, because they figure they’ll be killed by their own people”.
VP Vance may travel to Pakistan this weekend for potential talks with Iran.
Iran has threatened to disrupt the Bab el-Mandeb Strait—the vital Red Sea route connecting the Mediterranean with MENA and Asia—if attacks target its territory or islands.
Iran attacked a power plant in Israel; the state monopoly said there was no infrastructure damage.
Iran said the US and Israel attacked the vicinity of the Bushehr nuclear plant.
Media coverage of potential Kharg Island takeover scenarios has intensified in the past 24 hours.
Iran’s parliament is working on a bill to impose fees on ships in the Strait of Hormuz.
The Israeli military said it carried out a “wide-scale wave of strikes on Iran” this morning.
The Telegraph: Russia has begun arming Iran with drones in the first known transfer of lethal munitions from Moscow to Tehran since the war began.
The United Kingdom is discussing with global partners “a viable plan” to secure maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz.
* * * 3 MONTHS OF QUALITY FOOD // USE CODE THANKYOU10 FOR 10% OFF
Tyler Durden
Thu, 03/26/2026 – 10:15
One Day Until Trump’s Self‑Imposed 5-Day Deadline On Iran But Markets Appear Increasingly Numb
One Day Until Trump’s Self‑Imposed 5-Day Deadline On Iran But Markets Appear Increasingly Numb
By Molly Schwartz, Cross Asset Macro Strategist at Rabobank
More persistent inflation
Yesterday, Iran rejected the US-proposed 15-point plan, instead laying out its own conditions in a 5-point plan;
(1) halt the killing of Iranian officials;
(2) means to make sure no other war is wage against it;
(3) reparations for the war;
(4) an end to all hostilities; and
(5) Iran’s “exercise of sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.”
The probability that Washington would accept these terms in exchange for a ceasefire is roughly equal to the likelihood that Tehran would have accepted the original US proposal…zero.
Against that backdrop, the clock on Trump’s self‑imposed five‑day deadline continues to tick down.
The relative calm in markets suggests some investor confidence that hostilities may eventually wind down, however slim that prospect remains. Still, even a “diplomatic” resolution at this stage would carry material costs for both the US and Israel.
We have repeatedly argued that the Iranian regime’s overriding objective is survival; a negotiated outcome that leaves it intact (see Venezuela) in effect constitutes a strategic defeat.
As Michael Every and Ben Picton put it here, “If we see a US and Israeli defeat…Trumpism will suffer both electorally and geopolitically: its grand macro strategy will unravel, to China’s advantage.”
US Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt yesterday announced that JD Vance may be headed for Pakistan on Friday to continue negotiations, but if diplomacy fails, Trump has at least partial backing from NATO.
Mark Rutte said the President was “doing this to make the whole world safe,” and argued that it is “only logical” for European countries to take a couple of weeks to coordinate naval deployments to the Strait of Hormuz following Washington’s request. Not all European leaders are aligned, however, with officials in Germany, Italy, and Spain stressing that “this is not our war.”
Whether Europe views the conflict as its war or not, it is already implicated via the economic channel. Several ECB policymakers spoke yesterday at the ECB and Its Watchers Conference, striking a cautious tone as they assess how large and persistent the inflationary shock from the conflict may be. Kazaks said it remains “unclear” whether rate hikes in April are justified, but warned that risks could intensify if energy prices meaningfully pass through into other components.
Lagarde echoed this data‑dependent stance.
“We will not act before we have sufficient information on the size and persistence of the shock and its propagation,” she said, “but we will not be paralyzed by hesitation: our commitment to delivering 2% inflation over the medium term is unconditional.”
She underlined that April is a “live” meeting. Market pricing of the European OIS curve implies close to 16bp of hikes in April, but nearly 65bp of cumulative hikes by the end of 2026.
Markets, meanwhile, appeared almost numb. Earlier this week, asset prices swung sharply as Washington and Tehran issued conflicting statements on whether negotiations were progressing—or even taking place., with Crude bouncing between $96 and $115.
Yesterday, however, was markedly calmer. US 10‑year Treasury yields traded within their narrowest range since the conflict began, closing around 4.33%, while crude oil settled near $103/bbl.
Tyler Durden
Thu, 03/26/2026 – 10:05
Yankees shortstop José Caballero makes MLB history, becomes first player to use Automated Ball-Strike System
New York Yankees shortstop José Caballero made MLB history Wednesday: He became the first player to use the Automated Ball-Strike System (ABS).During the fourth inning of the Yankees’ 7-0 Opening Day win over the San Francisco Giants at Oracle Park, Caballero challenged home plate umpire Bill Miller’s strike call after Giants starting pitcher Logan Webb threw a sinker at the top of the zone.Caballero, 29, tapped his head to initiate the challenge and appeal the strike call, but lost the challenge. The 12 Hawk-Eye cameras of the Automated Ball-Strike System displayed that Webb’s 90.7 mph sinker was in the zone.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COMDespite losing the challenge, he had conviction in his decision.”Nope, I wanted to go for it,” Caballero said.Caballero thought it was a little higher than what was shown, but he is a fan of the ABS system despite his unsuccessful appeal.”I think it’s really good, keep everyone accountable,” he added. “It gives us a chance to really see how good (we are) with the zone or not. I wish it was the other way around, I’m trying to get the overturn call but this time I didn’t.”BASEBALL HALL OF FAME PITCHER GOES IN DEPTH HOW ABS SYSTEM WILL IMPROVE OFFENSE, HOW ARMS HAVE TO ADJUSTCaballero’s challenge was the lone one of the game. The Yankees were up 5-0 at the time of the challenge.Yankees manager Aaron Boone said he has tried to be direct with the feedback he has given to players regarding their challenges.”We’ve had a lot of dialogue at it. It’s something that we’ve poured a lot into, I’ve certainly,” Boone said. “It’s become one of the things I’ve kind of tried to lead the charge on a little bit. Another kind of end-of-spring meeting with all the position players and catchers at the end just kind of running through different ones that came up and give my feedback on it. I’ve been very direct with them during spring as far as after the fact if I thought one was really good or conversely if one was terrible.””I’ve tried to be real direct with them and why,” he said. “I feel like we’re going to be good at it, that’s the expectation. I’m sure we’ll continue to evolve with it.”Teams are given two challenges a game, but if they successfully challenge a call, they retain it. But if the challenge is unsuccessful, you lose it. So, the Yankees were down to one challenge for the rest of game after Caballero’s unsuccessful attempt in the fourth inning.Caballero, who went 1 for 4 with an RBI and a run scored, drove in the first run of the 2026 MLB season with a single that scored Giancarlo Stanton in the second inning.The Yankees (1-0) will look to continue their hot start when they take on the Giants (0-1) on Friday at 4:35 p.m. ET.The Associated Press contributed to this report.Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Barry Bonds reveals George Steinbrenner’s ultimatum that kept him from joining Yankees
The New York Yankees fared pretty well in the 1990s, but they actually could have been even better.That’s because, according to MLB’s home run king Barry Bonds, he almost wound up in the Bronx.However, owner George Steinbrenner, known for his rather rash decisions, gave Bonds an ultimatum that turned him off.CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM “George isn’t here anymore, so I can tell the truth, right? I would’ve been with the Yankees, but Steinbrenner got on the phone and called us and told me, ‘Barry, we’re going to give you the money — the highest-paid player at that time — but you got to sign the contract by 2 o’clock this afternoon,” Bonds said on the Netflix broadcast. “And I said, ‘Excuse me?!’ And I just hung the phone up.”And I went to go get lunch, and Dennis Gilbert, my agent, they were like, ‘Do you know what you just did?!’ I’m like, ‘Did you know what he just said?!’ I just said, ‘Forget it.’ By the time I walked down the street to go get lunch, I said, ‘Let me just think about this.’ The Giants called me, and I said, ‘I’m going home.'”So, instead of the Bronx, Bonds headed to the Bay and went to the San Francisco Giants — still the highest-paid player in MLB history at the time.YANKEES LEGEND GIVES THOUGHTS ON TEAM RUNNING BACK LAST SEASON’S SQUAD, AARON JUDGE’S CLUTCH FACTORBonds was fresh off his second MVP in three years, cementing himself as the game’s best player, all while Steinbrenner was suspended from Major League Baseball and was unable to run the day-to-day operations (he was still giving the paychecks, and his suspension was lifted the following March).Despite Bonds heading to San Francisco, the Yankees were still able to build their dynasty, as Gene Michael brought in the Core Four of Derek Jeter, Jorge Posada, Mariano Rivera and Andy Pettitte. Add Bernie Williams and Paul O’Neill to the mix, along with other moves by Bob Watson and Brian Cashman later, and you get four World Series titles in five years.New York perhaps could have used Bonds after the turn of the millennium, as he won four straight National League MVP Awards while the Yankees were unable to bring back another title until 2009.Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter
Josh Duhamel says he’s now 72% ready for a zombie apocalypse at his ‘doomsday’ cabin but fears AI robots more
Apocalyptic zombies and AI robots had better watch out.Josh Duhamel told Fox News Digital he is now about 72% ready for a zombie apocalypse at his off-the-grid “doomsday” cabin in rural Minnesota after he joked he was about 70% ready last summer. “Every year, I get a little bit more fully prepped,” he said. “But that’s part of the fun is the journey of figuring it out, seeing what the latest and greatest is. I’m less afraid of zombies and more afraid of AI robots now. I don’t know if we’re ever gonna fully be able to, you know, protect ourselves from what’s coming, but at least I can hopefully turn off all devices and just sort of shut ourselves off from the world if we need to.””Is that too dark? Maybe that’s too dark,” he wondered. “I don’t know.”GEORGE CLOONEY SLAMS CELEBRITY DIVAS, CREDITS KENTUCKY ROOTS FOR KEEPING HIM GROUNDEDDuhamel is starring and directing new movie, “Preschool,” a comedy about the big city pressures of getting children into the best early learning programs, which is premiering at the Fargo Film Festival in North Dakota.”I think that it’s a bit of art imitating life because we literally just went through this with my two-year-old son,” Duhamel said. “And, you know, it’s so relatable to anybody who has kids, especially if you’re on the East or West Coast or any big city that has a big private school option.”WATCH: JOSH DUHAMEL JOKES ABOUT PREPARING FOR AI ROBOTS AND THE ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE AT HIS RURAL CABINGrowing up in North Dakota, Duhamel said he just went to public school, “but in California, Los Angeles specifically, it is a real thing. And it surprises me that this movie hadn’t been made because it’s so ripe with comedic opportunity because, you’re right, parents will do anything to give their kid a leg up in the world.”CHRIS HEMSWORTH ADMITS DITCHING LA WAS ‘GREATEST DECISION’ HE’S MADE”Sometimes we forget that we just gotta let them be kids, you know, and we make it more about ourselves sometimes than we do about the kids,” he said. “Because, for me, it was like, you know, let the kids run around and get dirty and play in the mud.”WATCH: JOSH DUHAMEL DESCRIBES HIS NEW MOVIE ‘PRESCHOOL’ AS ‘ART IMITATING LIFE’ WITH HIS YOUNG SONHe continued sarcastically, “But, you know, preschool, if they don’t get off on that right foot, who knows? They might end up in prison someday.”Duhamel warned that “Hollywood can be a very seductive place, and it can be a very dangerous place if you don’t remember where you came from.”DISNEY STAR DAVID HENRIE SAYS HOLLYWOOD GOING THROUGH ‘NEW RENAISSANCE’ WITH FAITH-FRIENDLY CONTENT”I’ve always stayed very close to my roots,” he said. “I’ve got a very tight-knit group of friends that have been very close to me forever, since kindergarten, some of them. So, I’ve leaned on them a lot just to keep my a– in check throughout the years.”He said he’s been really “grateful” to have had “a place like North Dakota to root myself in because it’s helped me stay true to myself throughout all these years.”When asked if he feels disconnected from the Hollywood lifestyle in Minnesota, the “Ransom Canyon” star said, “That’s the point. I try to get disconnected from it because the truth is, the more I’m living in the real world, the more it informs my actual artistic choices.”‘YELLOWSTONE’ STAR LUKE GRIMES TARGETED BY MONTANA LOCALS AS MOVE FROM LA SPARKS SMALL-TOWN FURYHe continued, “Oftentimes, if you’re so caught up in what’s happening in the modern world, you lose track a little bit. So, for me, getting out there – it really sort of forces me to sit with my thoughts, and out there listening to the birds and the loons and the leaves rustling through the trees and getting out on the water. It’s really meditative in a lot of ways. It’s cathartic for me. And it allows me to create that creative space that I need to go do my job.”Duhamel said he could easily live at the cabin full-time.”After a couple of weeks, you start to miss like some of the modern amenities, like, oh, I don’t know sushi restaurants,” he admitted. “So, I do start to miss like some of the fun, sort of big city stuff, but at the same time, I could be completely content just living out there.”CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTERThe 53-year-old said the cabin gets a little cold in the winter, though, which can bring on “cabin fever.””I don’t want to turn into Jack Nicholson from ‘The Shining’. So, I need to come back and sort of plug back into the real world once in a while, but, you know, for the most part, I could truly live out there,” Duhamel said. LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSHe said he’s kept the cabin fairly “rugged” and “rustic,” but also we have everything we need, you know, and “so it’s kind of perfect.”Duhamel has two children: two-year-old son, Shepherd, with his wife, Audra Mari, and his 12-year-old son, Axl, with ex-wife Fergie.The former “Las Vegas” star said that the cabin is perfect for his kids.”My 12-year-old gets to get to see both sides of that,” Duhamel explained. “He’s in L.A., but he’s also at the cabin a lot, so he gets to go out there and kind of see the world as I did as a kid.”