THE NEWS

Ex-CIA chief John Brennan, evidence now shows, suppressed intelligence that Americans should have been given, wildly claimed there was no spying on the 2016 Donald Trump campaign, has been known to unleash untruths, and even was accused by a counter-terrorism expert of treason.

Now, he’s gone ballistic over the routine housecleaning decisions being made by President Donald Trump’s director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.

It’s all from his outrage that she is not keeping in place the intelligence officers who worked for Joe Biden.

Gabbard, in fact, recently announced the firings of Mike Collins, who was on the National Intelligence Council, and Maria Langan-Riekhof, his deputy.

According to reports, both have been named by whistleblowers as having political biases, acting on them, and undermining President Trump.

One Daily Fetched report identified them as “Deep State” operatives. And Fox News had reported they were “radically” in opposition to President Trump and his actions.

Brennan commented on the staff changes in an interview in which he was “visibly angry.”

Gabbard’s stated goals have been to prevent the politicization of intelligence, which has happened under Barack Obama and Biden.

For example, ex-CIA Director Michael Morrell was accused of helping organization a letter signed by dozens of intel operatives that claimed the scandal-proving laptop computer abandoned by Hunter Biden at a repair shop had “all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”

Actually, the laptop provided documentation of real scandals involving the Biden family.

And officials knew when they signed the letter that the evidence was factual.

Collins had been accused by whistleblowers of deliberately undermining Trump, and Langan-Riekhof was known for her advocacy for the now-discredited DEI agenda.

On MSNBC, Brennan unleashed his rage:

“This whole thing just makes me livid.”

A commentary by David Harsanyi, in fact, discussed the Durham report that reviewed the FBI’s political scheme to attack Trump over the “Russia” claims.

The column explained, “The just-released Durham report confirmed that the FBI not only failed to corroborate the Steele dossier, Hillary Clinton’s oppo-doc against former President Donald Trump, but it regularly ignored existing, sometimes dispositive, evidence to keep the investigation alive. Some officials were credulous. Others were devious. But no one ‘stole’ our democracy – other than perhaps intelligence officials and the journalists who helped feed the collective hysteria over Russia.

“John Brennan, Hamas-loving authoritarian and partisan propagandist, almost surely knew it was a con from the start. Yet he spent four years on television sounding like a deranged subreddit commenter. Even after privately admitting he knew there was no collusion, Brennan kept lying and using his credentials to mislead the public.”

John Durham, himself, concluded after a years-long investigation of the origins of the FBI war against Trump and the Trump campaign, “CIA Director John Brennan and Deputy Director David Cohen were interviewed by the Office and were asked about their knowledge of any actual evidence of members of the Trump campaign conspiring or colluding with Russian officials. When Brennan was provided with an overview of the origins of the Attorney General’s Review after Special Counsel Mueller finding a lack of evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian authorities, Brennan offered that ‘they found no conspiracy.’”

But Brennan later went on television to insist that he “suspected there was more” to collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian President Vladimir Putin than [special counsel Robert] Mueller had let on.”