Ripa teased that they “would capitalize” on the video of Consuelos trying to do so on Live “for years.”
THE NEWS
How many Biden appointees ‘burrowed in’ to the permanent bureaucracy?
Left-leaning federal bureaucrats aim to oppose President Donald Trump from within the administrative state, and some Biden administration appointees have attempted to “burrow in” to the federal bureaucracy by switching from “political” to more permanent “career” positions.
While presidents appoint more than 3,000 people for political positions, the federal government directly employs roughly 2.3 million people, most of whom serve in ostensibly nonpolitical, career positions.
“The biggest challenge that every single new Cabinet secretary and their subordinates will face is the entrenched bureaucrat,” Stewart Whitson, senior director of federal affairs at the Foundation for Government Accountability, told The Daily Signal in an interview Wednesday.
“Some of it is overt, and we saw an example of that with the FBI employee trying to coerce his subordinates to ‘dig in’ against the administration,” he noted, referencing an email FBI agent James Dennehy wrote in January shortly before his retirement.
“What’s worse is the quiet insubordination,” Whitson warned. He said many bureaucrats will “slow policy,” simply ignoring the president’s orders.
A recent poll found that a whopping 75% of Washington, D.C.-based federal employees making $75,000 or more per year who voted for Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris in November said they would not follow a lawful Trump order if they considered it bad policy.
Furthermore, a recent Foundation for Government Accountability study found that Democrat employees outnumber Republican employees by a 2-to-1 margin across federal agencies. In the 2024 presidential election, 84% of the money that federal employees gave in political contributions went to Harris.
Sean Higgins, a research fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, also highlighted the threat of employees slow-walking the president’s agenda.
“It’s easy to throw sand in the gears for something you don’t like, and that’s one of the reasons why things run so slowly in the government,” he told The Daily Signal.
Higgins noted that while analysts are familiar with the problem, no comprehensive study has shown exactly how many political appointees “burrow in.”
However, the Office of Personnel Management keeps a record of how many political appointees request—and receive—nonpolitical “career” placements.
An Overview of the Data
“OPM is committed to upholding merit system principles and preventing improper conversions from political to career positions,” McLaurine Pinover, an Office of Personnel Management spokeswoman, told The Daily Signal in a statement Friday. “This year, we launched a new review process to strengthen oversight and improve transparency in how agencies allocate career-reserved SES [Senior Executive Service] positions in the federal civil service, and we are closely reviewing all previous political conversions.”
“Our goal is to ensure all career appointments are based on merit,” she added.
The Daily Signal analyzed the available records, finding that the period between Jan. 1, 2024, and Jan. 20, 2025, had the largest number of political appointees approved to “burrow in.” Forty political appointees had been approved for “career” positions during that roughly yearlong span, with 17 approved just between Oct. 1 and Jan. 20.
The data includes yearly reports for non-presidential election years, and quarterly reports for presidential election years, with the final report for each presidential year lasting until the Jan. 20 inauguration of the new president.
The data shows higher numbers of political-to-career position placements during the Biden administration than during the first Trump administration. Eleven political appointees burrowed in during 2023, 23 burrowed in during 2022, and 33 did so in 2021. This brings the Biden administration total to 107.
During the election year-plus period Jan. 1, 2020, to Jan. 20, 2021 (Trump’s last year of his first term), 29 political appointees burrowed in. Seventeen did so in 2019, 7 in 2018, and 15 in 2017, yielding a Trump 45 administration total of 68.
The archived reports do not go back as far as the beginning of 2016, but the period between Oct. 1, 2016, and Jan. 20, 2017, during the Obama administration shortly before Trump took office, had a rather low number—only 8 political appointees burrowed in.
A few caveats: Some of the political appointees who appear in these reports had switched to career positions earlier than they appear in the Office of Personnel Management’s reports—the reports merely include dates that the switches were approved, and they often mark that a bureaucrat made the move before the office approved it. Due to these delays, Trump political appointees received approval during the Biden administration and Obama appointees appear in the lists during the Trump administration.
Requests to burrow in are rarely denied, but it does happen, and when a request is denied or in process, the Office of Personnel Management withholds the name from the report.
The Daily Signal combed through the report for Oct. 1, 2024, to Jan. 20, 2025, and a few names illustrate the phenomenon of President Joe Biden’s appointees burrowing in ahead of the Trump administration. Some of these political appointees applied to burrow in long before Trump’s election, but the Office of Personnel Management under Biden approved most of them after Trump’s victory. The final example comes from earlier in 2024, but illustrates a leftist ideological bent among some of the bureaucrats who burrowed in.
Kerry Doyle
Kerry Doyle, a lawyer, worked for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security under Biden, according to her LinkedIn profile.
She requested to move from DHS to the Justice Department, becoming an immigration judge. The Office of Personnel Management received the request on July 31 but processed it on Dec. 15. Doyle went from making $168,000 annually to $176,548.
As an attorney at ICE and DHS, she would have represented the Biden administration amid policies that, critics say, allowed more than 9 million illegal aliens to enter the country.
Doyle was about to be sworn in at the Chelmsford immigration court in Massachusetts but received an email from the Executive Office of Immigration Review in February, firing her, The Boston Globe reported.
Prior to her service in the Biden administration, Doyle had served as managing attorney at Church World Service, one of the nonprofits that went on to receive federal funding to move immigrants across the country during the Biden administration. She also worked as a scheduler and legislative assistant for Rep. Bob Wise, D-W.Va.
Margot Benedict
Margot Benedict, who started as an attorney at the Justice Department in July 2021, rose to become senior counselor to Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2024, according to her LinkedIn profile. According to the law firm Morrison Foerster, which currently employs Benedict, she first received an offer for a career position in 2023. She became a trial attorney for counterintelligence and export control in January 2024 after the Office of Personnel Management approved the transfer on Nov. 17.
Benedict had received $116,653 annually in her previous position, and she received a pay raise to $131,243 in the transfer to a career position.
The Trump administration fired her in March.
Before joining the Biden administration, Benedict had interned with the left-leaning National Women’s Law Center and served as a law clerk for the Senate Judiciary Committee’s ranking member, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. She also worked for three years at Montgomery Foerster, where she returned after the Trump administration fired her.
Elisa Santana
Elisa Santana, who joined the U.S. Agency for International Development in August 2022, applied to switch to a career position at the Department of Commerce. The Office of Personnel Management received her request in September and approved it on Dec. 15.
She went from making $104,604 annually to a salary of $106,382.
Santana posted on LinkedIn that she lost her job last week.
Before joining USAID, Santana worked for Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and before that, for Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas.
Tara Boggaram
Tara Boggaram, a director of strategy execution at the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, asked to switch to a career position as project finance specialist at the same body. The Office of Personnel Management received the request in late October and approved it on Jan. 12.
Boggaram took a pay cut, from $136,780 to $111,032.
According to her LinkedIn profile, she still works at the International Development Finance Corporation. She previously worked as a field organizer for Texas Democrat Beto O’Rourke’s failed 2018 U.S. Senate campaign.
Ruirui Kuang
Ruirui Kuang, an adviser to the International Development Finance Corporation board of directors, requested a career appointment at the same place. The Office of Personnel Management received on Nov. 7 and approved on Jan. 12 her transition to become managing director of pipeline management and execution.
Like Boggaram, Kuang took a pay cut—from $145,617 annually to $125,133.
Kuang previously worked in the Obama White House as an innovation specialist on the Social and Behavioral Sciences Team from February 2015 to August 2016.
Susan Wang
Susan Wang, a senior implementation adviser in the Biden White House Office of Management and Budget, requested a career position. The Office of Personnel Management received her request on Nov. 18 and approved her transition to attorney adviser in the DOJ’s office of legal counsel on Jan. 6.
Wang took a hefty pay bump, from $62,500 to $104,604.
According to her LinkedIn profile, Wang interned with then-Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., worked as a field organizer for the Obama campaign in 2012, and served as digital chief of staff for the Biden Presidential Inaugural Committee.
Megan Doherty
The Office of Personnel Management received a request for Megan Doherty, a deputy assistant administrator at the U.S. Agency for International Development, to switch to a career position on Nov. 21. On Jan. 12, the Office of Personnel Management approved her request to become vice president of programs at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Doherty received a substantial raise in the transition, going from $126,370 annually to $200,000.
On March 15, Trump signed an executive order calling for the elimination of several federal entities, including the Wilson Center. Mark Green, the center’s president and CEO, resigned on April 1, a day after the Department of Government Efficiency visited the center. Only five employees reportedly remain at the center, and it seems likely Doherty is one of them.
According to her LinkedIn profile, Doherty spent seven years at the National Democratic Institute, an ostensibly nonpartisan nonprofit that admits to having a “loose affiliation with the Democratic Party” and has received more than $1 million from the Foundation for Open Society (part of the foundation network of Hungarian American billionaire George Soros now run by his son, Alex). She served on President Barack Obama’s National Security Council as director for North Africa.
Andrea Delgado-Fink
Andrea Delgado-Fink’s name did not appear in the Oct. 1-Jan. 20 report, but earlier in the 2024 reports. Even so, she also illustrates the general trend of the previous seven names.
Fink, who appears to still be serving as deputy regional forester at the Forest Service, switched from her political appointee role as chief of staff for natural resources and the environment for Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack in October. She received a pay bump from $112,980 to $131,243.
Before joining the administration, Fink worked at the environmentalist group Earthjustice from 2012 to 2019. She joined the Biden-Harris transition team in November 2020 and joined the White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council in March 2021, according to her LinkedIn profile. Her “environmental justice” past suggests she may oppose Trump’s efforts to reverse Biden’s policies on climate change.
A Pay Raise for Doing the Same Job?
The Office of Personnel Management list included multiple political appointees who applied for career positions but did not receive official approval or denial before Jan. 20, the end of the Biden administration. It also included many approvals that the office did not receive until months or years after federal agencies had already processed them, which indicates that many more Biden political appointees may have “burrowed in” before Trump took office.
In most cases, political appointees received a pay bump when switching to a career position.
Higgins, the Competitive Enterprise Institute research fellow, noted that the pay may prove “motivation for people to burrow in this way.”
“If you can get yourself $15 grand more a year while still essentially doing the same job, why wouldn’t you?” he asked.
DHS unleashes possible money-saving measure for illegal aliens to self-deport: ‘Safest option’
Viral TikTok ‘cookie challenge’ tests family empathy, instinct, ethics
Elon Musk At Milken Conference: AI Will Replace Bloated, Inefficient Federal Gov’t
Elon Musk At Milken Conference: AI Will Replace Bloated, Inefficient Federal Gov’t
Since President Donald Trump took office in mid-January, the Trump administration has employed Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to streamline government operations. This initiative eliminates redundancies, fraud, and waste while leveraging artificial intelligence to automate and reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies.
On Sunday, Elon Musk attended the closed-door Milken Institute Global Conference, where he provided further details on deploying AI to eliminate government inefficiencies, potentially replacing some public sector workers, according to Bloomberg, citing an attendee of the prestigious conference at the Beverly Hilton in Los Angeles.
Musk told financier Michael Milken at the closed-door event, which tickets start at $25,000 and features high-level individuals, including US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, Citigroup’s Jane Fraser, and Citadel’s Ken Griffin, how AI will replace some of the federal government’s workforce.
Musk also spoke about his brain implant company, Neuralink, and the development of Starship at his rocket company, SpaceX.
DOGE and the Trump administration bet that AI can replace a sizeable portion of the government workforce—particularly those in administrative, data processing, and customer service roles—to dramatically reduce federal payroll costs, eliminate inefficiencies, and modernize public services.
Last week, the latest data from global outplacement and executive coaching firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas showed the government had led all sectors in job cuts this year, with 281,452 of those cuts attributed to DOGE-related cost-cutting.
Jobless Claims Jumped Last Week As ‘DOGE Actions’ Spark Biggest YTD Layoffs Since 2020 https://t.co/mPjuSJiyAH
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) May 1, 2025
In an interview, late last week on Fox News’ Jesse Watters Primetime, DOGE staffer Edward Coristine, nicknamed “Big Balls,” described some shocking examples of waste and mismanagement by unaccountable bureaucrats.
EXCLUSIVE: @elonmusk and the @DOGE boys EXPOSE reckless spending at the @usedgov. Caesars Palace and stadiums were being rented out for parties on YOUR dime. pic.twitter.com/pShztaGrT5
— Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) May 2, 2025
Yet efforts to eliminate waste and fraud from the federal government have been met with intense opposition from the Democratic Party as the era of unchecked spending ends.
Tyler Durden
Mon, 05/05/2025 – 10:45
NYC Mayor Adams Announces Purchase of $1.6 Million Worth of Panic Buttons to ‘Hopefully’ Curb Crime
Will There Be A Season 5 of ‘The Righteous Gemstones’? Here’s What Danny McBride And The Rest of The Cast Have To Say
Will there be a second fifth coming for the Gemstones? Get down on your knees and begin to pray.
‘SNL’ Boss Lorne Michaels Used To “Ban” Chris Farley “For Weeks At A Time” As Farley Struggled With Drug Addiction
Michaels cracked down on Farley’s alcohol and drug use after John Belushi’s tragic overdose.
Senate Democrats predicting ‘brutal’ UN ambassador confirmation hearing for Mike Waltz
“Resistance Is Futile” – For Both Bulls And Bears
“Resistance Is Futile” – For Both Bulls And Bears
Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,
“Resistance is futile” was a sentence that struck fear in the hearts of Trekkie fans during “Star Trek: The Next Generation,” specifically in both of the “Best Of Worlds” and “First Contact” episodes. In those episodes, the “Starship Enterprise” crew encountered a species called the “Borg.” The Borg’s primary purpose was to achieve “perfection” by assimilating other beings and technologies into their “hive mind,” known as the “Collective.” They viewed assimilation as a means to expand their collective knowledge, power, and ultimately, their vision of a perfect and harmonious existence. The reason “resistance was futile” was that the centralized control, driven by the Borg Queen, allowed for swift and coordinated actions across vast distances. At the same time, the assimilation process threatened to erase individuality and homogenize the galaxy.
I could go on, but you are asking yourself two questions. First, is Lance a total sci-fi geek? Second, what does this have to do with the markets and investing? The answer to the first question is “yes,” as I grew up with William Shatner as James T. Kirk in the original Gene Roddenberry “Star Trek.”
However, let’s dig deeper into the second question.
Over the past two weeks, the market has had a furious nine-day rally, the longest winning streak in 21 years. However, there are two takeaways from such a historic advance. First, it is “bullish” as investors return to the market. However, investors should also recognize that if the rally is the longest in 21 years, then previous such rallies failed. As shown in the chart below, there have been longer rallies, with 14 trading days being the peak. But in every case, it is worth remembering the following:
“‘Record levels’ of anything are records for a reason. It is where the point was reached where previous limits existed. Therefore, when a ‘record level’ is reached, it is NOT THE BEGINNING, but rather an indication of the MATURITY of a cycle.”
That reality exists for any data set, at either extreme. Let’s look at two examples.
The Bearish Example
On April 7th, the day the market bottomed, I wrote an article entitled “Hope In The Fear,” in which we discussed the extremes of “bearish sentiment” and technically oversold conditions. To wit:
“There are times when the probabilities of something happening outweigh the possibilities. Following last week’s market crash, the “probability” of at least a near-term rally outweighs the possibility of a further decline. Does that mean it is guaranteed to happen? No. But, several indicators have historically tilted the odds in the investor’s favor.”
The reason was the extreme technical oversold conditions that existed.
“Whether or not the current market crash is the beginning of a larger corrective cycle, such low readings have, without fail, marked the near-term low of a market correction. While the market has previously continued its corrective process after such low readings, such did not occur without a meaningful reversal rally first.”
When analyzing the market from a technical perspective, technicians watch two primary levels: support and resistance. As always, the demand between buyers and sellers determines stock prices. When the supply of stock for sale overwhelms the demand from buyers, “resistance” occurs, which impedes prices from moving higher. The same happens during declining markets, where resistance (support) to lower prices forms as the demand from buyers overwhelms the supply of stock for sale.
In that April 7th article, we stated that the markets were three standard deviations below long-term moving averages and challenging rising trend lines. In other words, those were previous levels where “resistance was futile,“ such oversold conditions typically precede short-term rallies to allow investors to reduce exposure to equities. We also noted that the target for a tradable rally was between 5500 and 5700. (The market closed at 5686 on Friday.)
Such is why we focus heavily on investor sentiment and positioning. When investors are extremely bearish and are “panic liquidating” equity exposure during a market decline, that is often a contrarian indicator that resistance to a further decline is forming. When sellers become exhausted, it only takes a few buyers to push higher prices. Of course, when resistance to lower prices forms, the media headlines are often the most negative, and investors’ “loss aversion” behavior is the most extreme.
As we concluded in that article:
“It won’t take much for the market to find a reason to rally. That could happen as soon as next week. If the market rallies, we suggest reverting to the basic principles to navigate what we suspect will be more volatile this year. However, at some point, just as we saw in 2022, the market will bottom. Like then, you won’t want to believe the market is bottoming; your fear of buying will be overwhelming, but that will be the point you must step in.
Buying near market lows is incredibly difficult. While we likely aren’t there yet, we will be there sooner than you imagine. As such, when you want to ‘sell everything,’ ask yourself if this is the point where you should ‘buy’ instead.“
But what about the bull case?
Resistance For The Bulls
As with the bears, “resistance is futile” for the bulls just as much. As noted above, the market has had the longest “positive day” stretch in 21 years. While the media is becoming more convinced that the “bulls are back in town,” which is probably true, it should also be a warning that “resistance” to higher prices is forming since such previous winning streaks have failed.
As noted above, the relentless market rally has pulled many investors back into the market over the last few weeks. Sentiment has quickly changed from extremely bearish to bullish, and professional investors have rapidly ramped up exposures. While sentiment and positioning are not yet back to extremes, the market has technically reversed much of its previous oversold and technically deviated conditions.
Most notably, the market is now approaching the 200-DMA, which is a level at which many buyers were stepping in before the “Liberation Day” market plunge. Many buyers are close to getting back to even and will likely be inclined to sell as they approach breakeven. Furthermore, the 100-DMA, which is close to crossing the 200-DMA, provides further resistance. As noted in “Death Cross,” these moving average crossovers impede further price advances until they reverse.
The 100 and 200-DMA moving averages have historically defined market trends. For example, the 100-DMA (blue line) supported market pullbacks during 2021 and since the October 2022 lows. Conversely, those moving averages defined the peaks of reflexive rallies during the 2022 correction. With the markets again trading below those averages, seeing sellers emerge as markets approach those resistance levels would be unsurprising.
Is the current correction over, and is the bull market resuming? Maybe. We certainly saw such a situation in the summer of 2023, when the markets declined 10%, a “death cross” occurred, and markets immediately bottomed and surged to new highs. Then, like today, there was a surge in corporate buybacks and a quick reversal of very bearish sentiment. However, as shown in the chart above, even if we are experiencing a 2023-type scenario, there will be short-term corrections and pullbacks, providing investors an entry point to increase equity exposure as needed.
So, how do we know if the current market is like 2022 or 2023? Should investors be selling rallies or buying dips?
Beating The Borg
In Star Trek, the crew of the Enterprise eventually defeats the Borg through a combination of strategic attacks and exploiting weaknesses in their collective structure. The crew of the USS Enterprise-D, led by Captain Picard, used their access to the Borg collective, through Picard’s assimilation, to their advantage and were able to disable and destroy the Borg cube by exploiting its regeneration subroutines. Unfortunately, defeating the “collective” of our emotional biases when investing isn’t much easier, but it is possible.
Interestingly, when I write posts like these, someone often comments, “Why won’t you just tell us whether the market is going up or down?” It’s a fair statement, but unfortunately, I am not prescient, nor is anyone else, and navigating markets does not work like that.
If I want to be bearish, it is easy to state the market is at resistance and about to crash, so you better “get out now.” Or, if I wanted to be bullish, I could point to October 2022 and make the case why markets are about to surge higher. Either prediction has a decent chance of being wrong, leaving investors on the wrong side of the trade. As such, this is why we don’t predict, but instead navigate the current market for the possibilities versus the probabilities.
Historically speaking, when markets break longer-term moving averages, the first attempt at reversal often fails. Notice that I said “often” and not “always.” That is because sometimes markets do the unexpected, and, as investors, we must be able to recognize the change and respond accordingly. Such is why we never recommend entirely getting out of markets.
In a recent #BullBearReport entitled Spock & The Logic-Based Approach To Investing, we discussed that as investors, we must weigh possibilities and probabilities and manage our risk accordingly. To wit:
“Investing means cutting through noise, avoiding speculation, and relying on data. For example, the media is jammed with emotionally charged headlines about tariff-induced trade wars, recessions, and de-dollarization. In reality, those events rarely occur. The chart below shows a normally distributed bell curve of potential events and outcomes. In simple terms, 68.26% of the time, typical outcomes occur. Economically speaking, such would be a normal recession or the avoidance of a recession. 95.44% of the time, we are most likely dealing with a range of outcomes between a reasonably deep recession and standard economic growth rates. However, there is a 2.14% chance that we could see another economic crisis like the 2008 Financial Crisis. But what about “economic armageddon?” That event where nothing matters but ‘gold, beanie weenies, and bunker.’ That is a 0.14% possibility.“
So, Where Are We Now
If you want my best guess, here it is:
- We’ve likely seen the market lows for this year.
- We’ve likely seen the highs as well.
Navigating a market trapped between support and resistance becomes emotionally challenging. Investors face sharp rallies into resistance — and retracements back to support — wearing down sentiment until mistakes happen.
Therefore, this is how we are positioned in this current and uncertain market environment.
- Primarily long equities, as the market structure remains bullish.
- Increased cash levels to manage policy and growth uncertainty.
- Short S&P 500 index to hedge downside risk.
We also recommend a healthy portfolio and risk management regimen.
- Tighten up stop-loss levels to current support levels for each position.
- Hedge portfolios against more significant market declines.
- Take profits in positions that have been big winners.
- Sell laggards and losers.
- Raise cash and rebalance portfolios to target weightings.
Here’s the hard truth: you can’t measure risk in advance.
Markets are unpredictable, and while we can guess what might happen, the future is uncertain. When we think about risk, most of us focus on the risk of losing money. However, there are other risks we should be aware of, like missing out on gains by playing it too safe or being forced to sell investments during a market crash. Both can be just as damaging to our portfolios in the long run. We don’t have any foresight into what the market will do next week or month.
All we can do is remain focused on our portfolio, manage the risk of “being wrong,” and realize that “resistance is futile” when investing in the market. As Howard Marks once penned:
“Too little skepticism and too much eagerness in an up-market – just like too much resistance and pessimism in a down-market – can be very bad for investment results.“
Just something to think about.
Now, “Make it so.”
Tyler Durden
Mon, 05/05/2025 – 10:20