Much of the media rushed to portray Pope Leo’s Palm Sunday homily as a blanket condemnation of the Trump administration. But that is not what he said — and certainly not what his biblical reference to Isaiah meant. Pope Leo’s homily opened with the stark warning from Isaiah 1:15 that God “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war … your hands are full of blood.” It was a harsh statement that at first glance seemed to dismiss all war and all who wage war. But taken in biblical context, Isaiah is not rejecting every use of force; he is condemning hypocrisy — those who claim to worship God while committing injustice, shedding innocent blood, or refusing to defend the vulnerable. The United States military is not doing that.
Unfortunately, most of those in the secular media do not know the context for Isaiah’s words, and so they are reporting that Pope Leo has pronounced that “no one can use Jesus to justify war.” But unfortunately, even the Vatican News carried the headline that “Jesus does not listen to prayers of those who wage war.” If these headlines were true, Pope Leo’s words would risk erasing the very moral distinctions that defined war in the 20th century. If taken at face value, Pope Leo’s logic would seem to condemn not only the U.S.–Israeli campaign in Iran but even the Allied response to Nazi aggression in World War II.
One should never ignore how painful such words can be for the countless service members who have never sought war, never shed innocent blood, and have served with courage, restraint, and moral seriousness. The thought that God rejects the prayers of soldiers — as reported by even the Vatican News — is heartbreaking to those of us who know the character of those whose service is marked not by bloodshed but by duty, honor, country, and a desire to protect the innocent.
But, unlike the media, which has labeled Pope Leo’s rhetoric as a strong rebuke of President Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, faithful Christians need to try to find the most charitable reading of Pope Leo’s words.
It is quite likely that the pope was not attempting to articulate a full moral theory of war at all, but simply offering a pastoral plea for peace in a moment of acute human suffering in the War in Iran. Pope Leo must know — as all faithful Christians know — that force can be morally necessary to stop a tyrant, defend the innocent, and prevent far greater evils. But by refusing to acknowledge that some wars are fought to halt atrocities rather than commit them, he leaves the unsettling — and most likely false — impression that he might not have supported even the most morally justified conflict in modern history: the Allied effort to crush Nazi aggression.
There is a similar Allied effort today to stop Iran from acquiring or deploying nuclear capabilities that could unleash devastation on a scale the world has not seen since 1945. The Catholic Church and many Christian denominations have opposed nuclear weapons, not because they deny the legitimacy of defense, but because they recognize the unparalleled horror these weapons inflict on the innocent. Yet that very teaching underscores why the country’s newest allies in this fight — including Sunni‑majority Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar — are sharing intelligence with the United States, strengthening missile defenses, and supporting U.S. diplomatic and security efforts. All have joined forces to help prevent Iran from gaining the power to annihilate entire populations. Their aim — like ours — is not conquest, but to avert a catastrophe whose moral cost would eclipse even the grave burdens of the current conflict.
It is also worth remembering that the men and women Pope Leo’s words inadvertently wounded are not some marginal subset of American life. Archbishop Timothy Broglio and other leaders of the Archdiocese for the Military Services have long noted that Catholics serve in the armed forces at rates higher than their share of the general population, a reality reflected in Department of War data showing that Catholics consistently make up a substantial portion of active‑duty personnel.
According to a 2023 Department of War study, roughly 70 percent of active‑duty service members identify as Christian. They serve at every level of the armed forces, from enlisted ranks to the academies, and they do so not in defiance of their faith but because of it — because they believe that the defense of the innocent and the pursuit of justice can be acts of charity. Many of these young Christians embrace military service as a vocation of disciplined selflessness, a way of offering their talents, courage, and even their lives for the protection of others.
To imply that their prayers are rejected by God risks alienating precisely those who have taken most seriously the biblical injunction to protect and serve. For that reason, Pope Leo’s rhetoric — however well‑intentioned — must be met with a robust articulation of Catholic teaching on war, peace, and moral responsibility. While the Catholic Church would never promote violence or unnecessary wars, it does not demand passivity in the face of grave evil. The Catholic Church honors those who serve honorably, who refuse to shed innocent blood, and who carry out their duties with moral seriousness and restraint. When soldiers and their families bear heavy burdens, it would be most helpful for Church leaders to speak with clarity, compassion, and fidelity to the tradition that has long recognized both the tragedy of war and the nobility of just defense.
In the end, what is needed is not a retreat from the moral tradition, but a renewed commitment to it. At a moment when the world is again confronted by regimes willing to threaten the lives of entire populations, the Christian message matters. Pope Leo’s appeal for peace is noble, but in expressing it, he may have inadvertently cast doubt on the long‑held teaching that a robust defense can be an act of love. Our sons and daughters who serve in the defense of the nation deserve to have their sacrifices honored, not folded into a rhetoric that confuses their protection of the innocent with the violence of tyrants. Those who carry the weight of military service deserve leaders who speak to them with clarity and compassion, not with words that the media can spin to cloud the dignity of their calling.
READ MORE from Anne Hendershott:
The Collapse of Courtship for Gen Z
The Manufactured Crisis Over Housing Pregnant Migrant Minors in Texas
The Doomsday Clock Is Running on Politics, Not Science
Image licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.