In last week’s missive, we discussed a critical point concerning the bull run so far.
“Despite the underlying economic and fundamental data, the markets have surged back to extremely overbought, extended, and deviated levels. The chart table below is published weekly for our RIA PRO subscribers (use code PRO30 for a 30-day free trial)
You will note that with the exception of bond prices, every market and sector is more than 5% above its 50-day moving average and year-to-date performance is pushing more historic extremes both in price and in extreme overbought conditions.
On virtually every measure, markets are suggesting the fuel for an additional leg higher in assets prices is extremely limited.”
The chart below compares last weeks analysis to this week. You can see the sharp difference between the two periods as much of the overextension last week has now been reversed.
The chart below also shows the short-term reversal of the market as well as the test of minor support at the initial October lows.
This short-term oversold condition, and holding of minor support, does set the market up for a bounce next week which could get the market back above the 200-dma. The challenge, at least in the short-term remains the resistance level building at 2800.
However, the next two charts suggest there is a decent probability any bounce will fail in the short-term and should be used for rebalancing risk.
- The market has not reversed to levels which normally signals short-term bottoms. The red lines in the bottom four panels denote periods where taking profits, and reducing risk, has been ideal. The green lines have been prime opportunities to increase exposure. As you will note, these indicators tend to swing from extremes and once a correction process has started it is usually not completed until the lower bound is reached.
Important Note: This does not mean the market will decline sharply in price. The current overbought conditions can also be resolved by continued consolidation within a range as we have seen over the last two weeks.
2) There is historically a very high correlation between what happens in the transportation sector (a view on the economy) and the market as a whole. Watch for a rally in the transportation sector to signal an all-clear for the markets.
The current set up suggests that the correction that started last week is not yet complete and any bounce will likely be a good opportunity to reposition portfolios in the short-term until a better entry point to increase exposure is achieved.
The problem with statements like these is that those of the “permanently bullish” mindset tend to extrapolate the analysis into the onset of the next major “bear market.” Such is certainly not the intent, nor is it a suggestion to sell everything and hide in cash.
What should be readily apparent is that paying attention to price can help alleviate our natural tendency to “buy high” and “sell low.” Managing a portfolio of investments is simply measuring risk and reward and placing bets when reward outweighs the potential risk. Tweaking exposure to “risk” overtime can pay big dividends over the long-term which is our goal of investing to begin with.
Always insist on a margin of safety
This time is never different
Be patient and wait for the fat pitch
Risk is the permanent loss of capital, never a number
Be leery of leverage
Never invest in something you don’t understand
If these rules sound logical to you, and you are nodding your head in agreement, then how does a pitch to “buy and hold” and “ride out the market” make any sense?
During a bull market cycle, buying and holding good investments which pay a dividend is absolutely the right thing to do. However, at the end of market cycle, not so much.
What Do Central Banks Know That You Don’t
As we noted in Thursday’s missive on why QE may not work this time, Central Bankers globally have jumped back into the “emergency measure” pool.
- The Fed
Has announced it will be “patient” with future rate hikes.
The pace of QT, or balance sheet reduction, will not be on “autopilot” but instead driven by the current economic situation and tone of the financial markets.
It is expected the Fed will announce in March that QT will end and the balance sheet will stabilize at a much higher level, and;
QE is a tool that WILL BE employed when rate reductions are not enough to stimulate growth and calm jittery financial markets.
- China has launched its version of “Quantitative Easing” to help prop up its economy which grew at the slowest pace in nearly 30-years.
China has taken fiscal and monetary policy measures such as fast-tracking infrastructure projects
Additional monetary support for the economy
A cut in taxes, and;
A Reduction banks’ reserve requirements
The ECB, after downgrading Eurozone growth, announced
They will not raise rates in 2019, and;
They will extended the TLTRO program, which is the Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operations scheme which gives cheap loans to struggling Eurozone banks, into 2021. (Currently, Italy, Spain, Greece, and Portugal all borrow more than they deposit and more tha $800 billion from the previous TLTRO is set to mature over the next two years. Without the extension of the program, defaults could rise sharply.)
But there is nothing to worry about, right?
Maybe, but if there is nothing to worry about, then why the sudden pivot by Central Banks? What are they seeing that you don’t?
As we discussed in our analysis, the macro-environment in the U.S. is markedly different than it was in 2009. The Fed’s starting point to battle the next recessionary environment is far weaker than it was then when the Fed funds rate was twice as high and the balance sheet four-times smaller.
Here is the important point. We, as investors, have been trained over the last decade to “buy” whenever Central Banks are engaged in monetary interventions. So far it has worked in lifting asset prices higher. But therein lies the risk of complacency.
In 2009, most of the risk in the financial and credit markets had been wrung out from the decline. Today, the markets are more exposed than ever to leverage and credit risk throughout the global ecosystem.
My friend Doug Kass had a great note Friday related to this risk.
“Astonishingly I heard a ‘talking head’ on one of the business media platforms earlier this week who said that none of the excesses that existed in past recessionary periods are in place today.
To say excesses, systemic issues, and possible instability, don’t exist is borderline irresponsible.
As I see it, there are several measurable excesses and associated risks that represent this cycle’s new challenges that may be summarized into these five categories:
- An untenable level of global (private and public sector) debt
- Structural instability and growth threats in the form of rising deficits and demographic trends (i.e., slowing population growth)
- Lack of (sovereign) cooperation
- Unparalleled political instability and rising policy risks
- A dangerous shift in market structure
Debt that is not self-funding is future consumption brought forward.
Through years of unprecedented monetary ease, we have enjoyed unsustainable consumption and growth which cannot continue at its current pace in the future. Debt, then, is a drag on future growth, and the amount of debt the world now has will be a monster drag on that growth.
The fact is that the global economies are over levered with debt in our private and public sectors that are excessive. As I chronicled in “Why Interest Rates Are the Bull Market’s Most Serious Threat,” in the fullness of time, the weight of debt will act as a governor to economic growth – it saps capital. To think otherwise is foolhardy.
Deficits and Demographic Threats
Under the weight of rising and uncontrolled deficits (supported by both parties) and slowing population growth, intermediate to longer-term economic and profit growth prospects are diminishing. Near term, domestic economic growth is already weakening (as supply side economics is being further discredited). At the same time Chinese growth is failing to stabilize and it appears that Europe is entering a deepening recession – underscoring the fragility of the global economic system that is still being propped up by low or negative interest rates.
It is my core expectation that U.S. and China will fail to agree on trade. (My baseline expectation is that investors will view a likely, superficial agreement as no agreement at all). We will find out shortly whether my view is accurate and that there will be no big deliverables with regard to IP theft and/or technology exchange. The consequences for the global economy are obvious – China accounts for only about 14% of world GDP but accounts for about one third of the delta in global economic growth.
Earnings & Risk
Most importantly, for investors, the consensus expectations for corporate profits, and economic growth expectations, remain far too optimistic.”
I will steal his last line as I agree that risks currently remain to the downside which explains our cautious outlook for 2019-2020.
If the message that Central Banks are sending comes to fruition, it will likely be a challenging backdrop for equities in the months ahead.
Currently, it certainly seems these concerns are outlandish and far fetched but the data is all too present and real. After a scorching run in the first two months of the year, it is hard to see anything as being bearish, but therein lies the risk.
As an investor, our job should be an honest evaluation of our portfolio allocations and our investment strategy with relation to the relevant market risks.
In other words, ask yourself this one simple question:
“What will happen to my money if something goes wrong?”
If that question raises no concerns for you, do nothing? But if you didn’t like the plunge last November and December, it may be time to re-evaluate things.