For the global justice system of today, we look at the United Nations and the big NGO industrial complex. What are they doing? They do not make arbitrations of international peace. Instead, they operate as a parasitic cartel. They take warlords and theocratic killers and wash their genocidal ambitions in a linguistic laundry of human rights terminology. Frankly, this is a multi-billion dollar vulture industry. Palestinians are kept in perpetual victimhood because these administrative institutions absolutely require the demonization of Israel to maximize their budgets and justify their existence. They need the conflict to survive.
The UN has degraded into a moral sewer. Applying the cold logic of Public Choice Theory reveals that the General Assembly and Human Rights Council essentially function as protection rackets for dictators. Petrostates and autocracies execute people in public spaces to maintain power. Yet they utilize the UN as a legislative mob. They achieve this by passing more resolutions condemning Israel than they do for Iran, North Korea, Syria, Russia, and China combined, according to tallies by the advocacy group UN Watch.
Perhaps a successor to the United Nations into which only stable democracies are invited could be developed.
This is a cynical logrolling exchange. Voting against Israel costs the casting regime nothing. With zero marginal cost, UN officials trade this currency to purchase permanent diplomatic immunity for the atrocities occurring within the domestic borders of their own countries. This inversion of morals is not a glitch; it is the system functioning by design. They divert institutional focus away from actual physical dungeons in Damascus or the gallows in Tehran, directing it strictly toward the Middle East’s only liberal democracy.
This deep-seated hypocrisy extends to the highest echelons of the U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres has repeatedly claimed that the killing of civilians in Gaza is “unparalleled and unprecedented in any conflict since I have been Secretary-General.” The comparison did not go unchallenged: a Community Note appended to the U.N.’s own social media post highlighted the far larger death tolls in Syria and Yemen. Catastrophes with vastly higher death tolls under or prior to Guterres’s tenure, including Tigray (600,000 dead), Yemen (377,000), and Darfur (300,000), never drew a fraction of the UN’s obsessive focus on Gaza.
Where did this institutional rot originate? It is a legacy of Soviet epistemological subversion. The “Zionism is Racism” campaign, which became U.N. Resolution 3379 in 1975, was never an organic awakening of the global conscience. It was a KGB Active Measures operation. Soviet diplomats and Arab bloc actors coordinated the campaign to rebrand a defensive indigenous struggle as a Marxist colonial enterprise. While they formally revoked 3379 in 1991, its poisonous DNA remains the foundational software now running in the U.N. and its specialized agencies. They apply a Judenrein (Jew free) standard of international law. No other country on Earth is subjected to this specific standard.
The NGO sector tells a similar story. Organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch act as the propaganda wing for this jihad. They have transitioned into kinetic belligerents. Selective outrage is simply a financial strategy to secure funding while ignoring actual genocides.
Look at the pathology of luxury beliefs within Amnesty International. Bashar al-Assad gassed children. The U.S. government estimated that 426 children were among the dead in the 2013 Ghouta sarin attack alone. Assad is a fugitive from humanity. Yet when he faces a potential death sentence, Amnesty delivers lectures about abolishing the death penalty and ensuring fair trial guarantees. This is calculated ontological subversion. They use the procedural aesthetics of Western legalism to shield a genocidal predator. They brand Israel an “Apartheid State” to unlock social justice funding, simultaneously providing the moral infrastructure for a monster such as Assad to escape the ultimate penalty. Their true function is revealed herein.
When a digital blackout occurs in Iran, and the regime slaughters thousands, these NGOs offer days of procedural silence. But an Israeli defensive buffer zone necessary to block incursions and an endless stream of missiles immediately triggers global campaigns. They are the administrative enablers of the next massacres.
The economic reality of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East exposes the ultimate fraud. UNRWA requires client list growth to survive. They eliminated standard cessation clauses and unconditionally grant hereditary Palestinian refugee status, even if the person is a foreign citizen of another country. Consequently, a shrinking pool of 1948 refugees has been converted into a demographic battering ram of 5.9 million clients.
To understand the true scale of this bureaucratic monstrosity, one must look at the personnel figures. UNRWA employs an estimated 30,000 people region-wide, with over 13,000 staff members in Gaza alone, and over 4,000 more in the West Bank. How could an organization with a workforce of that size in the Palestinian territories be blind to a terrorist infrastructure operating beneath and within its facilities? The answer is that it was not blind, but complicit.
Three female Israeli hostages, Emily Damari, Romi Gonen, and Doron Steinbrecher, were held captive for 471 days in Gaza before their release in January 2025. One of them, Emily Damari, later told U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer that she had personally been held for a period inside a UNRWA facility and was denied proper medical treatment for her gunshot wounds.
Separately, 84-year-old hostage Ditza Heiman stated she was held for nearly 50 days in the unfinished attic of a father of ten who worked as a UNRWA teacher.
The systemic rot permeates UNRWA’s operational infrastructure. The IDF has repeatedly reported finding Hamas using UNRWA-branded humanitarian aid bags to conceal weaponry. In one such operation in February 2026, the IDF stated its forces found approximately 110 mortar shells and several rockets hidden inside UNRWA aid sacks and blankets in an area of southern Gaza under Israeli control. Israel has also published what it describes as photographic evidence of weapons and tunnel shafts located at or near UNRWA-run schools and other facilities in Gaza.
The UN and allied NGOs are not honest brokers of conflict resolution. They operate as an interest group with a financial and institutional stake in the permanence of the conflict. Continued funding under these conditions simply trades away accountability to fuel bureaucratic power.
What should be done, in view of the foregoing? Simple: the U.S. should part company from the UN. The UN building located on the East Side of Manhattan should be converted into something far more ethical. Perhaps a successor to the United Nations, into which only stable democracies are invited, could be developed. Developing countries — Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Tonga, Paraguay, Taiwan, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Colombia — would be welcome. The U.S. pays between $10 and $18 billion to the U.N. annually. Surely, this money could be far better spent in almost any direction anyone can name.
READ MORE:
Israel and the Death Penalty
America’s Silent Kidney Crisis
Qatar Is Everything It Accuses Israel of Being