• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MAD MAD NEWS ©2021

Mad Focus Mad Success ©2021

NEWS 📻
WSJ ⏱️

LIVE TV NEWS >>

  • Forecast
  • Your Mad Life
    • Mad Focus
    • Mad Money
    • Mad Success
    • Mad Spaces
    • Mad Travel
  • Radio & TV
    • Live TV
    • Podcasts
    • News Clips

National

The story behind our new national park and its unique legacy

March 5, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: PopSci, SCITECH

The New River Gorge National Park and Preserve managed to uphold the outdoor traditions of the region while also getting top billing as a tourist destination.

The New River Gorge National Park and Preserve managed to uphold the outdoor traditions of the region while also getting top billing as a tourist destination. (Nick Kelley /)

This story originally featured on Outdoor Life.

The last time I visited the New River, it was deserted. My buddies and I had planned a multi-day fishing trip, and we set off without bumping into anyone at the put-in. We camped where we wanted, brought a duck dog, and caught a mess of fall smallmouth. So when I heard the New River Gorge had been designated as our 63rd National Park in the latest spate of National Park Service changes, I wasn’t exactly thrilled. I wondered about dog bans, a permit system for non-commercial boaters, and the end of hunting on the roughly 70,000 acres of public land surrounding the gorge.

Happily, most of that doesn’t seem to be the case. But the new designation did close a portion of public land to hunting amid objections from a reported minority of hunters, even as it allowed for the additional purchase of public lands.

Many West Virginians, however, worked hard to turn their favorite place into a national park without, they argue, compromising many of the sporting and paddling traditions that make it so special. But how, exactly, do you turn a piece of public land into a national park? And better yet, why would—or wouldn’t—you want one in your backyard?

Meet our newest national park

If you didn’t realize we added yet another national park to our ranks, you’re forgiven. The bipartisan proposal from three West Virginia lawmakers was included in the massive 2020 year-end coronavirus relief package. Once former President Trump signed the bill into law, the New River Gorge’s promotion from National River to National Park and Preserve came and went on Sunday Dec. 27, 2020, during that hazy time between Christmas and New Year’s when no one’s paying much attention to anything.

Despite the hefty $900 billion price tag of the 2021 spending package, which included $3.22 billion for the NPS, park officials say there were no funds allocated to this particular designation. In other words, it didn’t cost taxpayers anything extra to upgrade the River’s unit status.

And that status is, to be precise, a National Park and Preserve—only the second of its kind in the Lower 48 after Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve, though there are a handful of these hybrid designations in Alaska. The naming convention is important because it indicates hunting access: Hunting inside a national park is not allowed, but hunting is permissible inside a national preserve.

Besides the New River Gorge, the only other combination national park and preserve in the Lower 48 is Great Sand Dunes, in Colorado.

Besides the New River Gorge, the only other combination national park and preserve in the Lower 48 is Great Sand Dunes, in Colorado. (Natalie Krebs/)

And there’s plenty of game to hunt along the New River. The region is home to whitetails, black bears, turkeys, grouse, small game, and waterfowl. The fishing is excellent, too, with opportunities for smallmouth bass, catfish, and muskie in the river, plus trout in many of its feeder streams. The gorge itself is a geological marvel, dropping 750 feet over 50 miles to create the famed whitewater that, with the nearby Gauley and Bluestone rivers, attracts paddlers from all over the country. Rock climbers, hikers, and families also visit the historic coal region, which is still home to many of the mining structures from the heyday of the industrial revolution and war-boom of the early 1900s.

For the locals who’d been advocating for the Gorge’s designation upgrade, it was a long-awaited victory. Those folks include small-town business owners, life-long residents, kayakers, rafting guides, fishing guides, and yes, some local hunters and anglers. Apart from wanting to protect the New River Gorge indefinitely (ever hear of a national park that got sold to the highest bidder?), all those folks largely had the same goal: to attract more people to the New River Gorge.

An outtake from the author's 2019 fishing trip through the New River Gorge National River, now the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve.

An outtake from the author’s 2019 fishing trip through the New River Gorge National River, now the New River Gorge National Park and Preserve. (Nick Kelley /)

The case for a promotion

Dave Arnold is a serious bowhunter, retired co-founder of Adventures on the Gorge, and a member of the West Virginia Tourism Commission. He says the region’s rafting business peaked in 1995 and in 2000, both years seeing some 250,000 commercial rafters (including guides) run the New River and the nearby Gauley River rapids. Today, that same whitewater sees about 100,000 commercial rafters annually.

“You’re talking about a huge decline. Some people are really surprised by that,” Arnold says. “But if you look at the things you and I love, the same thing’s happening to hunting licenses. The same thing’s happened to the Boy Scouts. What it’s all about is something bigger. It’s about the Boomer class really being outdoor-focused; the Millennials aren’t. And it doesn’t matter whether it’s hunting, Boy Scouts, or rafting. I’m 66 years old. I grew up hanging out in a creek for hours looking for crayfish and snakes. The world isn’t like that anymore—at least not in the numbers we saw 40, 50 years ago.”

Arnold isn’t accusatory in his assessment of the situation—just matter of fact. (Boomers raised the Millennials, after all.) So, to resuscitate a dwindling tourism trade in a scenic natural area that already has an appetite for visitors, you just have to work on your advertising game, right? And no landmark gets top billing like a national park.

In 2019 alone, more than 327 million visitors spent $21 billion in communities within 60 miles of an NPS site, according to a DOI study (that examined all NPS units, not just National Parks proper). Of the 340,500 jobs supported by visitor spending, more than 278,000 jobs exist in communities adjacent to parks.

“If you study national parks always, the biggest winner is gateway towns,” Arnold says. “And in some cases, it’s too much of a winner. You get something that’s maybe too [over]grown, too big, too Pigeon Forge. Even Jackson Hole, which is the gateway town to the Tetons, has some issues with traffic. So, we have to be careful with that.”

But in a state that consistently ranks as one of the poorest in the country, that possible outcome seems less urgent to proponents than the issue of a dying economy. In the campaign to drum up local support for the redesignation, one number kept cropping up: the New River Gorge could enjoy a 21 percent jump in annual visitors simply by changing its designation. This figure was pulled from a study on Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve, which was re-designated from a national monument in 2004. And while Arnold calls comparing the growth of two disparate landscapes with the same classification “apples to cantaloupes,” he also says the consistent denominator is indeed growth, and it’s hard to turn that down, especially if tourism increases gradually, over decades.

“Part of this was selfish,” says Roger Wilson, a lifelong West Virginia resident and CEO of Adventures on the Gorge. “Selfish not [necessarily] for Adventures on the Gorge, but being selfish as a local who wanted to see our youngsters have a chance at employment, a chance of starting their own business, a chance of earning their own living and not moving away.”

Besides, the eastern US needs more visible public lands. Most people think of the sweeping vistas and iconic wildlife of Yellowstone and Yosemite when they think of national parks, but most folks don’t live within driving distance of them. The New River Gorge National Park and Preserve, Arnold points out, is within 500 miles of half of the U.S. population, including big urban centers like New York City and Washington D.C. And if we want to coax younger generations back into an outdoor lifestyle, then it stands to reason we need access to public lands near large urban centers.

One question Arnold often fielded while making the case for a national park was this: Is the New River Gorge of merit for the “golden star” that is a National Park designation?

Funny though it sounds, it’s a fair question. For example: When I learned my hometown of St. Louis had managed to snag a 2018 re-designation for the Gateway Arch, from memorial to National Park, I wondered who screwed up the paperwork. Tourists were going to show up to an otherwise underrated city and find the square patch of municipal park on a muddy, casino-riddled stretch of the Mississippi decidedly overrated. It’s a historic place—Lewis and Clark and all that—and the underground museum is pretty interesting. But national-park worthy, it ain’t. The Gateway Arch is missing all the stuff that a national park usually offers: sweeping views, plenty of wildlife, and the chance to get lost in a unique landscape.

Arnold is undeniably biased—he answered “absolutely” to the question around the gorge. A few opponents point to issues of sewage pollution, residual coal-mining contamination, and additional water quality concerns (including a nearby EPA superfund site) as grounds, among other arguments, that the area is not deserving of national park status.

But even if not everyone thinks the gorge deserved a new designation, most outdoor lovers agree it warrants protecting in some capacity. Some of those folks just think the National River status was sufficient to accomplish that goal.

Archambault running a rapid in the heart of the New River Gorge, now the New River Gorge National Park, in 2019.

Archambault running a rapid in the heart of the New River Gorge, now the New River Gorge National Park, in 2019. (Nick Kelley /)

Can you protect the park, and hunting?

Most hunters and anglers don’t like calling any attention to their favorite public-land spots, let alone drumming up national advertising. So how do you preserve a tradition while also welcoming new folks? For now, it seems like the NPS is keeping things mostly the same: hunting is still allowed on the majority of public land around the river, and the attitude toward land and water use remains relaxed.

“No fees are being planned,” says Eve West, the park’s chief of interpretation and cultural resources. “This is a no-fee park. There’s kind of been a rumor that got out there that we’re charging people for hiking. We’re not sure where that came from, and we don’t even know really how we’d do that. This is a park with a lot different access points. Being a river, it’s long and skinny, so there are lot of ways in and out of the park, with state roads as well.”

There are also reportedly no plans to institute a permit system for private boaters (non-commercial boaters on public waters). Arnold notes that the NPS actually had the authority to charge fees since the New became a national river back in the 1970s, but never did. Even the commercial rafting permits were issued through the West Virginia DNR rather than the NPS.

Roger Wilson’s family has lived on the same farm near Beckwith, West Virginia, since emigrating from Scotland in 1745. Wilson is the CEO of the aforementioned Adventures on the Gorge, an outfitter specializing in whitewater, rock climbing, and cast-and-blast trips along the New River. He’s also a passionate flintlock hunter who hunts around and in the gorge itself. And at 63, he’s been around long enough to witness the transition of the region from private ownership to expanded public access.

“A large part of the gorge was owned by land-holding companies: old coal companies, old coal families, that type of thing,” Wilson says. “And local people hunted—technically we all trespassed—on these properties. But once the river was made a National River [in 1978], the National Park Service started acquiring some of these lands, and they allowed hunting on it. So, for the first time we could legally hunt, even though we’d done it for decades.”

Once Congress protected the area with the National River designation, the NPS continued to purchase land for public use around the Gorge. This land acquisition teed up the region for the recent transition to a national park, because you can’t exactly designate a park where you don’t already own land.

But because some of the Gorge’s approximately 70,000 acres were designated as national park, some public land was closed to hunting—something many local hunters objected to and still disagree with on principle. Those closed lands are distributed in a few different spots, including around visitor centers, parking lots, and historic mining towns, as well as the largest, steepest chunk in the lower section of the gorge.

“We believe intentions are good, but we are opposed to the loss of over 4,000 acres of public hunting land,” Ed McMinn, past president of the West Virginia Bowhunters Association, said at one of the hearings in February 2020, according to MetroNews.

Case, left, and a bowhunter overlooking the New River Gorge—a vantage point that is now closed to hunting after the river's redesignation as a national park.

Case, left, and a bowhunter overlooking the New River Gorge—a vantage point that is now closed to hunting after the river’s redesignation as a national park. (Courtesy Larry Case/)

Larry Case—a Fayetteville resident, former whitewater guide, a retired game warden, and Outdoor Life contributor—argues that locals had approved of the national river protections in the 1970s because they were worried about proposed dam construction in the upper New River Gorge watershed, and because they’d been told they could still hunt around the New River Gorge.

“We’ve always been able to hunt in and around the gorge,” Case says. “When the national river was designated, we were assured—’Oh no, don’t worry about that. It’s a national river. You’ll always be able to hunt there.’ To me, that’s important. What we were told then didn’t matter.”

That is also why Case is skeptical of assurances that fees won’t be introduced, or that hunting won’t be restricted in other ways.

“Some of us pointed out when this mess was going on that hunting and fishing was mandated in this area in the Park Service compendium, meaning—to me—it would always be so. We were sloughed aside on that,” Case says. “[Proponents] always beat us up with this: ‘It’s really not that many hunters [who use the gorge].’ We don’t know how many it is. We just don’t. They also said, ‘It’s too rough and too steep, you can’t hunt there.’ Well you know what, it is rough and steep. This is West Virginia. We don’t have a whole lot of level ground here. There are people where that’s been a traditional place to go. Now are there scads of them? No. Do I have any numbers? No. We could argue this stuff all day long. But this place has always been open to hunting by law since 1978. I don’t care how many people hunt. It does not matter to me. Because my drum to beat is, we’ve got to have public access for hunters. The first thing everybody has to have is a place to go.”

Case, who moved to the area in 1973, explains the ease of parking along a road and hitting a trail that drops you down over a hill and into a gorge. He cannot recall an instance of a conflict between a hunter or a hiker or other non-hunter in the woods.

Arnold, who played a major role in helping advance the redesignation bill, originally envisioned the New River as a national park that allowed hunting, a compromise that might’ve made more folks happier than the current outcome. But he was told by lawmakers that such a thing was not possible, which resulted in a pivot to pursue the combined park and preserve designation.

An excerpt from the administrative history of the New River Gorge National River illustrates the historical debate between hunting and NPS designations, and suggests that this conflict is why so few hybrid park designations exist, because hunting tradition cannot fully coexist with a national park:

Acreage does not equal access

As hunters themselves, both Wilson and Arnold can appreciate the hit of losing hunting spots. But as business owners and tourism stakeholders, they reiterate that the overwhelming majority of public comments were in favor of designation.

Notably, the recent designation also included a provision that allowed the NPS to continue purchasing land for the park and preserve from willing sellers. There is no eminent domain that could threaten private landowners around the park.

“There have been some properties that we’ve never been allowed to hunt, mostly around the old Grandview State Park area, that the [NPS] has placed in the Preserve,” says Wilson. “So that’s open for hunting, and it’s never been open before in my lifetime.”

But not all parcels of public land are created equal, and West Virginia native Charley Mooney says that tract near Grandview should have always been open to hunting. He’s grateful it’s now accessible, but that it was more of a regulatory update than a concession from lawmakers. Mooney, who has worked in the outdoor industry since his first job at Water Stone Outdoors in Fayetteville at the age of 17, is also chair of the state’s relatively new Backcountry Hunters and Anglers chapter. The chapter’s formation accelerated in light of the fight against a potential loss of access.

The new boundaries of the New River National Park (in dark green) and Preserve (light green). The purple section is the proposed additional preserve lands (which would be open to hunting) near the Beury Mountain WMA.

The new boundaries of the New River National Park (in dark green) and Preserve (light green). The purple section is the proposed additional preserve lands (which would be open to hunting) near the Beury Mountain WMA. (NPS/)

“One of the main questions was, ‘We’re looking at numbers of tourists increasing, but what is that number? And is it worth the loss of hunting property?’” Mooney says, referring to BHA’s opposition of the loss of hunting ground. “That whole New River Gorge is a long strip that’s got…a lot of folks who live along that corridor. That was essentially their backyard: Folks would come in from work, the kids get off the school bus, and they dropped right into the [now] national park to squirrel hunt, or turkey hunt, or deer hunt. That was their backyard, and their public land to go to.”

The additional travel time to get to other public hunting areas means those residents will have a greater obstacle to hunting. According to BHA, by way of the NPS, the total net loss of public hunting acreage is, as close as anyone can figure 3,715 acres. While the NPS is looking to add another 3,700 huntable acres near the Beury Mountain WMA in an attempt to compensate for the loss of hunting acreage near the gorge, Mooney says ”it doesn’t necessarily offset the loss of where that acreage was.”

“They did make several concessions to us on a couple key locations of areas that are heavily used” by hunters, Mooney says. “There’s one 300-acre tract that was going to be closed. They gave us access to that, I know lot of folks use it.”

Mooney is further concerned about the lack of infrastructure to handle this predicted influx of tourists, given that, he says, all the hotels already book up at peak season. While the park and preserve designation allowed for an additional 100 acres of parking lots, he says it doesn’t address concerns about over-used trails and other lacking infrastructure. He says there was no economic study done on the area.

“We as a town have grown very well and been in an organic state for all these years,” Mooney says. Fayetteville in particular has long been in a hub for outdoor tourism and recreation. “This just seems like we’re maybe trying to rush it when there’s not enough infrastructure. We’re going to get there anyway—why should we lose hunting privileges for a lot of folks who have grown up in this area?”

A fat bronzeback, pulled from the rapids of the New River and released back into its waters.

A fat bronzeback, pulled from the rapids of the New River and released back into its waters. (Nick Kelley /)

Fishing guides

Nate “Archy” Archambault, a seasonal fishing and raft guide at ACE Adventure Resort in Oak Hill, is bullish on the designation, as is most of the boating community he knows who make their living—and spend their free time—on the New River. Archambault expects the existing infrastructure, like parking lots, to improve now that his stomping grounds are a national park, but that recreation will mostly stay the same.

“A lot of people want it to be protected,” says Archambault, a Marines Corps veteran and diehard angler. “There are a few people who are nervous about specific put-ins and whether their access will change or become regulated. They want it left alone because of national attention. But I think it’s better to protect it now rather than later.”

Historically, Archambault has seen interest from families and folks who want to enjoy the region’s famed whitewater, with relatively few visitors clamoring for guided fishing trips on the New. If the designation does anything for him personally, it’ll be to raise awareness about his fishing trips. He loves working on the water, and teaching new folks how to fish. Even with the national spotlight, he’s not worried about an influx of anglers blowing up his smallmouth spots.

“The rapids already do a lot of protecting when it comes to the fishing,” Archambault says. “If someone shows up and says, ‘I want to fish this section,’ the question becomes, ‘Do you have a raft? Can you run whitewater?’ And most people can’t.”

Meanwhile Larry Nibert, the owner of fishing and cast-and-blast outfitter the West Virginia Experience, is more skeptical that he’ll see a positive outcome from the designation.

“Personally, not speaking from a business side, anytime we lose that much hunting ground, I’m 100 percent against it,” says Nibert, better known as “Redneck” around town and on the water. “I see no good coming from this as a local. Because those people who stand to gain the most lose the least. There’s a lot of people that go out and hunt those grounds, no matter what Park Service officials say. Those are the only grounds they have to hunt. I just see more regulation coming, and I see the local—not the business owner—the local angler, the private angler, the private boater, stands to lose the most.”

And as far as business ownership does go, Nibert is still “out to lunch” on the designation’s full impact. He operates on seven rivers in the surrounding area, but the New River Gorge is his bread and butter.

“I was doing just fine making a good living for myself and my family, and the families of my staff up to this point,” Nibert says. He also notes that while he has concerns about the designation, representing this region of West Virginia that he calls home is most important. “We’ll see what will happen…You just roll up your sleeves and put your nose down and move forward. I’m a small fish in a big pond just trying to make a living. We can’t stop [the designation] so the wheels are already in motion…What the hell are you going to do? Like it, hate it, or love it, let’s move forward.”

Tagged With: gorge, managed, National, Park, preserve, river

Capitol authorities on high alert Thursday over ‘real inauguration’ threat

March 3, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, WND

New Jersey National Guard soldiers and airmen arrive near the Capitol to set up security positions in Washington, D.C., Jan. 12, 2021. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Master Sgt. Matt Hecht)

A belief spread by the Qanon community that President Trump will return to the White House on the old presidential inauguration date of March 4 has authorities on high alert.

But some influential figures in the Qanon community recently have abandoned the “real inauguration” prediction.

And many analysts don’t see any real threat.

“We haven’t seen anything to suggest that there’s any physical, real world mobilization behind that chatter,” Jared Holt, a visiting research fellow at the Digital Forensic Research Lab, told The Hill.

A memo from acting Sergeant-at-Arms Timothy Blodgett said Capitol Police at this time “has no indication that groups will travel to Washington D.C. to protest or commit acts of violence.”

However, on Wednesday, Capitol Police sources told the Fox affiliate in D.C. the force obtained intelligence pointing to a possible plot by “an identified militia” group to breach the building on Thursday. Two sources said the group is the Three Percenters. Members are accused in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

The Hill reported authorities are exercising caution, and the FBI deems the Qanon theory a national security threat because supporters were involved in the Jan. 6 riot.

Blodgett said in his memo that Capitol Police on Thursday will have additional personnel deployed around the Capitol.

The House has canceled its session Thursday.

The 4,900 National Guard troops who were deployed at the Capitol ahead of the inauguration will continue supporting local officers.

Previously, QAnon followers foresaw Jan. 20 as the day of the “Great Awakening” in which Trump would remain in office and arrest top Democrats for alleged complicity in child sex trafficking rings.

Meanwhile, National Guard soldiers at the Capitol have become ill after being fed nearly raw meat that contained metal shavings, according to whistleblowers, the New York Post reported.

A soldier told the Detroit News that morale “is very bad; many have served overseas and cannot believe the quality of food they are being fed here.”

On Wednesday, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., told MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell that the speeches at the Conservative Political Action Conference last week by former President Donald Trump and Sens. Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley “emboldened” people who threatened the U.S. Capitol.

Swalwell, who recently has drawn attention for his relationship with a Chinese spy, said the March 4 alert “aligns with warnings we’ve seen before the January 6 attack, post-January 6.”

“I have to say it angers me. It angers me that I have colleagues who have stood with some of these groups, who have perpetuated the lies these groups have told around the election and have done nothing to quell or condemn these groups,” he said.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., elicited an admission from an FBI official during a recent hearing that no firearms were recovered from the Capitol on Jan. 6, and no one has been charged with any firearm offenses, noted journalist Michael Tracey.

“Odd that so few are curious about this, given repeated declarations that what occurred was an ‘armed insurrection,'” Tracey observed.

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

The post Capitol authorities on high alert Thursday over ‘real inauguration’ threat appeared first on WND.

Tagged With: airmen, arrive, guard, Jersey, National, soldiers

Brooklyn-Bred Business Owner Starts Student-Entrepreneur Grant in Immigrant Parents’ Names

March 3, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: BUSINESS, Entrepreneur Magazine

Lorene Cowan founded the annual National Student Entrepreneur Summit as a forum for networking and mentorship. Now, with her father and late mother top of mind, she’s raising the stakes.

Tagged With: annual, Cowan, founded, Lorene, National, student

Identifying animals in photos is trickier than you might think

March 2, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: PopSci, SCITECH

Thylacines at the National Zoo in 1903.

Thylacines at the National Zoo in 1903. (Smithsonian Institution Archives/)

After a week of fanfare, an Australian man released photos of what he believes to be a Tasmanian tiger, also known as a thylacine, a six-foot long marsupial carnivore that white settlers hunted to extinction in the early 1900s. The photographer, Neil Waters, is the president of Tasmania’s Thylacine Awareness Group, which searches for evidence of the creature.

To be clear, Tasmania’s go-to authority on tiger identification, a curator of vertebrate zoology named Nick Mooney, does not believe that the photos show thylacine. “Based on the physical characteristics shown in the photos … the animals are mostly likely Tasmanian pademelons,” a sort of round-bottomed wallaby, according to a statement from the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, where Mooney works. (Other zoologists have agreed.)

But the photos are surprisingly ambiguous given how distinct the two animals are. One image looks like a wallaby hopping away from the camera. Another has shows a cat-like animal, with short, pointed ears. But the third? It’s harder to recognize, and there’s a hint of the stiff tail and stripes that distinguished the thylacine.

That’s the image Waters hangs his assertion on. He believes that it’s a baby, trotting away from the camera. “It’s got the shaggy hair I’ve seen on the juveniles in the Adelaide Museum,” he says. “It has got rather shiny, smooth hocks.” This, he says, would have to be a very strange-looking kitten.

So far, the expert consensus is firmly that these are not thylacines. But it raises a question: how could there be contention over a photo taken in broad daylight? And more to the point, is it really reasonable to think that an animal like a thylacine could live under the noses of humans all this time? As it turns out, people are asking the same question about animals in the United States. And it’s harder to be sure than you might think.

Grizzly bears in the Colorado Rockies?

David Petersen, the author of Ghost Grizzlies, says he’s seen something like the furor over the tiger before. He spent years interviewing people who’d claimed to have seen grizzly bears in the Colorado Rockies, where they had supposedly been extinct since 1979.

“It was just a constant flood every summer of people reporting grizzly bears,” he says. It was obvious to him that those were cases of mistaken identity, and said more about people than bears. “I evolved this theory that we kill off the real monsters, the animals that threaten us, and then in our imaginations we are driven to recreate them.”

It’s easy for a casual observer to mix up a grizzly and a black bear, which still live in Colorado, Petersen says, because western black bears are often brown, and grow much larger than people expect. The telltale signs are the grizzly’s humped back and flat face, and the black bear’s long, upright ears, but they can be subtle differences to the untrained eye.

A definitive judgment, he says, would involve both a photo in a readily identifiable place, and some poop or fur for genetic testing.

But even visual evidence can be tricky. Petersen says that he liked to show audiences a photo that had supposedly been taken in southern Colorado. “I would challenge people with this photo—is this a grizzly bear, or is it a black bear? And people were about 50-50 split on it, including so-called experts.” (He later decided that the photo didn’t come from Colorado and stopped using it.)

He doesn’t believe that grizzlies survived in Colorado, although it’s plausible that a few may travel down from Wyoming. And he’s only become firmer in that belief over time. “When I was doing my research in the early and mid 90s,” he says, “there were no trail cameras. Now there are millions of those things out there. Someone would have gotten it on camera by now.”

But, he says, whether or not an animal—even a huge one, like a grizzly—can be found is a very different question from whether people want to find it, and that’s led to ambiguities before. In the ’50s, the Colorado government declared the bear extinct, in spite of credible sightings from trappers. “At the same time, they had hired a guy to go up there and prowl around, secretly, to see if he could find more evidence.”

Over the following decades, he says, different state governments were more or less warm to the possibility of grizzlies based on political ties to ranching. “There’s all kinds of subtle political and psychological stuff going on in that world.”

In the end, Petersen defers to a “grizzly guru” who he interviewed for his book. “I don’t think there are any in Colorado, but it would be arrogant of me to proclaim that there aren’t, because we can’t know that.”

Ivory-billed woodpeckers in Arkansas?

And not so long ago, biologists believed that they’d rediscovered a large, loud, lost animal in the United States.

The ivory-billed woodpecker, a supersized cousin of the pileated woodpecker, lived in the swamps and pine forests of the Southeast until habitat loss drove it under in the mid 1900s. The last universally accepted sighting was in 1944 in a stand of old-growth forest in northeast Louisiana, just before the stand was was logged. But plausible sightings have continued ever since. There have been feathers, (age-unknown), (too-blurry-to-be-definitive) videos, and recordings of their distinctive (but not-distinctive-enough) call.

In 2005, some of those accounts, based on surveys conducted in the swampy bottomlands of Arkansas, were published in the journal Science, leading to a flurry of interest.

The researchers described the discovery in awe: “It’s like a funeral shroud has been pulled back, giving us a glimpse of a living bird, rising Lazarus-like from the grave,” one told the Cornell Chronicle in 2005. Another told New Orleans radio station WWNO in 2017 that the bird looks “almost like a mythical creature.”

The catch is that those findings are disputed by other ornithologists, and there haven’t been any sightings by other teams for more than a decade. All the same, tens of thousands of acres have been protected on the bird’s behalf.

Gray wolves in the Washington Cascades?

Just an hour and a half from downtown Seattle, biologists are asking similar questions about the range of gray wolves, which were extirpated in the 1930s, but have slowly rebuilt their numbers by moving in from Canada.

For the moment, most of those wolf packs are concentrated in the remote northeastern corner of the state, where they often come into conflict with ranchers. Prime wolf habitat in the protected areas around Mount Rainier and Olympic National Park, far to the west, so far remains empty. In between the two is I-90, a major barrier to animal movement.

“We’re expecting wolves to repopulate the southern Washington Cascades,” says David Moskowitz, a conservation biologist and photojournalist, who spearheads a volunteer effort to gather evidence of wolves south of the freeway with a nonprofit called Conservation Northwest.

There have been credible sightings of wolves in that area, he says, but definitive evidence is hard to come by. “Just because you get a photo of a wolf-like creature on your camera doesn’t mean you have wolves back in that area,” he says. Ruling out a coyote or a wolf-dog can be impossible from a photograph, and so the exact range of wolves remains unknown..

But there are major differences between wolf dispersal and a thylacine, Moskowitz cautions. “It’s hard to detect a single wolf, but if there’s a breeding population, you’re going to have localized activity, lots of coming and going.”

Eventually, he says, “it becomes increasingly hard for the creature to go undetected.” Asked what he thinks the likelihood of a pack going undiscovered in the region he surveys, he says, “I think it’s probably safe to say there’s not a breeding population of wolves south of I-90. Could a pair of wolves have had a litter of pups at some point in the last 10 years? Sure. Has it been a long-term, stable thing? That’s a lot harder to imagine.”

And for thylacines, living and breeding for decades undetected? “That’s hard to fathom.”

But, like Petersen, Moskowitz says that the question itself is a product of cultural forces. Out on the Olympic peninsula, which is covered in heavy forest and sharp mountains, there’s been conjecture for years that wolves are still around.

That came to a boil in the 1990s, Moskowitz remembers, when the state was discussing reintroducing wolves to the area. “That led to conspiracy theories, [people saying], the wolves are already here.” And if the wolves were there, it stood to reason that there was no need to reintroduce them.

And that motivated reason can muddy the process of gathering evidence. In Tasmania, where the killing of the thylacine went hand-in-hand with a state-sponsored genocide of indigenous Australians, he suspects, “If you have folks from that culture that extirpated that species and those people, there’s this idea of redemption.”

Tagged With: 1903, Archives/After, institution, National, Smithsonian, Thylacines

National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence issues report on how to maintain U.S. dominance

March 1, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: BUSINESS, Venture Beat


The National Security Commission on AI report makes recommendations ranging from 5G and China to immigration policy and civil rights.Read More

Tagged With: Commission, makes, National, recommendations, report, security

Fauci deputy agreed to Beijing-approved secrecy pact

March 1, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, WND

Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, addresses his remarks at a roundtable on donating plasma Thursday, July 30, 2020, at the American Red Cross-National Headquarters in Washington, D.C. (Official White House photo by Tia Dufour)

By Chuck Ross
Daily Caller News Foundation

Anthony Fauci’s deputy was required to sign a confidentiality agreement “tailored to China’s terms” before joining a World Health Organization team in China early last year to collect data about the novel coronavirus, according to an email obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

A WHO technical officer informed Dr. Cliff Lane, the Fauci deputy, would have to sign a confidentiality form and a disclosure of interest approved by Chinese authorities, according to a Feb. 15, 2020, email.

“The forms this time are tailored to China’s terms so we cannot use the ones from before,” Mansuk Daniel Han, a technical officer at WHO’s headquarters in Switzerland, wrote to Lane, who serves as deputy director for clinical research at the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Han asked Lane to complete a DOI, or disclosure of interest, along with the confidentiality form.

The DCNF obtained the email through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit (FOIA) filed on its behalf by Judicial Watch, the conservative watchdog group. The DCNF’s FOIA request sought Fauci and Lane’s emails referencing the World Health Organization and China.

“These new emails show WHO and Fauci’s [National Institutes of Health] gave special accommodations to Chinese communist efforts to control information about COVID-19,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement.

It is not clear what restrictions Beijing included in its confidentiality forms. They were not included in the emails turned over by the government to Judicial Watch and the DCNF.

The WHO did not respond to a request for comment.

The Chinese government has maintained a tight grip on scientists both inside and outside China studying the virus.

Chinese officials have been accused of silencing doctors, whistleblowers and journalists who tried to alert the public about the virus in December 2019.

Beijing also delayed a World Health Organization team that visited Wuhan last month to investigate the origins of the virus. On Jan. 4, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called the setback “disappointing.”

The team was able to visit Wuhan last month, but some scientists on the mission said Chinese authorities had refused to turn over raw data on early coronavirus patients in Wuhan.

China’s delay tactics earned a stern rebuke from the Biden administration, which called on authorities to turn over the raw data.

“They’re about to come out with a report about the origins of the pandemic in Wuhan, China, that we have questions about because we do not believe that China has made available sufficient original data into how this pandemic began to spread both in China and then eventually around the world,” National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said of the WHO during a Feb. 21 interview.

This story originally was published by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

wnd-donation-graphic-3-2021

The post Fauci deputy agreed to Beijing-approved secrecy pact appeared first on WND.

Tagged With: allergy, Anthony, Director, FAUCI, institute, National

‘Extra-Continental’ Migrants Throughout the Americas Marching and Clashing Their Way Toward New Biden Border

March 1, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: Columnists, VIEWS

A Unique Migrant Class with National Security Implications

Tagged With: Class, migrant, National, security, unique, with

Dr. Fauci on J&J COVID-19 vaccine: ‘I would have no hesitancy whatsoever to take it’

March 1, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: BUSINESS, MarketWatch

Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said, ‘Be careful when you try to parse this percent versus that percent.’

Tagged With: allergy, Anthony, Director, FAUCI, institute, National

Dr. Fauci on J&J’s COVID-19 vaccine: ‘People need to get vaccinated …I would have no hesitancy whatsoever to take it’

February 28, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: BUSINESS, MarketWatch

Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said, ‘Be careful when you try to parse this percent versus that percent.’

Tagged With: allergy, Anthony, Director, FAUCI, institute, National

Even NPR Noticed Sen. Gillibrand Won’t Talk About Cuomo #MeToo Moment

February 28, 2021 MadMadNews Reposted Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Newsbusters

On Friday’s All Things Considered, National Public Radio reported on Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s growing scandals, and as they discussed Lindsey Boylan’s charges of sexual harassment, reporter Sally Herships noted Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s office gave her the “No comment” treatment. This is the same Gillibrand that drove Sen. Al Franken out of office on sexual harassment charges. 

When it came to Franken, Gillibrand on Facebook that he had to go: “I believe it would be better for our country if he sent a clear message that any kind of mistreatment of women in our society isn’t acceptable by stepping aside to let someone else serve.” 

NPR anchor Ari Shapiro asked how the Democrats are handling Cuomo. He’s only going to address these charges if the Democrats and their supportive media get tougher. 

SHAPIRO: And what are Democratic lawmakers in New York saying? Are they part of the push to unseat the governor?

HERSHIPS: Yes and no. And this is where things get kind of interesting. So in addition to the underreported nursing home deaths, on Wednesday a former aide, Lindsey Boylan, published a post on Medium claiming that Cuomo had sexually harassed her. He has reportedly denied these allegations. She says he suggested they play strip poker, that he kissed her on the mouth. So while Democratic state lawmakers have been very vocal about the nursing home deaths, it’s interesting to note that one powerful lawmaker is remaining mostly quiet about the new allegations. That is Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. I wrote to her office earlier today to ask if she would support an investigation into the allegations of sexual harassment, and I have not yet received an answer.

The New York Post reported that on Thursday, Gillibrand admitted she hadn’t read Boylan’s account on the website Medium: 

“I have not read her allegations or her post, her Medium post,” Gillibrand told reporters on a call Thursday afternoon — a day after Cuomo accuser Lindsey Boylan came forward igniting widespread media coverage.

“But as I said, everyone has a right to be able to come forward, speak their truth, and be heard. And that’s true for her and that’s also true for Gov. Cuomo.”

The latest New York Times report on a second accuser — Charlotte Bennett — should prompt Gillibrand to read up and speak up, right? Bennett is “saying that he asked her questions about her sex life, whether she was monogamous in her relationships and if she had ever had sex with older men.”

Tagged With: considered, Friday’s, National, public, RADIO, things

  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 105
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Latest Posts

  • 5 best TV shows to watch on Paramount Plus – CNET
  • Facebook admits threat to ban knitting 81-year-old woman for ‘hate speech’ was a mistake
  • Critics Choice Awards 2021 Winners List (Updating Live)
  • China Box Office: Disney’s ‘Raya and the Last Dragon’ Flames Out at Third
  • DOTA: Dragon’s Blood – Official Season 1 Trailer (2021)
  • Apple to release mixed reality headset in 2022, analyst predicts – CNET
  • Vicious Dems in Congress urge cable companies to drop conservative news
  • Guia de Isora MiradasDoc Prizes ‘Shady River,’ ’Between Dog and Wolf,’ ‘The Other’
  • The Wall Street Journal: Billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott marries Seattle school teacher
  • 150 Reasons Why Breath of the Wild Is a Game for the Ages
  • How new taxes make taxpayers flee states
  • ‘Nomadland’ Wins Best Picture at Latino Entertainment Film Awards
  • FLIP! FLOP! Before Mocking Andrew Cuomo, CNN’s Chris Cillizza Adored Him
  • Rick Santorum: Defend Constitution to defend conservative media
  • Why Entrepreneurs Must Demand More From Healthcare
  • Joe Biden’s Executive Order on Voting Tells Agencies to Push Vote-by-Mail, ‘Combat Misinformation’
  • The autistic bliss of Zoom
  • Trump to campaign against Murkowski on her home turf
  • How to watch Coming 2 America with Eddie Murphy and Arsenio Hall, streaming now – CNET
  • Steve Scalise is keeping track of the policy ‘damage’ Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi have ‘already done’

Copyright © 2021 Mad Mad Studios

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.

SAVE & ACCEPT