Hugo Barra, who has served as VP of Facebook Reality Labs for the past four years — overseeing the social giant’s Oculus team and its VR and augmented reality development projects — is exiting his post. Barra announced his departure in a Facebook post Monday, saying May 17 is his last day at the company. […]
Jimmy Rich, who served as Robert Downey Jr.’s assistant since 2003, has died. He was 52. Downey, 56, shared the news of the “terrible and shocking tragedy” on his Instagram page, where he revealed Rich was in a fatal car accident on Monday night around 8 p.m. The pair first worked together on 2003’s “The […]
Britannia served as a floating palace for 43 years. Since his death last week, there have been calls for a new royal yacht named after the prince.
The law has served as a legal shield for social media companies. Now lawmakers say it should be changed to hold companies accountable.
Joel Steiger, who served as a writer, producer and consultant on some of the most successful television mystery series of the ’80s and ’90s including “Matlock,” “Jake and the Fatman” and “Diagnosis: Murder,” died Sunday in Los Angeles after a long illness. He was 79. After moving to Los Angeles to pursue his dream of […]
Jason Kilar, who has served as CEO of WarnerMedia since May 2020, has a compensation package worth about $17 million per year in cash and stock, according to a regulatory filing. Kilar’s base annual salary is $2.5 million, plus $2.5 million in short-term bonus and $12 million in stock, per AT&T’s proxy fling Thursday. “To […]
Wednesday’s White House press briefing served as another failure by the Biden administration to come clean on the illegal immigration crisis at the U.S./Mexico border and was bolstered by two rounds of questioning from Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy. During one exchange, Press Secretary Jen Psaki scoffed at Doocy’s concerns, prompting him to informing here that “it’s not funny.”
WH Southern Border Coordinator Ambassador Roberta Jacobson was under the gun in Doocy’s first round, including this hardball: “[D]o you think it’s coincidence that as soon as Trump and his immigration policy were on the way out and Biden and his stated policy were on the way in, this historic surge at the border started?”
Jacobson didn’t even try to hide their indifference to a flood of illegal immigration, saying “[s]urges tend to respond to hope and there was a significant hope for a more humane policy after four years of, you know, pent up demand” though smugglers can now “spread disinformation.”
Doocy followed up: “If the change in administration has brought hope, then, from your perspective, is this surge good?”
Jacobson insisted that she didn’t say this but instead meant that hope is being met with “protection” and ensuring “cases can be adjudicated more quickly” while “repeatedly” trying “to dissuade people from — from listening to those smugglers.”
Fast-forward to Psaki’s portion and Doocy came locked and loaded with this fiery query: “You’ve been telling migrants from right there for a month now, all the way back to February 10 that now is not the time to come, but they are coming in bigger numbers every day. So do you have a messaging problem?”
Psaki made clear she was already tired of Doocy (and, to their credit, other reporters in the room) pressing the White House on immigration, dialing up some snark:
Well, I would say that in the last administration, we had a morality problem and children were being pulled from the arms of their parents and kids were being set sent back on a treacherous journey, and that’s not the approach of this administration.
She continued on, but Doocy waited her out and then brought up how some crossing the border have donned pro-Biden shirts as well as the double standard on CDC guidelines for migrant detention facilities versus schools (click “expand”):
DOOCY: But since the last administration is gone, tomorrow is 50 days of Biden. There are migrants showing up wearing t-shirts that say, “Biden, let us in” and candidate Biden was the one who said “I would end this notion for the first time in history, the people seeking asylum have to be in squalor on the other side of the river.” Why doesn’t he come out and just say now is not the time?
PSAKI: Well, he actually did an interview with Univision about a week or a week and a half ago, where he conveyed a similar message and we’ve conveyed that at every opportunity that we have, I will say we are, as you noted, almost 50 days in. We are digging ourselves out of a broken and dismantled system. Roberta Master Jacobson referenced this in her opening as well when it comes to engagement with countries addressing the root causes. We couldn’t start doing that until January. 20th There are programs like the relaunching of the Central American Minors Program, which was ended by the prior administration in 2017. And that meant that — that that program, which would have allowed for people to apply from the region. We had to restart that program, so we’re working to fix the mess of the last couple of years. It’s going to take some time. But this is clearly a priority for the President. We are looking at a range of options, which include the opening of additional facilities. It includes steps we can take to expedite the processing. It includes application and implementation of the CDC guidelines that were just came out that allow for more children to be house safely in to be housed safely in these facilities. So, we’re looking at every option possible to help address the challenges we are facing at the border.
DOOCY: And you mentioned those CDC guidelines. Does the White House think it’s a problem that when the CDC tells these migrant shelter facilities that they can be at full capacity if they are careful about COVID, many of them do, but when the CDC tells schools they can open in person full capacity, many of them don’t.
PSAKI: Are — is there a school in particular that you have as an example that didn’t do that?
DOOCY: Are most schools in this country at full capacity with in-person learning?
PSAKI: Is there a specific school, though, that is not following the CDC guidelines of implementing the mitigation steps so they can reopen?
DOOCY: I mean the CDC is saying, “schools, you can be at — every school can be at full capacity.”
PSAKI: What the CDC guidelines —
DOOCY: As you know, he hasn’t talked to —
PSAKI: — just to be clear cause I think this is very important to be very clear and specific on.
DOOCY: I have it here.
PSAKI: They gave eight mitigation steps that schools can take to safely reopen. A number of schools have actually recently reopened.
Doocy didn’t fall for the misdirection, asking if this disconnect meant “the Border Patrol unions and the HHS unions been easier to work with than the teachers unions.”
Psaki became even more annoyed, turning her head and even chuckling at Doocy’s question, calling it “a little bit of mixing different circumstances.”
Normally calm, Doocy’s face became red with disgust, telling Psaki: “It’s not funny.”
Psaki replied with another swipe, demanding he “take a responsible approach to the two issues” because, apparently, adults and children returning to school poses a more serious risk to contracting COVID-19 and come with “different circumstances” and “guidelines” than adults and children inside border facilities.
Again, there were other journalists that stepped up to the plate. CBS’s Cordes led off the Jacobson Q&A and, in one of her three questions, took note of Jacobson’s insistence that, for many returning to government under President Biden, “this isn’t your first rodeo,” so “[s]hould the administration have been better prepared to handle this influx of children before it changed the policy allowing them to stay in the country?”
CNN chief White House correspondent Kaitlan Collins also came locked and loaded, serving as the latest reporter to question the White House on whether the crisis at the border is a crisis. Of course, Jacobson refused to say so (click “expand”):
COLLINS: You were talking about restarting CAM and these other long-term goals for what immigration policies should look like. But right now, new CNN reporting shows that unaccompanied migrant children are being held in these border facilities for, on average, 107 hours. That’s up from, I believe, 77 hours on average last week. So, what is the Biden administration doing right now to fix that?
JACOBSON: Well, I think my part of this focuses much more on what we’re doing at the end of this process in Central America and Mexico. I think all of us at every stage of this process are doing everything we can to make sure that children are well cared for and moved into facilities that are appropriate for them. But I want to make a point again that it’s really important that people not make the dangerous journey in the first place, that we provide them with alternatives to making that journey, because it’s not safe on route. And so if I could just emphasize that — that it’s really important that that message get out, because the perception is not the same as the reality in terms of the border not being open. But we want to provide through CAM, through other mechanisms ways for some of these young people to be reunited with family members in the United States. [SPEAKING SPANISH]
COLLINS: You’re telling them not to come just to follow up quickly —
COLLINS: — you’re telling them they should not come. Would you describe what’s happening on the border as a crisis, given how these numbers are spiking so much week-by-week?
JACOBSON: You know, I think — I’m not trying to be cute here, but I think the fact of the matter is we have to do what we do regardless of what anybody calls the situation and the fact is we are all focused on improving the situation, on changing to a more humane and efficient system. And — and whatever you call it wouldn’t change what we’re doing because we have urgency from the President on down to fix our system and make sure that we are better at dealing with the hopes and the dreams of these migrants in their home country.
Four years ago, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer served as an unofficial publicist for the NAACP as they staged a sit-in protest at the Senate offices of Jeff Sessions in Mobile, Alabama. He let then-NAACP boss Cornell Brooks speak in long paragraphs and compare their protest to the civil rights protests in Selma against the segregationists.
On Monday, Blitzer was at it again, teeing up leftist talking points from the NAACP boss Derrick Johnson, only this time they were protesting anyone that would object to Biden’s nominees. Showing pictures of Xavier Becerra, Deb Haaland, Neera Tanden, and sub-cabinet nominees Vanita Gupta and Kristen Clarke, Blitzer threw a softball suggesting Republican critics were racists opposed to “historic strides” in cabinet diversity:
WOLF BLITZER: Let me get your thoughts on another sensitive issue. A handful of Biden cabinet nominees are facing intense criticism from Republicans in the Senate. These nominees are all people of color. Some are civil rights leaders. Biden’s made some historic strides in terms of cabinet diversity, but are these nominees, from your perspective, being held to a different standard? And we’ve put five of them up on the screen right now.
DERRICK JOHNSON: Absolutely. We have a dual track. There should be no dual track. Judge Garland was voted out of Senate judiciary 15-7, bipartisan. That’s the same standard that all of our nominees should be confronted with: An opportunity to show, are they fit to serve? Do they respect and uphold the Constitution? Kristen Clarke, Vanita Gupta are well-qualified. They should be moved through the process in the same manner of which Judge Garland has been moved through the process. There should not be a dual standard.
CNN and the other networks have often avoided any focus on the extreme views of Biden appointees, hailing them instead for their skin color or sexual orientation. Kristen Clarke has been questioned for writing in a letter that “Black infants sit, stand, crawl and walk sooner than whites…Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities.” Blitzer failed to throw that at Johnson.
Blitzer then acknowledged Republicans have called some Biden appointees radical and dangerous….and then again suggested this was just racist tactics:
BLITZER: Yes, Merrick Garland the — was confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee, it will now go before the full Senate. He’s expected to be pretty overwhelmingly confirmed when all is said and done. Some of the nominees have been painted by their critics as radical, it’s crazy, even dangerous. How much weight do those words carry when they’re used specifically against people of color?
JOHNSON: It’s fear-mongering. We’ve seen, unfortunately, the Republican Party using fear to try — to throw out progress. We must move on as a nation. We should be in the midst of battles of ideals, not using the tool of fear, tool of race and division to define one’s political party.
Oh yeah, the NAACP never divides people by race! CNN is equally shameless — they CNN spent the Trump years suggesting most of what they were doing was “radical, crazy, even dangerous.” But saying that now about “progressives” is somehow automatically discriminatory.
A high-ranking Lincoln Project employee served as a paid campaign staffer for Georgia senator Jon Ossoff (D.) while he received payments from both groups, a potential violation of laws that prohibit coordination between campaigns and super PACs.
The Lincoln Project and the Ossoff campaign paid Democratic consultant Keith Edwards during the closely watched Georgia runoffs that tipped the scales of the Senate to Democrats. Edwards said he left his post as the Lincoln Project’s communications director in November to become senior digital adviser for the Ossoff campaign, but records show his consulting firm, That’s Good Media, received at least $20,000 from the Lincoln Project while Edwards was employed by the campaign, Federal Election Commission records show.
The Lincoln Project spent nearly half-a-million dollars on advertisements supporting Ossoff throughout his campaign.
From July to November 2020, Edwards’s firm collected $20,000 a month from the Lincoln Project for consulting work. The payments skip December, then resume on Jan. 4—just one day before the Georgia Senate runoff elections.
Recent Stories in Politics
Edwards received his first direct salary payment from Ossoff’s campaign in December. He received further salary payments from Ossoff’s campaign on Jan. 4, the same day the Lincoln Project paid his firm $20,000 for consulting work and months after he had ostensibly left the group for the campaign.
Kendra Arnold, executive director of the Foundation for Accountability & Civic Trust, told the Washington Free Beacon that Edwards’s arrangement with the Ossoff campaign and the Lincoln Project raises concerns over potential illegal coordination.
“When a super PAC has inside information from a vendor or employee of a candidate, any advertising the super PAC does on behalf of the candidate is an illegal in-kind contribution to the campaign,” Arnold said. “In situations where an individual has ties to both a campaign and outside organization, it raises serious concerns of illegal coordination.”
The Lincoln Project was heavily involved in the Ossoff runoff race, dropping hundreds of thousands of dollars to elect the Georgia Democrat between Nov. 9 and Jan. 1. While Edwards acted as communications director for the Lincoln Project, he was paid through That’s Good Media. Edwards is the sole individual linked to the firm in New York corporation records. That’s Good Media’s listed address in FEC records, which is different from its address in the corporation records, is the same as Edwards’s New York City apartment.
This type of arrangement has drawn intense scrutiny. Watchdogs have argued that sharing vendors “presents an easy way to undermine the independence of super PACs” and could allow them to “operate as a conduit” for information between two entities, such as where a campaign needs ads, what voters to target, and what the subject of the ads should be. In this case, Edwards was a direct salaried employee of the Ossoff campaign while receiving vendor payments from the Lincoln Project.
During his time at the Lincoln Project, Edwards was involved in crafting the group’s response to allegations that cofounder John Weaver made inappropriate sexual advances toward a number of young men. The group previously claimed that its members only learned of the allegations last month, well after Edwards had departed.
After Ossoff’s victory over Republican senator David Perdue, the Lincoln Project singled Edwards out for praise, tweeting, “Abe is proud of the work that superstar Lincoln Project digital warrior @keithedwards did for the historic election of @ossoff.” The Lincoln Project has acknowledged that Ossoff’s campaign borrowed Edwards, writing that it “hope[s] the Senator-elect will consider returning him so he can continue to live rent-free in Donald Trump’s little head.”
Abe is proud of the work that superstar Lincoln Project digital warrior @keithedwards did for the historic election of @ossoff and hope the Senator-elect will consider returning him so he can continue to live rent-free in Donald Trump’s little head.
— The Lincoln Project (@ProjectLincoln) January 6, 2021
RedState first raised questions on the Lincoln Project’s January payment.
The Lincoln Project and Edwards did not return requests for comment about their financial arrangements. Ossoff’s office also did not provide a comment on why Edwards was hired by their campaign or whether they were aware of the Lincoln Project’s Jan. 4 payment to Edwards’s firm.
The post Lincoln Project Staffer May Have Violated Campaign Finance Law, Ethics Watchdog Says appeared first on Washington Free Beacon.