Artificial intelligence is everywhere. Governments, corporations, and venture funds are pouring capital into AI infrastructure, models, compute capacity, and algorithms. The excitement is palpable; the technology feels transformative, and many investors believe that getting in early could lead to outsized gains.
But that logic has a big caveat: You don’t invest in “AI” itself — you invest in companies, and history suggests that, even when a technology revolution is obvious, picking the winners is extremely difficult.
Let’s dig into why investing in AI is tempting, how history warns us, and what “smarter” AI investing might look like.
The AI Story in 2025: Big Bets, Big Risks, Big Hype
Let’s ground this in what’s happening now:
- Tech companies are spending heavily. Microsoft has committed about $80 billion to AI and data-center expansion in 2025. Meta is also boosting capital expenditures to scale AI infrastructure.
- Nvidia is the current poster child. Its GPUs are central to training large AI models, and the company continues to see surging demand.
- AI spending is accelerating across the board. In 2025, the largest tech firms (Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon) plan to invest $300 billion+ in AI and related infrastructure.
So yes, there’s enormous capital flowing into AI, and some companies (like Nvidia) look like they’re already benefiting. But this is exactly where history tells us caution is needed.
Historical Case Studies: When Breakthrough Tech Doesn’t Mean Big Profits for All
Below are sharper, more specific examples to illustrate how technology revolutions often destroy value for many investors, even as they reshape entire industries.
The Early Automobile Boom
- In the first two decades of the 20th century, hundreds of automobile makers sprang up in the United States. By some counts, as many as 1,800 different car manufacturers were attempted at various times.
- Yet, by mid-century, nearly all of them vanished. Only a few — like Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler — survived long-term.
- Many entrepreneurs who saw the car as the future lost money because they underestimated scale, cost control, supply chains, distribution, and competition.
Warren Buffett has used this example to emphasize how easy it is to back “the wrong horse” in a transformative technology. The auto revolution succeeded — but most car companies didn’t.
Airlines: Transformative, but Treacherous for Investors
- Air travel redefined how people and goods move globally. But the airline industry has a long, brutal history of bankruptcies and shakeouts.
- Post-deregulation (circa 1978), over 160 U.S. airlines went bankrupt or shut down by the turn of the century.
- Even iconic names like Pan American World Airways (Pan Am) and TWA (Trans World Airlines) disappeared entirely.
As Buffett quipped, if you want to become a millionaire, you should start with a billion and buy an airline — because the risk is so high.
So, while airlines were historically game-changers, they were very unstable investments.
Railroads: The Infrastructure Bet That Burned Many
- In the mid-to-late 19th century, railroads were regarded as the backbone of modernization and expansion.
- Investors funneled capital into railroad companies, often speculating on which routes or lines would survive.
- But many railroad companies went bankrupt as competition, overbuilding, rate wars, and economic cycles hammered them. Nearly a third of U.S. railroads went under in the 1890s.
- Eventually, consolidation left a few surviving networks — but most initial speculators lost.
The lesson: Building the technology infrastructure (rails) was essential for growth, but few original investors captured steady profits.
The Dot-Com Bubble
- In the late 1990s, the internet was the clear next wave. Everyone wanted exposure to “internet stocks.”
- Dot-com names like Pets.com, Webvan, and eToys raised massive sums — then collapsed.
- The Nasdaq composite dropped by ~80% between 2000 and 2002.
- Even Amazon, which became one of the biggest success stories of all time, saw its stock fall over 90% from peak to trough during that crash. Many early investors didn’t survive or exited with big losses.
In short: The internet revolution succeeded, but most early bets failed — and the winners weren’t obvious in advance.
Why AI Might Be a Rerun — and Why Picking Winners Is So Hard
Putting the history and current AI landscape together, here are the big challenges:
- The infrastructure vs. application bet. Do you invest in chips, data centers, cloud platforms, software, vertical AI firms (healthcare, fintech, etc.)? History suggests that just owning “infrastructure” doesn’t guarantee long-term dominance.
- Rapid disruption. The pace of innovation is so fast that today’s leaders can become obsolete quickly.
- Margin pressures. AI operations involve heavy capital costs (hardware, cooling, power) that can compress margins.
- Competition and fragmentation. In many AI niches (e.g., agents, model serving, domain-specific AI), numerous small players will compete, with many ultimately failing.
- Crowded valuation risk. If the market expects too much, valuations can overshoot fundamentals — and reversals can be painful.
In short: The technology almost surely wins, but the companies that win are far from obvious.
Smarter Ways To Invest in AI
Here’s how to get exposure to AI’s upside — but in a way that avoids “bet the ranch” risk:
- Own the market. If you hold an S&P 500 index fund (or equivalent), you already own many of the potential AI winners — including Nvidia. In fact, Nvidia currently makes up over 7% of the S&P 500 — making it the single largest component by index weight. That means if Nvidia becomes the AI “hero,” your fund participates — without having to pick it.
- Diversify across sectors. Don’t over-concentrate in tech. AI will touch healthcare, manufacturing, logistics, finance, and even energy. A well-rounded portfolio helps you capture gains from multiple fronts.
- Avoid speculation. Resist the urge to chase small, hyped AI startups or “moonshot” stocks unless you’re comfortable with the risk of total loss. Many will fail.
- Stay patient and long-term minded. Big technological revolutions take decades to play out. Short-term volatility is guaranteed. The advantage goes to long-term holders.
- Tilt but don’t gamble. If you believe in AI, it’s reasonable to tilt your portfolio modestly toward companies with strong AI exposure. But avoid making it your entire bet.
Final Thought
Investing in AI seems like a compelling opportunity. There will almost certainly be major winners, and the economic shift may be massive. But knowing which companies will become those winners is tremendously difficult.
History is full of technological revolutions (automobiles, air travel, railroads, the internet) that changed everything — yet most of the companies that claimed “this is the future” failed. Even massively disruptive technologies don’t make every investor rich.
If you want exposure to AI’s upside without taking on extreme risk, you’re better off holding a broadly diversified portfolio (for example, via the S&P 500) — where you automatically own Nvidia, along with many other potential winners. Let the market decide which companies rise, while you stay anchored to sound investing principles.
The post Is Trying To Invest in AI a Good Idea? appeared first on Clark Howard.