Norwegian Cruise Line’s stock fell more than 8% in premarket trading on Wednesday after the cruise operator warned it expects to fall short of Wall Street analyst estimates for its second quarter as it faces an uncertain economic outlook.
BUSINESS
Get This Reloadable eSIM With $50 in Credit and Free Voice Number for $25
International travel is such a breeze when you can browse, do business and make calls without worrying about expensive roaming charges or changing SIMs.
Pay Attention to Your Fund’s Expense Ratio
Here’s How Expense Ratios Impact Your Investment Returns
Fact checked by Yarilet Perez
Reviewed by Pamela Rodriguez
For mutual fund and exchange-traded fund (ETF) investors, expense ratios are an important but sometimes overlooked element that can have a real impact on long-term returns.
The expense ratio is the annual charge that a fund imposes on its shareholders. It covers operational costs, such as portfolio management, overhead, administration, and marketing expenses.
Expense ratios of 0.25% or 0.50% may seem small, but they can accumulate into thousands of dollars in fees over decades-long investment periods. Knowing the role they play in your returns over time is thus crucial.
Key Takeaways
- Mutual funds and ETFs charge their shareholders an expense ratio to cover operating and distribution costs.
- Even seemingly low expense ratios can drag down total returns over a long-term investment horizon.
- Index funds, which are passively managed, typically have much lower expense ratios than actively managed funds or those invested in less tradable assets.
- The long-term trend has been toward lower expense ratios, although some funds still charge upward of 2%.
Why Are Expense Ratios Important?
A fund’s expense ratio is essentially the cost of admission for participating in a professionally managed investment vehicle. It’s given as a percentage of the amount you’ve invested and is deducted from your returns automatically, so it’s not like you’ll get a separate bill.
While many investors focus exclusively on performance figures, they may not realize how much these ongoing fees eat into their returns year after year. Investors should thus pay close attention to them:
- They directly cut into your returns: Every dollar paid in fees is a dollar less in your account that won’t grow over time. Higher expense ratios mean you keep less of your overall investment gains.
- Compounding effect: The impact of fees compounds over time, just as your returns do. A seemingly small difference in expense ratios can translate to significantly different outcomes over several decades.
- Indicator of fund type and strategy: Expense ratios will often reflect a fund’s management style. Actively managed funds or those invested in more obscure or less liquid asset classes will tend to have higher expense ratios, while passively managed index funds typically have much lower fees.
- Predictable and transparent: Unlike market performance, which is inherently unpredictable, expense ratios are known in advance and are one of the few investment factors you can control.
How Is the Expense Ratio Calculated?
Here is the expense ratio formula:
Expense Ratio = Total Fund Operating Expenses / Average Net Assets
A fund with operating expenses of $1 million and assets of $100 million would thus have an expense ratio of 1%.
Components of Expenses Ratios
Understanding what goes into a fund’s operating expenses can help investors make more informed decisions. These expenses typically include:
- Management fees: The management fee covers the portfolio managers and their teams, who are responsible for making investment decisions, and is often the largest part of the expense ratio (between 0.10% and over 1%). Actively managed funds require higher fees because they cover additional expenses related to research, analysis, and active trading in the markets.
- 12b-1 fees: SEC rules allow for 12b-1 fees that cover marketing and distribution expenses. These fees typically range from 0.25% to 1%, and are more common in mutual funds designed for retail investors than ETFs or funds targeting institutional investors.
- Administrative costs: This covers recordkeeping, customer service, legal, and accounting costs.
- Trading costs: Investors bear the costs related to trading activities in the fund’s portfolio, even though these costs do not appear directly in the expense ratio. Even with today’s low-commission environment, funds with high turnover ratios have higher trading expenses and more taxable events that flow down to investors.
- Other expenses: The fund’s other expenses may cover custodial fees, auditor fees, and compensation for the board of directors.
Funds determine their expense ratio once a year using the previous fiscal year’s operating costs and average asset values. Investors pay for the expense ratio in daily increments applied to the fund’s net asset value instead of a lump sum payment for the entire annual percentage.
Types of Funds and Their Expense Ratios
Different types of funds have vastly different expense structures:
Fund Type | Typical Expense Ratio | Example | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Passively Managed Index Funds/ETFs | 0.02% – 0.25% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO): 0.03% | Simply tracks market indices; minimal active management |
Actively Managed Funds | 0.50% – 1.50%+ | Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX): 0.63% | Employ portfolio managers who actively select investments |
Specialty/Sector Funds | 0.09% – 2%+ | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF): 0.08% | May have higher fees because of specialized knowledge required |
International/Emerging Market Funds | 0.30% – 1.75% | iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM): 0.72% | Higher costs because of the greater complexity of international investing |
Bond Funds | 0.03% – 0.75% | iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG): 0.03% | Generally lower than active equity funds; varies by credit quality and style |
Effect of Expense Ratios on Investment Returns
The impact of expense ratios becomes evident when examining long-term investment returns. The chart below shows how different expense ratios affect investment growth over time. Our example uses a consistent 10% gross annual return on an initial $10,000 investment:
After accounting for the compounding effect of these fees over 20 years, when the expense ratio is 0.05%, the investment grows to about $66,666, with about $285 paid in fees over time. When the expense ratio is 0.5%, the investment grows to about $61,416, with about $2,706 in fees. But with a 2.5% expense ratio, the investment grows to only about $42,479, with about $10,826 paid in fees.
Expense Ratio Trends
The good news for investors is that expense ratios have been decreasing because of growing competition among fund providers and other changes that have lowered overall expenses. For instance, improved operational efficiencies have helped fund providers reduce administrative costs.
There are also economies of scale. As funds’ asset bases continue to grow, fixed costs (such as transfer agency fees or accounting fees) represent a smaller proportion of total expenses, resulting in a lower overall expense ratio. In addition, investors have become more cost-conscious. It’s certainly easier to find this data than a few decades ago—they’re increasingly choosing lower-cost options, putting additional pressure on high-fee funds.
According to the Investment Company Institute, the average expense ratio for equity mutual funds has declined from around 1% in 2000 to 0.40% in 2024. For index equity ETFs, the average has fallen to 0.15%.
Despite positive trends toward lower expense ratios, some funds—particularly those sold through certain advisor channels or included in retirement plans with limited options—still charge high fees relative to the services provided.
The Bottom Line
Long-term investors should minimize expense ratios whenever possible to maximize their total returns. Compare fees among similar mutual funds or ETFs since even small percentage differences in this fee can quickly add up to significant costs over time.
The best investment choice doesn’t always mean selecting the cheapest fund available in every category, but funds with particular strategies might justify slightly higher costs. Investors should monitor their expenses and verify that elevated fees are warranted by the fund’s returns.
PlaysOut launches Web3 mini-game platform for superapps
PlaysOut launched its on-chain mini-game Platform and SDK toolkit, fully integrated with WeChat’s mini-game publishing framework.Read More
Structify raises $4.1M seed to turn unstructured web data into enterprise-ready datasets
Brooklyn-based Structify emerges from stealth with $4.1 million in seed funding to transform how businesses prepare data for AI, promising to save data scientists from the task that consumes 80% of their time.Read More
How Much Will Bayern Munich And Dortmund Earn From The Club World Cup?
The world soccer governing body FIFA had previously communicated that the tournament would include a $1 billion prize pool distributed to the 32 teams.
The Internet Wants To Know If 100 Men Can Defeat A Single Gorilla
The internet has been debating if 100 ordinary men can take down a single gorilla, but where did the question come from and why did it go viral?
Trump’s Crypto Sherpa Bo Hines Says Crypto Legislation on Target for Quick Completion
Strategists for two U.S. bills meant to create an oversight regime for crypto are setting out plans this week to pass legislation in the summer, Bo Hines, the White House official at the center of those efforts, told CoinDesk.
Hines, who President Donald Trump hired as executive director of the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets, told CoinDesk in an interview that the procedures are being ironed out to move legislation on regulating stablecoin issuers, and the crypto advocates in the White House and Congress will quickly pivot to the bigger bill that will set a full regulatory regime for U.S. crypto markets.
The progress so far puts the efforts “well on pace to achieve what the President desires,” he said, which is that both crypto bills reach Trump’s desk for signatures before Congress takes its summer recess in August.
The president’s adviser, who is a speaker at Consensus 2025 in Toronto May 14-16, said the bills to regulate stablecoin issuers that are moving through the Senate and House of Representatives are “90% aligned,” so it won’t be a difficult task to bring them together into a unified approach that would still need approval in both chambers.”We’re in the process of mitigating any differences between the two chambers there, but we feel like, you know, we’re in a really good spot to get that passed and signed into law,” he said. “It lays the foundation for everything that we can do.”
He said the more complex undertaking to write laws for how the U.S. should police the overall markets should emerge in draft bills “in the next few weeks.”
Trump’s business
While Congress is moving unusually fast, the president’s own crypto business interests have been criticized by Democrats who accuse Trump of improperly benefiting from his own policies and of inviting foreign influence from investors in his family’s projects. Trump’s interests include stakes in World Liberty Financial and the president’s own memecoin, $TRUMP. Hines pushed back, saying the rise of crypto has presented attractive innovations for investors.
“Any good business person would engage in a marketplace opportunity like that,” he said. “So, you know, I don’t view it as being detrimental in any capacity whatsoever.”
The president and his family have the “ability to engage with any marketplace that they see fit,” Hines said.
“We’re narrowly focused on just doing what’s in the best interest of the United States to make the U.S. the crypto capital world, usher in the golden age of digital assets, and we have our binders on to everything else,” he said. “That’s what the president’s asked us to do, and we’re going to deliver on his wishes.”
The White House official, 29, is known as a staunch loyalist to Trump, who had endorsed the former college football player in the first of his two unsuccessful North Carolina congressional campaigns. Despite his relative inexperience in the crypto field, Trump elevated Hines to a senior White House role to work beside crypto czar David Sacks and act as a “sherpa between White House policy, interagency activity, industry and what’s happening on Capitol Hill,” as Hines described it.
“We move at a speed that no other administration has ever been able to move before,” Hines noted.
Bitcoin reserve
Many in the digital assets industry had clamored for a digital assets reserve at the federal level, though the idea for how to approach it varies widely. Trump’s campaign-trail promises surged toward reality in March when he ordered his administration to start work on a bitcoin (BTC) reserve and a separate stockpile of other crypto assets.
One point of disappointment for those who’d wished for it was that Trump insisted the reserve be budget-neutral, meaning no new taxpayer money would go toward acquiring assets for the reserve.
Hines has been a prominent booster of this effort. He said the Treasury-led audit of U.S. crypto holdings, which needs to be done to find out the extent of assets (so far unmeasured) that’ll be directed into the stockpiles, is progressing quickly. The Treasury Department is now going through audit reports from various corners of the U.S. government, he said.
Trump had directed his administration to work out ideas for how to add even more to the funds without tapping taxpayers, and Hines said they’re still “fleshing out the best ideas.”
“I don’t think there’s going to be one single resolution where we say, ‘This is the path that we’re going.’ I think there could be multiple ways in which we engage in this,” Hines said, “We view bitcoin as digital gold, and we want to accumulate as much as we can.”
He didn’t have a timeline in mind for when the first tokens will begin stacking up as a longterm U.S. government investment.
Diverse views
The transition from President Joe Biden to Trump’s administration has been stark for the industry — until recently a target of government suspicion and now celebrated as an innovative movement that should be fostered. Already, regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission have reversed policies and started crypto roundtables behind doors that had been largely closed to digital assets discussions. And Trump himself held a crypto summit in the room of the White House where state dinners are hosted.
“We move at a speed that no other administration has ever been able to move before,” Hines noted.
Hines said he’s had as many as 200 meetings with crypto insiders in his short stint in the government, and he granted that their opinions can range widely. But he thinks the industry is largely aligned where it needs to be as Congress and regulators are considering its U.S. future.
When asked about some industry concerns about splitting the crypto legislation into two rather than a combined, single effort to improve its odds, he said details could still be worked out, though he’s currently focused on a stablecoin bill being quickly followed by market-structure legislation.
The crypto push, which he said “some will portray as being a chaotic process,” looks that way because that’s always the case in government policymaking “when you’re attempting to effectuate change.”
“We’re talking about revolutionizing a financial marketplace which has basically been archaic for the last three decades,” he said. “I just think that people should be very excited about what’s to come.”
CoinDesk 20 Performance Update: Index Declines 2% as Nearly All Assets Trade Lower
CoinDesk Indices presents its daily market update, highlighting the performance of leaders and laggards in the CoinDesk 20 Index.
The CoinDesk 20 is currently trading at 2733.26, down 2.0% (-57.08) since 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday.
One of 20 assets is trading higher.
Leaders: POL (+0.2%) and BTC (-0.6%).
Laggards: AAVE (-4.7%) and XRP (-4.0%).
The CoinDesk 20 is a broad-based index traded on multiple platforms in several regions globally.
Etsy vows to stay ‘nimble’ amid tariff fallout and ‘fluid’ consumer confidence
“The first quarter of 2025 played out largely as expected,” Etsy said.