BUSINESS

Salesforce has spent the last few quarters trying to send a clear message to investors: It’s not like the other software companies and won’t be left in the dust by new artificial intelligence tools. Its quarterly results, due out after the closing bell on Aug. 26, 2026, will be the latest indicator of whether or not that’s true.

Analysts polled by LSEG are looking for these big numbers:

Revenue: $11.32 billion

Earnings per share: $3.27

This page will refresh periodically with updates as they cross the wire, including the company’s results and its forecast and commentary to follow.

Every valuation is a story that someone agreed to believe.

In private markets, that story gets told in a conference room, signed by a handful of investors, and then repeated for years as if it were a fact.

Nobody has to test it. There is no daily quote, no crowd of skeptics pricing the risk in real time, and no moment when the number has to survive contact with strangers.

That arrangement works fine until the company needs public money.

Then the story stops being a story. It becomes a price, and the price gets set by people who were not in the room when the promise was made. Some companies survive that translation with their dignity intact. Plenty do not.

The space between what a business is said to be worth and what buyers will actually pay is where the useful information lives. This week, one of the widest gaps in modern retail finally landed on a stock exchange filing.

Shein, the ultra-fast-fashion retailer known for $5 dresses and $10 jeans, launched its Hong Kong global offering on Monday, Aug. 24, at a valuation of roughly $27 billion.

Four years ago, investors said it was worth $98.2 billion.

What the Shein IPO price actually admits

Shein is selling about 280 million Class B shares priced between HK$47.60 and HK$49.50, raising as much as HK$13.86 billion, or about $1.77 billion, according to CNBC.

The final price arrives Aug. 31, with trading set to begin Sept. 1 under the stock code 00625.

That top-end number values the company at close to $27 billion, down roughly 70% from its private peak.

Related: Shein’s latest buy blurs the line between ethics and fast fashion

The retreat happened fast. Shein opened investor meetings this month seeking $30 billion to $40 billion and ended up well below the floor of its own ask.

Here is the ladder, and it is worth reading slowly:

The company was valued at $98.2 billion in a 2022 private round, according to Reuters.

Investors marked it at $64 billion in 2023 and again in April 2024, CNBC noted.

Bankers opened this month’s meetings targeting $30 billion to $40 billion, Reuters reported.

The offering launched at close to $27 billion at the top of the range, according to the prospectus filed with the Hong Kong exchange.

“The company has missed the golden time to list,” William Ma, chief investment officer at GROW Investment Group, told CNBC.

Shein prices its Hong Kong IPO at about $27 billion, roughly 70% below its 2022 private mark.Mike Kemp / Getty Images

Why Shein owes $3.5 billion to its earlier backers

Here is the part that got buried under the valuation headlines, and it is the part I would read first.

Shein has agreed to hand as much as $3.5 billion in cash and shares to a select group of existing investors, a sum “almost twice the fresh capital it is seeking in an IPO,” reported The Standard HK.

The mechanism is called a conversion adjustment, and it is standard equipment in late-stage private rounds. Holders of Shein’s Series pre-D, Series D, and Series D plus preferred shares negotiated protection against exactly this outcome, a listing below the price they paid.

More Retail:

Clothing retailer returns to brick and mortar stores after 7 years

Popular men’s fashion retail chain files Chapter 11 bankruptcy

Ulta Beauty has left Target, here’s what’s replacing it

Those investors bought in at valuations of about $60.5 billion, $98.2 billion, and $64 billion, respectively. The IPO prices the company at less than half the cheapest of those marks.

So the protections triggered. Shein could pay up to $2.2 billion in cash if the deal prices at the bottom of the range, issue 19.6 million bonus shares at no cost, and separately make about $1.33 billion in additional payments to the same group, according to The Standard HK.

The money comes out of the company’s own balance sheet, not the IPO proceeds.

I ran those two figures side by side, and the arithmetic is blunt. Shein raises $1.77 billion from the public and owes up to $3.5 billion to the private investors who got there first. Boyu Capital, Tiger Global, General Atlantic, Thrive Capital, Mubadala, and Brookfield are among the names entitled to the payments.

Older Series A, B, and C holders get nothing from this arrangement.

How the tariff shift turned Shein’s profit into a loss

The valuation reset is not a mood. It tracks a real deterioration in the numbers.

Revenue reached $41.8 billion in 2025, up about 8%, while net profit fell 38.7% to $2.06 billion, reported WWD. Growth had run at 20.7% the prior year.

Then the first quarter of 2026 arrived. Shein swung to a net loss of $99 million against a $395 million profit a year earlier, and operating income dropped 26% to $258 million, reported the Japan Times.

The cause is sitting in the customs data. Washington killed the de minimis exemption in May 2025, ending duty-free treatment for parcels under $800, which was the structural advantage that made $5 dresses possible at scale.

Removing it has had “an adverse impact on our sales in the U.S.,” Shein said in the prospectus, according to Yahoo Finance.

U.S. revenue fell 14.3% to $2.04 billion in the quarter.

Europe is next in line. The European Union on July 1 imposed a 3-euro charge on low-value shipments, and Europe accounted for close to a third of 2025 revenue. Shein warned the effect could match or exceed what happened in America.

This is the same tariff math that has been pushing prices up at major U.S. retailers all year, except Shein built its entire model on the exemption that disappeared.

What the Shein listing tells you about private valuations

Most American readers will never buy this stock. It lists in Hong Kong, and the Class B shares carry one tenth the voting power of founder shares, leaving the four co-founders with 90% of the vote.

The useful part is the pattern, and my analysis of the payout structure is what makes it legible.

Private markets have been running on marks that nobody had to defend. Pension funds, endowments, and sovereign wealth vehicles hold those marks in their books, and increasingly, so do the private credit and private equity sleeves showing up in ordinary retirement accounts.

Shein is the rare case where the reckoning happens in public, on a specific date, with a specific number attached.

When it does, the order of payment matters more than the valuation. The investors with contractual protection get made whole first, out of company cash, before a single public shareholder collects anything.

Watch for that clause the next time a famous private company finally lists. The headline will be the valuation cut. The story will be who negotiated a floor and who did not.

Shein prices Aug. 31. The $5-dress era is being repriced with it.

Related: Beloved fashion brand makes surprising Shein move

Alphabet (GOOG) stock entered 2026 with a remarkably tough act to follow.

Its stock soared nearly 66% in 2025, according to Yahoo Finance, with investors buying into its bull case, backed by Google’s growing AI position, robust cloud business, and resilient Search franchise.

It’s still up more than 10% this year, based on Seeking Alpha data, but has lost 9% of its value over the past three months as investor concerns over spending and returns have collided. 

Now, though, Morgan Stanley analysts argue that investors might be overlooking a far bigger AI opportunity taking shape inside Alphabet.

Nevertheless, a lot of the concerns this year resurfaced in Alphabet’s Q2 results.

Revenue surged 24% to $119.8 billion, and Google Cloud shot up 82% to $24.8 billion, underscoring tremendous demand for AI infrastructure and services.

Still, Alphabet bumped its 2026 capex forecast to as high as $205 billion, intensifying Wall Street’s already elevated concerns over AI spending and monetization, as I covered in July.

That said, in a note shared with me, Morgan Stanley now sees a far bigger answer emerging. 

The firm is doubling down on Alphabet stock, leaning harder into the bull case, with investors remarkably underestimating a growing piece of the company’s AI business, a shift that could become hugely important for its valuation through 2028.

Google’s TPU opportunity is getting much bigger

Morgan Stanley is sticking with its Overweight rating and $400 price target on Alphabet, implying nearly 15% upside from the stock’s Aug. 21 close of $344.82. 

At the heart of the bank’s latest note, though, is a sharp reset to how much sales Google could generate by selling its proprietary Tensor Processing Unit, or TPU, systems to customers.

More Tech:

Anthropic-powered AI model sends shocking message to employee

Rocket Lab clears 1st hurdle in its biggest satellite deal

Apple’s $54 billion iPhone machine may be about to break its biggest ritual

Morgan Stanley estimates Alphabet could monetize first-party TPU sales at nearly $27 billion per gigawatt, up from the previous $20 billion estimate, assuming a 30% gross margin versus 20% previously. 

The eye-catching revision follows reports that Google could potentially supply about 1 million TPUs, representing 1.3 GW of capacity, for around $35 billion. Alphabet’s expanded custom-silicon relationship with Marvell Technologies (MRVL) also supports the bank’s view that TPU pricing is running hotter than previously assumed.

As a result of that change, you now have some enormous figures. 

Morgan Stanley expects Google to sell 0.3 GW of TPU systems in the second half of 2026, 3.2 GW in 2027, and 4.2 GW in 2028. That translates into $84 billion of TPU-related Google Cloud sales in 2027 and $108 billion in 2028, increases of 35% and 37% from previous forecasts.

The TPU ramp-up changes the scale of Cloud. Morgan Stanley bumped its total Google Cloud sales forecasts by 6% for 2027 and 7% for 2028 while raising Cloud EBIT estimates by 2% in both years.

Also read: Alphabet’s stock buybacks: History & investor impact explained

More importantly, the bank now expects Google Cloud to generate 48% of Alphabet-wide EBIT by 2028. That would turn Cloud into perhaps Alphabet’s most dominant profit contributor.

Currently, Google Cloud is generating nearly one-fifth of Alphabet’s total sales. In Q2, Cloud revenue was at $24.8 billion, or 21% of Alphabet’s $119.8 billion total sales, as reported by Seeking Alpha. 

However, there is a big trade-off to consider.

TPU hardware carries lower margins than Google’s core cloud services, compelling Morgan Stanley to lower its cloud margin estimates to 37% in 2027 and 40% in 2028.

Still, the bank expects core cloud incremental margins to hover around an impressive 50%, suggesting the underlying business remains tremendously profitable, even as TPU sales scale.

Morgan Stanley sees Google’s TPU business becoming a major Alphabet growth engine.Benjamin Fanjoy/Getty Images

Gemini 4 could be Alphabet’s bigger catalyst

Apart from Google’s massive TPU opportunity, Morgan Stanley sees Gemini 4 as another major catalyst for Alphabet stock. 

The bank expects the model to be released in late 2026 or early 2027 and says that returning Google to, or near, the AI frontier could restore investor confidence in its competitive positioning.

It comes at an opportune time.

Google’s flagship Gemini 3.5 Pro was delayed after reportedly falling short of internal performance goals, primarily in coding, while rivals OpenAI and Anthropic continued to push ahead. CEO Sundar Pichai has since hailed Gemini 4 as a substantially larger frontier model, signaling a faster release cadence.

“We’re really focused, putting a lot of effort into Gemini 4,” Pichai said on Alphabet’s Q2 call. “It’s a very ambitious effort.”

In addition, Morgan Stanley highlights Google’s Flash models, prioritizing speed and cost efficiency. That could become increasingly pertinent as enterprises move from AI experimentation to large-scale deployment, where inference costs matter much more.

And there’s plenty of evidence that Google can compete on this front. 

Independent testing by Artificial Analysis ranked Gemini 3.7 Flash among the leading models for intelligence, producing nearly 362 output tokens per second, with an input price of $0.75 per million tokens.

At the same time, scale isn’t theoretical anymore. Gemini now has nearly 950 million monthly active users, putting it within striking distance of ChatGPT, according to Reuters.

Google’s big test with Gemini is productization.

The tech giant gains immensely from deploying the service broadly across Search, YouTube, and Google’s other products in ways that produce durable sales growth.

Related: Bank of America raises price targets on 10 software stocks

What should Alphabet investors do now?

For Alphabet investors, the setup has everything to do with execution rather than proving AI demand exists. 

Morgan Stanley’s lofty target implies a superb 15% upside, but getting there will require investors to award a healthier premium as Cloud, TPUs, and Gemini become bigger earnings drivers.

The target assumes 24 times average 2027-2028 earnings, compared to Alphabet’s much smaller growth-adjusted premium today.

Morgan Stanley’s own model values Alphabet at 22 times 2028 earnings at $400, compared to around 19 times at recent prices. That means some of the upside requires multiple expansions, not just higher earnings.

From a broader perspective, investors have recently favored the big hyperscalers, including Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon (AMZN), since their sheer scale, customer relationships, and control over infrastructure offer far more durable advantages than those of highly leveraged AI specialists. 

However, the shift toward capital-intensive AI businesses might restrain their valuation multiples, even if earnings remain robust.

Nevertheless, spending remains the pressure point. Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft, and Oracle (ORCL) are expected to spend $750 billion on data centers in 2026, according to BigGo Finance, raising the bar for AI monetization and free cash flow growth.

For existing Alphabet stockholders, though, that argues for holding through, despite the spending-driven volatility, instead of treating every capex scare as thesis-breaking. For newer investors, it might be wise to build positions gradually instead of chasing every rally. 

The checkpoints are pretty obvious.

Investors need to monitor TPU sales, cloud margins, and backlog, as well as Gemini’s competitive performance and free cash flows. It’s important to note, though, that the downside is real.

Morgan Stanley’s bear case has Google stock dropping to $225 if advertising slows down, AI pressures margins, and spending discipline deteriorates. 

Alphabet, therefore, will continue to look attractive if AI spending consistently produces top- and bottom-line growth. If monetization fails to keep up with capex, the same spending fueling the bull case will become the stock’s biggest constraint.

More on Alphabet & its stock: 

History of Alphabet: Company timeline, milestones & facts

Alphabet’s dividend history, yield & future prospects explained

Alphabet’s stock splits: History & prospects explained

It’s still possible a future court ruling could block the policy.

Wall Street has spent much of 2026 debating whether AMD is an Nvidia alternative or a genuinely different bet. On Aug. 25, one of the Street’s higher-ranked chip analysts made his position clear.

AMD shares jumped roughly 4% on the day. The upgrade came with a specific argument about where server chip revenue is headed that goes well beyond the usual AI trade.

Raymond James upgrades AMD to Strong Buy, raises price target

Simon Leopold, Raymond James’ semiconductor analyst, upgraded AMD to Strong Buy from Outperform and raised his price target to $641 from $565 on Aug. 25, implying roughly 40% upside from AMD’s closing price that day, CNBC reported.

Leopold ranks 120th out of 12,496 analysts tracked by TipRanks, with a 60% success rate and an average return of 30% per rating. His $641 target sits above the consensus average of roughly $613 across all analysts covering AMD.

Read more AMD:

AMD filling reveals unexpected SpaceX and Nutanix bet

Nvidia dominates AI chips, but BOFA sees AMD closing in

Does AMD pay dividends? How the chipmaker spends its money

“AMD offers the strongest combination of direct earnings leverage, datacenter positioning, and market-share gains,” Leopold wrote in his note. Then he added a sentence that landed harder than the price target itself: “AMD’s growth should enable it to overtake Intel during 2027.”

AMD is up roughly 113% year to date heading into the upgrade. The stock had already been one of the better-performing semiconductor names in 2026 before the Aug. 25 move.

AMD server CPU revenue forecasted to hit estimated $201 billion or more by 2030

The center of Leopold’s argument is not AMD’s AI accelerator business. It is server CPUs, a part of the market that tends to get less attention than graphics chips but which he thinks is about to get much more profitable for AMD.

Raymond James forecasts server CPU revenue growing at a 44% compound annual rate to roughly $201 billion by 2030. Leopold’s own forecast is slightly below AMD’s internal estimate of $220 billion. He noted that his number could close that gap if agentic AI is adopted faster than he currently models, according to Benzinga.

The logic is straightforward. AI factories need accelerators to train and run models. But those accelerators still need powerful CPUs to coordinate tasks and manage data.

As enterprises deploy more agentic systems, those multi-step workflows need even more CPU coordination. That is where AMD’s EPYC processors come in.

BMO Capital recently said AMD is on the “verge of becoming a complete AI infrastructure provider,” citing the Helios AI rack as a product that could help it gain share against Nvidia, as StockTwits reported.

Microsoft will deploy Helios across Azure AI services beginning in the second half of 2026. Anthropic has also signed a major deal with AMD that significantly expands the chipmaker’s push into AI infrastructure.

At current prices AMD trades at roughly 41 times projected earnings.Caroline/Getty Images

AMD data center revenue up, EPYC gains market share against rival Intel Xeon

The upgrade also rests on AMD’s recent execution. Data center revenue surged in the second quarter to $6.7 billion, up 107% year over year. That accounted for more than half of AMD’s total quarterly revenue of $11.54 billion, which itself rose 50% year over year.

AMD’s server CPU market share has been moving in one direction. Its overall x86 processor shipment share reached 30.7% in the second quarter, while Intel’s fell to 69.3%.

AMD’s server-specific share rose to 34.5%, up 7.3 percentage points from a year earlier. Intel’s server share fell to 65.5%, according to Tom’s Hardware.

Related: AMD’s stock split history (& prospects) explained

When comparing EPYC against Intel’s Xeon directly, AMD’s server share rises as high as 46.4%, Mercury Research President Dean McCarron noted, according to Tom’s Hardware.

Intel is still the larger supplier. But every percentage point AMD takes is revenue that did not exist in AMD’s model a year ago.

AMD stock risks valuation and what investors should watch in 2026

Leopold’s bull case has a long list of moving parts. SpaceX chose Nvidia exclusively for its orbital AI infrastructure. Custom silicon from Microsoft and Google keeps getting better. Intel is not standing still.

And agentic AI, the part of the thesis that pushes the server CPU market to $201 billion, could roll out slower than anyone’s model assumes right now.

At current prices, AMD trades at roughly 41 times projected earnings. Getting to $641 means crossing a trillion-dollar market cap. That requires earnings growth to outrun revenue growth for years.

Leopold thinks that will happen. The next few earnings reports will say whether he is right.

The three numbers worth tracking are data center revenue, EPYC server processor revenue, and gross margins. Data center revenue is where AMD has been winning, but the pace needs to hold.

EPYC is the specific product driving Intel share losses. Any sign the gap is narrowing would put the 2027 overtake prediction in question. Gross margins will show whether AMD is growing profitably or buying share at the expense of earnings quality.

Nvidia reports on Aug. 26. Any commentary from Jensen Huang on AI infrastructure demand or server CPU competition will land directly on Leopold’s thesis.

A strong Nvidia quarter reinforces the bull case for the whole sector. A cautious outlook does the opposite.

Related: 5-star analyst resets AMD stock price target

Disney+ has revealed the premiere date and a new trailer for ‘The Remarried Empress,’ an epic K-drama about romance, betrayal and political intrigue. Here’s what to know.

Julia Collins always had an entrepreneurial spirit.

In crowded markets, the businesses that pull ahead are often not the ones with the best product or the biggest budget. They are the ones that make it easiest for customers to understand what they are, why they matter, and how they are different. As AI makes polished messaging cheaper and more abundant, category definition is becoming a more important growth lever. This piece explores why founders and business leaders need to think beyond awareness and start shaping the frame of reference customers use to evaluate them. It offers practical guidance for defining your market position clearly, avoiding vague or overly broad messaging, and building a business story that gives customers a reason to remember and choose you.

A popular sports bar and grill chain has abruptly closed four restaurants, cutting its footprint by 20%, less than two years after a new owner acquired the brand.

The closures come as restaurant chains across the country continue to deal with severe challenges stemming from rising food and labor costs, shifting consumer habits, and aggressive competition for diners. 

Full-service restaurants are feeling more pressure as they rely heavily on front-of-house staffing, table service, and bar staff. Moreover, full-service restaurants earn 3%-5% net, versus 6%-9% for fast-casual concepts and quick-service restaurants, on a scale where net margin above 6% is considered strong, according to data from Bloom Intelligence. 

Founded in 1997 in Hickory, North Carolina, Hickory Tavern is a sports bar and grill family restaurant chain popular for its saucy wings, flatbreads, loaded nachos, and mozzarella sticks. Aside from food, the bar was often seen as a popular neighborhood gathering place. 

Hickory Tavern suddenly shuts 4 restaurant locations for good 

Hickory Tavern abruptly closed four locations, leaving the chain with 16 remaining across the Carolinas, reported FSR Magazine. 

The affected locations include:

Mooresville, NC: 115 Morrison Plantation Pkwy, Mooresville, NC 28117 

Huntersville, NC: 9526 Birkdale Crossing Dr, Suite 30, Huntersville, NC 28078

Providence Road (Charlotte, NC): 11504 Providence Rd, Suite N, Charlotte, NC 28277

Columbia Vista (Columbia, SC): 907 Senate St, Columbia, SC 29201

Related: 125-year-old mall retail anchor closes discount outlet, cuts 101 jobs

Its parent company, Artistry Restaurants, now remains with 16 Hickory Tavern locations, including 11 locations in North Carolina and five in South Carolina. Artistry’s portfolio also includes Oak & Stone, Shrimp Basket, Boca, Atlantic Beer & Oyster, Sandbar Amelia Island, and The Chapman.  

Loyal customers at these closed locations have several alternatives under the current footprint. The company itself suggested they visit Hickory Tavern nearby locations in Harris, Ballantyne, Sun Valley, North Carolina, and Columbia-Woodhill, South Carolina.

Closures as a means to better direct resources and strengthen the brand 

Artistry explained that the reason for closures stems from the need to better direct their resources and the proximity to other Hickory Tavern restaurants played a role in the decision which locations to close. 

“While never an easy decision, it is important that we regularly evaluate where we can operate more efficiently so our resources and future investments are directed toward the priorities that will best serve our teams and guests,” Artistry Restaurants CEO Bryan Lockwood said in a statement. 

“These changes, along with other efficiencies, will support Hickory Tavern’s long-term plan and strength as a brand,” Lockwood added. 

Hickory Tavern got a new owner 19 months ago 

Originally launched by Brad Smith and Tom Hager, Hickory Tavern grew from a single local gathering spot into a regional footprint that peaked at roughly 25 locations prior to 2020, according to Business North Carolina. Over the years, the chain positioned itself as more than a standard sports bar due to its menu offering and customer service. 

In January 2025, Artistry acquired Hickory Tavern and started investing in the brand by employing various changes, from menu upgrades to restaurant redesigns. Moreover, the company introduced a new brand book of standards and practices and also teamed up with various companies, such as food distributor Sysco to streamline consistency across its footprint. 

Those initiatives aimed to strengthen the brand and enhance the guest experience.

“Even though we’re slated as a sports bar, I think we’re bigger than that and the community feels that. That’s why we’ve always pitched ourselves as this neighborhood gathering spot,” Tony Read, the brand president with decades of experience in the industry (Outback Steakhouse) previously told FSR Magazine. 

Read’s main focus is on enhancing the guest experience by improving the employee experience, stressing how the two are closely connected. 

“I’m a firm believer that the guest experience will never exceed the team member’s experience,” Read continued. “You ever go to a drive-thru, and you get to the window — how long does it take you to recognize if that person wants to be there or not? Immediately. And what I tell my team is how foolish of us to think that our customers don’t have that same ability.”

The company said that they are looking into transferring as many employees as possible to other Hickory Tavern locations. 

Sports bar, full-service restaurants battle several challenges 

The restaurant industry in general has been facing many challenges over the last couple of years. For many, the fatal blow was the pandemic, others that survived remained severely challenged and a small number managed to fully recover and thrive. 

In fact, nearly half (42%) of restaurant owners admitted their business was not profitable in 2025, and more than nine in 10 operators cited food, labor, insurance, energy and swipe fees as the greatest obstacles, according to the National Restaurant Association. 

There’s however a significant divide between types of restaurants, and cuisines they are serving. For example, I previously wrote about a set of unique challenges Italian restaurants are facing. 

Here’s some of my previous coverage of store closures:

Fast-food chain quietly exits an entire state after 50 years

114-year-old bakery chain closes 19 locations

125-year-old mall retail anchor closes discount outlet, cuts 101 jobs

Now, there’s also an important distinction between full-service and fast-casual and quick service restaurants. 

Median labor costs for full-service restaurants run at 36.5% of sales (with overall prime costs hovering around the upper safe limit of 65%). By contrast, fast-casual and quick-service operations maintain significantly leaner labor models at 25%–33% of revenue, according to financial benchmark data published by WhippleWood CPAs. 

Estimates vary by source: Bloom Intelligence puts full-service net margins at 3–5%, while WhippleWood CPAs estimates a broader 3–8% range for 2026.

Current 2026 industry ranges for profit margins vary by restaurant type:

Full-service restaurants: 3%–8%

Fast casual restaurants: 4%–10%

Quick-service restaurants: 5%–12%

Industry standards for restaurant sales per square foot:

Full-service restaurants: $150 per square foot minimum; $250–$325 per square foot is the moderate-profit range

Limited-service and fast-casual restaurants: $200 per square foot minimum; top fast-casual franchises average around $505Source: WhippleWood CPAs

Hickory Tavern permanently shuts four restaurants under new ownership. EzumeImages / Getty Images

Recent sports bar & casual dining closures, bankruptcies covered by TheStreet

Bar Louie: The neighborhood sports bar and cocktail chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in early 2020 and again in 2025. After shuttering underperforming locations to restructure debt, its store count dropped to around 40–48 locations, down from a peak of over 130.  

Hooters: The legacy wing and sports bar chain closed dozens of underperforming corporate-owned locations, citing rising labor costs, pressure from fast-casual alternatives, and shifting consumer habits. The closures were driven by restructuring efforts following a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, which completely eliminated its footprint in several states.

TGI Fridays: While a general casual-dining chain rather than a dedicated sports bar, TGI Fridays relied heavily on bar and sports-watching traffic. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy after closing hundreds of stores, leaving under 40 corporate units and a smaller network of franchised locations.

Champps Entertainment: The pioneer large-format sports bar chain—which once operated over 60 massive multi-screen venues across the country—gradually collapsed, closing over 50 locations due to high occupancy costs, debt burden, and declining foot traffic.

Dueling Axes: Niche entertainment sports bar chains faced similar headwinds. Dueling Axes, an axe-throwing sports bar concept, abruptly closed all 5 of its locations due to operating pressures and unexpected circumstances.

Related: Why Target shoppers may miss the best prices

You don’t have to leave the country to find an affordable place that matches your retirement vision.