Commentary Culture Investigations

The Podesta Cronyism Inflation Climate Act

President Trump’s address to the nation on election interference and other matters did not air on the principal broadcast networks, who deliberately sought to prevent their viewers from hearing whatever Trump had to say. However, they all offered rebuttals.The speech was censored per the request of socialist Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Per People Magazine:On Tuesday, Ocasio-Cortez was asked by Pablo Manríquez, a reporter for Migrant Insider and the liberal outlet MeidasTouch, whether U.S. news networks should air the President’s address. “I don’t think we should be contributing to any platforming of lies about our elections,” the New York Democrat and possible 2028 Presidential contender said. “Many of these outlets often receive transcripts, and I think we have an ethical obligation not to air things that undermine our election and are not rooted in evidence and fact.”“Of course, it depends on the contents of this speech, but that’s my take on it,” the 36-year-old congresswoman added.And the networks largely complied.  ABC and NBC refused to air the speech, breaking in live to offer post-address rebuttals. CBS broke in but were late getting to the speech, going to The White House at about 4 minutes in, carried another 17 minutes and then broke back to the studio for analysis and rebuttals. Two moments from CBS’s coverage: First, as our colleague Nick Fondacaro points out, Major Garrett and Tony Dokoupil insist on claiming there is no evidence to support President Trump’s claims despite not having seen a single one of the declassified documents. Then Garett suggests Trump is going to steal the midterms (click “expand” to view all transcripts). Despite the documents being declassified only tonight and the fact neither of them have read the documents in the minutes since the address started, Garrett and DoKoupil claim there’s no evidence of Trump’s claims. They then suggest Trump is going to steal the midterms. pic.twitter.com/ILFPxhxSxd— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 17, 2026 TONY DOKOUPIL: He did not completely walk the line of the promise from The White House to not relitigate 2020.MAJOR GARRETT: He came close to it. He didn’t use some of the rhetoric he has used in the past, but he inferred that there was still something problematic about the election when there was not.DOKOUPIL: And the claim that there are noncitizens and dead people active on voter rolls.GARRETT: Actively voting- that is not substantiated. But he said there are catastrophic vulnerabilities and Tony, you have to ask yourself what is that rhetoric about? Is that rhetoric about setting the stage for federal intervention in the midterms? I mean, we’ve had primary elections all this year. We’ve had more in August. Those primary elections have been under a system that the President said that is catastrophically vulnerable. Yet he and all the other Republicans and Democrats have accepted the elections, I mean, the results of those primaries because they’re being carried out according to state law and with resilient and checkable and auditable results.Amazing stuff here. Is the refusal to acknowledge the possibility of a scintilla of election-related impropriety not its own form of election denialism?Next, Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan comes on and refutes President Trump’s claims against China with…literal Chinese propaganda. Margaret Brennen uses a Chinese propaganda statement to “fact-check” Trump.Listen to the bravado she gives the Chinese while she reads: “China has never and will never interfere in a the presidential elections of a the United States.”She then balks at Trump with “And so, what… pic.twitter.com/tKOx9QIGND— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) July 17, 2026 MARGARET BRENNAN: It’s impossible for us to fact-check each thing that was said but on the specific thing in regard to China that you raised, the President was informed when he was President in his first term, in a classified memo on January 7th. Both the assessments regarding interference, and that was also public prior to that date. So he was aware. And we reported on this network at the time in regard to the assessments as to which foreign countries favored which election candidates. He seems to be alleging that China actively tried to undermine him and even referenced wanting to get him to resign at one point. Ahead of this I did reach out to Chinese officials who were already prepared with a prerebuttal here. I’ll read it to you.The quote is: “China has long adhered to the principle of noninterference in others’ internal affairs. The U.S. election is an internal matter, its outcome determined by the American people. China never and will never interfere in the Presidential elections of the United States.”Now, what was assessed by the intelligence community and made public as recently as- I’m looking at April 2020, I want to read for you what was in the National Intelligence Council. It’s “Chinese intelligence officials analyzed multiple states’ election voter registration data, to conduct public opinion and analysis on the 2020 U.S. general election.” So public opinion analysis is what the U.S. intelligence community said the Chinese were doing. The President is alleging something far more aggressive there in actively undermining his presidency and I think, Tony, the question for tomorrow will continue to be, “and so what are you going to do about it?”Like the Chinese Embassy is going to admit to any sort of wrongdoing. Brennan didn’t address the specific claims made by President Trump against China such as the voter data breach, alleged printing of ballots, or corporate influence operation. Instead, she just regurgitates the statement from the Embassy. NBC refused to air the speech, breaking in after the fact and offering minimal coverage. This segment offers the fullest compendium thereof: WATCH: NBC obeys AOC by not airing President Trump’s speech but attempted to rebut it by complaining that Trump didn’t present any documents during the speech, and that there was no evidence of China interfering with our voting system and ballots. What is a 220 million voter data… pic.twitter.com/rI3QmsQaWb— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 17, 2026 HALLIE JACKSON: Let me bring in now our Chief White House Correspondent Garrett Haake, who is joining us from the North Lawn. And Garrett, President Trump previously for years had pushed conspiracy theories about election fraud. So bring us up to speed tonight. What did he say, if anything, that was new?GARRETT HAAKE: Hallie, broadly speaking, much of this would sound familiar to people who follow the President. He described the U.S. election system as falling, in his words, “catastrophically short of the standards we should have for election security” and described the declassification and review of American election records that broadly fell into several categories, including that obtaining of voter information by China. Another category as relates to activities that were taking place in Venezuela. A third category on cover-ups, and a fourth on domestic, let’s call them voter irregularities, including a focus specifically on one GOTV group in Michigan.He concluded with a line — I don’t know if it was scripted or ad lib — saying that stolen elections can not happen again. But never did he use the data he was presenting to make a case that any specific election was stolen. Merely that there were these categories of vulnerabilities. He concluded with a push to pass the SAVE America Act, a piece of legislation that would overhaul parts of the voting system in this country, namely requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship to both register and to vote, casting that as a prescription. But again, the prescription didn’t exactly match up with the complaints that the President outlined throughout the course of this. As you said, Hallie, hundreds of pages of documents here released by The White House with information we still have to review to find what exactly is new and what’s supported by other information publicly available.JACKSON: And our team’s looking through it, Garrett, thanks, including our National Security and Global Affairs Correspondent Dan De Luce. And Dan, one of the questions people will ask: was there anything revealed by the President, is there anything in these documents that would have changed any actual vote count?DAN DE LUCE: I didn’t hear that in that speech. He talked about China not wanting him to get elected. He talked about them getting ahold of this voter data. But I didn’t hear him, and I haven’t seen in these documents so far some kind of indication that China or another foreign actor penetrated our voting system, got into a state’s election counting system, tampered with ballots. He didn’t talk about that. I don’t see it yet in the documents. He’s not even really alleging that. So, I think the case is still out there. As far as we know, and there’s such overwhelming evidence, Joe Biden won that election. And he’s also not making clear what should be done now, exactly. Because he’s talked about the federal government should take over the process. But he kind of left that open in that speech.In sum, a fancy version of “without evidence” and complaints of Trump not presenting evidence during the speech that had just been declassified. There was also the allegation that there was no evidence of China interfering on our voting system and ballots. But what is a 220 million voter data breach, ballot printing operation and corporate influence operation if not interference with our election?Finally, there’s ABC: they came in after the speech and unloaded. Here’s how Mary Bruce opened the special coverage: WATCH: ABC didn’t air President Trump’s address. Instead, Mary Bruce opens post-address coverage with a prebuttal, presuming viewer idiocy by telling them, “It’s complicated.” pic.twitter.com/Ume3U7kLzB— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 17, 2026 MARY BRUCE: Good evening, I’m Mary Bruce. We are coming back on the air because President Trump has just completed his address to the nation, touting his record and what he believes are his accomplishments in office so far. For 22 minutes just now the President, in a rare prime-time address from The East Room, starting his remarks with the issues so many in our part- in his own party were hoping for him to tout. His efforts to bring down healthcare costs. Immigration and the border. And the economy. Also touching briefly on the ongoing war with Iran. And then the President, for the bulk of these remarks, focusing squarely on the nation’s elections. Saying that without trust in the nation’s elections there can be no greatness. And announcing the declassification and release of what he called critical intelligence that reveals vulnerabilities in our infrastructure, claiming it shows foreign interference, especially by China, and renewing his previous claims of irregularities in voting machines.The President just made a host of allegations about information that he claims has been withheld from the public and withheld from him when he was President, and he’s calling for the Justice Department and the FBI and CIA to investigate how this information, in his words, was hidden. The President, of course, was President at the time, but still he is attacking the intelligence agencies that reported to him in 2020. The President is now making these new claims based on existing intelligence that he’s now declassifying, after directing his administration to go back and review the raw data. He is now making this information public for all to see on The White House website, whitehouse.gov. We should stress this is complicated. This is information that is just being made public. And our teams, just like the public, are carefully unpacking all of this. We’re going to continue to do so tonight and throughout the coming days. The President saying his purpose in disclosing this information, quote, “is not to weaken confidence in elections, but to earn that confidence by confronting vulnerabilities and correcting them.” The President, we should note, has for years pushed false claims of fraud. This is a deeply personal issue for President Trump, something he’s been talking about a lot since he lost the 2020 election. Claims of widespread voter fraud, though, have been repeatedly disproven by the Courts and by members of his own party in his first administration.If this is so complicated, as Mary Bruce alleges, why not just air the speech so viewers can follow along? If you ever wondered why we refer to the media as “Elitist”, there you have it: a Chief White House Correspondent signaling to viewers that they’re too stupid to understand Trump’s various claims. Also, just for fun: contrast how Bruce refers to Trump’s accomplishments (“what he believes are his accomplishments”) versus her drooling recount of Joe Biden’s farewell to the nation.The elitism theme continues. Here’s Rachel Scott also saying that Trump’s statements are “complex:” WATCH: Rachel Scott’s post-speech prebuttal is indistinguishable from what you’d hear from a Democrat elected official. Also, “it’s complex.” pic.twitter.com/VFAwhj4fyG— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 17, 2026 MARY BRUCE: I want to go now to Rachel Scott at The White House. And Rachel, so much has been discussed today about why the President is giving this speech now.RACHEL SCOTT: Yes, Mary, you look- sources tell me that this is an issue that the President, quite frankly, has been fixated on, that the President wanted to come before the American people tonight and deliver this address. There’s a lot of discussion over on Capitol Hill about whether or not this should have been the focus of what the President should be talking about. We are so close to the midterm elections. They’re just about 110 days away. And for a lot of Republicans, they wanted to hear what the President outlined in probably the first 60 seconds of this speech, talking about the economy, talking about immigration issues they believe are going to be front and center for voters in this midterm election.And there was a question heading into tonight, because The White House was very tight-lipped on what exactly the President was going to say- about how much President Trump would be focused on the 2020 election. We know he has made a series and slew of false claims about that election that he lost, but the President did spend quite a significant time talking about the 2020 election. Again, what the President presented tonight, it’s complex. Our team is digging through these documents that The White House says they’re now declassifying and making available to the American people. We’re reading through it to fact check and understand more of what the President is presenting. But I can tell you, here is what we do know. We know that President Trump and his allies, they challenged the 2020 election repeatedly. They lost about 60 cases in court. We know that the President tonight was talking about how he was deceived. He talked about how the American people were deceived in the 2020 election. Of course, President Trump was President at the time, and his own intelligence officials were presenting assessments to him that showed there was no widespread evidence that would have changed the outcome of the election, something that his own Attorney General said at the time, too, Mary.BRUCE: And that is such an important point and as you know, we are all combing through this.Rachel Scott’s post-speech prebuttal is indistinguishable from what you’d hear from a Democrat elected official. And it’s worth noting Scott addresses none of the substance of Trump’s remarks. Instead she concern trolls Republicans about the subject of the speech before saying the allegations are “complex.” Again, why not air the speech?Then there’s Pierre Thomas, tackling the noncitizen voters and allegations of “Deep State” meddling. Credit to Thomas, though, for acknowledging the Chinese voter data theft: WATCH: ABC’s Pierre Thomas plays the “no evidence” card and moves the goalposts as to the extent of the Chinese intrusion, denying votes were changed but doesn’t address the substance of Trump’s allegations. At least he didn’t insult viewers by saying “it’s complex.” pic.twitter.com/7lu9RyeSXM— Jorge Bonilla (@BonillaJL) July 17, 2026 MARY BRUCE: And Pierre, in Washington, you know, the President spent so much of these remarks tonight making these claims, especially about China. And I know that that is something that we have looked at before in the past, accusations that China was involved or somehow trying to meddle in the 2020 election. And I do want to read what the President said about calling for new investigations, because he said that he is asking the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Justice Department, the FBI and the CIA to investigate how and why such crucial information was hidden and to fire those involved. And you, I understand, are learning that the DHS is going to be discussing this more tomorrow.PIERRE THOMAS: Indeed. Mary, here are some of the dominant points. As you point out, he is claiming that China was able to get access to voter registration information about millions of Americans, hundreds of millions of millions of Americans. What we don’t yet know is whether they were able to do anything with that information. There is no evidence that they were, again, able to change the outcome of votes. The other very specific thing that he pointed out that I did take note of is that he said that DHS had found that 278,000 noncitizens are registered to vote, and that DHS will be doing a briefing on that fact tomorrow. Again, that’s a very specific thing that can be checked out. We will look at and the secretaries of state who conduct these elections, I’m sure, will have something to say about whether this information is accurate or not. So again, a lot to unpack.And the final point I would make, Mary, is this: part of his claim is that his administration, the top intelligence and top law enforcement officials misled and kept information from him, calling them the Deep State. That is a very damning accusation. It will be interesting to see what some of those people who were in position have to say about that.BRUCE: Yeah, Pierre, as we were saying, the President now really shining a spotlight in many ways on his own first administration and asking a lot of questions about who knew what and when. A lot of questions to be asked and unpacked in the coming days.On the one hand, it’s nice to see Pierre Thomas deviate from the subject matter being “complex.” On the other, Thomas plays the “no evidence” card and moves the goalposts as to the extent of the Chinese intrusion. Thomas denies votes were changed but doesn’t address the substance of Trump’s allegations. Thomas closes out by questioning the number of noncitizens registered to vote, and Trump’s statements on the Deep State. Much of this coverage could have been avoided had the Elitist media simply aired the totality of President Trump’s remarks live, so that Americans could come to their own conclusions. But that’s a bridge too far. Instead, they largely chose to self-censor at the behest of a socialist Member of Congress. Americans’ trust in media numbers aren’t going up anytime soon, if this pathetic performance is any indication.

by Megan O’Matz and Jennifer Smith Richards

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

In just over eight months, the second Trump administration has made a rapid succession of political hires and policy decisions at the U.S. Department of Education that could spur profound changes in the way schools are operated and children learn.

After years of advocating to expand private and religious education and homeschooling, using tax dollars, a cadre of conservative activists is in a position to push forward its agenda. Some of its policies are already undermining public schools, which it has denigrated as unsuccessful and out of step with Christian values, a ProPublica investigation found.

In many communities, public schools are valued hubs for community life and services, including meals, socializing and counseling. More than 80% of students are enrolled in traditional public schools, which must serve all children, including those with disabilities. The administration, however, views public schools as a monopoly that should be broken up.

“Millions of young Americans are trapped in failing schools, subjected to radical anti-American ideology,” Education Department Secretary Linda McMahon claimed immediately after taking office. She and others in the administration believe that progressive activists have led schools to focus too much on “woke” policies rather than on rigorous academic standards.

Agency officials and spokespeople declined to speak to ProPublica.

Here are five ways the Education Department under McMahon is creating profound change in public schools.

1. Encouraging an exodus

McMahon and President Donald Trump want to expand tax-funded school choice options, giving more families the financial means to leave public schools. Trump pushed Congress to pass, and signed into law, a new federal tax credit to finance the first national school voucher program, set to open to families on Jan. 1, 2027. The Education Department has also encouraged school districts to spend some federal money meant for disadvantaged students on services from private providers and on children from low-income families who live within district boundaries but attend private schools.

Public school leaders say they’ve already watched students transfer out to private and charter schools in recent years — and with them, they’ve lost essential per-pupil funding. They worry that voucher expansion will cause further damage to their budgets and threaten their survival.

Occasionally, McMahon has spoken positively of public schools — for example, praising some for literacy gains. But more often, and more emphatically, she portrays them as unsuccessful, as do her advisers.

Education Department adviser Lindsey Burke came from The Heritage Foundation, where she co-authored the education chapter of Project 2025, the policy playbook for the Trump administration. It calls for tax-funded education accounts so parents can customize their children’s schooling. Years ago, Burke said she hoped that one day “we will marvel at the fact that we once assigned children to government-run schools consigning the poorest to schools that were often failing and sometimes unsafe.”

2. Cutting federal funding

In a move that affects public school students across the country, the department has slashed hundreds of millions of dollars in grant funding for a variety of programs, including for mental health professionals and for training and supporting new teachers. More cuts are likely.

The administration’s proposed education budget for fiscal 2026 calls for combining 18 existing grant programs — including funds for rural schools and homeless students — into a single $2 billion block grant to be allocated to states. That is about $4.5 billion less than if the grants survived alone. Overall, the Trump administration has proposed reducing federal spending on education by 15% in the 2026 budget. Congress has not passed a budget yet, and the government is shut down.

3. Injecting God into the classroom

Department officials have decried what they view as liberal indoctrination in public schools — what one top leader describes as a “Marxist and anti-God and anti-family agenda.” They now are pursuing policies that align with conservative Christian values, including opposing protections for transgender students and restricting materials about sexuality. Early this year, the department notified schools it would follow Trump’s executive order stipulating that there are “two sexes, male and female.”

McMahon has made Meg Kilgannon, who advocates for more Christian leadership in school districts, a top adviser. Kilgannon has decried the removal of spirituality as a topic from classrooms, arguing that “if we’re not going to discuss our identity as Christians,” schools will push “racial identities” and “sexual identities” on students instead.

In a speech on Sept. 8 at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, D.C., Trump announced that the Education Department “will soon issue new guidance protecting the right to prayer in our public schools.” He said that the Bible is “an important part of the American story” and that he intends to “protect the Judeo-Christian principles of our founding, and we will protect them with vigor.”

4. Promoting curriculum choices

The federal government historically has not dictated curriculum choices, and McMahon has stressed that she thinks what is taught in schools is best left to local communities. Yet the Education Department is prioritizing patriotic education, promoting civics lessons that present American history and the nation’s founding principles in an “inspiring” manner. History should portray an “ennobling characterization” of the country’s past, the department said. Critics contend that the administration’s aim is to present a sanitized version of history, downplaying bitter episodes, including racial oppression and sexism.

The department has directed states and districts to avoid material that could make white students feel “intrinsic guilt” based on the oppressive acts of past generations. McMahon also supported the rights of parents to pull their children out of classes they find objectionable, such as those involving books with gay characters or themes.

5. Weakening civil rights protections

The department is using its Office for Civil Rights to press public schools to drop programs and policies designed to help Black or Hispanic students. The office has launched investigations against school districts for teaching lessons on systemic racism, hosting empowerment gatherings for students of color and providing remedial help for Black youth, all of which the administration says discriminates against white students.

In addition, the department has repeatedly targeted school districts for allowing students who were born male but identify as female to play on girls sports teams and use bathrooms and locker rooms reserved for girls. In some instances, the department has issued or threatened sanctions, including the potential loss of federal funding and referral to the U.S. Department of Justice for further action.

Help ProPublica Report on Education

by Melissa Sanchez and Mariam Elba

Leer en español.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for Dispatches, a newsletter that spotlights wrongdoing around the country, to receive our stories in your inbox every week.

She desperately wanted to get out of the country.

It was mid-May and Pérez, a Venezuelan mother of two, couldn’t survive on her own in Chicago anymore. She’d been relying on charity for food and shelter ever since her partner had been detained by immigration authorities after a traffic stop earlier in the year.

Pérez, 25, thought it’d be safer to return to Venezuela with her children than to stay in the U.S. Her request for asylum was still open and she had a permit to work legally, but so did a lot of other Venezuelans getting picked up on the streets and taken into custody. Authorities were detaining immigrants regardless of whether they’d followed the rules.

She had also seen how President Donald Trump singled out her countrymen, calling them gang members and terrorists, even sending hundreds to a foreign prison. She was terrified of getting detained, deported and, worst of all, separated from her young daughter and son. They were the reason the family had come to the U.S.

Then she heard about Trump’s offer of a safe and dignified way out.

“We are making it as easy as possible for illegal aliens to leave America,” the president said in a video on social media in May announcing the launch of Project Homecoming.

He spoke about a phone app where “illegals can book a free flight to any foreign country.” And he dangled other incentives: Eligible immigrants wouldn’t be barred from returning legally to the U.S. someday, and they’d even get a $1,000 “exit bonus.” Believing the president’s words, Pérez downloaded the CBP Home app and registered to return to Venezuela with her children.

Months passed. Her partner was deported. In July, Pérez said, she got a call from someone in the CBP Home program telling her she’d be on a flight out of the country in mid-August. She began packing.

But as the departure date neared and the plane tickets hadn’t arrived, Pérez got nervous. Again and again, she called the toll-free number she’d been given. Finally, somebody called back to say there might be a delay obtaining the documents she’d need to travel to Venezuela.

Then there was silence. No further information, no plane tickets. Pérez registered on the app again in August, then a third time in September, as immigration arrests ramped up in Chicago.

Today, Pérez feels trapped in a country that doesn’t want her. She’s afraid of leaving her apartment, afraid that she will be detained and that her children will be taken away from her. “I feel so scared, always looking around in every direction,” she said. “I was trying to leave voluntarily, like the president said.”

The Trump administration’s immigration crackdown is having the intended effect of terrifying people into trying to leave. There have been some 25,000 departures of immigrants from all countries via CBP Home, according to U.S. Department of Homeland Security data obtained by ProPublica.

The data indicates that of those 25,000 people, a little more than half of them returned home with DHS assistance; nearly all the others who left the U.S. ended up returning on their own.

And it’s not just CBP Home. Applications for voluntary departures — an alternative to deportation granted to some immigrants who leave at their own expense — have skyrocketed to levels not seen since at least 2000, reaching more than 34,000 since Trump’s second administration began, immigration court data shows. (The number is higher than in years past, but nowhere near the number of immigrants the administration has deported this year.)

But for many recent arrivals from Venezuela — arguably the community most targeted by the Trump administration, and whose country is now bracing for the possibility of a U.S. invasion — leaving has not been as simple as the president has made it sound.

ProPublica spoke with more than a dozen Venezuelans who said they wanted to take the U.S. government’s offer of a safe and easy return. They signed up months ago on the CBP Home app and were given departure dates. But after those dates came and went, these immigrants said they feel betrayed by what the president told them.

Part of the problem is tied to the lack of diplomatic relations between Washington and Caracas. There are no consular services for Venezuelans in the U.S. Many of the hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans who migrated to the U.S. in recent years seeking asylum or other humanitarian relief entered without valid passports, as Pérez did. But to get on a plane for Venezuela, they’re being told they’ll need a special travel document known as a “salvoconducto,” or “safe passage,” from their government.

And relations between the two countries are getting worse. The Trump administration has pushed for regime change in Venezuela, sent warships to the Caribbean and, in recent weeks, blew up four Venezuelan boats it claimed were transporting drugs to the U.S. Bracing for an invasion, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has said he’s ready to declare a state of emergency to protect his country, which could make it harder for Venezuelans abroad to return home.

The Venezuelans who want to leave the U.S. described how CBP Home representatives told them that their lack of passports wouldn’t be a problem and that the U.S. government would help them obtain the travel documents they needed. Now they are being told that they’re on their own — if they get any response at all.

The Trump administration was aware of the potential challenges from the start. In his May proclamation, the president directed the State and Homeland Security departments to “take all appropriate actions to enable the rapid departure of illegal aliens from the United States who currently lack a valid travel document from their countries of citizenship or nationality.”

In a statement, a DHS spokesperson said the agency is working with the State Department “to acquire travel documents for those who lack safe passage. So far thousands of Venezuelans have already self-departed using CBP Home.” The State Department referred questions to DHS.

The internal DHS records obtained by ProPublica show nearly 3,700 departures of Venezuelans via CBP Home through late September. It’s unclear how many Venezuelans have applied. The DHS spokesperson said the agency could not confirm the numbers and would not say whether the program is meeting projections. (A congressional committee has directed DHS to include information about CBP Home departures in monthly reports the agency previously published, but has not published in this administration.)

An estimated 10,200 Venezuelans were deported between February and early October, according to deportation flight data tracked by the nonprofit Human Rights First’s ICE Flight Monitor.

Many of the Venezuelans interviewed by ProPublica are mothers of young children who say they decided to take the president’s offer after their work permits expired, their temporary protected status was canceled or their spouses were deported. Few are willing to return by land because of the dangers posed by cartel violence and kidnappings in Mexico — dangers many of them experienced when they migrated here.

Nearly all of them, like Pérez, asked not to be identified by their full names because they’re afraid of bringing unwanted attention to themselves and of the potential consequences of such attention. Interviews with Venezuelan immigrants were conducted in Spanish.

Before their departure dates came and went, they had made preparations to leave — turning over the keys to their apartments, pulling their children from school, shipping their belongings to Venezuela. And they have sunk deeper into poverty as the weeks and months pass.

Pérez applied for her family to return to Venezuela through the CBP Home app months ago but has been stuck in limbo in Chicago without a clear path forward.

(Jamie Kelter Davis for ProPublica)

In Los Angeles, a family of four slept in their tiny Toyota Echo for weeks to save on rent as they waited for their departure date. They sold the car and other belongings to pay for bus tickets back the way they’d come. Nearly two months after their return to Venezuela, they said they’re still waiting for the exit bonuses they’d hoped would help them start over.

In Youngstown, Pennsylvania, a mother of two said she didn’t enroll her 8-year-old son in school this fall because she assumed they would be gone by now. She recently moved into a friend’s apartment in New York City and plans to turn herself in to immigration authorities and ask to be deported.

“I don’t want to be here anymore,” the woman said, between sobs. “What am I supposed to do?”

Several immigration attorneys and advocates told ProPublica that they don’t trust the CBP Home app or the Trump administration’s promises to help immigrants self-deport. The National Immigration Law Center recently published a guide explaining some of the potential risks of using the app, such as leaving the country without closing an immigration court case and becoming ineligible for a future visa. Some lawyers said they discourage clients from using the app at all.

Ruben Garcia, director of Annunciation House, a nonprofit in El Paso that supports migrants and refugees, said in the current climate, he understands why some people might consider the administration’s offer to leave. But, he said, the offer has to be backed by action.

“If you’re going to say you’re going to do this,” Garcia added, “then you damn well better make sure that it’s truthful and that it works.”

Emily, a Venezuelan immigrant in Columbus, Ohio, holds her phone showing an email from the CBP Home program.

(Maddie McGarvey for ProPublica)

CBP Home replaced an earlier app that the Biden administration had promoted to try to bring order to the soaring numbers of migrants attempting to enter the country. Pérez and other asylum-seekers used that earlier version, CBP One, to make appointments to approach the border. Trump, who campaigned on the promise of mass deportations, ended that option on his first day back in the White House.

In March, he reintroduced the app with the new name and function, allowing immigrants to alert the government of their intention to self-deport. It was part of a $200 million advertising blitz meant to encourage immigrants to “Stay Out and Leave Now.” Two months later, Trump unveiled Project Homecoming and the added incentives of free flights and exit payments. The administration moved State Department funds meant to aid refugees resettling in the U.S. to DHS to help pay for the flights and stipends, according to federal records and news reports.

DHS officials have mentioned the app in dozens of press releases about policy changes and enforcement operations. For example, in the September announcement that DHS was ending temporary protected status for Venezuelans, officials also encouraged Venezuelans to leave via CBP Home. And immigrants who show up for their hearings at immigration court see posters taped on the walls about the benefits they could get if they “self-deport using CBP Home instead of being deported by ICE.”

Emily and Deybis downloaded the app in June, when it seemed as if their life in the U.S. was collapsing. They said they used the earlier CBP One app to approach the border with their two children in January 2024 and were allowed into the country with protections that were supposed to last two years. They settled in Dallas, applied for asylum and got work permits; Deybis found a job in a hotel laundry and Emily at a Chick-fil-A. Then, this spring, the Trump administration ended protections for immigrants like them and canceled their work permits.

They lost their jobs and could no longer afford their rent. On the app’s sky-blue home screen, they saw a drawing of a smiling man and woman holding hands with a child. “Let us help you easily leave the country,” another screen told them in Spanish. They agreed to share their phone’s geolocation, entered personal information and uploaded selfies.

They received an automated email from “Project Homecoming Support” explaining that they would be contacted soon by someone from a toll-free number who would help coordinate their travel. Within weeks, they got a call from an operator at that number who said she worked on behalf of DHS.

Emily said she made clear the family didn’t have Venezuelan passports but was told that wouldn’t be a problem; the U.S. government would procure any necessary documents for them. They said the operator gave them an Aug. 1 departure date and told them to expect their plane tickets by email.

Emily and Deybis sold their car and moved with their children to Columbus, Ohio, where Deybis’ nephew let them stay in his unfinished basement apartment until their departure. The plane tickets never came.

Then the nephew was detained in a traffic stop and deported. Panicked, Emily and Deybis said they called the toll-free number again and again, leaving messages that went unanswered. Emily submitted a new application and sent more emails.

In mid-September, they got an email from the “CBP Home team” telling them to contact the Venezuelan embassy in Mexico to get travel documents on their own.

“We are working very hard on your case,” the email assured.

When they called the embassy, though, the number was busy. They found travel agencies that offer to procure travel documents at a cost but said they were told the Venezuelan government requires an arrival date and proof that plane tickets have been purchased. Emily and Deybis can’t afford them.

“Thank you so much for your patience and we understand your frustration,” they heard back in another email. “Wait for new instructions from DHS.”

As they wait, they worry about how they’ll survive when winter comes. Most days, Deybis visits local food pantries and looks for discarded items in alleys and on street corners that they can resell. A few weeks ago, they sold their daughter’s bed to help pay the rent.

“We’d rather be in Venezuela with our family than suffer here,” he said.

Emily and Deybis share a basement apartment in Columbus, Ohio with their two children. They’re unable to work and have resorted to selling the few possessions they have to feed the family.

(Maddie McGarvey for ProPublica)

Pérez said her daughter was the family’s main motivation to come; the girl had been born with a heart defect and needed surgery they could not find in Venezuela, where hospitals operate through power outages and have limited capacity for advanced surgeries, not to mention supplies.

“We didn’t come for the American dream, or for a house, or for some life of luxury,” said Pérez. “What we wanted is for our daughter to live.”

She and her partner made the trek to the U.S. in 2023, with her daughter, then 6, and their 4-year-old son. Pérez thought they did it “the right away” by waiting in Mexico for weeks until they got an appointment to approach the border via CBP One. After they were processed, the family headed to Chicago, a city they had heard was a sanctuary for immigrants. At first they took shelter inside a police station, as hundreds of new immigrant families were doing at the time. Pérez said medical workers who visited the station learned about her daughter’s condition and connected the family to a hospital charity care program. The following spring, the frail little girl with dark brown eyes got the operation she needed.

In late 2024, the family moved to South Florida, where Pérez’s partner found work rebuilding homes damaged by hurricanes. Then in February, he was arrested for driving without a license or registration. He spent about two months in jail before he was transferred into immigration custody.

Pérez didn’t feel safe in Florida anymore. She returned to Chicago with her children.

But as the months pass without an answer from the CBP Home program, Chicago doesn’t feel safe, either. This fall, the Trump administration zeroed in on the city for immigration enforcement, sending in the U.S. Border Patrol. Pérez recently downloaded another app that tells her whether there’ve been sightings of federal immigration agents nearby, and she watches videos of other immigrants getting arrested. One day in September, a federal agent shot and killed an immigrant in a nearby suburb. Pérez wonders if she might die, too.

On a sunny September afternoon, Pérez peered down the street outside her children’s school, scanning for suspicious vehicles. Her daughter, who is now 8, bounded down the steps first, wearing a pink bow and a broad smile. Her son, now 6, in a Spiderman shirt and a blue cast from a playground accident, appeared next.

They share their mother’s anxiety. On their walk home, Pérez’s daughter leaned over her brother and chided him for speaking Spanish in public. The girl said her teacher had warned her that federal agents might be listening.

It reminded Perez that she now needs to leave the U.S. for the same reason she came: her children. She plans to register yet again on the CBP Home app.

Pérez plays with her two children in Chicago. Her partner was deported earlier this summer, leaving her unable to support the family alone.

(Jamie Kelter Davis for ProPublica)

Jeff Ernsthausen contributed data analysis.

by Anjeanette Damon, ProPublica, and Dayvid Figler, City Cast Las Vegas

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for Dispatches, a newsletter that spotlights wrongdoing around the country, to receive our stories in your inbox every week.

Nevada state regulators have accused Elon Musk’s Boring Co. of violating environmental regulations nearly 800 times in the last two years as it digs a sprawling tunnel network beneath Las Vegas for its Tesla-powered “people mover.” The company’s alleged violations include starting to dig without approval, releasing untreated water onto city streets and spilling muck from its trucks, according to a new document obtained by City Cast Las Vegas and ProPublica.

The Sept. 22 cease-and-desist letter from the state Bureau of Water Pollution Control alleged repeated violations of a settlement agreement that the company had entered into after being fined five years ago for discharging groundwater into storm drains without a permit. That agreement, signed by a Boring executive in 2022, was intended to compel the company to comply with state water pollution laws.

Instead, state inspectors documented nearly 100 alleged new violations of the agreement. The letter also accuses the company of failing to hire an independent environmental manager to regularly inspect its construction sites. State regulators counted 689 missed inspections.

The Boring Co. is disputing the violation letter, a state spokesperson said.

The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection could have fined the company more than $3 million under the 2022 agreement, which allowed for daily penalties to be assessed. But regulators knocked down the total penalty to $242,800. For example, the bulk of the total possible fine was linked to the alleged missed inspections, but the agency chose to levy just a $10,000 penalty for each of the company’s 11 permits.

“Given the extraordinary number of violations, NDEP has decided to exercise its discretion to reduce the penalty to two $5,000 violations per permit, which it believes offers a reasonable penalty that will still serve to deter future non-compliance conduct,” regulators wrote in the letter.

Payment of the penalty isn’t required until after the dispute resolution process is complete, a state spokesperson said. In the letter, the agency reminded the company that it “reserves the right to direct TBC to cease and desist construction activities” under the agreement.

In the past, Musk has espoused paying penalties rather than waiting for approvals as a way of doing business.

​​“Environmental regulations are, in my view, largely terrible,” he said at an event with the libertarian Cato Institute last year. “You have to get permission in advance, as opposed to, say, paying a penalty if you do something wrong, which I think would be much more effective.”

Neither Musk nor Boring responded to requests for comment for this story.

The Sept. 22 letter documents the latest in a string of alleged violations of state and local regulations by The Boring Co. since it began construction in 2019 of the Loop project, which uses driver-operated Teslas to move people through the tunnels. The project, initially a 0.8-mile underground route connecting the sections of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority campus to each other, has grown to a planned 68 miles of tunnels and 104 stations across the Las Vegas Valley. It’s carried out in partnership with the LVCVA, the tourism board best known for the “What Happens Here, Stays Here” slogan.

Boring uses a machine known as Prufrock to dig the 12-foot-diameter tunnels, applying chemical accelerants as part of the process. For each foot the company bores, it removes about 6 cubic yards of soil along with any groundwater, according to a company document prepared for state environmental officials.

Because it is privately funded and receives no federal money, the project is exempt from many exhaustive governmental vetting and environmental analysis requirements. But it is required to obtain state permits to ensure the waste does not contaminate the environment or local water sources.

A January story by ProPublica and City Cast Las Vegas documented how the company worked to escape county and state oversight requirements by arguing its project didn’t fit under existing regulations and promising to hold itself accountable through independent audits — all while being cited for permitting and water pollution violations in 2019, 2021, 2022 and 2023. Last year, the company successfully lobbied to be exempted from holding a county “amusement and transportation system” permit, arguing instead for an oversight plan that removed multiple layers of inspection.

Workers have complained of chemical burns from the waste material generated by the tunneling process, and firefighters must decontaminate their equipment after conducting rescues from the project sites. The company was fined more than $112,000 by Nevada’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration in late 2023 after workers complained of “ankle-deep” water in the tunnels, muck spills and burns. The Boring Co. has contested the violations. Just last month, a construction worker suffered a “crush injury” after being pinned between two 4,000-foot pipes, according to police records. Firefighters used a crane to extract him from the tunnel opening.

After ProPublica and City Cast Las Vegas published their January story, both the CEO and the chairman of the LVCVA board criticized the reporting, arguing the project is well-regulated. As an example, LVCVA CEO Steve Hill cited the delayed opening of a Loop station by local officials who were concerned that fire safety requirements weren’t adequate. Board chair Jim Gibson, who is also a Clark County commissioner, agreed the project is appropriately regulated.

“We wouldn’t have given approvals if we determined things weren’t the way they ought to be and what it needs to be for public safety reasons,” Gibson said, according to the Las Vegas Review Journal. “Our sense is we’ve done what we need to do to protect the public.”

Asked for a response to the new proposed fines, an LVCVA spokesperson said, “We won’t be participating in this story.”

The repeated allegations that the company is violating regulations — including the bespoke regulatory arrangement agreed to by the company — indicates that officials aren’t keeping the public safe, said Ben Leffel, an assistant public policy professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

“Not if they’re recommitting almost the exact violation,” Leffel said.

Leffel questioned whether a $250,000 penalty would be significant enough to change operations at The Boring Co., which was valued at $7 billion in 2023. Studies show that fines that don’t put a significant dent in a company’s profit don’t deter companies from future violations, Leffel said.

A state spokesperson disagreed that regulators aren’t keeping the public safe and said the agency believes its penalties will deter “future non-compliance.”

“NDEP is actively monitoring and inspecting the projects,” the spokesperson said.

Dua surat pada 2021 dan 2022 menunjukkan Tengku Taufik diarah menyelesaikan isu PETRONAS dan Kingtime, namun Tengku Taufik

While American politicians are pushing the Covid vaccine for American children, other countries are warning against it. In Denmark, the government has actually made it impossible for those under 18 to receive a COVID-19 vaccination without a doctor’s recommendation since children are at such a low risk of symptoms. The Swedish government no longer recommends the vaccine for those under 17 years old. Since September 1, the British government has limited COVID-19 vaccination to children under 12 to just those at high risk.Why the difference?On the most recent episode, Peter Schweizer and Eric Eggers explain there are two key motivations guiding this: profits and liability protections.

As more US states and European countries commit themselves to pushing electric cars, the nagging questions about mining become more pressing. Electric cars need lots of rare-earth minerals. As demand for EVs grows, so does the need to find, mine, and refine these minerals into service. And this leaves a lot of questions, and a lot of room for America’s adversaries to exploit the demand. On the latest episode of The Drill Down, co-hosts Peter Schweizer and Eric Eggers talk sense about the problems this creates.

Insider trading by members of Congress and senior officials of the executive branch demonstrate the sort of corruption that enrages voters. Co-host Eric Eggers starts this week’s episode of the Drill Down off with a fitting observation: “Behind every powerful and successful woman… is a husband with incredibly well-timed stock trades.”