Gateway Pundit

Globalist newspapers and media outlets are celebrating the massive turnout at Budapest Pride as a resounding defeat for Viktor Orbán, but reality tells a very different tale.

The event drew an impressive 100,000 participants, shattering the previous record of 35,000. However, reports confirmed a significant influx of foreigners, spurred by Ursula von der Leyen’s public statement, with 70 European Parliament members, activist Greta Thunberg, and other outsiders joining the march.

The parade featured a provocative performance by two drag queens, dancing to profanity-laced music. It kicked off with a startling display of public indecency as one performer bent over, pulling down his shorts, and revealed scant women’s lingerie.

Budapest Mayor Gergely Karácsony, a liberal opposition figure, seized the stage to deliver a pointed political message. “If you can ban a Pride event in a single European Union Member State, then no citizen in Europe is safe,” he declared.

Karácsony cleverly circumvented Orbán’s legislation, which empowered police to ban LGBTQ+ marches under a child protection framework and threatened fines up to 200,000 HUF ($590 USD).

By labeling the event a municipal celebration of Hungary’s 1991 liberation from Soviet rule, he argued it required no police permits, exploiting a legal gray area to sidestep the national ban.

This maneuver appears to place the event outside the new law’s jurisdiction, shielding participants from fines if Karácsony opts not to enforce it. Orbán responded with a measured concession: “We have informed everyone, everyone knows the legislation. The rest is the responsibility of the authorities, politics no longer has anything to do here.”

Despite globalist enthusiasm, the domestic mood seems to favor Orbán over the pride marchers.

Publicus Research, a left-leaning Hungarian pollster, backed Orbán’s stance, revealing that 51% of Hungarians support banning pride events.

A right-leaning pollster, Nézőpont Institute, echoed similar findings, with 51% favoring restrictions on pride parades to protect children and only 43% disagreeing. This suggests Orbán has won the public debate on pride, despite the event’s scale.

The TISZA Party, an emerging force aiming to unseat Orbán, faces challenges, with 53% of undecided voters opposing pride. Meanwhile, 81% of TISZA supporters back the event, and party leader Péter Magyar taunted Orbán on Instagram, dubbing him the “Pride King” amid the record turnout, a stance that could alienate Hungary’s family-oriented culture.

Globalists may exploit the event’s optics to attack Orbán, but the truth will emerge at the ballot box. Even leftist analysts cannot obscure that most Hungarians prioritize family values over pride, particularly as TISZA’s polling numbers begin to falter.

The post EU: Progressive Globalists Celebrate Turnout at Budapest Pride, While Majority of Hungarians Back Ban appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

By Dr. Niall McCrae

In the covid debacle, health professions played a major role in enforcing the official narrative. I can now reveal my experience with the UK Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC), who charged me with contradicting government guidance on vaccination and risking patients’ lives, after writing an entirely factual article on Gateway Pundit.

As a senior lecturer in psychiatric nursing at King’s College London, the NMC was my professional regulator.

When covid vaccines were introduced, I feared that blind faith and propaganda about an oxymoronic ‘miracle of science’ would lead to less impressive and harmful outcomes.

On 4^th March 2021, Gateway Pundit published my article ‘British government study confirms Covid-19 vaccine risk’.  The article is linked below. This related to a Public Health England report showing increased infections soon after vaccination, which I attributed to a known phenomenon of temporary depletion in immunity.

British Government Study Confirms Covid-19 Vaccine Risk: Infections INCREASE in Fortnight after Jab – Updated

Although factually accurate, a fact-check website labeled my article as ‘misleading’. On 8^th March I was notified by the NMC of a referral by a ‘Dr Byrne’, who had seen my writing and found me on the register. The NMC began an investigation of my fitness to practise, alleging ‘failure to uphold your position as a registered nurse – in that you promoted health advice contrary to official health advice in the context of a global pandemic’.

From the outset, I was confident that the NMC had no reasonable case against me. I submitted my statement, supported by three experts (physician Helen Westwood, biostatistician Paul Cuddin, and nursing professor Roger Watson.  Cuddin wrote: ‘on the basis that there is consistent, increasing real-world and clinical evidence of increased infections in the two weeks after vaccination, the points raised by Dr Niall McCrae need to be addressed as a matter of urgency.’

The NMC, overwhelmed with referrals of Covid-19 dissidents, moved slowly. In September 2022 I received a report by two investigators (Velia Soames and Victoria Taylor), who applied Kafkaesque logic: –

‘It isn’t our role to make a final decision about the accuracy of your article or to have an opinion about its contents. Our role is to establish whether there is enough evidence to make it a realistic possibility that the Fitness to Practise Committee would first decide that the comments you made were in line with governmental health advice at the time, and if not, whether your comments had the potential to encourage the public to distrust official government advice and as such undermine trust and confidence in the nursing profession.’

Apparently, my academic title meant falsely claimed expertise:

‘The title of Dr, or indeed nurse, would likely lead members of the public to believe you had expert medical knowledge in this field, and that your advice/comments could be trusted, when in fact it appears you did not have such expert knowledge.’

They seemed to believe that I am unable to comprehend analysis of medical treatment. Having written almost a hundred peer-reviewed scientific papers, and a manual on systematic literature reviewing, you’d think that I deserve some credit. Moreover, the NMC was belittling its own profession.

The investigators raised ‘underlying problems with your attitude’, asserting that ‘you appear not to accept the regulatory concern, and your responses to us suggest you do not intend to change your practice in the future.’  Although I was polite and cooperative, my perceived arrogance would be ‘hard to remediate’. This is the justice of the Soviet Union, where Gulags were filled with thought criminals who could never be rehabilitated.

‘We are therefore of the view that you are currently a risk to the health, safety or well-being of the public, meaning that your practice needs to be restricted in some way.’

The investigators recommended a fitness-to-practise hearing. But first they would consult NMC lawyers. Months went by, then years. Eventually in March 2025 I received a letter from the NMC stating that legal advice was not to prosecute. However, the NMC committee would carry on regardless. I was invited to a preliminary hearing, with a full hearing scheduled one month later.

I attended the initial hearing with solicitor Robin Tilbrook. I prepared for my defence, including my argument that if registrants cannot oppose government policy, why isn’t the NMC investigating nurses who walked out of wards on strike?

The hearing went smoothly. The NMC legal advisor stated that there was no public interest in pursuing the case. Tilbrook concurred, emphasising that the NMC should not interfere with my right to free speech. After an adjournment, the chairwoman informed me of the decision to drop the case.

Like other professional bodies, the NMC was corrupted by covid-19. After four years and two months, I was free, but others have been persecuted and ejected from the register, with public shaming. I hope that my case encourages others to stand their ground against the censorial regime.

The post VICTORY! After Four Years and Two Months British Nursing Council Drops Charges Against Dr. Niall McCrae for Publishing His Completely Factual Report on COVID Vaccine Risks on The Gateway Pundit in 2021 appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A year ago, when the 2024 presidential election was getting into full swing, Democrats and the media were freaking out about Project 2025, a conservative agenda that had been put together by think tanks on the right. Trump wasn’t even talking about it, but the left used it to try to panic voters and tie it directly to Trump.

Now, the same people are putting together their own version of it called ‘Project 2029.’

The left does this all the time. In 2004, they said they needed their own Drudge Report. In 2010, they said they needed their own Tea Party. In 2024, they started saying they needed their own Donald Trump. In 2024, they said they needed their own Joe Rogan.

Now they need their own Project 2025.

NEWS: A group of Democratic thinkers are plotting to lay out a new agenda for the left.

They’re called it Project 2029.

Comes in middle of raging Democratic debate: whether the party needs better ideas or just better salesmanship to succeed in 2028. https://t.co/8hCRZVJNZ7

— Shane Goldmacher (@ShaneGoldmacher) June 30, 2025

From FOX News:

Democrats take page from conservative playbook with new Project 2029

Democrats are taking a page from the conservative playbook.

A group of leading Democratic Party thinkers is beginning to collaborate on a policy agenda for their eventual presidential nominee in the 2028 election cycle.

And, as first reported by the New York Times, they’re calling it Project 2029. It’s an obvious play on the notorious Project 2025, the more than 900-page policy blueprint assembled by the conservative powerhouse Heritage Foundation think tank for the Republican Party’s 2024 presidential nominee.

Democrats repeatedly attacked Project 2025 during the previous White House race as a far-right threat to the nation. Then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and his campaign distanced themselves from the document, even as many Trump allies helped draft it.

They should’ve titled it operation holy shit how do we get out from under concealing Biden’s cognitive decline to the country.

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) June 30, 2025

So they’re taking the 2020 strategy that they already enacted, which was so unpopular that it put Republicans in control now, and they’re copying Republicans on their branding.

They’re still the party of failed ideas and no innovation.

— Common Sense (@SensibleSimio) June 30, 2025

Democrats are so predictable. When JD Vance is being sworn in for his second term, Democrats will be saying that they long for the days of ‘reasonable Republicans’ like Donald Trump. Count on it.

The post After Losing Their Minds for Months Over ‘Project 2025’ Democrats Are Now Crafting Their Own ‘Project 2029’ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Paramount and CBS was forced to pay millions of dollars to President Trump and agreed to change its editorial policy in a settlement.

President Trump filed a $20 billion lawsuit against the network’s parent company Paramount for deceptively editing a ’60 Minutes’ interview with Kamala Harris.

Trump will be paid $16 million up front, according to Fox News.

Fox News reported:

Paramount Global and CBS agreed on Tuesday to pay President Donald Trump a sum that could reach north of $30 million to settle the president’s election interference lawsuit against the network.

Trump will receive $16 million upfront. This will cover legal fees, costs of the case, and contributions to his library or charitable causes, to be determined at Trump’s discretion. There is an expectation that there will be another allocation in the mid-eight figures set aside for advertisements, public service announcements, or other similar transmissions, in support of conservative causes by the network, Fox News Digital has learned.

Sources close to the situation told Fox News Digital that CBS has agreed to update its editorial standards to install a mandatory new rule. Going forward, the network will promptly release full, unedited transcripts of future presidential candidates’ interviews. People involved in the settlement talks have referred to this as the “Trump Rule.”

In October President Trump sued CBS News for $10 billion (now increased to $20 billion) for deceptively editing its ’60 Minutes’ interview with Kamala Harris.

“President Trump brings this action to redress the immense harm caused to him, to his campaign, and to tens of millions of citizens in Texas and across America by CBS’s deceptive broadcasting conduct,” the lawsuit stated, according to Fox News.

Fake news 60 Minutes was caught editing Kamala’s answers to make her sound coherent and normal.

In fact it was so bad that ’60 Minutes’ spliced her nonsensical answer and replaced it with a completely separate sentence she said earlier in the interview.

Mixing and matching questions and answers. This isn’t journalism. It’s fraud.

Here is the original 60 Minutes exchange:

Kamala Harris: Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region.

And here is ’60 Minutes” edited exchange:

Bill Whitaker: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening?

Kamala Harris: We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the United States to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end.

WATCH:

Holy. Shit.

60 Minutes cut Kamala’s nonsense answer on Israel and replaced it with a completely seperate sentence she said earlier in the interview…

Mixing and matching questions and answers. This isn’t journalism. It’s fraud.pic.twitter.com/onXli46xL6

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) October 8, 2024

The post BREAKING: CBS, Paramount Forced to Pay Trump Massive 8-Figure Settlement for Deceptively Editing ’60 Minutes’ Kamala Harris Interview appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Hundreds of anti-ICE rioters shut down a bridge in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday.

Far-left protestors holding signs that read ‘Eviction Moratorium Now!’ and “ICE out of LA!” blocked both lanes on the Sixth Street bridge.

Traffic Advisory The 6th St Bridge remains closed due to a demonstration occupying all lanes of traffic.

— LAPD Central Division (@LAPDCentral) July 1, 2025

Rather than removing the protestors from the bridge and making arrests, the LAPD told the public which direction the protestors were marching in an X post.

Traffic Advisory Demonstration has reversed course and now marching EB 6th St Bridge towards Boyle St.

— LAPD Central Division (@LAPDCentral) July 1, 2025

KABC reported:

A large group of protesters shut down the Sixth Street bridge in downtown Los Angeles Tuesday afternoon.

The demonstration blocked all eastbound and westbound lanes.

AIR7 was above the scene and captured several dozen protesters walking on the bridge, many holding signs and waving flags. A large sign hanging on the bridge read “Sick of ICE!” and a parked truck had a sign that read “ICE out of L.A.!”

The group also set up several barricades with caution tape and large sign that read, “Eviction moratorium now!”

WATCH:

A large group of protesters shut down the Sixth Street bridge in downtown Los Angeles Tuesday afternoon.

AIR7 was above the scene and captured several dozen protesters walking on the bridge, many holding signs and waving flags. A large sign hanging on the bridge read “Sick of… pic.twitter.com/ki3t40pkwE

— ABC7 Eyewitness News (@ABC7) July 1, 2025

Tuesday’s bridge closure comes after anti-ICE rioters took over downtown Los Angeles, burned cars, assaulted federal agents and destroyed property.

The post Anti-ICE Rioters Shut Down Bridge in Downtown Los Angeles (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Waffle House announced it has dropped the 50 cent per egg surcharge the restaurant chain added in February as egg prices soared after mismanagement of the avian flu by the outgoing Biden administration in 2024 led to a shortage of eggs.

The news media, which downplayed sky high inflation under the Biden administration, suddenly couldn’t stop talking about the price of eggs as soon as President Donald Trump was sworn into office on January 20. It took just a few months for Trump to fix Biden’s blunder.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins released an update last week (excerpt):

U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke L. Rollins today provided an update on the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s comprehensive, five-pronged strategy announced in February to combat Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI). After reaching a record high due to the Biden Administration’s lack of action, wholesale egg prices have now dropped 64%, with retail prices falling 27% from their peak earlier this year. We must remain diligent, and egg farmers and producers can continue to utilize USDA resources to conduct biosecurity assessments before the Fall.

“When President Trump entered office, the cost of eggs was at a record high, seriously denting consumers’ wallets after years of awful inflation. On my first day as Secretary, we got to work to implement a five-pronged strategy to improve biosecurity on the farm and lower egg prices on grocery store shelves. The plan has worked, and families are seeing relief with egg prices driving food deflation in the April Consumer Price Index,” said Secretary Rollins. “While we are proud that over 900 biosecurity assessments have been conducted to date, resources remain available, and we are urging poultry farmers of all sizes to get your assessments done today before a potentially challenging fall.”

Excerpt from an NPR report on the improving egg supply:

The spike in egg prices was a challenge for Waffle House, which serves about 272 million eggs in a typical year. The Georgia-based chain operates more than 2,000 restaurants, and its 24-hour diners are such a fixture in the southeast that FEMA uses an informal “Waffle House Index” to measure hurricane damage.

The temporary egg surcharge was its own sort of misery index as the nation vented its frustration with runaway food prices. Other breakfast chains like Denny’s also added surcharges when eggs were in short supply.

…The American Egg Board, which represents farmers, notes that rebuilding the nation’s egg supply will take time. As of June 1, there were about 285 million egg-laying hens in the country. That’s down more than 6% from a year ago, and down nearly 13% from early 2022, before the avian flu outbreak began.

“The good news for egg lovers is that ongoing recovery efforts by egg farmers, support from USDA, and a decrease in new cases of bird flu have provided stability in both egg prices and supply,” the board said in a statement. “Further, demand for eggs typically falls after Easter and into the summer months, which has made more eggs available at retail and grocery stores.”

In a post on X on Tuesday, Waffle House said the surcharge was dropped a month ago on June 2, “Egg-cellent news…as of June 2, the egg surcharge is officially off the menu. Thanks for understanding!”

Egg-cellent news…as of June 2, the egg surcharge is officially off the menu. Thanks for understanding! pic.twitter.com/xXE6giZhRe

— Waffle House (@WaffleHouse) July 1, 2025

Waffle House press release issued February 3:

Due to bird flu, Waffle House is adding a .50 cent per egg surcharge to all menus @wsoctv pic.twitter.com/hpfn52RIlh

— Joe Bruno (@JoeBrunoWSOC9) February 3, 2025

If you went to your local Waffle House, your menu looked like this:

EGG CRISIS AT WAFFLE HOUSE IN WENTZVILLE!

Waffle House has added a 50¢ per egg surcharge due to the nationwide bird flu egg shortage. Judge Mike Carter saw it firsthand while dining with his kid!

Prices should return to normal once the market stabilizes. Stay tuned! pic.twitter.com/FyISjvq7Ky

— Mike Carter (@Vote4Carter) February 16, 2025

The haters blamed President Trump, of course:

First it was Waffle House and now Denny’s with an egg surcharge…where are those cheap eggs that Trump promised on his first day pic.twitter.com/ljuua6A3Wr

— Wu Tang is for the Children (@WUTangKids) February 25, 2025

Waffle House is now charging 50 extra cents per egg as prices spike under Trump. pic.twitter.com/SUP3iVMd6p

— No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen (@NoLieWithBTC) February 4, 2025

BREAKING: Waffle House announced this evening that they have implemented a .50 cent surcharge per egg.

Thanks, Trump! pic.twitter.com/LTpopOLaVn

— Chris D. Jackson (@ChrisDJackson) February 4, 2025

Waffle House & Denny’s adding a 50-cent surcharge to egg dishes. Is that what you voted for, MAGA?

— Stephen King (@StephenKing) February 27, 2025

Last word goes to the White House:

Amazing! Thank you, President Trump! https://t.co/asC2lzlo4s

— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) July 1, 2025

https://t.co/4LupDv1X4J pic.twitter.com/74446RIpFp

— Dan Scavino (@Scavino47) July 2, 2025

The post Winning! Waffle House Drops Egg Surcharge appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

A driving school in New York City is accused of rushing to give driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants, even if it was obvious that they had no idea how to drive a car.

Why do you suppose they would do this? What possible thing can illegals do with a license that they can’t do without one, besides driving?

Do you suppose this had anything to do with voting? Are we even allowed to ask that?

The New York Post reports:

NYC driving school rigged driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants — even if they couldn’t drive: DA

A Big Apple driving school paid off DMV examiners to fraudulently fast-track driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants — even if they had no clue how to drive, Staten Island prosecutors said Tuesday.

T&E Driving School in Queens took cash from Chinese immigrants — many of whom didn’t even speak English — and paid off a crew of Department of Motor Vehicles employees on Staten Island to illegally obtain driver’s licenses, District Attorney Michael McMahon said at a press conference.

The crackdown, dubbed Operation Road Test, took down the ring in a joint investigation with state investigators and the US Department of Homeland Security, prosecutors said.

“Our investigation found that T&E Driving School blatantly flouted the laws and procedures that are necessary to ensure the public safety on the road,” George Ioannidis, assistant special agent in charge for Homeland Security Investigations in New York said Tuesday.

“As alleged T&E utilized social media and strategic advertising to Target exploited members of the Chinese community and guaranteed individual driver’s licenses regardless of their immigration status, language, and even their ability to operate a vehicle,” he said.

Something similar was recently discovered in Florida and the people involved are being prosecuted.

Imagine all the other shit we still haven’t uncovered yet https://t.co/Or2b3JyA2o

— Phocion The Good (@Phocion) July 1, 2025

(Image:Source)

The post New York City Driving School Fast-Tracked Licenses for Illegal Immigrants – Even if They Clearly Couldn’t Drive appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Did Obama vindicate Tina Peters and President Trump in 2016?

Guest post by Martel Maxim. 

Oh how far we’ve come since Tina Peters (see https://tinapeters.us/) and President Trump cracked open the Deep State’s Deepest and Darkest Secret – that the secret is of how elections are stolen on a national magnitude.

Through stolen elections, especially during the last 25 years in the age of Computerized voting, the Deep State has successfully assembled and infested a network of controlled and compromised individuals into a great deal of positions of political power in our country.

Anyway, the lightning fast speed of computers interconnected throughout the entire election ecosystem has ironically resulted in a laughingly obvious collection of bizarre political misfits and ‘leadership’ that unfortunately almost ended America as we know it.  If it wasn’t so serious, it actually would be funny.

Characters that hide behind the ‘color of law’ such as Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Pocahontas, Mitch McConnell, Bernie Sanders, AOC, Colorado SOS Jena Griswold,  and good ole Chuck Schumer are just some of the top show headliners, and so many more from the land of the compromised and controlled (Hundreds) who back them up.  At least Chuck Schumer gets some ‘America saving credit’ for exposing the depravity of the Deep State by telling President Trump his famous “6 Ways to Sunday” disclosure that put all of us on notice regarding the existence of the Deep State, and how it operates.  JFK, RFK, MLK, 9/11, and so many others sadly learned about this first hand.

Thank God that President Trump “broke the Deep State’s computerized cheating algorithms” by indeed making the Presidential election of 2024 “too big to rig”.  However, “too big to rig” didn’t really work for House or Senate races which they continue to steal as we speak.

We cannot rest, because there are not many House or Senate Candidates running in the 2026 Midterms who can claim a “too big to rig” status, therefore the ability of the Deep State to rig the Midterms must be prevented.  In order to end this reign of terror, the machines and all their lying cheating software have got to go out the window for at least the Federal races in the 2026 Primary and General Midterms, starting with the primaries beginning in less than a year.  Although it may be difficult to put in place a viable hand count system developed and deployed within about 6 months, we have no choice at this point, and it’s being worked on as a number one priority.

In 2016, when President Obama just might have opened the door to acknowledging 2020 was stolen.  The last 15 seconds of this video are perhaps the most important 15 seconds on YouTube that makes this point.

Although Obama speaks in broad terms on this video, he says,

“If Mr. Trump is up 10 or 15 points on election day and ends up losing, then maybe he can raise some questions”.

The common sense interpretation of that statement is:  “If there’s a notable deviation from historical precedent on how elections normally proceed”, then maybe he can raise some questions”.  Assuming that’s a reasonable interpretation, let’s look at what he didn’t include in that sentence.

First of all, he didn’t say when during the election cycle his measurements were to be taken.  Let’s assume that if during the first hour of voting (back in 2016 they hadn’t yet done the mass mail out ballot and early voting extremes), that Trump was ahead, but ended up losing somewhat later during the day, then that scenario would be hard to dispute if Trump had lost.

However, in 2020 President Trump was largely ahead of Biden, ranging from approximately 5-7 points in all swing states when 90+ percent of the vote was in.  That is, until the magic 3am ballot drops occurred along with the quick catch-up miracle spikes as shown in the below charts.

These spikes were met with Deep State comments like “don’t believe what you see” and dystopian headlines like:  “How Real-Time Visualizations of Vote Count ‘Spikes Can Lead to Unfounded Allegations of Election Fraud”.  In other words, “your common sense interpretation of the charts doesn’t apply”.

The same dystopian deep state control led practically all US courts to reject any challenges to the 2020 results as ‘not having standing’.  That same logic was the engine that persecuted and prosecuted Tina Peters for exposing their system of fraud.  You can also see that same pattern with their lawfare against President Trump these past 10 years.

The propaganda masters fail to let it be known that this same sequence of events occurred in all the Swing States, practically all at the same time.  In other words, lightning didn’t just strike twice, it struck 7 times, practically all at the same time.  Remarkable!

So former President Obama, what do you have to say about all this?  Do these circumstances reach a reasonable threshold intent of what you said in the above video?  Do these noted deviations in how 2020 was conducted in light of historical data raise your curiosity?   If that was you in place of President Trump, and you didn’t lose by 10-15 points, but instead lost by slim amounts shown in the spike charts all at around the same time, ….would you think ‘something just wasn’t right’?

Would you still agree with Chris Krebs, former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) who played a pivotal role in ensuring the security of the 2020 U.S. presidential election when he publicly stated that the November 3rd election was “the most secure in American history,” emphasizing that there was no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.  Would you wonder what planet he lived on?

So let’s get back to your video.  If indeed a threshold of reasonableness was reached in the above information, would you then say that President Trump had validity to have never conceded that 2020 election?  Would you also agree that what Tina Peters exposed has great validity?  By the way, nobody in authority ever had an interest in reading those reports, especially your former Voter Protection Attorney, and now Colorado SOS Jena Griswold.  Griswold’s only mission has been to “shoot the messenger, Tina Peters”.  Something just does not sit right about all of this.

So President Obama, as America wakes up, it will demand more answers to common sense questions like the above.  The choice on how you want to be remembered in history is up to you, and this situation is a litmus test of how you will navigate that test on behalf of those people who believed in you.  Those 15 seconds in your video says a lot.

We can’t unsee what we’ve now seen, especially as Tina Peters remains in prison for doing what was right.

The post Did Obama Vindicate Tina Peters and President Trump Back in 2016? first appeared on Joe Hoft.

The post Did Obama Vindicate Tina Peters and President Trump Back in 2016? appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

President Trump’s Department of Justice has unleashed a sweeping initiative to revoke U.S. citizenship from naturalized criminals, gang members, sex offenders, and even war criminals who gamed the system to infiltrate our homeland.

According to a bombshell June 11 memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate, the DOJ Civil Division has been ordered to “prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law.”

The document outlines a robust list of enforcement targets, ranging from terrorists and war criminals to gang members, human traffickers, sex offenders, and fraudsters who have scammed the U.S. government and its citizens.

Top Priorities for Denaturalization Include:

• Terrorists and those tied to espionage or the export of sensitive U.S. technology
• Individuals guilty of war crimes or human rights abuses
• Members of transnational gangs and drug cartels
• Naturalized criminals who committed felonies and lied about them
• Sex offenders and human traffickers
• Fraudsters who ripped off Medicare, Medicaid, or the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)

The memo reads in part:

The Department of Justice may institute civil proceedings to revoke a person’s United States citizenship if an individual either “illegally procured” naturalization or procured naturalization by “concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation.” 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a).

The benefits of civil denaturalization include the government’s ability to revoke the citizenship of individuals who engaged in the commission of war crimes, extrajudicial killings, or other serious human rights abuses; to remove naturalized criminals, gang members, or, indeed, any individuals convicted of crimes who pose an ongoing threat to the United States; and to prevent convicted terrorists from returning to U.S. soil or traveling internationally on a U.S. passport.

At a fundamental level, it also supports the overall integrity of the naturalization program by ensuring that those who unlawfully procured citizenship, including those who obtained it through fraud or concealment of material information, do not maintain the benefits of the unlawful procurement.

The Civil Division shall prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.To promote the pursuit of all viable denaturalization cases available under 8 U.S.C. § 1451 and maintain the integrity of the naturalization system while simultaneously ensuring an appropriate allocation of resources, the Civil Division has established the following categories of priorities for denaturalization cases:

1. Cases against individuals who pose a potential danger to national security, including those with a nexus to terrorism, espionage, or the unlawful export from the United States of sensitive goods, technology, or information raising national security concerns;
2. Cases against individuals who engaged in torture, war crimes, or other human rights violations;
3. Cases against individuals who further or furthered the unlawful enterprise of criminal gangs, transnational criminal organizations, and drug cartels;
4. Cases against individuals who committed felonies that were not disclosed during the naturalization process;
5. Cases against individuals who committed human trafficking, sex offenses, or violent crimes;
6. Cases against individuals who engaged in various forms of financial fraud against the United States (including Paycheck Protection Program(“PPP”) loan fraud and Medicaid/Medicare fraud);
7. Cases against individuals who engaged in fraud against private individuals, funds, or corporations;
8. Cases against individuals who acquired naturalization through government corruption, fraud, or material misrepresentations, not otherwise addressed by another priority category;
9. Cases referred by a United States Attorney’s Office or in connection with pending criminal charges, if those charges do not fit within one of the other priorities; and
10. Any other cases referred to the Civil Division that the Division determines to be sufficiently important to pursue.

These categories are intended to guide the Civil Division in prioritizing which cases to pursue; however, these categories do not limit the Civil Division from pursuing any particular case, nor are they listed in a particular order of importance.Further, the Civil Division retains the discretion to pursue cases outside of these categories as it determines appropriate. The assignment of denaturalization cases may be made across sections or units based on experience, subject-matter expertise, and the overall needs of the Civil Division.

The post DENATURALIZATION CRACKDOWN: Trump DOJ Unleashes Sweeping New Policy to Revoke Citizenship of Naturalized Americans Convicted of Serious Crimes appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Hamas attacks in Israel on October 7^th 2023 have unleashed a deadly and seemingly endless conflict in the Middle East.

For the last 21 months, death and destruction have become the norm, and parallel conflicts involving Lebanon, Yemen and finally Iran have all also ignited.

Eventually, the escalation ended up bringing the US to conduct air raids against the Houthis – and against the Iranian Ayatollahs’ nuclear programs.

After managing to broker a peace deal between Israel and Iran, US President Donald J. Trump has today (1) announced that his negotiating team has managed to convince the Israeli side to agree to a 60-day cease-fire.

“My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump said on Truth Social on Tuesday evening.

CNN reported:

“President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Israel had “agreed to the necessary conditions” to finalize a ceasefire in Gaza, though it was not immediately clear whether Hamas would accept the terms.

Two administration officials said Hamas still had to agree to the deal. In a post on Truth social, Trump said the Qataris and the Egyptians would deliver it.

[…] CNN reported earlier that Qatari officials had submitted on Tuesday a new proposal for a 60-day ceasefire to both Hamas and Israel to halt the fighting in Gaza, which is backed by the Trump administration, according to a source familiar with the matter.”

This is a developing story. Stay tuned for more.

Read more:

IDF Announces Elimination of Founding Member of Hamas and October 7 Mastermind Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa

The post PEACEMAKER: Trump Announces That Israel Has Agreed to a 60-Day Gaza Ceasefire, Urges Hamas To Accept It Too appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.