Mad Mad News

Live Above The Madness

INVESTIGATIONS

AWESOME: Former Democrat Batya Ungar-Sargon Absolutely LIGHTS UP Indian-Born Democrat Congressman Pushing to Impeach President Trump (VIDEO)

Filed Under: Gateway Pundit, INVESTIGATIONS

Credit: Piers Morgan Uncensored

The Michigan congressman who is leading the push to impeach President Trump got absolutely destroyed yesterday by a former member of his party.

As The Gateway Pundit reported on Monday, Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-MI), a native of India, flew back into DC after yet another unwarranted congressional vacation and decided to file a whopping SEVEN articles of impeachment against President Trump. And unsurprisingly, the catalyst for Thanedar’s filing of articles of impeachment was Trump daring to deport Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a dangerous MS-13 gangster and alleged wife-beater.

“Trump has already done real damage to our democracy,” Thanedar whined. “But defying a unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court ruling? That has to be the final straw.”

“The court said the wrongfully deported Kilmar Garcia must be allowed to return and receive due process,” he continued. “Trump ignored it. He ignored the Constitution, he ignored the very checks and balances that keep our democracy intact.”

Thanedar introduced a whopping SEVEN articles of impeachment against Trump, including for Obstruction of justice and abuse of executive powers. As long as Republicans control the House, his resolution will go nowhere.

On Wednesday, former Democrat Batya Ungar-Sargon got a chance to confront Thanedar for his impeachment push on Pier Morgan’s podcast and did not disappoint. She first debunked the lies surrounding the Garcia case, the crux of Thanedar’s impeachment push.

“Kilmar Garcia did not have an order not to deport him; he had an order not to deport him to El Salvador, so he should have been deported to another country she said. “This person is a wife-beater and a gangbanger and a human trafficker.”We were let down as Americans because he got a lot of due process, and we just didn’t follow through because the immigration courts are deeply flawed.”

Ungar-Sargon then slammed the students supposedly arrested for criticizing Israel, explaining that they belonged to a group that 100% supported Hamas’s total destruction of the Jewish nation. “That is a violation of a green card,” she pointed out.

Ungar-Sargon then turned her attention to Thanadar, setting him ablaze for pushing Trump’s impeachment.

“There is no constitutional crisis. This congressman seems to think that having bad polling numbers is an impeachable offense…It is utterly laughable!” she exclaimed. And it’s because the Democrats have no agenda!”

WATCH:

Ungar-Sargon went on to tell Thanadar she knows exactly why he and his fellow leftists want Trump gone.

“Donald Trump is running to the left of them on economics, and to the left of them on fighting wars,” she said. “He’s a social moderate; he’s not even a conservative.”

“There is not a single value the Democrats hold that they are not willing to immediately abandon if Donald Trump starts to defend it,” She continued. “It was the Democrats who thought we had to control the border, to protect working-class wages. Now all you see is Democrats pushing free trade…You see Democrats embracing Chinese propaganda because it is merely against Trump.”

At one point, Thanadar tried to interrupt, but Ungar-Sargon quickly shut him down. She then closed with a warning to the congressman.

“And congressman, I’m sorry, but the UAW and the Teamsters have both endorsed the tariffs,” she said. “You are in a lot of trouble in Michigan.”

The post AWESOME: Former Democrat Batya Ungar-Sargon Absolutely LIGHTS UP Indian-Born Democrat Congressman Pushing to Impeach President Trump (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya speaks out on autism and COVID in new interview

Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, The Blaze

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya has landed the coveted role as director of the National Institutes of Health, and those in the Make America Healthy Again movement couldn’t be happier, as getting to the root cause of our nation’s health problems is what Bhattacharya has been working toward his entire career.

“I want to fulfill the mandate that President Trump and Secretary Kennedy gave to me, which is to use the NIH to do the research so we can understand how to make America healthy,” he tells Jill Savage of “Blaze News Tonight.”

And one of the first steps Bhattacharya is taking is launching a major initiative where scientists across the country will be compelled to actually answer the question of why autism has risen so significantly in recent years.

“The problem with autism is that — first, the rise, when you look back, is just meteoric,” Bhattacharya tells Savage.

However, to question the cause of autism or to focus on its rise coincides with a disbelief in vaccines or being “anti-science.”

“Somehow, you’re automatically anti-vaccine if you just notice the fact that there are so many more autistic kids than there were when I was a kid. And you put that together, and what you have is millions of families that don’t have an answer to this question,” he explains.

In the coming months, Bhattacharya tells Savage that Americans can expect to see tons of resources thrown at this problem.

“In just a few months, we’ll have a dozen or more research teams, where we chose them competitively from lots of research teams across the country,” he says. “It’ll be a range of methods, so, you know, basic science lab work to epidemiology to you name it, and with no holds barred as to hypothesis.”

As Dr. Bhattacharya was one of the lone voices that was willing to speak out against the federal government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems that we’re in good hands.

“The rest of the industry was saying, ‘No, you’re wrong,’ and, ‘Don’t say the things that you’re saying,’” Savage comments.

“It was a shocking experience for me. I thought scientists had academic freedom, and I’ve learned differently. In fact, probably the biggest problem during COVID was that. Like normally, if you can’t have free speech, then you can’t have science, is what I learned. And I think that’s why we had such bad outcomes with COVID,” he tells Savage.

“We suppressed speech of scientists. The Biden administration suppressed speech of normal Americans who questioned the school closures, the lockdowns, and all the policies that didn’t actually protect anybody, that yet ended up harming so many people at scale,” he continues.

“That’s actually another one of my priorities. I want to restore free speech in science,” he adds.

Want more from ‘Blaze News Tonight’?

To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Federal judge rules Trump cannot use Alien Enemies Act to deport Tren de Aragua terrorists: ‘Unlawful’

Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, The Blaze

President Donald Trump issued a proclamation on March 15 invoking the Alien Enemies Act and declaring that Tren de Aragua is “a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization” aligned with the Venezuelan Maduro regime that “is perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion against the territory of the United States.”

“I proclaim that all Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of TdA, are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States are liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as Alien Enemies,” added Trump.

A federal judge ruled Thursday that President Donald Trump’s invocation of the AEA through the proclamation was “unlawful” and barred the Trump administration from using it against Venezuelan aliens in the court’s judicial district.

The administration deported at least 137 Venezuelan aliens under the law on March 15.

‘The Proclamation does not suggest that they have done so through an organized armed attack.’

While claiming at the outset that neither “the Court nor the parties question the Executive Branch’s authority and responsibility to enforce federal laws,” U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. appears to have done just that.

The judge indicated that Trump’s March 15 proclamation satisfactorily placed responsibility for Tren de Aragua’s actions in the U.S. on the Venezuelan government — precluding the need to determine whether the terrorist gang represents a foreign nation or government. Rodriguez noted, however, that the activities of the terrorist gang inside the U.S. “do not fall within the plain, ordinary meaning of ‘invasion’ or ‘predatory incursion’ for the purposes of the AEA.”

While Tren de Aragua terrorists might have illegally entered the nation, “harmed lives in the United States and engage in crime, the Proclamation does not suggest that they have done so through an organized armed attack, or that Venezuela has threatened or attempted such an attack through TdA members,” wrote the judge.

Rodriguez concluded that “the historical record renders clear that the President’s invocation of the AEA through the Proclamation exceeds the scope of the statute and is contrary to the plain, ordinary meaning of the statute’s claims.”

While numerous courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, have blocked the Trump administration’s deportations under the AEA, Rodriguez is reportedly the first judge to have reached a final decision on the merits.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the lawsuit with the ACLU of Texas to keep suspected foreign terrorists from being deported, celebrated the decision.

ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said in a statement, “Congress never meant for this 18th-century wartime law to be used this way. This is a critically important decision that prevents more people from being sent to the notorious CECOT prison.”

Reuters indicated that neither the White House nor the Department of Justice responded to its requests for comment.

On Thursday, Rodriguez also allowed Venezuelans targeted for deportation under the AEA to proceed with a class-action lawsuit against the Trump administration, reported WFIN.com.

“The unusual circumstances of this case present a compelling justification to utilize a procedure equivalent to a class action authorized by Rule 23,” wrote Rodriguez.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The First 100 Days for the Trump-Hating Left

Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Newsbusters

President Donald Trump’s approval declined after he announced broad tariffs not just on China but on trading partners who, in his opinion, take advantage of America with their tariffs on American goods. But how quickly those rooting for Trump’s failure forget the mood of the country during the Biden administration.

In September 2024, NBC News wrote: “Two in 3 voters say the country is on the ‘wrong track’ as voters weigh whether Vice President Kamala Harris or former President Donald Trump would be better able to change that less than two months from Election Day.” Not exactly a tough act to follow.

Critics call Trump 2.0 an “imperial” presidency careening toward a “constitutional crisis,” meaning Trump intends to ignore lower court rulings that thwart his agenda. Yet most sat silently when one of the Democrat stars, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-N.Y.,) demanded that President Joe Biden ignore a 2023 lower court ruling to ban the so-called abortion pill. AOC called the ruling a “mockery of our democracy and a mockery of our law.”

When the Supreme Court ruled the Biden student debt forgiveness program unconstitutional, Biden insisted the ruling left him undeterred. He said, “The Supreme Court tried to block me from relieving student debt. But they didn’t stop me.”

Trump has secured the southern border and is fulfilling his promise to deport the estimated 15 million illegal aliens — prioritizing violent criminals — intentionally admitted into the country by Biden. Former First Lady Michelle Obama recently fretted: “I worry for people of color all over this country. … And that makes me — that frightens me. It keeps me up at night.”

Michelle Obama must not have gotten much sleep during her husband’s administration, when even Democrats derisively referred to President Barack Obama as “deporter-in-chief.” In January 2024, PolitiFact wrote: “Under Trump, from fiscal year 2017 to fiscal year 2020, the Department of Homeland Security recorded 2 million deportations … During Obama’s first term, fiscal year 2009 to fiscal year 2012, there were 3.2 million deportations (removals and returns).”

Suddenly, Democrats are pro-“insurrection.” Democrat Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker recently called for “mass protests” against Trump: “It’s time to fight everywhere and all at once. Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption. But I am now.”

“Fight everywhere and all at once”? The governor will no doubt claim he means “fight” peacefully. But when Trump, on Jan. 6, 2021, urged his supporters to “fight like hell,” his critics described this as the equivalent of ordering his supporters to set the country on fire. Never mind Trump also said, “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

Suddenly, “mocking” one’s disability isn’t such a bad thing after all. An August 2016 Bloomberg poll of likely voters found what most bothered them about then-candidate Trump was that he supposedly “mocked” a disabled reporter, something Trump has denied doing. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Trump supporter, has since 1984 been paralyzed from the waist down. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) in March, at a California Human Rights campaign event, elicited laughter when she said: “Y’all know we got Governor Hot Wheels down there. Come on now. And the only thing hot about him is that he is a hot a– mess.” Crickets from most Democrats.

Polls show a majority of Americans support Trump’s border wall and a plurality support his goal of mass deportation. Democrats therefore find themselves thrashing about to decide on an effective anti-Trump attack strategy. What’s their message? Waste, fraud and abuse are to be protected? Illegal alien MS-13 gang member Kilmar Abrego Garcia is the equivalent of a political prisoner? Teslas are bad — so much for climate change?

Democrats continue to claim that only the very rich stand to benefit from extending the Trump tax cuts. Biden in his first major speech since leaving office repeated the nonsense that Trump wants to “cut and gut” social security. So, there’s that.

If Trump is proven right on his tariff strategy and our trading partners cut deals that eventually turbocharge the economy, what’s left for the Democrats? Apart from mass suicide, there’s always the Trump’s a “racist/fascist/Nazi” card. It’s better than nothing.

Harvard Law Review Awards $65k Fellowship to Student Charged in Assault of Israeli Classmate: Report

Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Washington Free Beacon

The Harvard Law Review is awarding a $65,000 fellowship meant to serve “the public interest” to Ibrahim Bharmal, the Harvard Law School student who faced criminal charges for assaulting an Israeli classmate, according to a new report.

Bharmal is one of this year’s recipients of the Harvard Law Review Fellowship, Ira Stoll of The Editors reported. The program supports “recent Harvard Law School graduates”—Bharmal is set to graduate this month—with “a demonstrated interest in serving the public interest through their work and scholarship.” It comes with a $65,000 stipend that funds each fellow’s work “in a public-interest related role at a government agency or nonprofit organization.” For Bharmal, that work will come at the Council on American-Islamic Relations’s Los Angeles office, according to Stoll.

The move comes at a tumultuous time for both the Harvard Law Review and Harvard Law School. The Trump administration is probing both entities over internal documents, first reported in the Washington Free Beacon, that show editors at Harvard Law Review use race to select both editors and articles for publication. At least one private attorney, former Texas solicitor general Jonathan Mitchell, plans to sue the journal over the practice, ordering its editors on Friday to preserve documents that he plans to subpoena.

Bharmal, himself a Harvard Law Review editor, attracted the attention of the Trump administration even before it launched the investigations into the prestigious law journal.

In its April 11 letter to Harvard outlining the policy demands necessary to “maintain Harvard’s financial relationship with the federal government,” the Trump administration called on the Ivy League institution to permanently expel “the students involved in the October 18 assault of an Israeli Harvard Business School student,” a reference to Bharmal and his fellow defendant, divinity school graduate student Elom Tettey-Tamaklo.

On that day, in 2023, Bharmal and Tettey-Tamaklo were shown shoving and accosting their Israeli classmate in a video first reported by the Free Beacon. Keffiyeh-clad individuals, who assembled outside of the business school as part of a “die-in” protest condemning Israel’s days-old retaliatory war on Hamas, surrounded the Israeli student, as he attempted to walk through the crowd. They repeatedly shouted “SHAME!”

Bharmal and Tettey-Tamaklo were charged with misdemeanor assault months later, in May 2024, one year before their expected graduation dates. As their assault case progressed, both students remained in good standing with Harvard, which did not say whether it would award them degrees if they were convicted or if their proceedings remained active.

Both Harvard Law School and the Harvard Law Review, meanwhile, stood by Bharmal throughout his court appearances.

Last month, on April 10, Harvard Law School published a blog post in which Bharmal fondly reminisced on his time at the “Crimmigration Clinic,” a law school course in which students work on federal immigration cases. Two weeks later, the Harvard Law Review published an anonymous “blog essay” titled, “The Immigrant Rights Resistance Lives.” Bharmal is the author, internal messages obtained by the Free Beacon show.

Bharmal appeared in a Boston court on Monday, five days after publishing that “blog essay.” There, a Suffolk County judge ordered him and Tettey-Tamaklo to perform 80 hours of community service and take an in-person anger management class as part of a pretrial diversion program that will bring an end to the case.

More students may have been charged in relation to the “die-in” protest if not for Harvard. The Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office asked the university to assist in a follow-up investigation aimed at helping “to identify any additional perpetrators,” the Free Beacon reported. Harvard refused, according to the office. Assistant District Attorney Ursula Knight called the school’s behavior “a shock to the Commonwealth.”

Should Bharmal complete the pretrial diversion program—he is due in court on July 25 to update the judge—his record will not contain a criminal conviction. Still, that likely wouldn’t have jeopardized his impending job at CAIR: The group recently sued Columbia University to stop the school from complying with federal records related to anti-Semitic protests, and its leader said he was “happy to see” Gazans “break the siege” during Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack.

The post Harvard Law Review Awards $65k Fellowship to Student Charged in Assault of Israeli Classmate: Report appeared first on .

UCLA Police Arrest Three Anti-Israel Agitators Over Unauthorized Anniversary Screening of Documentary Glorifying Encampments

Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Washington Free Beacon

UCLA police arrested three protesters Wednesday, including one who slapped an officer, as they tried to stage an unauthorized screening of a documentary glorifying last spring’s anti-Israel encampments that gripped campuses nationwide.

Around 30 officers in riot gear descended on around 200 protesters gathered to watch The Encampments. School officials warned the organizer, UCLA’s Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapter, three times that it wasn’t allowed to screen the film before law enforcement was sent in.

Police arrested two keffiyeh-clad activists and confiscated their screening equipment. A third protester was arrested earlier in the day after slapping an officer as they blocked her from setting up the film screening. UCLA had deployed additional police officers to campus ahead of the one-year encampment anniversary, the Daily Bruin reported.

The arrests come nearly a week after the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office announced that only 2 of the 205 protesters arrested during last spring’s violent encampment would face criminal charges, citing UCLA’s “failure or inability to assist” in the investigation. The University of California system is also facing a Justice Department investigation into whether it “has engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, religion and national origin against its professors, staff and other employees by allowing an Antisemitic hostile work environment to exist on its campuses.”

SJP, which helped organize UCLA’s violent anti-Israel encampment and is under suspension for vandalizing a regent’s home, planned to screen The Encampments Wednesday on Royce Quad to commemorate the anniversary of the violent end to UCLA’s encampment at the location where the tents were established.

“This film screening should serve as a reminder that the confrontations with zionist & state violence on UCLA’s campus were a sliver of one Palestinian’s every day reality. That is why we will continue to fight until Palestine is free,” the group wrote on Instagram last week.

But the event wasn’t sanctioned, and campus police closed off the area around 2:30 p.m. They arrested the first protester, who is unaffiliated with the university, and issued her an administrative “stay away” order, barring her from campus, according to the Daily Bruin.

“UCLA is committing genocide and refuses to meet students’ demands to divest from weapons manufacturers,” the protester said while in police custody. “Everyone pull up to the film screening. Fuck these pigs.”

SJP tried moving to two other locations on campus, with around 200 protesters joining in, but both times university officials again told them the screening wasn’t allowed. Police in riot gear swarmed in at 9 p.m. to disperse the crowd, arresting two more activists. The protesters left the area an hour later.

UCLA temporarily suspended SJP in February after its members vandalized the home of University of California regent and United Talent Agency vice chairman Jay Sures. The SJP and Graduate SJP chapters harassed the Jewish chancellor’s family, surrounded a family member’s vehicle, and held a sign that read, “Jonathan Sures you will pay, until you see your final day.”

The group was also pivotal in organizing the encampment at UCLA. The anti-Israel protesters blocked Jewish students from accessing parts of campus for a week. Police were eventually called in and broke up the encampment, arresting hundreds, but only after a violent clash between the agitators and counterprotesters.

UCLA, however, continues to argue that it didn’t have a responsibility to stop the anti-Israel radicals from excluding Jews from parts of campus. Students could only gain access to the occupied area if given clearance and a wristband. The administration didn’t call in police until violence broke out between protesters and counterprotesters. After a tense, hours-long showdown—during which protesters likened officers to the Ku Klux Klan—authorities dismantled the tents.

UCLA and its police department did not respond to requests for comment.

The post UCLA Police Arrest Three Anti-Israel Agitators Over Unauthorized Anniversary Screening of Documentary Glorifying Encampments appeared first on .

Arizona Grand Jury Returns Five-Count Indictment Against Alleged Tesla Arsonist

Filed Under: Gateway Pundit, INVESTIGATIONS

Image: U.S. Department of Justice.

On Wednesday, a federal grand jury in Phoenix returned a five-count indictment against an alleged arsonist who attacked a Tesla dealership in Mesa, Arizona.

The charges against Ian William Moses, 35, include Maliciously Damaging Property and Vehicles in Interstate Commerce by Means of Fire.

The charging documents filed in the case allege that in the early morning on Monday, April 28, Moses, dressed in a dark hooded sweatshirt and a black mask, entered the Tesla parking lot carrying a red plastic gas can and a black backpack.

Further, while in the Tesla parking lot, documents say Moses was captured on video as he placed fire starter logs next to the dealership building, poured gasoline onto the starter logs, the building, and three Tesla vehicles, and ignited the starter logs.

Image: U.S. Department of Justice.

A silver Tesla Cybertruck was destroyed in the subsequent fire.

Image: U.S. Department of Justice.

Video shows Moses leaving the dealership on a dark colored bicycle shortly thereafter.

According to reports, Mesa police officers arrested Moses approximately a quarter mile away from the Tesla dealership shortly after the incident while he was still dressed in the same clothes as he was seen wearing at the scene.

After his arrest, officers found a hand-drawn map of the area in Moses’ pocket with the Tesla dealership marked by the letter T.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi remarked, “If you engage in domestic terrorism, this Department of Justice will find you, follow the facts, and prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law. No negotiating.”

ATF Acting Director Dan Driscoll added, “ATF’s Special Agents and forensic investigators, working with the FBI and local partners, quickly recovered and analyzed critical evidence following this deliberate attack.”

“This attack poses a serious threat to public safety and the ATF remains committed to aggressively pursuing anyone who endangers our communities through violence or destruction.”

“There is nothing American about burning down someone else’s business because you disagree with them politically,” said U.S. Attorney Timothy Courchaine for the District of Arizona.

“These ongoing attacks against Tesla are not protests, they are acts of violence that have no place in Arizona or anywhere else. If someone targets Tesla with violence, they will be found and confronted with the full force of the law.”

Each count of conviction for Malicious Damage to Property in Interstate Commerce carries a minimum penalty of five years and up to a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

The post Arizona Grand Jury Returns Five-Count Indictment Against Alleged Tesla Arsonist appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Mea Culpa? Big Tech Censors Shamed by Abortion Pill Study

Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Newsbusters

Pro-lifers have been warning the public that the abortion pill hurts women for years. Here’s why Big Tech and its fact-checkers have much to answer for. 

A massive study published on Monday found that around 11.2% of 154,554 women underwent a “serious adverse event” after taking the abortion pill. This percentage is 22 times higher than the less than 0.5% statistic pushed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that loosened restrictions on the abortion pill during the Biden administration. The Foundation for the Restoration of America commissioned the study. And while this study is not the first to show that over one in ten women who take the pill are seriously harmed, social media platforms and fact-checkers have censored criticism of the abortion pill for years. 

[Story Continues on MRC Free Speech America] 

WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan Signals Imminent Arrests for Sanctuary State Officials – “Wait Until You See What’s Coming. I Meant What I Said”

Filed Under: Gateway Pundit, INVESTIGATIONS

Border Czar Tom Homan indicated to The Gateway Pundit on Thursday that criminal charges for sanctuary state and city officials are imminent following the arrest of two judges for attempting to harbor and conceal illegal aliens.

This comes as President Trump indicated he may take harder actions in his fight against illegal immigration, including suspending the Writ of Habeas Corpus for illegal aliens to go around radical judges who are attempting to block his border security agenda.

Federal law 8 U.S. Code § 1324 carries penalties of prison time for anybody who “brings to or attempts to bring to,” “moves or attempts to transport or move,” “conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection” illegal aliens. Charges may be enhanced if the alien causes injury or death to another person, which is all too common with the violent criminal aliens. Democrat officials’ sanctuary policies are a clear violation of federal law.

Previously, Homan told The Gateway Pundit, “When they cross the line of harboring and concealing, that’s a felony, and we got Pam Bondi now, who won’t hesitate to take action.”

WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan Tells TGP Sanctuary Officials “Absolutely” Should be Arrested, Suggests Felony Charges Incoming: “Hold Tight on That One Because it’s Coming”

About one week later, a former New Mexico judge and a Milwaukee County judge were arrested for harboring and concealing illegal aliens in an apparent warning shot to sanctuary officials whose policies and noncompliance with ICE are obstructing justice.

Following the arrest of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers (D) also sent out a memo dated April 18 that lays out explicit steps for state workers to follow and obstruct ICE when agents arrive at government buildings.

Homan told The Gateway Pundit during a press gaggle Thursday to “wait and see what’s coming” for the Democrat officials, like Tony Evers, who are harboring and concealing illegal aliens.

“I meant what I said,” he added. You can not support what we’re doing, and you can support sanctuary cities if that’s what you want to do. But if you cross that line of impidement or knowingly harboring and concealing illegal aliens, that is a felony, and we will treat it as such.“

WATCH:

Conradson: The President signed an executive order just this week threatening to defund sanctuary cities. Why not just arrest the leaders who are harboring and shielding illegal aliens, actually terrorists, from deportation?

Homan: Wait until you see what’s coming.

Conradson: Your comment on the Wisconsin Governor sending directives to state agencies to not comply with ICE and actually stop your deportation efforts?

Homan: Wait until you see what’s coming. I meant what I said. You can not support what we’re doing, and you can support sanctuary cities if that’s what you want to do. But if you cross that line of impidement or knowingly harboring and concealing illegal aliens, that is a felony, and we will treat it as such.

The post WATCH: Border Czar Tom Homan Signals Imminent Arrests for Sanctuary State Officials – “Wait Until You See What’s Coming. I Meant What I Said” appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

🛩️ Fly Smarter with OGGHY Jet Set
🎟️ Hot Tickets Now
🌴 Explore Tours & Experiences
© 2025 William Liles (dba OGGHYmedia). All rights reserved.