🎯 Success 💼 Business Growth 🧠 Brain Health
💸 Money & Finance 🏠 Spaces & Living 🌍 Travel Stories 🛳️ Travel Deals
Mad Mad News Logo LIVE ABOVE THE MADNESS
Videos Podcasts
🛒 MadMad Marketplace ▾
Big Hauls Next Car on Amazon
Mindset Shifts. New Wealth Paths. Limitless Discovery.

Where Discovery Takes Flight

Mindset Shifts. New Wealth Paths. Limitless Discovery.
Real News. Bold Freedom. Elevated Living.
Unlock your next chapter — above the noise and beyond the madness.

✈️ OGGHY JET SET

First-class travel insights, mind-expanding luxury & unapologetic freedom — delivered straight to your inbox.

Latest Issue:
“The Passport Playbook – How to Cruise, Fly, and Never Get Stuck Abroad”
by William “Ogghy” Liles · Apr 24, 2025

Subscribe for Free
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Mad Mad News

Live Above The Madness

INVESTIGATIONS

Small Idaho Town Feels Immediate Impact From Trump’s Energy Order

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Washington Free Beacon

When President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting wind energy development on his first day in office, it appeared to solely target offshore wind farms. But buried deep in the order, Trump also halted a single onshore wind development, the Lava Ridge Wind project in southern Idaho, handing an unlikely victory to local residents and a crushing blow to the green energy movement.

Trump’s order marked the culmination of a years-long grassroots opposition effort that turned into a David and Goliath contest, pitting farmers, ranchers, and landowners from tiny Lincoln County, Idaho, against federal bureaucrats and LS Power, the billion-dollar New York-based green energy developer behind Lava Ridge.

The behemoth project—spanning 38,535 acres and including 241 wind turbines—was poised to have detrimental impacts on grazing, farming, and local wildlife, sparking fierce opposition from locals.

Trump’s action signals a turning of the tide for the green energy industry in the United States. While the Biden administration often fast-tracked behemoth green energy projects—it formally approved Lava Ridge in December—Trump campaigned on a promise to slow rapid green energy development and, instead, listen to locals most impacted by such projects.

“When I read that executive order, it was such a relief that the president took time to listen—he took the time to pay attention,” John Arkoosh, a rancher who runs cattle near the proposed location of the wind project, told the Washington Free Beacon in an interview. “I feel like we’re getting back on the right track in this country, finally.”

Since the 1930s, Arkoosh’s family has operated on a federal allotment where a large portion of the Lava Ridge project would have been built. Arkoosh and his ancestors have invested hundreds of thousands of dollars for water development, fire management, seeding, and fencing, all of which he said benefited not only their business but also the local environment and wildlife.

“We’re really tied to the land and and we really care about the resource,” Arkoosh added.

His family’s investment in the property would have been squandered if Lava Ridge was allowed to proceed. That is why he and dozens of others joined forces roughly six years ago in opposition to the development, traveling statewide to voice their concerns with officials at all levels of the government.

They argued the project would infringe on federal grazing allotments, destroy wildlife habitats, strain local resources, reduce hunting opportunities, damage wetlands, and pose an undue burden on local communities—despite being sited in Idaho, the project would send its electricity production to California. They also said its 660-foot-tall turbines would visually compromise the Minidoka National Historic Site, the location where 13,000 Japanese Americans were interned during World War II.

“Friends of Minidoka is pleased that the Department of Interior will put a hold on their decision,” a spokesman for Friends of Minidoka, a nonprofit organization that seeks to uphold the site’s legacy, told the Free Beacon. The Japanese American Citizens League separately said the project would “forever tarnish the sanctity of the land where so many were denied justice.”

While state officials opposed Lava Ridge, local concerns fell on deaf ears in the federal government—Biden administration officials sided with LS Power and accelerated permits for the project. In their December record of decision, federal regulators acknowledged the project would trample thousands of acres of land, kill scores of protected species, and interfere with the Minidoka National Historic Site’s viewshed but approved it anyway, saying it would help fight global warming.

“We realized pretty quick that they were just going to ramrod this down our necks,” Dean Dimond, who runs a small farm situated along the border of the Minidoka National Historic Site and within a few hundred feet from Lava Ridge’s proposed site, told the Free Beacon in an interview. “I would venture to say that anybody that was in favor of it are back in Washington, D.C., and it was all about the money. It wasn’t about those of us out here that were going to have to live with it and work with it every day.”

“It really is pretty cool,” Dimond continued when asked about Trump’s executive order. “It was put on as a priority and he said he would do it and he did it. I mean, Magic Valley, Idaho—they’re addressing that at the president’s inauguration. That’s kind of a big deal.”

A White House official told the Free Beacon that Trump prioritized blocking Lava Ridge for many of the same reasons why Arkoosh, Dimond, and other locals banded together in opposition to it.

The official said the project would be a “misuse of public lands” and noted the widespread disapproval of it among nearly all stakeholders, including Idaho residents, farmers, ranchers, environmentalists, hunters, water users, tribal nations, aviators, historians, and archaeology groups.

“We finally are going to get some relief. We’ve got a president that listens to the people and cares about what’s happening on the ground in our local communities,” said Arkoosh. “He’s for Americans and I’m so relieved. We’ve just been on a backwards slide for years and it was—it felt so hopeless. I mean, if the election had gone a different way, I don’t know what we would have done.”

Trump’s order also received praise from state leaders like Gov. Brad Little (R., Idaho) and Idaho’s entire congressional delegation. Rep. Mike Simpson (R., Idaho), whose district is home to Lava Ridge’s proposed site, lauded the order and said the project is “unwelcome and has zero place in our state.”

A spokeswoman for LS Power declined to comment in an email to the Free Beacon.

The post Small Idaho Town Feels Immediate Impact From Trump’s Energy Order appeared first on .

Against women wearing pants

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, The Blaze

Without a notion of absolute virtue, conservatism is an ideology of relativism. All it seeks to conserve is the latest acceptable standard.

It is the act of drawing a line in the sand. When liberals manage to “wash” that line away, conservatives will “redraw” that line wherever it feels the least painful for them.

Women fought to wear pants, and not because pants make them feel pretty.

We can see this with cross-dressing.

A century ago it was considered “cross-dressing” for a woman to wear pants. No longer.

In one more century, I suspect it will no longer be considered “cross-dressing” for a conservative Christian man to wear a dress. In fact, I doubt the concept of “cross-dressing” will even exist.

Pantsuit nation

Here is why I believe this.

In America, it wasn’t legal for women to wear pants in public until 1923, because it was considered wrong for a woman to wear men’s clothing (and vice versa).

This idea was influenced by the Old Testament verse Deuteronomy 22:5: “The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God.”

The belief that pants are masculine-coded has persisted into the 21st century.

The first woman to wear pants for a portrait in the White House was Hillary Clinton in 2004. The first woman to wear pants in the Senate was in 1989.

Still, women were not permitted to wear pants on the U.S. Senate floor until two female senators defiantly entered wearing pants in 1993 and forced the rule to be amended later that year.

It is still widely considered inappropriate for a woman to wear pants to church, funerals, weddings, and court, although this is slowly becoming less true. Many airlines didn’t drop their requirements for feminine uniforms until 2012-2016. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints only began allowing its women missionaries to wear pants in 2017.

Skirting the issue

The “fight” to wear pants has mostly been pushed by feminist-type personalities. Nonetheless, many women who consider themselves neither liberals nor feminists avoid wearing dresses if they can at all help it.

These women are usually the ones most offended at the idea that wearing pants is inherently masculine. They might argue that such a notion is antiquated, especially now that pants are cut in feminine styles that complement a woman’s body. (For them, perhaps; I’ve never found a pair of jeans to flatter my hips.)

They may further argue, in a strange sort of “gotcha,” that there’s no such thing as cross-dressing at all. “Dress codes” for men and women shift depending on the time and the place.

There are other (non-Western) cultures in which a woman wears pants. Men used to wear tunics. Not only that, men used to wear lace, high heels, and makeup, and now all those things are feminine.

However, women did not fight for the right to wear lace or high heels.

Trouser envy

Women fought to wear pants, and not because pants make them feel pretty. Women wanted to be like men and to wear what men wore, and liberal women have no issue admitting this. This only offends conservative women who want to judge men for wearing dresses.

Even to this day, if a woman wants to look extra feminine, she reaches for a dress. If she is feeling like a “tomboy,” or she just wants to be “practical,” “simple,” and not show off that she’s a woman, she wears pants.

Inherently, we all know that pants are not queenly or princess-like.

I believe what’s most interesting about the how fashion has changed is how default neutral-gendered clothing has morphed. Femininity was once the default neutral gender, while men wore over-the-top fashion statements. Babies wore gowns (feminine).

Now the default neutral-gender clothing is masculine, and babies wear sleepers (masculine) instead of gowns (feminine). Where the default was “robes” for everyone, it’s now “pants” for everyone. Where there might once have been more things that a woman shouldn’t wear, there are now more things that a man ought not to wear if he doesn’t want society accusing him of “cross-dressing.”

One could argue this is a result of progress. Fashion changes. The expectations for the different sexes have changed. Perhaps this is not a bad thing, but it does become a complicated matter when only a man is at risk of cross-dressing but anything a woman wears is beyond reproach.

The same conservative women who think nothing of wearing jeans become quite angry at the sight of a man in a dress. For now.

I speculate that unless we make a full return to femininity, it will be normal for men to wear whatever they want, just as women already do, and that there will be no such thing as cross-dressing.

Perhaps the first step will be rejecting the greatest lie feminism sold women: that femininity is oppressive or restrictive. We find true strength in embracing our womanhood, not rejecting it.

I, for one, will be putting our sons in pants and our daughters in dresses. The differences between men and women are God-given and timeless; I believe in choosing clothing that reflects this.

Trump’s swift actions drag America back from the brink

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, The Blaze

During Donald Trump’s second inauguration, a lip reader focused on an off-camera exchange between Barack Obama and George W. Bush. According to the lip reader, Obama, a staunch socialist, leaned toward Bush, an established RINO, and asked how they might “stop what’s happening.” Thankfully, the immediate answer is nothing at all. Trump’s inauguration represents a significant shift, pulling the nation back from the brink of the November 5 election, which many feared could lead to a tyrannical socialist regime.

For over a century, the Democratic Party and complicit Republicans have gradually imposed socialist policies in America. Since Obama’s rise to power in 2008, these policies have increasingly targeted American conservatives. Executive agencies, such as the IRS, harassed the Tea Party movement, the Department of Health and Human Services targeted the Little Sisters of the Poor, and the FBI investigated reporters who dared to challenge the Democratic Party line.

In America, the illness is the Democrats, and we all need a cure.

Since Donald Trump announced his presidential candidacy in 2015, these agencies, along with RINO Republicans, directed their efforts against him, his family, his businesses, his associates, and other conservatives. Americans should recognize how close the nation came to losing its freedoms and express profound gratitude to Trump for his decisive actions in just the first four days of his second administration.

Trump’s new administration withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Accords and the World Health Organization, restoring sovereignty over the nation’s economy and health care system to the American people.

At home, Trump has nominated John Ratcliffe as his new CIA director, Pam Bondi as his attorney general, and Kash Patel as his man to reform the FBI. Under this new leadership, conservatives will no longer face investigations or persecution for expressing their love of country and freedom. These appointments aim to ensure full investigations into the past 16 years of agency misconduct, uncovering the truth about recent history.

Trump is securing the border while empowering law enforcement to operate in Democrat-controlled sanctuary cities. This marks the end of years where Democrat-led city and state administrations shielded criminal gangs involved in systematic drug and sex trafficking. In just a few days, hundreds of murderers, rapists, and drug dealers have been arrested, making the nation safer. This also signals the end of the Democrat Party’s alleged practice of importing illegal immigrants to replace American voters or form socialist militias to plunder inner cities.

Trump has declared the Green New Deal dead and frozen further funding for the Inflation Reduction Act. Both initiatives were designed to enable a massive economic takeover of the energy sector and redistribute wealth to Democrat-controlled states and constituencies at the expense of businesses and taxpayers nationwide. This move could spell the end of environmental, social, and governance policies, which aimed to control the nation’s investment capital and direct it to Democratic Party-aligned enterprises. Let’s hope it also ends the practice of financial institutions “debanking” citizens and businesses for holding unfashionable conservative views.

Trump is dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion programs across all government agencies and the military. These DEI initiatives, engineered to divide the country, infiltrated public institutions and businesses through executive boards and human resources departments to indoctrinate American adults.

He is also putting an end to critical race theory in education. This socialist-driven framework re-educated America’s youth to despise their country and themselves. What’s more, the president is halting transgenderism in education and medicine — another socialist initiative that exploited prepubescent children by pushing psychotropic drugs and promoting irreversible physical changes. These policies, which included surgeries and treatments that targeted children’s minds and bodies, were part and parcel of the Democratic Party’s agenda.

From restoring national sovereignty and reforming intelligence and justice agencies to securing the border, enforcing law and order, and shutting down redistributionist programs, Trump is steering the nation away from the precipice engineered by over a century of the Democrats’ socialist policies. His actions are bringing the country back to free enterprise and a focus on education reform.

Our nation has been saved.

One of Trump’s best nominations so far might be Linda McMahon as secretary of education. Her appointment should serve as a model for this generation and the next. Trump assigned McMahon with returning control over education to states, local communities, and citizens, with the goal of putting herself out of a job.

Socialism, like all tyrannies throughout history, thrives on concentrated power. To reverse the tide of tyranny in America, we must decentralize power for a generation or more — shifting authority out of Washington, D.C., and returning it to the states and the people.

History offers a cautionary tale. When Ronald Reagan took office promising a conservative revolution, then-House Democratic Leader Tip O’Neill (D-Mass.) publicly declared, “I can read the Congress; they go with the will of the people, and the will of the people is to go along with the president.” Privately, however, he assured fellow Democrats, “Time cures all ills.”

In America, the illness is the Democrats, and we all need a cure. Thank you, Dr. Trump.

The Media Lose Their Minds Over Federal Funding Freeze

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, Newsbusters

With a single stroke, the Trump White House sent the left and their attendant media into a tailspin, scrambling to find a way to spin the twin daggers aimed directly at the heart of the Government-Industrial Complex: The OMB federal funding freeze and the proposed buyouts to over 2 million federal workers.

Most emblematic of that coverage: David Muir’s overwrought introduction to Mary Bruce’s reporting on ABC World News Tonight. As always, Muir serves a lengthy brief that negates the need for further reporting on any given matter:

DAVID MUIR: We begin tonight with the breaking headline. Sources telling ABC News President Trump is now expected to offer buyouts to nearly all federal workers. More than 2 million Americans. So how would this work, and what’s driving this? And it all comes as The White House aimed to put a freeze on billions of dollars of federal aid effective at 5:00 today but then, with minutes to spare, a federal judge temporarily blocking the move. That freeze could impact millions of Americans, from seniors to school children. Questions whether this could affect Head Start, school lunches, Meals on Wheels for seniors. We have it all covered tonight, beginning with the plan to offer buyouts to millions of those federal workers.

Part of the misdirection is to show sympathetic victims of the funding cuts, in hopes that this will evoke opposition to the cuts. Hence the mentions of Meals on Wheels and Head Start. Because who doesn’t love toddlers and seniors? But the funding cut is really about the grants to lefty organizations, as NBC’s Lester Holt indicated in his open.

LESTER HOLT: The two-page memo from the Office of Management and Budget specifically calls out foreign aid and programs that tend to be favored on the political left.

CBS’s Nancy Cordes identifies one of those such groups: LULAC, which endorsed Kamala Harris in 2024:

NANCY CORDES: Take LULAC, for example, it’s the nation’s largest Latino civil rights organization. They told us they believe one of their largest education programs is on the list to be frozen, if that is true, they say they will not be able to make payroll for about 125 employees. 

Univision’s Pedro Rojas got a reaction from the head of another such Democrat-adjacent group: Hispanic Federation.

PEDRO ROJAS: Frankie Miranda, president of the Hispanic Federation, says that the measure leaves many unknowns.

FRANKIE MIRANDA: We are trying to get more information about the federal agencies that handle many of these funds, and yet what exists is uncertainty and confusion. 

Making the story about victims obfuscates and diverts from what is about to happen on the budget front- a big court fight over the constitutionality of the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which forces the Executive Branch to spend monies allocated by Congress to the different agencies. If this law is found to be unconstitutional due to its infringement on the President’s Article II powers, then President Donald Trump is free to gut the Deep State like a fish. 

Telemundo’s report was the only one to hint at a looming court fight:

JOSEPH MALOUF: The check is cut and all that is needed is to deliver it. Intercepting the check is not authorized under the Constitution.

LETITIA JAMES: He exceeded his authority.

CRISTINA LONDOÑO: And Trump exceeded his authority, said New York Attorney General Letitia James, one of at least five Democratic state prosecutors who promised to fight the measure in court, as well as non-profit organizations that claim that among the temporarily frozen funds is included research into cures for cancer in children, protection of victims of domestic abuse, suicide prevention lines, among others. 

Telemundo’s contributing attorney calls these impoundments “intercepting the check” Congress has already cut, which will be at the heart of the court case in front of the federal judge of indeterminate appointment. And by “indeterminate” I mean she’s a Biden appointee. But that gets muted. Unlike, say, Judge Aileen Cannon, who got hit with a “Trump-appointed” tag any time she was mentioned.

The media were caught flat-footed by the spending freeze and federal employee buyout, and it shows. 

Click “expand” to view the full transcripts of the aforementioned reports as aired on their respective newscasts on Tuesday, January 28th, 2025:

ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHT

1/28//25

6:32 PM

DAVID MUIR: We begin tonight with the breaking headline. Sources telling ABC News President Trump is now expected to offer buyouts to nearly all federal workers. More than 2 million Americans. So how would this work, and what’s driving this? And it all comes as The White House aimed to put a freeze on billions of dollars of federal aid effective at 5:00 today but then, with minutes to spare, a federal judge temporarily blocking the move. That freeze could impact millions of Americans, from seniors to school children. Questions whether this could affect Head Start, school lunches, Meals on Wheels for seniors. We have it all covered tonight, beginning with the plan to offer buyouts to millions of those federal workers. Here’s our Chief White House Correspondent Mary Bruce.

MARY BRUCE: Tonight, President Donald Trump continuing his overhaul of the federal government. ABC News learning the administration is offering all well over 2 million federal employees a buyout to resign as long as they do it by February 6th, just nine days from now. In an email blasted to federal employees tonight, those interested in taking the buyout told to reply with one word. Resign. The White House tonight saying “American taxpayers pay for the salaries of federal government employees, and therefore deserve employees working on their behalf who actually show up to work in our wonderful federal buildings, also paid for by taxpayers.” The White House saying they would be paid out until September. All of this coming as Trump tries to root out federal spending that doesn’t align with his priorities. Tonight, just minutes before The White House put in place a sweeping freeze on potentially billions of dollars in federal grants and loans, possibly impacting millions of Americans, seniors and children across the country, a federal judge temporarily blocking it. Saying, “it seems like the federal government currently doesn’t actually know the full scope of the programs that are going to be subject to the pause.” The White House today sparking major questions after it announced plans to pause and review funding for federal assistance programs, for everything from free school breakfasts and lunches, Head Start for hundreds of thousands of children, and Meals on Wheels for millions of seniors.

KAROLINE LEAVITT: Good afternoon, everybody.

BRUCE: The new White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt in her first briefing defending the move, saying it’s needed to make sure these programs don’t run counter to President Trump’s agenda.

LEAVITT: What does this pause mean? It means no more funding for illegal DEI programs. It means no more funding for the Green New Scam that has cost American taxpayers tens of billions of dollars. It means no more funding for transgenderism and wokeness across our federal bureaucracy and agencies.

BRUCE: The broad directive immediately prompting confusion, even at much bigger programs like Medicaid, which provides health insurance for 72 million low income Americans. States reporting the online portals down. Medicaid warning of possible payment delays due to executive orders regarding potentially unallowable grant payments. The White House says they expect the portal will be back online shortly, and payments are still being processed and sent. Tonight, the administration is adamant programs that provide direct benefits to Americans, like Medicaid, Social Security, Medicare, and federal food assistance programs will not be impacted. 

BRUCE: What is the president’s message to Americans out there, many of whom supported him and voted for him who are concerned that this is going to impact them directly?

LEAVITT: Again, direct assistance will not be impacted.

BRUCE: What do you mean direct assistance, Karoline, if it’s going to another organization and trickling down?

LEAVITT: Direct assistance that is in the hands of the American people will not be impacted.

BRUCE: Meals on Wheels telling ABC News “the lack of clarity and uncertainty unfortunately means seniors will panic, not knowing where their next meal will come from.”

Tonight, lawmakers in both parties are accusing the president of overstepping his power, blocking funding that was already allocated by Congress. And on this breaking news of these buyouts, the union that represents federal workers is now blasting the move, saying, quote, “purging the federal government of dedicated career federal employees will have vast, unintended consequences that will cause chaos for the Americans who depend on a functioning federal government.” David?

MUIR: All right. Mary Bruce, leading us off tonight. Mary, thank you.

CBS EVENING NEWS

1/28/25

6:35 PM

MAURICE DUBOIS: And President Trump wants to freeze many federal grants and loans to make sure they comply with his agenda. It is not clear yet exactly what that might affect. And late today, a federal judge blocked the freeze.

JOHN DICKERSON: It was ordered in a late-night memo from the Office of Management and Budget, and Nancy Cordes is at The White House. Nancy, this is confusing. So can we go first to who would not be affected by this order if it were in effect?

NANCY CORDES: We are still trying to figure that out, John. The judge said today she is imposing this stay until at least Monday so she has more time to determine whether organizations will be harmed by the funding freeze. Right now no one seems to know how much funding is being paused, how many groups that affects, and for how long. But The White House did release a memo today to say that many vital programs will not be affected, like Social Security, Medicare, food stamps, Head Start, farm assistance, and rental assistance. As for the organizations that will be affected, well, all The White House has said so far is that this pause will apply to any programs that conflict with the president’s new executive orders on topics like immigration, foreign aid, and DEI, or Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.

DUBOIS: So Nancy, of those who think they might be affected, how are they reacting tonight?

CORDES: Well, Democrats argued these funds were already approved by Congress and that the Trump Administration doesn’t have the authority to do this. Of the groups that might be affected, the way that they are reacting, well, in the absence of much information, thousands of organizations that rely on federal funds were making panicked calls to Congress today to try to figure out if they are on the list. Take LULAC, for example, it’s the nation’s largest Latino civil rights organization. They told us they believe one of their largest education programs is on the list to be frozen, if that is true, they say they will not be able to make payroll for about 125 employees. So even a brief pause could have a significant effect.

DICKERSON: Nancy Cordes for us at The White House. Thank you, Nancy.

NBC NIGHTLY NEWS

1/28/25

6:32 PM

LESTER HOLT: Good evening and welcome. The speed of President Trump’s rush to remake the federal government may have left some in its wake today and caused a federal judge to step in, temporarily halting an abrupt Trump order to pause spending on federal grants and loans. The order outlined in an early morning memo left many organizations that depend on federal funds, from nonprofits to state programs, confused and scrambling for some clarity. The White House stressing the spending pause would not apply to funds that are directly paid to individuals. The two-page memo from the Office of Management and Budget specifically calls out foreign aid and programs that tend to be favored on the political left. The court today pausing the White House plan for a week. Now tonight a sweeping new shake up to report, hitting the email boxes of every federal worker. It is where we begin with Garrett Haake.

GARRETT HAAKE: Tonight as part of his promise to reduce government spending, President Trump is making more than 2 million federal workers an offer. Quit now and accept a severance package. NBC News first reporting federal employees received the by email late this afternoon. The White House expects 5 to 10% of the federal workforce to accept it, which could lead to $100 billion in annual savings. But tonight, in a blow to the administration, a federal judge has temporarily blocked the president’s attempt at another government shake up, after the Office of Management and Budget overnight ordered a temporary pause on grant, loan or federal financial assistance programs that might run counter to President Trump’s executive orders.

KAROLINE LEAVITT: It means no more funding for illegal DEI programs. (VIDEO SWIPE) It means no more funding for transgenderism and wokeness across our federal bureaucracy and agencies. (VIDEO SWIPE) President Trump is looking out for you by issuing this pause, because he is being a good steward of your taxpayer dollars.

HAAKE: Democrats immediately assigned the president’s action.

CHUCK SCHUMER: Law enforcement, rural hospitals, aid to the elderly, food for people in need. (VIDEO SWIPE) The decision is lawless, dangerous, destructive, cruel.

HAAKE: While several state attorney generals sued to block the move.

LAETITIA JAMES: When Congress dedicates funding for a program, the president cannot pull that funding on a whim.

HAAKE: But Republicans defending the freeze.

JAMES COMER: Let’s get a handle on ass this spending and figure out if it is going where it is supposed to go.

HAAKE: Tonight The White House saying individual federal assistance would not be paused or reviewed under its plan.

KAROLINE LEAVITT: Social security benefits, Medicaid benefits, food stamps, welfare benefits. Assistance that is going directly to individuals will not be impacted by this pause.

HAAKE: But all of it sparked confusion about who would be impacted. The White House says Head Start, the early childhood education program for low income families, would not be affected. But Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy posting, quote, Head Start reimbursement system is shut down in his state.

What was your reaction when you heard about this order overnight?

TALETHIA EDWARDS: Yeah, it was a shock.

HAAKE: While in Florida, Talethia Edwards’ four-year-old son Raymond is one of the more than 800,000 children served by the program. She told me the uncertainty is nerve-racking.

EDWARDS: You look for the options but there are not many options when you think of affordability in child care.

HOLT: And Garrett, that judge temporarily blocking the pause on federal assistance until a hearing next week. Meantime, President Trump has issued a new executive order impacting transgender children and teens. What can you tell us about that?

HAAKE: That’s right, Lester. This order says the U.S. will not fund, promote, or assist in any way with transition surgeries for anyone under age 19, including directing government healthcare providers to exclude coverage for transgender coverage or hormone treatments, all of it likely to spark a legal challenge. Lester.

HOLT: Garrett Haake. Thank you.

NOTICIAS TELEMUNDO

1/28/25

6:32 PM

JULIO VAQUEIRO: Good afternoon, this has been a day of confusion. Last night the president announced an executive order requiring the freezing of financial aid to numerous government programs. What were those programs? How did this directly affect our lives? The question was in the air. The government did not clarify the scope of the measure. But this afternoon, before it took effect, a judge put the president’s order on hold. Cristina Londoño prepared the chronicle of confusion.

CRISTINA LONDOÑO: Chaos and confusion took over Washington and sowed nervousness in communities. Upon learning of this memo from the Budget Office, temporarily freezing federal aid, this mother of four froze.

FLOR BARUCA: How many families identify with me that their children are safe at school, that they will have their food there? Imagine taking that away from them. It would have been awful.

LONDOÑO: The issue stole the show at the debut of the new White House spokesperson. Karoline Leavitt came out to calm millions.

KAROLINE LEAVITT: Social Security benefits. Medicare. Benefits. Food stamps. Welfare benefits assistance that is going directly to individuals will not be impacted by this pause.

LONDOÑO: However, she reiterated that this is a directive to government departments to examine the programs they subsidize, stressing that they seek to cut what they call Marxist equity programs, transgenderism, and the social engineering of the Green New Deal, which they consider is a waste of taxpayers’ money. So far it is not known specifically what these programs are.

CHUCK SCHUMER: It’s a dagger at the heart of the average American family.

LONDOÑO: It is a dagger to the hearts of families, said Democrat Charles Schumer, insisting that it is an unconstitutional measure because Congress is who approves the funds.

JOSEPH MALOUF: The check is cut and all that is needed is to deliver it. Intercepting the check is not authorized under the Constitution.

LETITIA JAMES: He exceeded his authority.

LONDOÑO: And Trump exceeded his authority, said New York Attorney General Letitia James, one of at least five Democratic state prosecutors who promised to fight the measure in court, as well as non-profit organizations that claim that among the temporarily frozen funds is included research into cures for cancer in children, protection of victims of domestic abuse, suicide prevention lines, among others. Although the Trump administration has not confirmed the suspension of these funds, it insists that the government must align itself with the will that the People expressed at the polls. The federal judge in Washington who stopped the pause in federal funds summoned the government and the plaintiffs next Monday to present their arguments.

VAQUEIRO: Cristina, in breaking news, President Trump’s administration is offering a severance package to 2 million federal workers.

LONDON That’s right, Julio. What he is trying to do is reduce the size of the federal government at all costs. He promised that. The objective is to encourage workers to resign with a package that includes approximately eight months of salary and benefits. A senior government official told NBC that they expect between five and 10% of the federal workforce to accept the offer, which could generate savings of around $100 billion, Julio.

VAQUEIRO: Good, Cristina. Well, there are two pieces of news that are shaking Washington today. Thank you so much.

UNIVISION NEWS

1/28/25

6:31 PM

ILIA CALDERÓN: How are you, good evening. Today The White House suspended all aid and loans disbursed by the federal government. We’re talking billions of dollars allocated to programs like school lunch that benefit vulnerable communities, public health initiatives like childhood cancer research, municipal works, and funds for charities. However, a federal judge has just blocked part of this controversial measure. Pedro Rojas has the latest.

PEDRO ROJAS: In the federal court in Washington DC, and at the request of four non-profit organizations, a judge Loren AliKhan blocked until Monday the entry into force of the temporary freeze of billions of dollars in federal resources ordered by President Donald Trump to government agencies to ensure that funds are used according to his policies.

Frankie Miranda, president of the Hispanic Federation, says that the measure leaves many unknowns.

FRANKIE MIRANDA: We are trying to get more information about the federal agencies that handle many of these funds, and yet what exists is uncertainty and confusion. 

ROJAS: In the middle of a busy press conference, the new White House spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt, defended Trump’s plan. [Speaks in English] “This is not a complete pause,” the spokesperson said, adding that the measure lasts until February 10 and requires each agency to explain how the budget is used. A memo states that “the use of federal funds to promote Marxist equity, transgenderism, and Green New Deal social policy is a waste of taxpayer money that does not improve the daily lives of those we serve.” Democrats in Congress oppose it. “It’s hard to describe how destructive this decision is for the country,” said Senator Chuck Schumer. Republicans are open to assessment. “The government spends a lot of money and what we want is for it to go to appropriate places,” said this congressman from Utah (Blake Miller). Trump signed five executive orders impacting the military. He reinstates soldiers discharged for not getting vaccinated, prohibits transgender personnel, eliminates diversity and inclusion programs, orders the construction of anti-missile defense domes and sobserves the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp, in Poland. 

The White House insists that the temporary freeze of resources for now does not affect social benefit programs for Americans. In Washington, Pedro Rojas, Univision.

CALDERÓN: And in an attempt to reduce the size of government, President Trump today offered all federal workers a severance package if they resign by February 6. This package would include seven months’ salary plus benefits. 5-10% of the federal workforce is expected to take up this offer.

 

California Democrat Proposes Legislation to Sue Oil Companies Over Wildfires That Had NOTHING to Do With Them

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: Gateway Pundit, INVESTIGATIONS

Hughes fire in Los Angeles County: screen image KTLA

Scott Weiner, a Democratic State Senator in California, is introducing legislation that would allow people to sue oil companies over the wildfires that have ravaged the state in recent weeks.

This is typical Democrat political sleight of hand.

Oil companies had NOTHING to do with the destructive nature of these fires. If people want to sue someone, they should sue the Democrats who run the state and completely dropped the ball on being ready for these entirely predictable fires.

It’s amazing that this is even real.

A newly proposed California state law would create a new pathway for victims of wildfires and insurance companies to sue oil companies over climate change. https://t.co/17RikPgRLf

— CBS News (@CBSNews) January 28, 2025

From CBS News:

A newly proposed California state law would create a new pathway for victims of wildfires and insurance companies to sue oil companies over climate change.

Democratic State Senator Scott Weiner introduced the bill directly linking the wildfires to climate change caused by oil companies, as part of the statewide response to the Los Angeles-area wildfires.

“Absolutely catastrophic wildfires happening in the middle of winter,” Weiner said. “For insurance companies, they’re going to have to, if this bill passes, they’re going to have to take a very hard look at seeking compensation from the oil companies.”

Republican State Senator Roger Niello is opposed to the bill.

“It will be an invitation for lawsuits,” Niello said. “This furthers the narrative, the false narrative that this is all about climate change. It is of course much more complicated than that.”

This is Weiner. He is trying to place all of the blame for this on climate change and oil companies.

I’m introducing legislation (SB 222) to ensure oil companies pay for the climate-fueled disasters that are burning & flooding California.

Californians are bearing these costs with explosive insurance premium increases that make CA less affordable. That has to change.

— Senator Scott Wiener (@Scott_Wiener) January 27, 2025

Did oil companies cause the lack of water in the fire hydrants? Did oil companies fail to clear all of the flammable brush? No. The Democrats who run the state did that.

Oil companies didn’t mismanage California’s fire mitigation and preparedness. Democrats did that.

In fact oil companies not only didn’t have anything to do with these fires, they’re responsible for all of the petroleum products used by firefighters to put out the Democrat fires. https://t.co/u4YMC6YALp

— Eric Spencer (@JustEric) January 28, 2025

California will not be saved until these Democrats are voted out of office.

The post California Democrat Proposes Legislation to Sue Oil Companies Over Wildfires That Had NOTHING to Do With Them appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Republican congresswoman introduces legislation to add Trump to Mount Rushmore

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, The Blaze

A Republican congresswoman has introduced legislation that would add President Donald Trump to the four presidents on Mount Rushmore in South Dakota.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida filed the bill on Tuesday to honor Trump for his “transformative impact on America and the historical significance of his leadership.”

‘His remarkable accomplishments for our country and the success he will continue to deliver deserve the highest recognition and honor.’

The current national memorial bears the visages of Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Theodore Roosevelt. Their heads measure about 60 feet tall.

While some on social media were angered and furious over the suggestion, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California recently called for former President Joe Biden to be added to the memorial.

“You have Teddy Roosevelt up there. And he’s wonderful. I don’t say take him down. But you can add Biden,” Pelosi said while a guest on “The View” in August before the election.

Further, in 2020, Don Lemon said not only that former President Barack Obama should be added the memorial but that he should be placed “front and center” for his accomplishments.

“I think, listen,” Lemon said at the time, “if they are going to put someone on Mount Rushmore, considering the history of this country, the first black president should be front and center.”

Some Native American groups have called for the destruction of the memorial because they consider that it was a stain on the sacred land and a reminder of broken promises to their ancestors.

“His remarkable accomplishments for our country and the success he will continue to deliver deserve the highest recognition and honor on this iconic national monument,” continued Luna on social media. “Let’s get carving!”

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Awakened homeowner grabs gun, waits for intruder to open bedroom door. A shoot-out follows — and it’s all caught on video.

January 29, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: INVESTIGATIONS, The Blaze

A Michigan home invasion over the weekend resulted in a shoot-out — and it was all caught on surveillance video, WJBK-TV reported.

It began when two intruders broke into 24-year-old Benjamin Nevers’ home in Dearborn Heights on Saturday morning, WXYZ-TV reported.

‘I’m kind of glad the guy who shot me is still alive, too. I don’t want to kill nobody.’

Nevers told WJBK he and a friend had returned from a trip to the Bahamas when two suspects appeared on security video breaking into Nevers’ residence through a kitchen window and moving around the house.

Nevers’ friend was seen on surveillance video lying face down in the living room and being held at gunpoint. WXYZ said the two intruders searched the house for studio equipment and jewelry before ending up at Nevers’ bedroom door.

“Then I woke up, and I was just quick enough to react to grab my gun and cock it, and I just sat there and kind of waited,” Nevers told WJBK. “I knew they were going to come to my room.”

Surveillance video shows Nevers inside his bedroom with his gun pointed at his bedroom door — and as soon as a gunman comes in, the shoot-out commences.

Nevers told WXYZ the gunman shot him in the foot — but that he fired twice at the gunman, hitting him in the leg.

An exterior camera shows the wounded suspect limping and practically crawling out of the home.

Aftermath

As for Nevers’ injuries, he told WJBK that his foot was “completely shattered” and needed “immediate surgery” with “screws and plates.” Nevers added to WJBK that he also “got hit in the back.”

Nevers added to WJBK that his girlfriend, who was lying in a bed behind him during the exchange of gunfire, also was shot.

“I know she got shot in the back, and it … traveled up and … hit her kidney, and I think it’s lodged in her chest right now … they can’t get the bullet out ’cause it’s too dangerous,” he told WJBK. “So I know they are watching her, and it’s going to be a couple more days.”

Nevers told WXYZ he believes his large social media following from his days as a party promoter tempted the suspects to target him.

He told WJBK that a bag the suspects tried to steal contained “a bottle of Don Julio” and “a chocolate bar.” Nevers added to WJBK that “there was a studio microphone” for the taking and that “these guys did this for nothing.”

He also told WJBK that he’s “just happy everybody is alive and well. I’m kind of glad the guy who shot me is still alive, too. I don’t want to kill nobody.”

Attorney Jim Makowski told WXYZ it “absolutely” was a clear-cut self-defense shooting on Nevers’ part: “The homeowner acted completely responsibly. He identified a threat, he armed himself, and when the threat materialized, he opened fire, and it was a good shoot.”

Suspect arrested

Phillip Price is facing 21 felony charges for the break-in, including two counts of assault with intent to murder, WXYZ reported, adding that Price remained in custody with no bond.

WXYZ added that police are searching for a second suspect.

You can view video reports here and here about the incident, both of which include clips of the shoot-out as well as interviews with Nevers.

Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Joe Rogan Praises JD Vance for His Performance in Biased CBS News Interview: ‘Thank God for That Guy’ (VIDEO)

January 28, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: Gateway Pundit, INVESTIGATIONS

It is safe to say that Joe Rogan is a big fan of Vice President JD Vance.

During a recent episode of his podcast, Rogan praised Vance’s performance in his interview with CBS News hack Margaret Brennan, in which she repeatedly and smugly tried to hurl gotcha questions at him.

It’s amazing that Brennan was even allowed to do this interview, given her performance in the VP debate before the election.

The Daily Caller reports:

‘Thank God For That Guy’: Joe Rogan Heaps Praise On JD Vance After ‘F*ckin’ Amazing’ CBS News Interview

Podcast host Joe Rogan on Tuesday praised Vice President J.D. Vance following his CBS News interview with host Margaret Brennan.

Vance appeared on “Face the Nation” Sunday, facing questions from Brennan on the economy, immigration and the Trump administration’s future plans. Rogan, on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” called the interview “fuckin’ amazing” and “a masterclass,” crediting the vice president with effectively countering Brennan’s talking points.

“He’s great. Thank God for that guy. He’s so good at dismantling those dopey people and just breaking down — she was like, ‘This is a country built on immigrants.’ He’s like, ‘Yes, that doesn’t mean that 240 years later we have to have the dumbest immigration policy possible.’”

During the interview, Brennan raised the topic of President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship for illegal migrants and immigrants with temporary legal status. She noted that the United States is “a country founded by immigrants” and called it “a unique country,” which Vance agreed with.

Watch the clip below:

NEW: Joe Rogan heaps praise on JD Vance after his “f*ckin’ amazing” CBS News interview:

“He’s great. Thank God for that guy. He’s so good at dismantling those dopey people … she was like, ‘This is a country built on immigrants.’ He’s like, ‘Yes, that doesn’t mean that 240… pic.twitter.com/tkpV4bBXQc

— Jason Cohen (@JasonJournoDC) January 28, 2025

Republicans should stop granting access to people like Margaret Brennan. They treat Republicans like enemies and they will never change.

The post Joe Rogan Praises JD Vance for His Performance in Biased CBS News Interview: ‘Thank God for That Guy’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

OWNED: Stephen Miller Schools Jake Tapper on His “Who’s Going to Pick the Crops” Argument as Trump Admin Deports Illegals (VIDEO)

January 28, 2025 Ogghy Filed Under: Gateway Pundit, INVESTIGATIONS

President Trump’s brilliant Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller schooled CNN host Jake Tapper over Trump’s immigration policies.

The Trump Administration began its immigration raids and deportation operations on day one of Trump 2.0 last week.

As of Tuesday, ICE has arrested more than 3,500 illegal aliens since Trump was sworn into office last week.

Jake Tapper tried to get Stephen Miller with a gotcha question on the whole “who’s going to pick the crops” argument but he ended up getting schooled.

“The Department of Agriculture says that between 2020 and 2022, 42% of crop workers were undocumented immigrants and in many cases as you know do the jobs many Americans do not want to do,” Tapper said. “So, how does President Trump make sure that the effort to deport people who are not in this country legally doesn’t end up hurting Americans that want safe borders, absolutely, but also, don’t want to see even more higher prices in groceries?”

Stephen Miller crushed Jake Tapper.

“Well, I mean, I’m sure it’s not your position, Jake. You’re just asking the question that we should supply America’s food with exploitative, illegal alien labor,” Stephen Miller said.

“I obviously don’t think that’s what you’re implying,” Stephen Miller added. “Only 1% of alien workers in the entire country work in agriculture. The top destination for illegal aliens are large cities like New York, like Los Angeles and small, industrial towns, of course, all across the heartland as we’ve seen with the Biden influx.” None of those illegal aliens are doing farm work.”

Jake Tapper tried interrupting Stephen Miller but failed.

“The illegal aliens that Joe Biden brought into our country are not full stop doing farm work. They are not the illegal aliens he brought in from Venezuela, from Haiti, from Nicaragua. They are not doing farm work. They are in our cities collecting welfare,” Stephen Miller said.

“As for the farmers, there is a guest worker program that President Trump supports. Over time as well, we will transition to automation so we will never have to have this conversation ever again,” Stephen Miller said.

WATCH:

HOLY SMOKES: @StephenM just scorched a combative Jake Tapper and his “who’s going to pick the crops!” propaganda:

“Well, I mean, I’m sure it’s not your position, Jake. You’re just asking the question that we should supply America’s food with exploitative, illegal alien labor.… pic.twitter.com/dhBsJpN59W

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) January 28, 2025

Trump’s border czar Tom Homan said he’s just getting started and wants to increase daily deportations.

WATCH:

Holy sh*t!

Jesse Watters just asked Homan if he was satisfied with the deportation operations so far.

Homan: “No, we’ve got to do more.”

This is what I like to hear! DEPORT THEM ALL! pic.twitter.com/WvuNx6qpIB

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) January 29, 2025

The post OWNED: Stephen Miller Schools Jake Tapper on His “Who’s Going to Pick the Crops” Argument as Trump Admin Deports Illegals (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 503
  • Page 504
  • Page 505

Primary Sidebar

Latest Posts

  • Ex-Synapse CEO reportedly trying to raise $100M for his new humanoid robotics venture
  • Acting FEMA administrator out after pushing back against Trump agency plans
  • First American elected pontiff, get to know Pope Leo XIV
  • Need More Proof That Polls Showing Trump Underwater Are Bogus?
  • Wow, He HATES Her … LOL: Here’s Why Joe Biden Really Thinks Kamala Harris Lost and HOOBOY (Watch)
  • ‘Golden Bachelor’ Gerry Turner Goes Instagram Official With A New Ladyfriend Following The Infamous “Golden Divorce”
  • Passenger shocked by plane crew error that put her 3 year-old at risk — and she’s not happy with the airline’s response
  • Bernie Sanders insists he’s entitled to use expensive private jet travel
  • The Top 3 Worst Business Decisions I Ever Made — and How They Turned Into the Biggest Drivers of My Success
  • Social media startup Fizz sues Instacart and Partiful for trademark infringement over new Fizz app
  • GOP senators: Congress should vote on Trump’s potential Iran nuclear deal
  • Fox News to air special editions of ‘Special Report’ and ‘Hannity’ live from Middle East
  • How to Boot TV Shows From ‘Continue Watching’ on Disney Plus
  • Vile Leftists Target and Mock Disabled Elderly Woman Leaving Riley Gaines TPUSA Event: “Kill yourself” “I hope you die” (Video)
  • Cardinals choose pope from America for the first time in history
  • Video: Alleged bully beats up crying 10-year-old girl, pulls her by hair to school restroom floor as other girls cheer attack
  • WBD global streaming subs increase by 5.3m to 122.3m in mixed Q1 report
  • Box Office Beatings Will Continue Until Movies Improve: AMC Posts Eye-Watering $202M Loss to Start 2025
  • Jeremy Renner Details Near-Fatal Snow Plow Accident in New Memoir ‘My Next Breath’
  • Jiří Bartoška, Actor and Karlovy Vary Film Festival President, Dies at 78

🛩️ Fly Smarter with OGGHY Jet Set
🎟️ Hot Tickets Now
🌴 Explore Tours & Experiences
© 2025 William Liles (dba OGGHYmedia). All rights reserved.