In the efforts to attract new audiences and stay relevant in an evolving luxury market, creative directors are often tasked with rebranding renowned fashion houses. While this injects a fresh perspective to a Maison and opens the opportunity for profits, it can also be something of a double-edged sword that could chip away at the âtrue essenceâ of the founderâs heritage, shifting the focus from legacy to trend-driven appeal. As designers reinterpret brand histories through selective eras or aesthetics, the risk of diluting tradition grows, leaving fashion giants in a constant cycle of balancing reinvention at the expense of authenticity.
Rise of the âRebrandingâ Era
The luxury fashion industry operates at a crossroads â where heritage and reinvention are constantly at odds. Previous years have seen the former appointments of visionary creative directors like Alessandro Michele at Gucci and Hedi Slimane at Saint Laurent illustrating how the industry (or rather their conglomerates) prioritises a bold, contemporary overhaul to captivate new audiences. Micheleâs maximalist, vintage-inspired take propelled Gucci to fresh cultural relevance, while Slimaneâs Saint Laurent fixated on the rock-and-roll aesthetic â sidelining other aspects of Yves Saint Laurentâs legacy. These shifts may generate buzz and financial success, but they often leave behind the nuanced, multifaceted heritage of the original founders.
Yves Saint Laurent was pivotal in shaping the 1960s mod era, introducing sharp tailoring, A-line silhouettes and clean, architectural lines that were more refined than the grunge-heavy Saint Laurent of today. His designs for women, like the 1966 Le Smoking tuxedo and safari jackets, embodied a forward-thinking modernity that was bold yet elegant. During his tenure, Slimane cemented the brandâs reputation as the go-to for skinny jeans, biker jackets and indie-rock aesthetics, largely omitting Saint Laurentâs more refined innovations. His version of Saint Laurent became synonymous with punk and youth subcultures, but at the cost of other dimensions of the brandâs heritage. Hedi Slimaneâs interpretation of Saint Laurentâs legacy prioritised the brandâs rock-and-roll persona, but this narrow lens overlooks the full breadth of Yves Saint Laurentâs innovative fashion â from the renowned le smoking tuxedo jacket to his embrace of global inspirations. In focusing on one chapter, the brand lost the richness of its founderâs multidimensional story.
Similarly, it was McQueenâs dramatic silhouettes, controversial narratives and conceptual runway showcases inspired by historical events, personal struggles or macabre fairy tales â that challenged fashion norms. When Sarah Burton took over as creative director, she carried on McQueenâs craftsmanship but steered the brand toward a more wearable, commercially palatable aesthetic. While her designs retained McQueenâs appreciation for intricate details and couture-level execution, they lacked the raw, provocative edge that made his work so distinctive.
Despite this, Burtonâs McQueen was successful, and her tenure was marked by technically brilliant designs. However, it was arguably tamer, prioritising elegance over shock value. Now, with Sean McGirr taking over, there is speculation about whether McQueenâs original daring spirit will return or if the brand will continue down a more âcommercialâ path. That being said, having a collection with âcommercialâ appeal is not necessarily a bad thing as evidenced by the success of Sarah Burtonâs tenure and Maria Grazia Churi at Dior.
The Fine Line Between Evolution and Erasure
Maintaining a brandâs DNA while catering to modern audiences is an increasingly delicate balancing act. At Dior, Maria Grazia Chiuriâs feminist-driven collections have reshaped the houseâs identity, infusing it with new cultural relevance â but at the expense of the romantic, architectural silhouettes that once defined Christian Diorâs vision. Similarly, Virginie Viardâs Chanel leans into the ease of wearability, yet risks diluting the theatrical craftsmanship that Karl Lagerfeld cemented as the brandâs modern identity. The challenge for these brands is not just about staying relevant but ensuring that reinvention does not come at the cost of heritage.
Under Lagerfeld, Chanel experienced immense commercial success, yet his embrace of casual wear â T-shirts and even menswear â diverted the focus from the intricate, artistic side of Chanel that had made the brand a symbol of Parisian haute couture. Virginie Viardâs tenure has been marked by a softer, more approachable aesthetic that feels safe compared to Lagerfeldâs daring creations. While this has resonated with some consumers, it is also seen by some as less âgroundbreakingâ, losing the edge that Chanel once had.
Kim Jones â who draws inspiration from Christian Diorâs life and eccentricities â has successfully reinterpreted the brandâs legacy, offering a modern, gender-fluid perspective without losing its spirit. His Dior Men collections introduce layers of personal connection to the founder, giving consumers a deeper emotional bond to the brand. By referencing Diorâs life and eccentricities, Jones invites consumers to connect with the history of the brand on a deeper, more personal level. This adds layers to the designs and gives the collections emotional depth, rather than presenting them as mere reinventions of past glories. It enriches the brand narrative without losing its identity. Jones does not simply replicate Diorâs designs or ideas but reinterprets them, reflecting how the houseâs rich history can be recontextualised in todayâs fashion landscape. For example, he may reference Diorâs passion for gardens or the iconic New Look but adapts them with a modern, sometimes gender-fluid, sensibility that speaks to a new generation of luxury consumers.
Demna arguably played a huge role in transforming the Maison into a cultural phenomenon but was at times criticised for not successfully bridging his approach with CristĂłbal Balenciagaâs original vision. His designs include everything from dystopian aesthetics and meme-worthy footwear (like the sock sneaker and Crocs collaborations) to provocative ad campaigns. Despite the contrast, Demna has echoed Balenciagaâs original craftsmanship in some ways. His tailoring â particularly in structured coats and draped dresses â nods to CristĂłbalâs technical genius. However, his prioritisation of branding, streetwear and shock value has, at times, overshadowed this aspect.
Unlike many other luxury houses, Louis Vuitton has managed to modernise while remaining true to its origins. Founded in 1854 as a trunk-making company, Louis Vuittonâs DNA remains deeply embedded in its roots of travel. While creative directors like Marc Jacobs, Kim Jones, Virgil Abloh and now Pharrell Williams have introduced contemporary elements, the brandâs core identity â luxury travel â remains intact. Its iconic monogram, steamer trunks and travel-inspired accessories continue to be a cornerstone of its identity.
Unlike Saint Laurent or Balenciaga â which have undergone extreme transformations â Louis Vuittonâs evolution has been more seamless. Even with streetwear collaborations and experimental designs, its heritage as a trunkmaker and its commitment to artisanal craftsmanship remain central.
What Comes Next: The Future of Fashionâs Heritage Houses
As fashion moves into a new era of creative leadership, questions arise about whether heritage brands will continue reshaping their pasts or if the industry will see a return to their founding principles. Matthieu Blazyâs Chanel and Jonathan Andersonâs potential move to Dior Men could redefine house codes with a fresh perspective, while Alessandro Micheleâs Valentino may pay closer homage to Valentino Garavaniâs original elegance. On the other hand, history has proven that some of fashionâs most admired rebrands â from John Gallianoâs extravagant Dior to Hedi Slimaneâs singular take on YSL â had little resemblance to their foundersâ original visions.
As it stands, Demnaâs tenure at Balenciaga is at an end and he is moving to Gucci. Donatella Versace is stepping down from her role as creative director. Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez â the visionary duo behind Proenza Schouler â are set to succeed Jonathan Anderson as LOEWEâs new creative directors. Matthieu Blazy moves to Chanel while Glenn Martens makes a move to Maison Margiela. Louise Trotter will be at the helm of Bottega Veneta while Michael Rider is at Celine and Simone Bellotti is Jil Sander. Jonathan Anderson is rumoured to be heading to Dior as roles in Fendi and Balenciaga are still open. As the fashion industry continue on its game of musical chairs, these brands will face tough decisions about how to evolve while maintaining their original identities.
For more on the latest in style and fashion reads, click here.
The post The Cost of New Creative Directors appeared first on LUXUO.