🏠 HOME 🚀 THE NEXT FRONTIER NEW 💸 MONEY 🎯 SUCCESS 🏡 LIVING SPACES
  • Skip to main content

Mad Mad News

LIVE ABOVE THE MADNESS

SUCCESS


How to Work With a Proactive AI Agent Without Losing Control of Your Day

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: Addicted2Success, SUCCESS

For most of the time AI has been useful in business, it has waited for you. You opened a chat window, typed a request, and got an answer. That arrangement is changing quickly. On October 21, 2026, Anthropic opened a research preview of Claude Duet, an app built for professionals and small business owners that checks your connected apps, sends you a morning brief, keeps working in the background, and messages you when it thinks something needs you. Google has described its new Gemini agent in similar terms, saying you delegate an outcome and come back to finished work. And as CNBC reported, these products are arriving into a market where OpenAI’s Dots and Meta’s Muse are already competing for the same role.
A proactive AI agent can be one of the best hires a lean business ever makes, or it can become one more voice in your pocket demanding attention. The difference has very little to do with which product you choose. It comes down to how you set it up in the first few weeks, what you let it watch, when you let it interrupt you, and how you review what it does on your behalf.
What Changes When the AI Comes to You First
With a traditional assistant, you control the timing of every interaction. With a proactive agent, the software decides when to speak up. Anthropic says Duet sends a short brief each morning on the most important items across your connected apps, then keeps tabs on those apps through the day and messages you only when something needs your attention. It also runs on its own virtual machine with its own browser, which means it keeps going when your laptop is closed and your phone is off.
That puts a new kind of judgment in the loop. Anthropic is candid that the early version still might misread a thread or miscalibrate what is urgent. That matters, because the costliest mistake a proactive agent makes usually isn’t a wrong answer. It’s a badly timed interruption, or a quiet miss on the one email that mattered.
Anthropic’s short launch video gives a clear picture of how this new kind of assistant is meant to work in a normal day.

Decide What It Watches Before You Connect Everything
The temptation with any new agent is to connect every app you own on day one. Duet, for example, can draw on more than 6,000 connectors and plugins in Anthropic’s marketplace, covering tools like Gmail, Slack, QuickBooks, Stripe, Gusto, HubSpot, Docusign and Shopify. More connections give the agent more to work with, but they also give it more to misread, more places to go wrong, and more reasons to message you.
A better approach is to start with the two or three systems where things genuinely fall through the cracks. For most founders that means the inbox, the calendar, and whatever tool tracks money coming in, such as invoicing or payments. Let the agent prove itself there before you add your CRM or team chat. Each new connection should solve a problem you can name.
It’s also worth understanding what happens when you change your mind. Anthropic’s safety and privacy notes for Duet explain that disconnecting an app stops new access from that moment, but anything the agent already learned from it stays in its memory until you reset that memory in settings. That’s a sensible design, but it means “I’ll just try it and disconnect later” isn’t quite a clean undo. Connect deliberately, and know where the reset button is.
Write Your Interruption Rules Like a Job Description
The single most valuable thing you can do with a proactive agent is tell it, in plain language, what deserves your attention and when. Anthropic notes that you can tell Duet what you want to hear about and how often, and every serious agent in this category will need some version of that instruction. If you don’t write it, the agent is left guessing at your priorities, and its guesses will be generic.
Think of it in three tiers. The first tier is what justifies an immediate message, such as a client threatening to cancel, a payment that failed on a large account, a calendar conflict with something you can’t move, or a message from a short list of people you always want to hear from. The second tier belongs in the morning brief, which covers replies you owe, invoices that are overdue, meetings that need preparation, and anything that changed overnight. The third tier is everything else, which should wait for a weekly summary or simply be handled without you ever seeing it.
Be specific about names, amounts and timeframes. “Tell me about important emails” is too vague to act on. “Message me straight away if any of these five clients writes in, if any invoice over a set amount is more than seven days late, or if anything on tomorrow’s calendar overlaps” gives the agent something it can actually act on. Revisit these rules after the first week, once you can see where it pinged too often and where it stayed quiet.
Your best thinking happens in long, uninterrupted stretches, and a proactive agent can either protect them or chop them into pieces. If you’ve already built something like a founder energy operating system to guard your focus, your interruption rules are where the agent plugs into it.
Design a Morning Brief You Will Actually Read
A morning brief is only valuable if it’s short enough to read before your day takes over and specific enough to act on. Ask for a fixed structure. A good starting format is the three things that most need a decision from you today, the replies you owe and who is waiting on each one, money movements worth knowing about, and anything the agent noticed that you didn’t ask about but probably should know.
That last category is where proactive agents earn their keep. Anthropic shared examples from early testers, including a broker whose brief flagged a property showing that was on her calendar for the wrong day, and a brand strategist whose agent noticed a client call sat right before her flight and offered to move it. Neither of those was a task anyone assigned. They were patterns the agent noticed because it could see across the calendar, the inbox and the plan for the day at once.
Ask the agent to link every item in the brief back to its source so you can check its reading in seconds. And if you notice you’re ignoring a section, cut it. A shorter brief you read every day beats a thorough one you skim.
Delegate Outcomes, Not Steps
The other half of a proactive agent is the work it does while you’re away. Duet can take a short message describing a task, work out which apps and steps it needs, and notify you when it’s done or needs your review.
The way to get good results is to brief the agent the way you’d brief a capable contractor. Describe the outcome you want, what “done” looks like, the deadline, the sources it should use, and anything it must not touch. “Pull together every unpaid invoice older than thirty days, draft a polite reminder for each one in my usual tone, and leave them for me to approve” is a strong brief. “Sort out my invoices” is not.
The quality of that work depends heavily on how well the agent understands your business. Duet carries over memory, skills and connected apps from your Claude account, and other agents work in similar ways. If you’ve taken the time to give your AI persistent business context, including your offers, your customers, your tone and your rules, a proactive agent starts from a far better place than one that has to piece your business together from scattered emails.
Guard Against Approval Fatigue
Every responsible proactive agent asks permission before it does anything consequential. Anthropic says that before Duet sends a message, makes a payment, signs a document or deletes anything, it shows you exactly what it’s about to do, including every recipient, and waits for your approval. Some actions, such as trading securities or moving money between bank accounts, are off-limits even if you approve them, and certain steps like paying or sending money can’t be covered by a “don’t ask me again” rule however often you’ve approved them before.
Those safeguards only work if you actually read what you’re approving. Anthropic itself calls approval fatigue a serious issue, noting that too many requests teach people to tap through them without adequate consideration. In week one you’ll read every approval carefully. By week six, if you’re getting thirty a day, you’ll be tapping “yes” on autopilot, which is exactly when a misread thread slips through.
The fix is to reduce the number of approvals rather than speed up how you handle them. Tighten the agent’s scope so it isn’t asking about low-value actions, batch routine drafts into one review session instead of a stream of pings, and treat any approval involving money, a new recipient, or something you can’t undo as a moment to slow down. If an approval screen ever feels like a formality, that’s a signal to change the setup.
Watch the Usage Meter as Well as the Output
Proactive agents cost more to run than a chat window because they’re working when you aren’t. Anthropic says Duet checks your connected accounts every few hours rather than continuously, specifically because nonstop checking would use up your plan’s limits much faster. During the preview it shares your plan’s usage limits with the rest of Claude, background checks count toward them, and bigger jobs like building a financial model or a deck take more model turns and background work.
If you rely on the same plan for your own writing or research, an agent running heavy background tasks can leave you short when you need the tool most. On business platforms the cost shows up on an invoice instead, which is why Google highlights cost controls for Gemini such as real-time spend caps at the project level. Check consumption weekly in the first month, and hand larger tasks over deliberately rather than letting the agent take on open-ended projects.
Review What It Did Every Week
A proactive agent that works unsupervised still needs a manager. Set aside time once a week to look back at what it did. Duet keeps a task list where each task has its own page and can be steered mid-task, and most comparable tools will give you some kind of activity history. Ask whether it surfaced what mattered, whether it bothered you with things that didn’t, and whether it took any action you wouldn’t have taken yourself.
Use the answers to adjust your interruption rules, your brief format and your connected apps. Check memory too. If the agent has picked up an outdated price, a former client, or a rule you’ve since changed, correct it or reset it. Small errors in what an agent believes about your business compound quietly when it’s acting on those beliefs every day.
The Real Win Is Getting Your Attention Back
It’s easy to judge a proactive AI agent by how much it does. The better measure is how much of your attention it gives back. The founders who get the most from these tools will treat the agent like a capable chief of staff, with a clear brief, firm rules about when to interrupt, and a regular review of its work.
Set it up that way and you get an assistant that notices the double-booked meeting and chases the overdue invoice while you stay focused on the work that moves the business forward. Skip that setup and you’ve simply added another inbox. The technology is ready either way. How useful it becomes is still up to you.
The post How to Work With a Proactive AI Agent Without Losing Control of Your Day appeared first on Addicted 2 Success.

How ‘Ghosts’ Star Asher Grodman Learned to Fly by the Seat of His Pants. (Without Wearing Any Pants.)

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: Entrepreneur Magazine, SUCCESS

The breakout ‘Ghosts’ star shares his advice on beating imposter syndrome, taking big swings and putting heart at the center of your work.

The 90-Day Plan to Become AI-Native When You Don’t Have a Transformation Budget

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: Entrepreneur Magazine, SUCCESS

Becoming AI-native takes one quarter, one revenue process and no new software: Here’s the 90-day plan you can run without a transformation budget.

Beloved seafood restaurant suddenly closes all locations after 98 years

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: SUCCESS, The Street

Whether large chains or family-owned neighborhood joints, seafood restaurants have continued to face significant challenges throughout 2026.

Casual dining Florida chain Red Lobster closed 36 of its restaurants in different corners of the country last year as part of a wider shrinking of its footprint after emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy at the end of 2024.

Other seafood chains, including Bahama Breeze and Joe’s Crab Shack, have also shuttered dozens of locations due to similar struggles with skyrocketing ingredient and other operating costs. For some of the larger chains, sale-leaseback real estate deals also locked them into high monthly rent payments, even amid falling traffic.

Cook’s Seafood permanently closes both California restaurant locations

For smaller family-owned restaurants, the situation is often even more dire.

Opened in 1928 by a local policeman with a dream of running a seafood restaurant, Cook’s Seafood was a Menlo Park neighborhood staple long before the suburb between San Francisco and San Jose became a hub of Silicon Valley innovation.

Bill Cook originally opened Cook’s Seafood as a counter selling fish and chips but expanded to a full-service after seeing a few years of early success.

Up until now, it operated both as a market selling fresh fish and seafood and a restaurant serving fish and chips, fresh catch of the day, and seafood classics such as lobster rolls and clam chowder.

Related: Popular fried chicken chain suddenly closes all stores

As reported by local media outlet Palo Alto Online, several employees at both the original location and a second one that opened in 2025 in Pleasanton, across the San Francisco Bay, received a text message saying that both locations were being shut down.

“We are sad to inform you that after 98 years, we have closed all Cook’s Seafood locations Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2026,”  Dan Dowler, who had been working at the restaurant as a counter clerk since 1972, reportedly received via text.

“Our family thanks you for all your years of service, and we’re sorry for saying this so late tonight. But we don’t want you to drive to work tomorrow, as the building is closed. We’ll send out more updates later today.”

Cook’s Seafood has been operating as a fish counter since 1928.Cook’s Seafood

“This year has been very difficult for restaurants”: Cook’s Seafood on abrupt closures

Local residents also photographed a similar message posted on a printout in the windows of the two locations, InMenlo noted. A representative of the restaurant could not be immediately reached for comment. Calls to the two locations redirected to voicemail.

Without elaborating further, the statement issued by the Cook’s Seafood team named a “year [that] has been very difficult for restaurants” as the reason for the decision to shutter.

More Retail And Travel News:

Airline to launch unusual new flight to Cayman Islands from the U.S.

Taco Bell to bring back five favorites after 20 years

153-year-old footwear retailer quietly closes 40 stores

Low-cost airline launches easier way to get to Sri Lanka

The abrupt closure of a neighborhood staple hit hard for both many of Cook’s Seafood longstanding employees and members of the community with generational memories of going to the restaurant for fresh fish.

“My very frugal mother only bought seafood from Cook’s when I was growing up in Menlo Park,” resident Linda Hubbard told Palo Alto Online. “And I’ve followed in her footsteps. Always the best, it will be missed.”

Related: Luxury hotel chain Nobu sets its latest sights on Puerto Rico

Binance Says It Plans To Resume Withdrawals This Weekend After $6.3 Billion Hack

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: Forbes, SUCCESS

The $6.3 billion breach represents the largest cryptocurrency hack in history.

Gold House Celebrates The Festival Of Lights With Gold Diwali Event

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: Forbes, SUCCESS

Gold House commemorated the annual Festival of Lights at its Gold Diwali event at The Majestic Downtown LA, honoring the rich heritage of South Asian culture worldwide.

In a wild October for markets, these stocks were the biggest winners and losers

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: MarketWatch, SUCCESS

Many Big Tech stocks were hit hard but the S&P 500 showed strength under the surface, with a majority of stocks showing gains for the month.

Why Intel’s stock saw its worst day in decades — and a $140 billion wipeout

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: MarketWatch, SUCCESS

Intel’s PC business is under pressure as memory-chip prices dent demand and as corporate IT teams have less budget for laptops.

Macy’s is selling a leak-proof 12-piece glass food storage container set for just $22

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: SUCCESS, The Street

TheStreet aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

Why we love this deal

One of the common causes of kitchen clutter is a disorganized fridge or pantry to the brim with bags of ingredients, snack packs, mismatched produce, and identifiable leftovers that get lost or forgotten when they’re shoved to the back. Not only does it leave you overwhelmed, but it often causes so much delicious food and money to go to waste. Thankfully, the great news is that a solid set of containers like the Sedona Kitchen Glass Food Storage Set can help eliminate that problem easily. 

Not only do the right containers like this Sedona set keep your foods fresher for longer, protecting meals from air and bacteria, but they even work as organizational tools to help you keep uncooked food neat, tidy, and easy to find. And although a sturdy set can set you back, sometimes a great sale like the latest one at Macy’s lets you get quality for a super low cost. The $61 food storage set is on sale for 64% off. Save $39 and get the 12-piece set for only $22 in this limited-time sale. 

Sedona Kitchen Glass Food Storage Set, $22 (was $61) at Macy’s

Courtesy of Macy’s

Shop at Macy’s

Why do shoppers love it?

Unlike plastic containers, which can cause issues like staining, odor retention, and even microplastic shedding or chemical leaching, glass containers offer superior safety, durability, and convenience. Usable in extreme temperatures, glass is always BPA, phthalates, and chemical-resin free, with a non-porous surface that prevents bacterial buildup, staining, and odor absorption. This set, which is made from borosilicate glass, is designed to withstand sudden temperature shifts and high heat meaning you can move a container from the fridge to the microwave seamlessly. It can withstand temperatures ranging from -4 degrees Fahrenheit up to 752 Fahrenheit, ensuring that not only can it safely store food but it can even be used for heating up or freezing in the oven, microwave, or freezer.

That said, what isn’t temperature safe? The lids. Made from plastic and silicone, the lids to these kinds of containers aren’t as durable as the container themselves. They are useful in the freezer but with heat in an oven or microwave, always remove the lids before use. The lids themselves use plastic and silicone seals to lock lids in place and prevent leaks or spillage. The silicone provides an airtight seal that prevents mess and keeps foods fresher for longer.

In this set, you receive two square containers with matching lids, three rectangular containers with lids, and a rectangular divided container with a lid — the latter which is perfect for meal planning or organizing multiple foods in one container. The containers vary in size. The square containers can each hold 10.48 ounces and 17.92 ounces, the rectangular containers can each hold 12.51 ounces, 21.64 ounces, and 35.15 ounces, and the multi-compartment rectangular container can hold 35.16 ounces. 

Related: Macy’s is selling a $550 10-piece stainless steel cookware set for 54% off

The containers come in a bright blue or lime green color. For convenient storage purposes, they nest into one another so you can save space when stowing them away. 

Details to know

Material: Borosilicate glass, plastic, and silicone. 

Colors: Two.

Includes: The set includes two square containers, three rectangular containers,  and one divided rectangular container. 

Dimensions: The square containers can each hold 10.48 ounces and 17.92 ounces, the rectangular containers can each hold 12.51 ounces, 21.64 ounces, and 35.15 ounces, and the multi-compartment rectangular container can hold 35.16 ounces. 

Cleaning: The containers are dishwasher safe. 

These glass containers are the perfect replacement for ratty old plastic ones. “I was getting tired of throwing out plastic containers that were discolored from use or pitted with white stains from dishwasher use,” one shopper said. “The glass is much cleaner and more sterile.” 

Shop more deals 

Art & Cook 24-Piece Glass Food Storage Set, $25 (was $72) at Macy’s

Tupperware Heritage Collection 10-Piece Food Storage Container Set, $60 (was $100) at Macy’s

Save space, save food, and save money with this efficient, food-preserving Sedona Kitchen Glass Food Storage Set, now only $22 at Macy’s.

SpaceX accuses T-Mobile, other carriers of trying to harm it

October 30, 2026 MMN Editor Filed Under: SUCCESS, The Street

Your phone works until it doesn’t.

Drive far enough past the last cell tower and the bars disappear. For years, that was just the price of living or traveling in rural America.

It’s more than an annoyance. Out there, a dead phone can turn a flat tire or a medical emergency into a much bigger problem.

Satellites were supposed to fix that. Your carrier would partner with a space company, and your phone would text through the sky when the towers ran out.

It mostly worked. Starlink now texts ordinary phones through more than 650 satellites, and T-Mobile signed on as its U.S. launch partner.

That deal assumed the carriers and the space companies would stay friends.

That friendship is now playing out in public, in filings at the Federal Communications Commission.

SpaceX accused T-Mobile and rivals of blocking direct-to-cell rules to stifle competition, dismissing AFTRCC as a lobbying group.Kevin Carter / Getty Images

SpaceX says rivals want to hurt a competitor

SpaceX (SPCX) accused T-Mobile (TMUS) and other legacy carriers of trying to slow its Starlink Mobile service in a new filing with the FCC.

“SpaceX has worked extensively with other operators, including T-Mobile,” the company wrote. “Unfortunately, the misplaced desire to harm a competitor has led many incumbents to oppose modernized rules that would bring direct-to-cell service to underserved border communities.”

Direct-to-cell means a satellite talks straight to an ordinary phone, with no special dish or handset.

Related: SpaceX’s Starlink growth creates new problem for AT&T

SpaceX also took aim at an aviation spectrum group, the Aerospace and Flight Test Radio Coordinating Council, or AFTRCC.

“The Commission should recognize that AFTRCC is now purely a lobbying organization whose mission is to protect legacy companies and their comments should not be viewed as independent or objective,” SpaceX wrote.

AFTRCC has coordinated the radio spectrum used for flight testing since 1969, consultant Jeremy Bayer wrote in a recent RealClearDefense column defending the group.

T-Mobile is SpaceX’s partner and its critic

That’s what makes this fight awkward.

T-Mobile launched T-Satellite with Starlink in July 2025. It costs $10 a month as an add-on and comes included with T-Mobile’s Experience Beyond plan, according to SatelliteInternet.com.

The two companies used to sound like allies at the FCC. T-Mobile endorsed SpaceX’s 2025 request to run its satellites at higher power, Telecoms.com reported.

More SpaceX:

T-Mobile pushes back on SpaceX’s bid to take its customers

AT&T CEO holds firm stance on Elon Musk’s SpaceX phone strategy

T-Mobile’s partnership with Starlink hits unexpected turbulence

Now the relationship looks cooler. T-Mobile removed Starlink’s name from its main T-Satellite webpage in October, TheStreet reported.

That came days after T-Mobile, AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) formed a joint venture to close coverage gaps, including through satellites, Light Reading reported. Existing satellite deals stay in place, the carriers said.

Why border towns are caught in the middle

Satellite signals don’t stop at the border.

Under SpaceX’s FCC license, it can exceed certain signal-strength limits near another country only where that country’s regulator allows it, according to a January FCC order.

SpaceX’s filing argues that updated rules would bring service to “underserved border communities.” The quoted passage doesn’t spell out which rules it means.

My read: border towns face a double gap. Many are rural with few towers, and satellite power near the border is capped.

Those are exactly the places satellite texting was built for.

The carriers say the airwaves are already full

The carriers have their own case, and it’s about interference.

AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile asked the FCC to drop two 5G bands from its satellite plan, saying more than 300 million users rely on them, TeslaNorth reported.

T-Mobile warned satellite signals could wipe out up to 96% of a cell site’s uplink coverage area and cut uplink speeds by 88% to 99%, Capacity reported.

T-Mobile CEO Srini Gopalan also met separately with FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, the outlet reported. Industry group CTIA warned that the FCC’s decisions “have real consequences for consumers.”

FCC moves ahead on satellite spectrum

On Oct. 29, the FCC voted to advance a proposal that would expand satellite-to-phone spectrum. “With today’s proposal, we take our most comprehensive step yet to modernize the FCC’s rules for direct-to-device,” Carr said, TeslaNorth reported.

Here’s what’s on the table:

Spectrum added: 482 MHz for satellite-to-phone service

Eligible bands: From five to 13

Leasing: Satellite firms could certify coexistence deals instead of leasing airwaves from every carrier

What carriers want cut: The 2.5 GHz and 3.45 GHz bands, or 290 MHz

By my math, the carriers want about 60% of the new spectrum removed.

The vote isn’t final. It opens a comment period, and a second vote on final rules will follow.

Wall Street is already nervous

Investors are treating Starlink Mobile as a real threat.

T-Mobile shares fell 5% in morning trading on Oct. 23 after Bloomberg reported SpaceX was in talks to access about 80,000 cell sites, 24/7 Wall St. reported. AT&T fell 4% and Verizon 3%.

Elon Musk has said Starlink could “ultimately be a business that generates several hundred billion dollars in revenue a year,” Forbes reported.

The carriers aren’t convinced. Gopalan has called direct-to-cell “a complementary category,” 24/7 Wall St. reported.

What it means for your phone

If you pay for T-Satellite, nothing changes today. Your service runs on existing agreements, and the carriers said those stay in place.

Here’s what I’d watch:

The comment period. Final rules will decide how much spectrum satellites can use

Your plan’s fine print. Check whether satellite texting is included or a $10 add-on

New entrants. A fourth carrier usually means more pressure on prices

Coverage maps. Rural and border users have the most to gain from satellite service

For now, the company that helped put satellite texting on your phone is fighting its own partner in Washington. Whoever wins will shape who fills America’s dead zones, and what you pay to stay connected.

Related: SpaceX has a plan to make your phone carrier obsolete

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 341
  • Go to Next Page »

© 2026–2027 OCON Entertainment Group LLC. All rights reserved.
MadMadNews.com is owned and operated by OCON Entertainment Group LLC.
Third-party news, images, videos, and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.
Copyright, Ownership & Takedown Notice