SUCCESS

Drivers who recently refueled or grabbed a coffee at popular regional chains like E-Z Mart, Fas Mart, Village Pantry, or Scotchman might be surprised to learn that major structural changes are underway behind the counter.As fuel prices remain much higher than many would like them to be, consumers around the country are tightening their wallets, directly impacting convenience store sales right at the register.The National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) documents that lower-income consumers are cutting back on quick stops, driving down in-store transaction volumes nationwide.“Inside transactions were down 1.9% year over year for the first half of the year,” pointed out Chris Rapanick, managing director of NACS research, speaking of 2025. More Retail:Dollar General copies Costco’s playbook with a discount twistPepsi and Coca-Cola bet big on soda Americans say they wantIconic supermarket chain closes more stores and facilitiesAt the same time, pump prices have surged year-over-year, putting added pressure on both drivers and station operators. The national average for a gallon of regular gas sat at $4.01 as of August 11, 2026, up significantly from around $3.14 during the same period last year, according to AAA.To navigate these headwinds, parent company ARKO Corp. has quietly surrendered corporate control of more than 471 store locations over the past two years, shifting away from direct retail management toward wholesale fuel supply.

ARKO, the powerhouse behind E-Z Mart, Fas Mart, and Village Pantry, shifts 471 company-operated stores to independent dealers.Brandon Bell / Getty Images

ARKO, the powerhouse behind E-Z Mart, Fas Mart, Village Pantry exits 471 stores ARKO Corp. recently reported its second-quarter earnings, disclosing revenue of $2.35 billion, up from $2.00 billion in the same period of 2025, driven by higher wholesale fuel supply volume and elevated fuel prices. The company also reported that it converted 21 company-operated retail stores into dealer locations during the second quarter. This brought the company’s total count to 471 converted stores since launching its “dealerization” initiative in 2024.Under this setup, ARKO hands over store operations, payroll, and inventory to independent dealers instead of running the physical storefronts itself. The company keeps collecting rent and acts as the wholesale fuel supplier, which cuts down expensive store-level costs like store labor and credit card swipe fees.”Consumer demand softened during the second quarter as sustained higher fuel prices continued to pressure household budgets. Even so, our teams remained focused on the areas within our control, maintaining disciplined fuel and merchandise margins while continuing to deliver value for our customers. Importantly, our Wholesale and Fleet Fueling segments continued to perform well,” stated Arie Kotler, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ARKO. Why has ARKO been converting its stores to dealerships? Management explained in its SEC Form 10-Q filing that these locations generate better profits as wholesale dealer sites than as corporate-run retail stores. “Conversions of certain retail stores benefit both our retail and wholesale segments, as these sites have yielded, and we expect will continue to yield, greater profitability once converted. In such cases, we realize higher profit from ongoing fuel supply agreements and rental income than from continued operation of these stores in our retail segment,” the company disclosed in the filing. ARKO added that these conversions allow it to better prioritize investment across remaining retail stores. In its annual report for 2025, the company highlighted that “This channel optimization strategy is delivering tangible benefits, including reduced operating costs, lower maintenance capital requirements, and improved cash flow. By focusing on core locations and leveraging our wholesale network, we are enhancing returns while creating a more efficient base of stores.” ARKO isn’t alone in feeling this pressure. Convenience store consolidation has intensified industry-wide as smaller and mid-size operators struggle to keep pace, according to Dennis Ruben, executive managing director at c-store advisory firm NRC Realty & Capital Advisors.“Unless somebody’s got a company with a succession plan or a family member that wants to keep in the space… frankly, there’s a lot of incentives for somebody to sell right now,” Ruben told C-Store Dive. ARKO says its strategy works, plans more store conversions as card fees surge Among reasons why some operators are transferring store-level financial responsibility to independent dealers is the surge in transaction costs. While direct store operating expenses, including wages and benefits, card fees, utilities, maintenance and merchandise, increased 4.2%, at the slowest rate since the pandemic, credit and debit card fees reached a record of $21.3 billion, according to NACS April report. Subsequently, ARKO confirmed that the strategy is working, as second-quarter site operating expenses decreased by $16.6 million or 9.4% for the same quarter of 2025, driven by “$25.8 million of reduced expenses related to retail stores closed or converted to dealer locations.The reduction in operating expenses was partially offset by “an increase in same-store operating expenses of $8.3 million, or 5.6%, primarily due to higher credit card fees associated with elevated fuel prices, insurance, personnel costs and rent.”During the second-quarter earnings call, CEO Kotler noted that around 70 additional stores are set for conversion or already converted since the quarter ended. “Each conversion moves us further towards a lower cost, more capital efficient operating model with stronger cash flow characteristics. While the pace of conversion moderated this quarter, our expectation for the program remained unchanged,” Kotler said. What ARKO’s exit from 471 stores means for consumers While ARKO says it is already seeing positive effects of this turnaround strategy, transforming company-operated convenience stores into dealerships has its challenges, and it might not be the right tactic for every company. For example, retail giants like 7-Eleven and Alimentation Couche-Tard (parent of Circle K) operate using both models, while CrossAmerica Partners is converting dealer-operated locations over to company-operated sites. Each strategy has its upsides and downsides, according to experts. C-store consultant Julie Jackson said converting a large volume of stores “could be a huge organizational realignment that has to happen.” “This strategy also brings the risk of getting into business with a franchisee or dealer who mishandles operations or doesn’t comply with the agreement,” Jackson told C-Store Dive.When a company transitions from company-operated locations to dealers, headquarters gives up direct control over store employees, branding execution, and proprietary product programs, which can directly affect consumers’ experience. In addition to loyalty program changes and potential brand inconsistency, the dealers have the right to set their own final pump prices. This means that the company whose sign is on the canopy (e.g., Shell, BP, or E-Z Mart) is often not the entity setting the local fuel price; rather, it is the dealer. “In contrast to corporate-owned stores, franchised stores typically carry shelf prices anywhere between 5% and 20% more expensive than their counterparts (Humphrey 2007). This is partially due to the inability of franchise stores to achieve economies of scale,” according to an exploratory study on the store image in a franchise setting.  Related: Another grocery chain quietly shuts down more stores

The Democrats who may get a bigger say in future crypto legislative efforts are familiar figures, and they generally look at digital assets with distrust.

Total deposits grew from $1.1 billion in March to $4.6 billion by July, driven by clients in crypto, AI and defense.

‘Reacher’ is back this week with season 4, and its Rotten Tomatoes review score from critics is certainly eyebrow-raising.

Many of today’s enterprises have a shoebox problem: fragmented, incomplete, and duplicated records, forcing customers or employees to connect the dots themselves.

Mistral AI wants to turn European AI sovereignty from a talking point into a product — one with a service-level agreement attached.The French artificial intelligence company announced Tuesday a three-part expansion of its infrastructure business: regional inference endpoints that let customers choose whether their AI workloads run in Europe or the United States, a new “Priority Tier” backed by an uptime guarantee for mission-critical deployments, and a coalition of European enterprises making multi-year compute commitments that Mistral says will underwrite 200 megawatts of infrastructure across Europe by the end of 2027 — and a full gigawatt by the end of 2030.In a move that may raise eyebrows among sovereignty purists, the company also said it will begin hosting third-party open models on its platform, starting with GLM-5.2 from Z.ai, the Chinese AI lab formerly known as Zhipu.Taken together, the announcements mark a decisive shift in how Mistral positions itself. The company that built its reputation training open-weight language models is now selling something closer to critical infrastructure: assured capacity, regional control, and contractual reliability for enterprises and governments that want frontier AI without surrendering control over where it runs.”When we spoke in June, the story was around how Mistral was building a full-stack AI offering,” Timothée Lacroix, Mistral’s co-founder and chief technology officer, told VentureBeat in an exclusive interview ahead of the announcement. “Today, the announcement is about strengthening one part of this infrastructure, which is the inference part.”That one part, it turns out, comes with a price tag measured in the tens of billions of dollars.Inside Mistral’s plan to build 1 gigawatt of European AI compute by 2030The headline numbers deserve scrutiny, because they imply staggering capital requirements. Mistral currently operates less than 200 megawatts of capacity, according to the company. Details shared with VentureBeat show the near-term buildout resting on three sites: a 44-megawatt facility near Paris that became operational in the second quarter of this year, a 23-megawatt facility in Sweden built in partnership with EcoDataCenter using renewable energy and advanced cooling, and a 10-megawatt site in Les Ulis, France, that came online in the third quarter.Getting from there to one gigawatt by 2030 is a different order of magnitude. Independent estimates suggest just how different: research firm Epoch AI calculates that a typical one-gigawatt AI data center requires roughly $38 billion in upfront capital expenditure, with servers and GPUs — not buildings or land — consuming the majority of the cost. Goldman Sachs Research pegs next-generation AI facilities at $15 million to $20 million per megawatt before accounting for the chips inside them.Lacroix did not dispute the scale of the challenge. The investment required for a gigawatt of capacity “is a large investment that requires also a lot of scaling and revenue behind it,” he said.The urgency, in his telling, comes from a supply crunch that is about to get worse. “More and more, and especially around 2027 and 2028, we see that the demand for AI compute is exceeding what the market has to offer, especially in Europe,” Lacroix said. McKinsey has estimated that meeting global AI demand could require $5.2 trillion in data-center capital expenditure by 2030 — and Europe, by most analyses, is starting from behind.A company valued at a fraction of its American rivals cannot close that gap with venture capital alone. Which explains the most consequential — and most unusual — piece of Tuesday’s announcement.European Compute Units turn AI sovereignty into a five-year contractMistral is assembling what it calls an anchor group of enterprises whose long-term commitments will collectively finance infrastructure none of them could justify alone. Those commitments convert into “European Compute Units,” or ECUs — a claim on Mistral-built capacity over multiple years that participants can spend on inference, training, model adaptation, or other AI workloads as their needs evolve.If that structure sounds more like a power-purchase agreement than a cloud contract, that appears to be the point. Data-center financing increasingly resembles large infrastructure projects — gigawatts, substations, energy agreements — rather than traditional technology spending, and lenders want demand locked in before capital gets deployed. Mistral raised €830 million ($962 million) in debt earlier this year to fund its data center near Paris, TechCrunch reported in March, and pre-committed enterprise demand is exactly what makes that kind of financing repeatable at ten times the scale.Lacroix was unusually direct about the mechanics. “The entire point of compute units is to have commitment,” he said. “The goal is to have customers commit for around five years, or at least a long time.” Asked what happens if a customer wants out early, he didn’t soften the answer: “There is no getting out.”What makes a five-year, no-exit commitment palatable, he argued, is flexibility in how the capacity gets consumed. “Typically this can be spent on raw inference that you then feed through any other AI stack. It can be spent on raw compute as managed Kubernetes, and it can be spent at the very top with our full AI offering,” he said. “My hope is that they will use it with our full-stack services and will love it.”The anchor group already includes some of Europe’s industrial heavyweights. Amadeus CEO Luis Maroto said in a statement that “capacity, deployment control, and operating continuity become increasingly important for all enterprises.” ASML chief Christophe Fouquet — whose company led Mistral’s $13.4 billion (€11.7 billion) Series C last year — called building European AI capacity one of the few industrial endeavors that “will matter more to Europe’s next generation,” while Capgemini’s Aiman Ezzat framed it as “a question of who shapes the future of European industry.” CMA CGM chairman Rodolphe Saadé said the shipping group’s Mistral deployment is “already under way among thousands of employees.”Commitments of that duration only make sense, of course, if the sovereignty being purchased is real. On that question, Mistral’s announcement contains an asterisk worth reading closely.The fine print on sovereign AI: what data can still leave EuropeThe centerpiece product is Mistral Regional Endpoints, now generally available, which let customers pin inference and its associated processing to Europe or the U.S. Alongside it, the new Priority Tier — in public preview — offers committed service levels, custom rate limits, and an uptime SLA for mission-critical workloads.Mistral claims it is the only European AI lab offering both a choice of processing region and an SLA-backed service tier, and Lacroix said a third option is coming: an endpoint “that stays on Mistral-controlled infrastructure, so on Mistral compute” — for customers who want their inference not just in Europe, but off hyperscaler hardware entirely.Then comes the fine print. Mistral’s own materials note that in-region inference remains subject to “limited, safeguarded transfers” to sub-processors that may sit outside the chosen region. Pressed on what actually leaves Europe, Lacroix pointed to the connective tissue of modern AI applications: tool calls.”There are some tool services, like some tool calls, that might be hosted in places where we don’t fully control this,” he said, citing web search as an example. “A few of our web-search providers might not all be in Europe, and in that case, we need to potentially gate that capability.”His answer to the compliance question — would this satisfy a European bank or a defense ministry? — was that gating is the feature, not the bug. Capabilities that cannot be sourced in-region can be switched off entirely, restricted to certain users or workspaces, or, given sufficient demand, rebuilt with European providers. “Any capabilities that we don’t find a provider for in Europe — if it needs to be done in Europe, we’ll find some way to implement it or find ways to address it,” Lacroix said.For enterprise buyers, that is a more honest framing than most sovereignty marketing offers: full regional control is available, but the moment an AI agent reaches out to the open web, sovereignty becomes a configuration decision rather than a default. The same pragmatism runs through the announcement’s most surprising line item.Why Europe’s open source AI champion is hosting China’s GLM-5.2A French national champion — one that has partnered with the French army and positioned itself as Europe’s answer to American AI dependence — hosting a Chinese lab’s model invites an obvious question. Lacroix’s answer was disarmingly matter-of-fact.”It’s a great model. Everyone loves it. It’s open weight, so there was no good reason for us not to do it, really,” he said, noting that Mistral’s own stack is already built on open-source software like Kubernetes.On security vetting, he argued that open weights fundamentally change the risk calculus. “The risks in taking a new model, at the layer of the weights, are — at least in my opinion — rather limited,” Lacroix said. “We checked basically all of the safety and compliance evals that we have. We’ll control that model, its outputs, and what it does the same way we do any of our models. We have the same inputs and outputs and monitoring capabilities over all of it.”The strategic logic is worth unpacking. By hosting third-party open models under European regional controls and the same SLAs as its own, Mistral is repositioning itself from model vendor to sovereign distribution layer — the trusted intermediary through which any open model, regardless of origin, can be consumed by a regulated European enterprise that could never call a Chinese API directly. It is the “model garden” playbook the hyperscalers run with Bedrock and Vertex, executed on European soil with European guarantees.Customers appear to be reading it that way. “Mistral allows us to run open models under strict regional controls and service commitments, making it easy for us to maintain data residency and compliance requirements,” Matan Griberg, CEO of AI software-engineering company Factory, said in a statement.Lacroix stressed the move is not a retreat from frontier training: the model Mistral had in training as of June “is still training, and we’re still very excited about it,” he said. But openness to rivals’ models signals where the company now believes its moat lies — not in any single model, but in the infrastructure underneath all of them. Which makes its relationship with the world’s most powerful infrastructure company all the more interesting.How the multibillion-dollar Microsoft deal funds Mistral’s independenceHovering over every sovereignty claim is Mistral’s deepening relationship with Microsoft. In July, the two companies announced a multibillion-dollar expansion of their partnership under which Microsoft will rent capacity from Mistral’s European data centers to serve its own cloud and AI demand, while adding Mistral Medium 3.5 and OCR 4 to Microsoft Foundry, bringing Medium 3.5 to Copilot Studio, and enabling Mistral models on Azure Local for disconnected, customer-controlled environments. Mistral CEO Arthur Mensch told The Wall Street Journal at the time that two-thirds of Mistral’s customers already work with Microsoft.How does a company selling independence from U.S. hyperscalers square taking one on as its largest tenant? Lacroix described Microsoft not as a patron but as an anchor customer that de-risks the buildout.”It allows us to scale different parts of the business differently by building infrastructure with Microsoft as a customer,” he said. “We can scale that team, we can scale our infrastructure, and make sure that we can then, on the side of it, also build for ourselves and for our customers.” He compared the arrangement to the neocloud playbook — companies that built businesses supplying capacity to the hyperscalers themselves. “As that part of our business resembles that of neoclouds, we’re following the same thing.”It is a genuinely clever inversion: rather than renting American infrastructure, Mistral is renting infrastructure to one of America’s largest companies, using Microsoft’s demand to finance capacity that also serves European sovereignty customers. But the independence has limits no contract can engineer away — the GPUs filling Mistral’s European data centers come overwhelmingly from Nvidia and other American chipmakers, as SiliconANGLE noted in its coverage of the July deal.Asked directly why a customer should choose Mistral over an EU region on AWS or Azure, Lacroix gave two answers. “The simplest possible answer is capacity. There is more demand than supply right now, and so it adds another option,” he said. The second cuts closer to the pitch: “We are a European provider, and on the region that would be Mistral compute, we are fully independent. That’s a truly differentiated offering than all of the hyperscalers or pure inference companies can provide.”The economics of open models: why agentic AI is pushing inference to the cloudThere has always been a tension at the heart of Mistral’s business: its best-known models are free to download, and open models have historically been difficult to monetize through APIs. Asked how free weights fund a gigawatt buildout, Lacroix offered the clearest articulation yet of the company’s thesis — that the economics of self-hosting are collapsing under the weight of the models themselves.”When the models were smaller, and we were before the explosion of agentic AI, it was doable for enterprises to host their own — up to, let’s say, 100-billion-parameter dense models — on their premises,” he said. “More and more, with models going into the trillion or more parameters, with the current hardware, and with the increasing amount of tokens that need to be processed, it becomes harder.”His conclusion was blunt: “I don’t see how, with the current trend of model size and growth of agentic tokens, we keep the full inference on-prem. To me, that is why we think we’re going to monetize our cloud inference.” Inference, he noted, is particularly well suited to the cloud because it “does not need to hold any data” and can be encrypted in transit.In other words: open weights get Mistral into the enterprise, and the physics of trillion-parameter agentic workloads brings the inference — and the revenue — back to Mistral’s data centers. The thesis will get an expensive test. Mistral has raised roughly $4 billion to date, according to PitchBook data — a fraction of the war chests assembled by OpenAI and Anthropic — and Bloomberg reported in June that the company is in talks to raise about €3 billion at a roughly €20 billion valuation, nearly double its Series C mark. The revenue behind the buildout will have to come from exactly the enterprises Tuesday’s announcement is courting.And Europe, in Mistral’s telling, is only the first market for what it is selling. Asked whether the framework could be replicated in the Middle East, Asia, or anywhere else anxious about AI dependence, Lacroix didn’t hedge: “It’s completely right. We’re starting this in Europe because it’s also an easier part of the world for us to scale into, especially in the infrastructure. But we definitely want to extend this, depending on customer demand.” Every layer of the stack, he said, “can be controlled, changed, replaced depending on where we operate and what the requirements are — that’s pretty much where we excel.”That is the wager underneath the SLAs, the compute units, and the Chinese model flying a European flag: in a world where the U.S. and China dominate frontier AI, the durable business is selling everyone else control. To fund it, Mistral is asking Europe’s largest enterprises to sign five-year contracts with no exit — while making a bigger, longer commitment of its own. A gigawatt, after all, is a promise measured in decades. For Mistral, too, there is no getting out.