SUCCESS

Aljamain Sterling defeated Youssef Zalal via 49-45 unanimous decision at UFC Vegas 116. Full results, bonus winners, Ryan Spann KO highlights and reaction.

The Philadelphia Phillies’ Dave Dombrowski hired the Boston Red Sox manager and now both of their teams are under fire.

Non-chartered teams in IndyCar will not be allowed to enter races in IndyCar with the exception of the Indianapolis 500 beginning in 2027, IndyCar confirmed April 25.

Looking for help with today’s New York Times Wordle? Here are some expert hints, clues and commentary to help you solve today’s Wordle and sharpen your guessing game.

Trump fired all 24 members of the National Science Board, the body that oversees NSF. The institutional design that built American science is at stake.

Treasury secretaries do not usually speak in terms of existential risk. Their language tends toward caution, precision, and careful hedging. What Scott Bessent said at a Wall Street Journal event in Washington on April 15 was none of those things.He issued a warning about artificial intelligence that sounds less like a policy position and more like a countdown. And the timeline he attached to it should be getting far more attention than it has.What Bessent actually said”If China is the casino, artificial intelligence is the table stakes,” Bessent said at the WSJ event. “If we don’t win in AI, then it’s game over,” Bloomberg reported.He did not frame AI as a long-term investment theme or a sectoral opportunity. He framed it as the minimum condition for staying relevant in the next era of global competition.The table stakes metaphor is deliberate. You need them just to sit at the table. Lose them and you are out of the game entirely.Related: Bessent and Powell send Wall Street’s biggest banks a warningWhat makes the statement more striking is the timeline. Bessent said the transformation is not five years away, and not even three. He believes the window before AI starts defining daily life much more broadly is “a year, maybe 18 months,” Bloomberg noted. That is not a forecast. That is a countdown.Where the U.S. actually standsBessent did not claim the United States has already won. He said the American lead over China in AI is currently just three to six months. That is an uncomfortably thin margin for a race he is describing in existential terms.He did point to one specific advantage the U.S. is building. On computing power, Bessent said the share of global AI controlled by the United States has already moved from the 30s percent range into the 50s. His projection is that it will reach 70 to 80 percent within a few years, Bloomberg reported.He also specifically praised Anthropic’s Mythos model as a revolutionary step that could help the United States maintain its edge. Mythos is designed for identifying vulnerabilities in software and computer systems. Access is currently limited to a very small number of carefully chosen parties.Scott Bessent’s warning about artificial intelligence is unlike anything a Treasury chief has said before.Bessent’s endorsement came just days after he and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powellsummoned Wall Street banks to an urgent meeting. The concern: that Mythos could usher in a new era of cyber risk, Bloomberg noted.Why a three-to-six month lead is a problemA three-to-six month technological advantage in a race Bessent describes in existential terms is not reassuring. It is barely a lead at all in the context of the kind of structural competition he is describing.The reason that margin matters is what happens if China closes it. The country that leads in AI does not just get a productivity edge. It gets influence over the systems that run logistics, finance, defense, energy, healthcare, and communications.MoreEconomy:Ernst & Young drops stunning take on economy as oil jumpsTreasure secretary delivers surprise take on the economyPowell sends message on U.S. economy and AI-related job loss fearThe U.S. winning by a few months only matters if those months are used to build something durable.That is what makes Bessent’s comments more than a soundbite. He is telling policymakers, companies, and investors that the United States has a narrow lead in a race with an extremely short window, and that doing nothing is not a neutral option.Key figures from Bessent’s April 15 remarks:Bessent’s quote: “If China is the casino, artificial intelligence is the table stakes. If we don’t win in AI, then it’s game over,” according to BloombergTimeline before AI broadly defines daily life: “a year, maybe 18 months,” Bloomberg notedU.S. lead over China in AI: three to six months, Bloomberg confirmedU.S. share of global AI computing power: risen from the 30s percent to the 50s, targeting 70 to 80 percent within a few years, Bloomberg reportedBessent praised Anthropic’s Mythos model as a breakthrough in the U.S.-China AI race, Bloomberg confirmedBessent and Powell summoned Wall Street banks to discuss Mythos-related cyber risk, Bloomberg reported.

Scott Bessent’s warning about artificial intelligence is unlike anything a Treasury chief has said before.Posner/Getty Images

What this means for investorsBessent’s warning reinforces something investors already sense but may not have priced in with enough urgency. AI is not a theme that plays out slowly and predictably. It is a race with a compressed timeline and high-stakes consequences for the companies on the right and wrong side of it.The investment implication is not that every AI stock will win. It is that capital will continue to flow toward the infrastructure layer of AI: chips, data centers, cloud platforms, power generation, networking, and cybersecurity.These are the components of the computing advantage Bessent is pointing to. They are where strategic investment is already concentrated.For investors still treating AI as a distant or speculative trend, Bessent’s remarks are a direct challenge. A Treasury secretary saying the window is 12 to 18 months is not a niche forecast. It is a signal that the people closest to the policy levers believe the race is happening now.What it means for workers and householdsBessent’s timeline has implications beyond markets. If AI starts defining daily life within 12 to 18 months, many of those changes will arrive before workers, educators, and governments are fully prepared to respond.The sectors most likely to feel it first are those where AI is already making inroads: customer service, software development, legal research, financial analysis, content creation, and logistics.In each of those areas, AI is not replacing people overnight. But it is changing what skills are most valuable and how quickly tasks get done.Bessent’s message is ultimately simple, even if its implications are large. The AI race is not a future event. It is already under way. And the people, companies, and governments that treat it as something to prepare for eventually may find that “eventually” has already arrived.Related: Bessent makes stunning claim about Iran and its oil