SUCCESS

Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio, said the president attacked her and called her “incompetent’ after a court blocked the inscription of his name on the Kennedy Center’s facade.

Weakening U.S. demand, a setback for the Clarity act and expectations of a fed rate hike weigh on bitcoin.

U.S. prosecutors allege two engineers used confidential Robinhood token listing data to front-run announcements using Hyperliquid perpetual futures.

Key Morningstar Metrics for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETFMorningstar Medalist Rating: GoldProcess Pillar: HighPeople Pillar: Above AverageParent Pillar: HighVanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF VIG pulls in stable, profitable firms that have increased their dividend payments for over a decade. This simple, repeatable approach and low costs form a long-term edge over peers.This strategy tracks the S&P US Dividend Growers Index, which targets US stocks that have increased their dividend payments for at least 10 consecutive years. It eliminates the highest-yielding names from that cohort to ensure its holdings are financially stable and more likely to continue making dividend payments. The index weights its holdings by their free-float-adjusted market cap, which leverages the market’s collective wisdom and mitigates turnover and the associated trading costs. It also limits individual stocks to 4% of the portfolio at each annual rebalance to promote diversification.Targeting stocks with 10 years of dividend growth is a strict hurdle that provides a big advantage. It indirectly targets profitable companies that not only have the capacity to increase their dividend payments but also a willingness to do so. Combining yield and quality results in a balanced portfolio of more than 300 companies. However, if a company misses a single dividend payment, it would have to wait 10 years before it is welcomed back. For example, Apple AAPL and ExxonMobil XOM didn’t join the portfolio until 2023 after a decade of increasing dividends. Still, this is a worthwhile trade-off that keeps the portfolio full of high-quality companies that should continue to increase their dividends.The strategy’s strict requirements tend to weed out recent highflyers. Magnificent Seven stocks Amazon.com AMZN, Tesla TSLA, Alphabet GOOGL, and Nvidia NVDA are among the biggest stocks missing from this portfolio. These omissions can cause diverging performance relative to large-blend Morningstar Category peers in the short term, but this strategy should have smoother and more consistent performance over the long run. Likewise, excluding the highest-yielding eligible stocks reduces the portfolio’s exposure to value traps without giving up the fund’s yield advantage over the broad market.A portfolio of high-quality, stable companies should be tough to beat on a risk-adjusted basis over the long haul. This strategy’s low expense ratios further carve out a durable edge.Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF: Performance Highlights fThe US ETF’s risk-adjusted performance has been solid over the past decade. It nearly kept pace with the return of its average peer despite 13% lower volatility, putting it ahead of its average peer in risk-adjusted terms.Lower volatility is key to this fund’s success. It tends to outperform when markets drop, like when it beat the category index by 10 percentage points in 2022. The drawback is its potential for lackluster returns when markets trend higher. Indeed, the US ETF share class returned 16% annualized over the three years through August 2026, yet underperformed its category index by 5 percentage points annually during that time. Crucially, the fund has proved its ability to capture more of the market’s upside than downside, giving it an edge over its bogy in the long term.Low costs provide another durable edge over competitors. Market-value-weighting and a simple, repeatable process reduce transaction costs, creating an advantage when coupled with one of the lowest fees in its category.

People tend to have a negative bias toward AI interactions. A disclosure paradox exists. What is to be done? An AI Insider analysis and scoop.

“I racked up this debt to cover my living expenses for two years without an income stream.”

If the Federal Reserve hikes interest rates in an effort to slow down the rapid rise in longer-term yields, history shows it probably won’t be a success.

TheStreet aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

Why we love this deal

Having any amount of outdoor space where you can sip your morning coffee or kick back in a rocking chair is a delight. If this area also includes a patch of yard, it comes with the inevitable maintenance required when grass pokes through the sidewalk or weeds get unruly. Tiny yards are a breeze to tidy up compared to larger ones, taking less time in the blazing sun pushing around the lawn mower and whacking weeds. That said, if you have a small yard, you likely have a small home, which means less space to store all that lawn equipment.

The Black+Decker 3-in-1 Electric String Trimmer, Edger, and Lawn Mower makes yard work even more efficient, giving you every tool you need to maintain the lawn in one streamlined package. Since the compact design has three tools in one, it eliminates the need for multiple pieces of equipment, stowing away easily and giving you back precious storage space. Normally, you’d have to pay $124 to add this handy yard tool to your collection, but it’s currently on sale for just $89 at Walmart. As a bonus, the electric tool only requires an outlet to power up, so you don’t have to deal with extra trips to the gas station for fuel.

Black+Decker 3-in-1 Electric String Trimmer, Edger, and Lawn Mower, $89 (was $124) at Walmart

Courtesy of Walmart

Shop at Walmart

Why do shoppers love it?

The versatility of this Black+Decker tool is unmatched. When placed in the rolling base, you can use the electric tool as a compact lawn mower to effortlessly cut grass. With a tap of the foot pedal, you can quickly convert the equipment from a mower to a string trimmer or wheeled edger to create clean borders around the sidewalk and tackle dense undergrowth. The tool has a large coverage area with a 12-inch cutting swath, so you’ll spend less time trimming. “I took it out of the box, and 45 minutes later, the lawn was mowed, the weeds were whacked, and the edging done,” one shopper raved. They added, “The HOA came by and was amazed at how good the yard looked.”

Related: Amazon is selling a ‘very roomy’ lockable double-door outdoor storage shed for just $150

With over 150 perfect five-star ratings, this equipment is highly rated by shoppers. The corded tool is powered by a 6.5-amp motor, so it will deliver reliable and consistent performance. While it’s not as heavy-duty as larger models, it should have plenty of power for basic yard work. One shopper reported, “It even went through the high grass, and tall weeds were not a problem.” The same reviewer also appreciated the easy care required for this tool: “Cleanup was a breeze — I just hosed it off after unplugging. Stores in minimal space.”

Details to know 

Power source: Electric.

Cutting width: 12 inches.

Weight: 13 pounds.

Average shopper rating: 4.2 out of five stars.

It’s important to note that this Black+Decker mower, edger, and trimmer does not come with a power cord. You will need to add your own extension cord before starting on yard work. If you don’t have your own, there are many options available at Walmart for under $20. 

Shop more deals

Black+Decker Cordless 2-in-1 String Trimmer and Edger, $69 (was $100) at Walmart

Greenworks 24V 13-Inch Brushless String Trimmer, $110 (was $140) at Walmart

Lemolifys 12-Inch Brushless Wheeled Weed Eater, $109 (was $200) at Walmart

The Black+Decker 3-in-1 Electric String Trimmer, Edger, and Lawn Mower is such a helpful tool with a smart design that’s perfect for small yards. Score it for just $89 at Walmart by adding it to your shopping cart now.

Ethereum is moving ahead with EIP-8141 while Coinbase-backed Base backs EIP-8130, leaving wallets and apps that span both networks facing different transaction systems.

Nuclear energy has become one of Wall Street’s more closely watched investment themes as artificial intelligence and data centers put new pressure on the U.S. power grid.

Due to data centers, AI, and industrial growth, the U.S. Department of Energy expects electricity demand to rise significantly.

The federal government has supported that forecast with dollars.

In March of 2025, the Energy Department published a request for $900 million to assist the development of American-made Generation III+ small modular reactors.

The market opportunity is so much bigger.

The Energy Department has predicted the U.S. may need as much as 200 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity by 2050 to fulfill rising energy demand.

That suggests a potentially huge opportunity for those that can get new reactors into commercial operation.

One company aiming to get there is NuScale Power (SMR).

But Wall Street doesn’t think every nuclear stock will necessarily emerge as a winner.

UBS downgraded NuScale Power to Sell from Neutral and cut its price target to $6 from $10.

That implied roughly 40% downside from the stock’s level when the analyst call was issued.

And the questions raised by UBS go to the heart of the conundrum hanging over the growing small modular reactor industry: How soon can promising reactor technology be turned into a working commercial power plant?

UBS slashes NuScale Power stock price target

UBS’s negative argument is about execution.

Competitors are going into construction, whereas NuScale has an expected build time of more than five years and no concrete client commitments, the analyst said.

UBS said such circumstances presented “meaningful challenges.”

The bank now forecasts just one NuScale project breaks ground in 2028 and sees a cumulative cash burn of $700 million from 2026 through 2028.

That provides a stark contrast between excitement for nuclear power and the dangers of actually bringing a new reactor design to market.

Those dangers are not exclusive to NuScale.

Energy Department officials have recognized utilities’ and other prospective consumers’ worries about cost overruns in development and abandonment of projects.

DOE has also projected that order books of five to 10 deployments of at least one reactor type may be required to support advanced nuclear and reach commercial scale.

NuScale has already passed a big regulatory barrier.

NuScale’s US460 standard plant design received approval from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in May 2025.

The design has six modules each generating 77 megawatts of power, making the overall plant capacity 462 megawatts.

The NRC said its clearance means the design may be cited in applications for building permits, operating licenses and combination licenses.

The agency finished its review in 22 months, two months ahead of schedule.

Related: This ‘boring’ stock has had a 500% return over 5 years

The NRC also has the underlying regulatory documentation for the approval of NuScale’s US460 design, giving investors the key record of the company’s regulatory development.

That gives NuScale a distinctive position.

We see concrete regulatory progress.

The bigger issue is the commercial timeframe.

NuScale Power has substantial liquidity but is burning cash

The $700 million cash-burn estimate from UBS is more substantial against NuScale’s most recently disclosed balance sheet.

NuScale reported $766.5 million in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2026, in its quarterly filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The company also held $305.7 million of short-term investments and $820.8 million of investments.

The total of these three categories is over $1.89 billion.

NuScale reported no debt and stated it anticipates that its cash, investments, and continuous access to capital markets would be adequate to satisfy its cash needs for at least the next 12 months and beyond.

But the other side of the company’s financials provides insight into why cash burn is critical to UBS’s theory.

NuScale has lost money since company was founded and recorded a cumulative deficit of $824.4 million as of June 30.

Cash spent in operating operations was $372.9 million during the first six months of 2026, compared with $56.1 million for the same period in 2025.

The increase was mostly due to a $259.9 million payment to commercialization partner ENTRA1 and reduced collections from customers and vendor prepayments for long-lead supplies, NuScale said.

NuScale too has gone to its stockholders for a big financial infusion.

The corporation sold roughly 89.7 million Class A shares via an at-the-market program in the first six months of 2026.

Those sales yielded $1 billion in gross profits, or around $984.5 million after issuance expenses, the document said.

The weighted average price of sales was $11.14 per share.

That funding gave NuScale a major cash boost but also speaks to a key portion of the investment equation.

Until commercial projects generate sufficient cash, access to capital markets remains an important source of funding.

NuScale’s annual report also gives further insight on the company’s commercialization agreements including its ties with RoPower Nuclear and ENTRA1 Energy.

Popular nuclear stock runs into a $700 million problemBloomberg / Getty Images

NuScale’s Romania project offers a counterpoint to UBS concerns

The bearish thesis isn’t without important counterarguments.

But there are significant counterarguments to the pessimistic view. One of the biggest is Romania.

NuScale has been collaborating with RoPower Nuclear on a planned 6-module small modular reactor project at the old Doiceşti coal-power facility.

The project has moved beyond the original idea proposal stage.

Romanian nuclear power plant Nuclearelectrica stated that it would finish the second phase of the front-end engineering and design by the end of 2025.

That job comprised project cost estimates, scheduling, licensing and permitting information, and financial modelling required for the next phase of the project.

Next came a milestone of greater importance.

On Feb. 12, 2026, shareholders approved the final investment decision for the Doicești small modular reactor project.

That is substantial development for a corporation that is being challenged on its ability to transform technology into practical projects.

But making a choice to invest and having a nuclear power plant that is up and running are completely different achievements.

Nuclear plants take years to license, finance, build and complete before they generate power.

And that is the gap UBS regards as a concern.

NuScale also has a potentially far bigger possibility in the US.

More Wall Street:

Wall Street’s AI trade faces its biggest valuation test

The next Wall Street shift is already underway

Wall Street sends strong 4-word verdict on the stock market

TVA and NuScale have announced support for an ENTRA1 Energy initiative, with plans to install up to 6 gigawatts of NuScale small modular reactor capacity throughout TVA’s seven-state area in September 2025.

The size is substantial, but investors need to differentiate a projected deployment program from reactors currently under construction or in operation.

That divergence is especially noteworthy in light of UBS’s concern regarding solid customer agreements.

So whether NuScale can turn theoretical deployments into commercial off-take agreements and ultimately construction might be one of the most crucial variables in deciding whether UBS’s gloomy thesis plays out.

NuScale Power faces competitors moving toward construction

The rivalry makes NuScale’s timeframe extremely relevant.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s advanced-reactor docket shows other developers and utilities pushing projects through construction-related regulatory milestones.

For example, in May 2025, TVA filed the last part of its building permit application for a BWRX-300 small modular reactor at its Clinch River plant in Tennessee.

That helps explain why UBS is focused not simply on whether NuScale can eventually deploy its technology but on when that deployment can happen.

Timing is key in a market where utilities, IT corporations, and other big electrical consumers are looking for more dependable power.

The Department of Energy’s advanced-nuclear study projects the U.S. will require around 200 gigawatts of new nuclear power by 2050.

The agency also cautioned that the time it would take to ramp up deployment might make the ultimate buildout substantially harder.

A DOE scenario that begins large-scale deployment by 2030 and reaches 13 gigawatts per year by 2040 could put the U.S. on track to add 200 gigawatts of nuclear capacity by 2050.

A five-year delay might mean more than 20 gigawatts a year of deployment and could raise capital needs by as much as 50%.

Thus, the opportunity is potentially immense.

But speed counts.

Wall Street downgrade raises stakes for NuScale Power stock

The downgrading by UBS has left NuScale’s investors with two very different views of the company’s tale.

There is a lot of evidence for the bullish case.

NuScale has a 462 megawatt US460 plant design authorized by the NRC.

Romania’s Doicești moves to final investment decision after second front-end engineering phase

ENTRA1 and TVA are investigating a possible program of 6 gigawatts of NuScale-powered capacity.

NuScale also concluded June with about $1.89 billion in cash, short-term assets and investments and no debt.

Also, the background of the sector is positive.

The U.S. government anticipates more demand for power and has committed hundreds of millions of dollars to speed up the deployment of domestic small modular reactors.

But UBS is looking at what hasn’t occurred yet.

The bank has a long development timeframe, not enough definite customer commitments, rivals moving toward building and a significant capital burn before NuScale hits the milestones investors are looking for.

The cash dilemma is hard to ignore when considering NuScale’s own financial disclosures.

During the first half of 2026, the business utilized $372.9 million of cash in operational operations and raised approximately $1 billion via stock sales.

That doesn’t mean UBS’s $6 objective will be accurate.

They do demonstrate how important execution is.

The fundamental assumptions behind the Sell rating might alter if NuScale converts prospective projects into binding commercial agreements and makes more rapid progress toward construction than UBS estimates.

If capital continues to flow out of the firm, and timetables become extended, the analyst’s warning becomes more serious.

That makes the next chapter of NuScale’s tale less about the future of nuclear power.

The Department of Energy’s estimates are clear: Washington views nuclear power as a key element of addressing growing U.S. energy needs.

For NuScale stockholders, the more pressing issue is whether this specific nuclear business can transform regulatory clearances, alliances and planned projects into running reactors swiftly enough to justify its value.

UBS isn’t buying it.

Related: JPMorgan makes bold BWX Technologies prediction