Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Hockey Canada both said Tuesday that Russian athletes will not be allowed to compete for their country in next month’s World Juniors in Alberta, despite their original ban being lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) last week.The CAS ruled on Friday that Russian teams can compete in upcoming men’s and women’s world championships, overturning the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF)’s decisions to exclude them from its competitions.Next month’s World Juniors is the first tournament affected by the decision, but Canadian authorities have doubled down on their stance.CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE”While Russia and Belarus are supporting this illegal and unjustified horrific war in Ukraine, as long as that’s going on, there will be none of those athletes competing for their countries in Canada,” Carney said. “So, if you’re asking specifically about the World Juniors, the Russians will not be there.””Hockey Canada thanks the Government of Canada for today’s strong position that Canada intends to prevent Russian and Belarusian officials and athletes from participating under their national symbols in international sporting events taking place on Canadian soil,” Hockey Canada said in a statement. “We will be meeting with our Board of Directors this week to discuss next steps given the government’s clear position.”Sweden, Finland, the Czech Republic, Norway, Latvia and Denmark came out with statements signing up for a boycott of games against Russia as long as the war in Ukraine is ongoing. STRAUSS, a workwear company that is a top sponsor of the world championships next year, threatened to walk away after Finland announced Monday it was rallying other nations to refuse to play Russia.NHL AND FANATICS UNVEIL ‘HOMETOWN REMIX’ JERSEYS CELEBRATING LOCAL CULTURE FOR ALL 32 TEAMS”We have been a partner of the Ice Hockey World Championship for many years and value our collaboration with the IIHF. Should Russia’s national team participate in the 2027 World Championship in Germany as a result of the CAS ruling, we will forgo all logo exposure associated with the tournament. We are also considering withdrawing as a sponsor,” STRAUSS said Tuesday.Russia did not compete in Olympic hockey earlier this year, the first since 2014, which had NHL players, nor was it included in the NHL’s 4 Nations Face-Off. Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, four days after Olympic competition ended that year.In a brief statement, CAS cited a lack of sufficient evidence to support the IIHF’s security concerns. Russia’s sports minister, Mikhail Degtyarev, told state television channel Vesti that “discrimination in hockey has been brought to an end,” and “this place rightfully belongs to us.”The IIHF said in a statement after the ban was lifted it disagreed with the decision.”We wish to express deep outrage at this decision, taken amid a full-scale war. The threats that were the reason for suspending Russian teams in 2022 have not disappeared. On the contrary, they have only intensified,” Ukraine’s ice hockey federation said on its website last week.SIGN UP FOR THE DAILY OUTKICK NEWSLETTER”We believe that the safety of participants and the integrity of international sport cannot be considered separately from the realities of the war that Russia continues to wage against Ukraine.”Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
‘LAWYER UP’: Jubilant Dems Warn Lawfare Campaign Will Begin the Moment They Take Office
California Congressman Robert Garcia on C-Span
California Congressman Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, has wasted little time threatening the Trump administration following his party’s victories in Tuesday’s midterm elections.
“LAWYER UP,” Garcia wrote on X, signaling that Democrats are preparing an aggressive campaign of congressional investigations against President Donald Trump and his senior officials.
LAWYER UP.
— Congressman Robert Garcia (@RepRobertGarcia) November 4, 2026
Garcia, who is poised to chair the powerful Oversight Committee when Democrats take control of the House in January, has already been preparing investigations into the president, his family and his administration.
“We’re not starting from scratch here,” Garcia told Punchbowl News ahead of the election.
“There’s an enormous amount of work that has happened that is public, and there’s an enormous amount of work that’s happened that we’ve been quietly working on for many months.”
His stated targets include the Trump family’s business interests, cryptocurrency ventures, immigration enforcement operations and the administration’s handling of documents relating to Jeffrey Epstein.
With control of the committee, Democrats would gain the power to issue subpoenas, compel testimony and demand documents, potentially dragging administration officials into months of hearings and costly legal disputes.
Other Democrats have issued similar warnings.
Senator Ron Wyden from Oregon posted a one-word message on X: “Subpoenas.”
Subpoenas.
— Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) November 4, 2026
Rep. Delia Ramirez of Illinois also signalled her intention to target administration officials.
“Noem, Markwayne, Miller, Homan, Bovino, what’s up?” she wrote. “Clear your schedule.”
Noem, Markwayne, Miller, Homan, Bovino, what’s up?
Clear your schedule.
— Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (@repdeliaramirez) November 4, 2026
“Thank you, Mr. President. Our thank you will come in January – with subpoenas,” wrote Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari.
Thank you, Mr. President. Our thank you will come in January – with subpoenas.
— Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (@RepYassAnsari) November 4, 2026
The threats raise the prospect of prolonged left-wing witch hunts and lawfare campaigns, Washington as Democrats revel in the power of holding the House and the Senate.
Although congressional committees cannot bring criminal charges themselves, they can refer potential wrongdoing to federal prosecutors.
The possibility of impeachment proceedings also remains, although removing Trump would require a two-thirds majority in the Senate.
The post ‘LAWYER UP’: Jubilant Dems Warn Lawfare Campaign Will Begin the Moment They Take Office appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Micron and other chip stocks slip as election results strike at the core of data-center optimism
Democratic victories in Texas and other states raise long-term questions about the AI buildout, though they do not “unwind projects already funded.”
Mark Cuban says get your cash ready for this change — ‘That’s when the real money is made’
Everyone wants to buy stocks before they take off. The trick, according to billionaire investor Mark Cuban, is having enough cash when everyone else suddenly wants to sell.
Cuban is urging investors to resist the temptation to chase soaring stocks, keep some money available and wait for the next market downturn. The opportunity, he believes, comes when prices fall and investors with cash can move while others are scrambling.
Read more: Mark Cuban says the ‘best’ guaranteed ROI on $100K is bulk toothpaste and soup
Cuban explained why patience can pay off more than trying to catch every market rally while speaking on “The Diary of a CEO” podcast with host Steven Bartlet on October 26.
“You can invest a little bit for the fun of it, but be patient, have some cash because at some point it’s going to turn,” Cuban said during the interview. “When that happens, that’s when the real magic happens and where the real money is made. The delayed gratification.”
He pointed to the COVID-19 market sell-off as an example of putting that philosophy into action.
“During COVID I just started buying up everything when it hit. And I crushed it,” Cuban said on the podcast.
Why Cuban thinks cash matters before the next market downturn
The familiar saying that cash is king has been repeated by investors for generations, but Cuban has made it a central part of his own investment philosophy.
In a 2008 Blog Maverick post titled “How to Get Rich,” he argued that investors should save money not just for retirement, but for the opportunities that emerge during market turmoil.
“The first step to getting rich is having cash available,” Cuban wrote. He added, “You aren’t saving for retirement. You are saving for the moment you need cash.”
He also criticized the buy-and-hold approach for leaving investors with little money available when stocks fall. His conclusion was blunt: “Cash is king for those wanting to get rich.”
Mark Cuban has emphasized “cash is king” for years. Anna Webber / Getty Images
His mindset echoes the approach taken by Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate led for decades by Warren Buffett. Berkshire has maintained enormous cash reserves while waiting for investments that meet its standards.
More Warren Buffett:
Warren Buffett’s $142 billion fortune hits a new milestone
Warren Buffett’s farewell letter has 4 words for every investor
Warren Buffett shares a simple rule for surviving a market crash
The 3 biggest mistakes Warren Buffett made as Berkshire CEO
In its 2025 annual report, Berkshire addressed criticism of its substantial cash position, explaining that it reflects patience and discipline rather than an abandonment of investing. The company said it would continue pursuing the right opportunities for shareholders.
The strategy isn’t unique to Cuban. It’s a familiar approach among investors who believe the ability to act when prices fall can be just as valuable as owning stocks when prices rise.
Most Americans have their 401(k) money invested in stocks
There’s one major difference between Cuban’s strategy and the financial reality facing millions of American households.
For many workers, retirement savings aren’t sitting in cash waiting for a market correction. They’re invested in mutual funds, index funds and target-date retirement funds that often hold substantial stock positions.
According to Vanguard’s How America Saves report, the average participant-weighted allocation to equities among its defined contribution plan participants was 78% in 2024. At the median, participants held 87% in equities.
That means many retirement savers are exposed to market movements whether they actively follow stocks or not.
Cuban’s comments don’t mean workers should empty their 401(k)s or abandon long-term investing. He didn’t recommend a specific cash allocation or tell investors to sell their retirement holdings.
Instead, his message centers on keeping some financial flexibility rather than feeling compelled to invest every available dollar immediately.
The real advantage comes when other investors panic
Cash doesn’t guarantee a profit, and waiting for a market crash can mean missing years of potential gains if stocks keep climbing.
But Cuban’s COVID example illustrates why having money available can matter when markets suddenly sell off.
The broader lesson is familiar to long-term investors. Opportunities don’t always appear when markets are booming. Sometimes the biggest advantage belongs to those who have the patience and financial flexibility to buy when everyone else is running for the exits.
Related: More Cuban:
JCPenney makes big move to win back holiday shoppers after store closures
If you were alive in the ‘70s, ‘80s, or ‘90s, you likely remember receiving JCPenney’s annual holiday catalog.
Back then, the department store was one of the nation’s largest non-food retailers, and its annual “wish book” was one of its cherished traditions.
But oh, how times have changed.
Today, JCPenney is struggling to remain relevant with consumers and is fighting for its future in an increasingly competitive retail environment.
In 2026, the department store chain closed six stores and saw net sales drop by more than 8% year over year, according to reporting from TheStreet and Retail Dive.
But the mall classic isn’t throwing in the towel just yet. It recently announced its holiday deals, betting that major savings will be enough to bring shoppers back through its doors.
JCPenney promises major savings for holiday shoppers
This holiday season, JCPenney says it’s helping shoppers save by putting 97% of its assortment on sale.
“As America’s Favorite Department Store, JCPenney has always been the place families trust for quality and value,” the retailer said in a statement. “In fact, 92% of budget-conscious shoppers say they are confident, ‘I got a good deal’ at JCPenney.”
These deep seasonal discounts, then, are intended to help strengthen perceptions of the chain as being a budget-friendly destination.
In addition to the sale, the department store also pledged to clarify discounts and deals, letting shoppers know exactly when to buy specific items to get the best savings.
To that end, “JCPenney is doing something most retailers won’t do: revealing its holiday playbook and guiding consumers through the season with exactly what to buy and when to buy it so they can feel more confident saying, ‘yes,’” the statement shared.
JCPenney said it will put 97% of its merchandise on sale this holiday season, helping shoppers stretch their budgets.MarianVejcik / Getty Images
JCPenney needs more than holiday sales to turn things around
This new approach to holiday savings comes at a particularly crucial time for the department store.
After filing for bankruptcy in 2020, the chain was eventually purchased and underwent a major restructuring. As part of that, TheStreet’s Fernanda Tronco reported that it has closed more than 200 stores over the last six years.
More holiday shopping news:
Walmart gets aggressive when it comes to holiday sales
Target raises price of annual grocery deal for holiday shoppers
Walmart joins Starbucks in adding collectable holiday collection
Now owned by Catalyst Brands, the chain has a chance at a second life, but is still struggling financially and reputationally.
“JCP remains financially stable and with the backing of Catalyst and investors it’s really not going anywhere,” Saunders told Retail Dive recently. “And, to be fair to the company, it’s not being run into the ground in the way Sears was — on the contrary, there is investment and effort to rebuild things.”
That being said, financial stability doesn’t necessarily translate to a successful retail and reputational comeback.
JCPenney is now in the tough position of having to convince consumers that it still has something to offer in an increasingly crowded retail market, particularly as shoppers have more options than ever for finding affordable clothing, home goods, and other everyday essentials.
That’s where the holiday deals come in.
If JCPenney can earn the trust of the value-seeking shopper during this high-stress, high-spend season, it has the opportunity to turn them into consistent visitors and regain some of its foothold in the sector.
But the challenge extends beyond simply getting shoppers through the doors over the next few weeks. The department store also needs to turn that renewed interest into sustainable sales growth.
“Penney’s holiday performance will test whether its combination of affordability, apparel, home and beauty can drive traffic and spending without excessive discounting,” Glenn McMahon, partner at MAC Advisory and Consulting, told Retail Dive.
“The issue is not simply whether consumers will spend; it is whether [JCPenney] can convert holiday demand into enough profitable sales and cash flow to address deeper business challenges,” he added.
Related: Bath & Body Works makes a big move for the holidays
A Modest Proposal Explaining the Midterm Rout
Donald Trump implored voters to “pretend that I’m on the ballot.”
To that end, he held an unusual midterm Republican National Convention in Dallas dubbed Trumpapalooza in which he spoke on both nights and feverishly visited 29 campaign stops in the final month of the campaign. The electorate, despite seeing that much of the president, rejected his message and voted for his opponents. Democrats added five governorships, netted at least six and maybe as many as nine U.S. Senate seats, and added an estimated 35 seats in the House of Representatives. When, a day after the election, Mississippians await an answer to which party won its open U.S. Senate seat, then you know Republican endured a very rough night.
Did voters just not get enough Trump this election cycle? The “modest proposal” advanced here explores how Tuesday’s results might have been different if voters had gotten, to quote Andrea True, even “more, more, more” of Donald Trump.
Not Enough Memes
Did Americans get too few memes from the president? Trump, of course, gave us a meme of Michelle and Barack Obama as chimpanzees and a meme of himself depicted as Jesus Christ. What voters told us in Tuesday’s results is that they just did not get enough memes of the Obamas as dancing apes and not nearly enough memes that portrayed Donald J. Trump as Jesus H. Christ. Yes, he posted memes of himself as the greatest president in history. But why did he mostly limit himself to greatness in a mere mortal sense and then, when portraying himself as a god or prophet, limit himself to one conception of the deity and not also depict himself as Buddha, Muhammad, Vishnu, Yahweh, Brahma, Ahura Mazda, An, Horus, Osirus, Zeus, and Quetzalcōātl?
Not Enough Bribes
Did the president not promise enough money to voters to vote Republican? Recall that the president pledged $5,000 payments to every adult American if Republicans won. Americans perhaps saw this as opening offer — Art of the Deal and all — and only voted against the GOP because the president unwisely did not up the ante to $10,000 or even $25,000. The party of limited government needed greater giveaways.
Not Enough Time Spent on Renaming Things
Donald Trump renamed the Gulf of Mexico “the Gulf of America” and Lake Ontario “Lake America.” The Department of Defense became the Department of War. He issued an executive order that rechristened artificial intelligence “super intelligence.” He went too small. Shouldn’t his advisors have counseled him to change North America to, well, “America America” — and maybe rename the Sun as well?
Not Enough Attacks on Republican Donors
Trump’s outside-the-box thinking led him to call Elon Musk, the Republican Party’s biggest donor for the last two election cycles, “a big-time drug addict” and threaten to deport him. A reticent Trump declined to double down on this strategy. If only Trump had accused other donors of, say, “wife beating” and threatened to sic the IRS on them, then maybe Tuesday’s result would have been different.
Not Enough Interest Payments From Lenders to Borrowers
Donald Trump calls for the Fed to institute the lowest interest rate in the world. In the midst of vexing inflation, he advocates the cheapest money possible — a zero percent interest rate. Of course, some nations have gone cheaper and the idea of a negative interest rate appeals to the president. Maybe the Republicans lost because he did not demand that the banks pay the borrowers for taking their money.
Not Enough Making Celebrity Deaths About Him
Do you remember when the president responded to Rob Reiner’s death by saying the director died “reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding, and incurable affliction with a mind crippling disease known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, sometimes referred to as TDS. He was known to have driven people CRAZY by his raging obsession of President Donald J. Trump, with his obvious paranoia reaching new heights as the Trump Administration surpassed all goals and expectations of greatness”? This was, of course, a moment of great statesmanship. Alas, he really misplayed matters when he refused to also inject himself into the deaths of Dolly Parton, Patrick Stewart, and Peabo Bryson.
Not Enough Attacks on Fellow Republicans
Donald Trump called his biggest cheerleader in Congress, Marjorie Taylor Greene, a “traitor,” said Republican Senator Susan Collins “should never be elected to office again,” disinvited Senator Rand Paul, whom he called a “sick wacko,” from the annual congressional picnic at the White House, ran the most right-wing members of Congress, Bob Good and Thomas Massie, out of office, and publicly gave out Senator Tom Cotton’s personal cell number for the offense of opposing permanent Daylight Savings Time. Clearly, he did not attack enough Republicans for the strategy to pay dividends for Republicans.
Not Enough Attacks on Fox News
Speaking of attacks on allies, Donald Trump sued the Wall Street Journal, attacked Fox News host Shannon Bream as “beyond redemption,” said that Leonard Leo, the then head of the Federalist Society, was a “bad person” and a “sleazebag” who “probably hates America” because Federalist Society–approved judges did not rule his way on tariff edicts. Like the aforementioned attacks on Republican officeholders, Trump did not pursue this strategy to a degree that the GOP could reap the rewards.
Not Enough Buildings With Trump’s Name on Them
Donald Trump put his name on the Kennedy Center. What possessed him to stop there? Why did he not place the Trump name on Disneyland, Harvard University, Washington, D.C., and other places and institutions already named for other people?
Not Enough Foreign Countries Becoming U.S. States
Trump vowed to make Canada the “cherished 51st state.” This public dream to annex Canada deep-sixed Pierre Poilievre’s chances of becoming prime minister at the expense of possibly giving Democrats two extra members of the U.S. Senate. But Canada holding representation in the U.S. Congress equal to California (not to mention the inclusion of Greenland and Venezuela) would have allowed Trump to preside over the largest country in the world. And Republicans could then disprove the xenophobia charge by naturalizing more foreigners in one moment than the country did in the whole of the last century. Alas, Canada remains above us and not between California and Colorado in the alphabetical order of states.
Not Enough Debt
Donald Trump has presided over the greatest dollar-amount increase in the national debt of any president in U.S. history. But Franklin Roosevelt raised the debt the most as a percentage of the GDP. Maybe Trump lost because, although he presided over the largest federal government in U.S. history, his deficits and accumulated debts, at least as a percentage of GDP, still pale next to a few other presidents. Give the man two years and a Democratic Congress, and let’s see what he can accomplish.
Not Enough Wars
Donald Trump used the military to attack seven countries as he strangely campaigned for a Nobel Peace Prize. Maybe if he had attacked eight or nine countries, he might have received the prize from the committee rather than the mere medal from a Venezuelan woman pressured into an act of generosity. Yes, his military attacks on Iran, Nigeria, Venezuela, and points beyond, and rhetorical attacks on Norway for the Nobel Committee denying him the prize, made Trump look bigger. For the sake of the country and party, and not, of course, for selfish motives, Trump needed to attack more countries and demand more prizes (such as an NBA MVP award).
“If our people vote,” President Trump said on the eve of the election, “we win in a landslide.” The landslide buried the wrong party.
“For of all sad words of tongue or pen,” John Greenleaf Whittier wrote, “The saddest are these: ‘It might have been!’”
What might have been if American voters had encountered more Donald Trump this election season? One can only guess. But I do know my Democratic neighbors who hate the president strangely want to see more of him stumping for Republicans in 2028.
This article was adapted from this installment of @RightWingWilderness on YouTube.
Liberal Commentator Casually Talks About Executing Elon Musk for Being a ‘Traitor to the West’ (VIDEO)
Screencap of Twitter/X video.
Liberal commentator Scott Galloway recently mused, rather casually, about the possibility of executing Elon Musk for being what he called a ‘traitor to the west.’
Musk has done more for the human race in the last six months than Galloway has done in his entire life, but this moment is important to see and hear.
This is where the minds of leftists are right now. With this blue wave midterm, they will become even worse. They are salivating about the idea of going after their perceived enemies.
In the clip below, Galloway has the nerve to compare Elon Musk to the Rosenbergs, who were executed as traitors.
From the Western Lensman:
Scott Galloway calls Elon Musk a “traitor to the West” and invokes the executions of the Rosenbergs after WW2.
“We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall. This is a traitor to the West, and he should be held to the same standards as every other traitor in the West.”
*Applause*
These people are absolutely unhinged.
See the video below:
Scott Galloway calls Elon Musk a “traitor to the West” and invokes the executions of the Rosenbergs after WW2.
“We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall. This is a traitor to the West, and he should be held to the same standards as every other traitor in the West.”
*Applause*… pic.twitter.com/BuJP2hlfmJ
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 3, 2026
John Sexton commented on this at Hot Air:
The Rosenbergs were executed in 1953 for being Soviet spies. Contrary to Galloway’s rant, they were not lined up against a wall and shot. They were executed via the electric chair at Sing Sing Prison in New York.
As for Elon Musk, he has personally done more for Ukraine than any single person in the world. Ukraine’s entire defense is based on the communications platform of Starlink. The betrayal Galloway is talking about is Musk’s decision recently to reinstate a speed limit on Starlink so that it could not be used for attacks. This reportedly did interfere with some of Ukraine’s drone interceptors within their own territory, though it should not have had an impact on Starshield, the military version of Starlink controlled by the Pentagon.
Get ready for an even more emboldened and unhinged left.
They are already fantasizing about violence.
The post Liberal Commentator Casually Talks About Executing Elon Musk for Being a ‘Traitor to the West’ (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Express Service: California AG Mysteriously Reinstates Deadbeat Charity Controlled by Code Pink Activist Medea Benjamin, Despite Missing $54 Million
California’s progressive attorney general, Rob Bonta, quietly reinstated privileged charitable status to Arc of Justice, the serially tax-delinquent “charity” used by Code Pink benefactress Medea Benjamin to dole out millions to far-left activist groups, the Washington Free Beacon can reveal.
The charity’s reinstatement came just 13 days after it first requested the action, which was estimated to take up to nine months, “despite a record showing years of delinquent filings, missing audits, a revoked state tax exemption, and unanswered questions” about more than $54 million in assets, according to a new investigation by the watchdog group Intelligent Action Network shared exclusively with the Free Beacon.
California’s Franchise Tax Board first revoked Arc of Justice’s tax-exempt status in April 2024, after the charity stopped filing and paying any required penalties, the Free Beacon exclusively reported earlier this year. This left a sizable cloud of mystery around the foundation’s $54.6 million in total assets, which still remain unaccounted for. Benjamin’s charity also did not file a federal tax return in fiscal years 2021, 2023, 2024, and 2025—and reinstatement on the state level requires a petition that includes complete copies of the IRS Form 990-PF for each delinquent year. But Bonta’s Registry of Charities and Fundraisers pushed through Arc of Justice’s reinstatement in less than two weeks “without demanding a full accounting of what happened to its money during the period when it was suspended and later revoked,” IAN found.
Bonta’s preferential treatment of Benjamin’s charity is even more remarkable given that one day before his registry approved reinstatement, “the Franchise Tax Board certified that Arc of Justice was not in good standing and was not tax-exempt in California,” according to documents provided by IAN to the Free Beacon. While the Franchise Tax Board had informed Arc of Justice “that its application for reinstatement would take about nine months to process,” Bonta’s registry “did not wait for that process.” Rather, it “reinstated Arc of Justice, even though the Registry’s own rules provide for automatic suspension when a charity’s Franchise Tax Board exemption has been revoked.”
Bonta’s office did not respond to multiple Free Beacon requests for comment on the decision. Bonta, who won a second full term in Tuesday’s midterm elections, is also locked in a high-profile showdown with the Trump administration over efforts to stop non-citizens from voting. The attorney general has sought to position himself as one of the president’s top legal foes.
The tangled web surrounding Arc of Justice and its finances leaves many unanswered questions about a foundation that has served as the financial backbone for a network of radical advocacy groups tied to Benjamin and her Code Pink cofounder, Jodie Evans. Evans is married to Neville Roy Singham, a Maoist American tech mogul who funds far-left causes from his base in Shanghai and who is currently the subject of a Justice Department criminal probe.
Arc of Justice had not filed with California’s Registry of Charities and Fundraisers since 2018. Documents from that year and 2019 still “remain absent from the public file,” according to IAN. The organization’s 2021 federal tax return, which covers $17.3 million in revenue and $10.8 million in contributions, also “still does not appear in the IRS’s public filing records.”
Moreover, “in three of the Petition for Reinstatement’s five years, Arc of Justice reported more than $2 million in revenue but no independent audit, which the Registry’s own system flagged as required by California law. None of these issues prevented reinstatement.”
“This wasn’t oversight. It was a thirteen-day pass from Attorney General Bonta’s office for a $54.6 million foundation that still has its state tax exemption revoked, still has no IRS record of its 2021 or 2025 federal returns, and still hasn’t accounted for what it did with its money while the Registry barred it from spending it,” Susan George, IAN CEO and cofounder, told the Free Beacon. “California’s charity regulator waved it through without demanding an audit, an accounting, or a single serious answer. The only question left is why the hurry.”
Arc of Justice only moved to rectify the delinquent tax filings after IAN began investigating its finances and discovered that “no public document establishes what has happened to” $51,445,599 in outstanding assets, “where it is held, or whether any of it has moved.”
Arc of Justice, for its part, claimed its noncompliance stems from a mere “administrative misunderstanding,” in which the group thought it had effectively moved operations to Florida. That explanation, however, is lacking: Every federal tax return the foundation filed from 2017 through 2024 named California as the state to which it reports. The “Petition for Reinstatement” additionally failed to disclose that just “one day after IAN first publicly raised concerns about Benjamin’s foundation, its officers formed a new Florida corporation under the Arc of Justice name.”
The Florida-based entity was founded on May 8 of this year—seven days before the federal tax filing deadline passed—with the same organizational name and same officers as its California incorporation. The address provided for the group, in Miami’s downtrodden Little River neighborhood, is the same one “the California foundation used on its federal filings for years,” IAN separately reported earlier this year. Google Street View images of the address, dating back to 2022, show a small, colorful shack adorned with peace signs and other cheerful imagery.
“Nothing in the public record shows that Bonta’s Registry examined what role the Florida corporation was intended to play, whether it was operable, or whether any charitable assets had been transferred to it,” according to IAN’s findings.
But “most consequentially,” IAN notes, is the apparent lack of oversight by Bonta’s office: “The Registry of Charities and Fundraisers reinstated Arc of Justice without demanding a full accounting of what happened to its money during the period when it was suspended and later revoked. The Petition contains no 2025 financial statements, no accounting of assets following revocation, and no evidence addressing the $2.7 million in grants the foundation reported making in 2024, when the Registry’s own notice shows it was already suspended.”
In the face of these findings, Bonta’s registry still concluded on September 9—13 days after the petition for reinstatement was received—that Arc of Justice posed “no threat to the public or to charitable assets.” The letter was signed on Bonta’s behalf by Registrar David Eller.
Eller himself described the reinstatement process in 2024 as lengthy and complex, telling the California state legislature that resolving delinquency status “involves a legal compliance review,” and that complex cases spanning multiple years “create a lot of extra time to do the full review.” Registry staff typically take anywhere from 30 to 90 days to review each renewal filing “for compliance and possible law violations.”
But in Arc of Justice’s case, “the foundation’s petition came with five years of overdue renewal filings” and “was granted in 13 days,” according to IAN.
“The Attorney General’s office had broad authority to slow the process down, demand additional records, require audits, order an accounting reaching back years, restrict access to charitable assets, or impose meaningful conditions before reinstatement,” IAN wrote. “It did none of those things. Instead, after years of noncompliance and five years of overdue renewal filings, Arc of Justice was restored to registered status in 13 days, while its California tax exemption remained revoked.”
Perhaps even more startling is the competing compliance notices from Bonta’s registry and California’s Franchise Tax Board. Arc of Justice’s reinstatement petition contained a Franchise Tax Board letter from Sept. 8, one day before Bonta’s registry approved the action, certifying that the foundation “is not in good standing” and, therefore, not tax-exempt. As of Sept. 29, the Franchise Tax Board’s own records still list the Foundation as “suspended” and “not exempt,” though the registry’s “order granting reinstatement does not mention” this finding. Arc of Justice’s status with the Franchise Tax Board remains unchanged as of this writing.
“By its own records, it took the Registry seventeen months to issue a revocation notice, and thirteen days to undo the revocation,” IAN found.
California’s Franchise Tax Board told the Free Beacon that “information about whether an entity has taken steps to reinstate its tax-exemption is confidential taxpayer information.” Due to that policy, “we are very limited in terms of the information we can share publicly on such entities.” The agency was only able to direct the Free Beacon to its searchable “revoked exempt organization” webpage.
Benjamin and other Arc of Justice representatives did not respond to a Free Beacon request for comment on the matter.
The post Express Service: California AG Mysteriously Reinstates Deadbeat Charity Controlled by Code Pink Activist Medea Benjamin, Despite Missing $54 Million appeared first on .
He Was on the Ballot, After All
After the carnage, Democrats currently sit at a 55-seat Senate majority.
Virginia Is for the Culture of Death & Other Harsh Electoral Realities
Virginia is no longer for lovers.