Harmeet Dhillon, the assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights division announced her resignation on Thursday.
Minnesota Vikings’ soft benching of Kyler Murray leads to Carson Wentz taking over as new starting QB
This is how the Minnesota Vikings soft benching of Kyler Murray in favor of new starter Carson Wentz played out:At the beginning of the week, even with the season’s first loss still fresh for the Vikings, coach Kevin O’Connell committed to Murray as his starting quarterback. The coach was asked whether Murray would be the Vikings’ starter against the Buffalo Bills on “Monday Night Football” if he overcame his sore hamstring during the week.”Yes,” O’Connell responded without equivocation.VIKINGS QUARTERBACK BATTLE MEETS EXPECTED END AS KYLER MURRAY BEATS OUT JJ MCCARTHY FOR STARTING JOBExcept, there was equivocation.O’Connell announced Thursday that Wentz will start for the Vikings while Max Brosmer will serve as the backup. Murray is out this week.”After evaluating Kyler on Monday, getting some imaging and things, we did determine he does have a hamstring strain,” O’Connell said. “Don’t believe it to be much more than a week-to-week kind of thing right now, but for him, his movement skills and the way he plays the game, we do feel like we’d be putting him at risk of possibly turning this into a more significant injury than it is by trying to have him work through it here early on.”This is obviously a decision based on an injury, but also based on performance.Murray has not played to expectations since joining the team in March on a one-year contract. He’s thrown five TD passes in six games and that ranks him tied for 29th in the NFL.The team’s passing “attack” has been mostly in retreat while averaging 165 yards per game, which is 31st in the NFL. And, most importantly, the offense is 27th in the league, averaging 20 points per game.The reason the Vikings lead the NFC North with a 6-1 record is because the 93 points they’ve allowed is the lowest mark in the league.That, obviously, is not sustainable, and there were signs that the Vikings’ patience with Murray could be running out regardless of the injury.KYLER MURRAY KNOCKED OUT OF VIKINGS DEBUT AFTER FOREARM TO THE HELMET AND BLOW TO NECK BY TWO PACKERSMurray’s health status opened the door for Wentz to step into the starting role, as he did earlier this year after Murray suffered a concussion in the regular-season opener.Wentz led a comeback win in that opener and then helped his team win the one game he started after that, a gritty 9-3 win against the Chicago Bears.”There’s a ton of confidence in Carson,” O’Connell said Thursday.Taken together, these factors give the Vikings’ coaching staff reason to move in a different direction without embarrassing Murray, whom the team still hopes can contribute once he’s fully healthy.So, we’re seeing the soft benching of Murray.The signs this was coming began following the 19-15 loss to Detroit. After the game, receiver Justin Jefferson was clearly frustrated.(Hint to Vikings quarterbacks: Keep Jefferson happy because if he isn’t, you’ve done something wrong and failed to utilize one of the NFL’s most dynamic offensive weapons.)Jefferson, usually affable, exited the locker room without talking to reporters.”I don’t fault the frustration or the competitiveness in any way, shape or form,” O’Connell said afterward.O’Connell did seem to fault Murray for an inability to maximize his opportunities to Jefferson.The coach mentioned the attempts to Jefferson: “A couple that we missed maybe a little high, one on schedule, one off schedule.”And, O’Connell added, “I thought there were some play-pass chances that we didn’t see or didn’t pull the trigger on.”That all points to the quarterback who just lost his starting job because of a hamstring injury – more or less.FOLLOW ARMANDO SALGUERO ON X: @ARMANDOSALGUERO
Fake Amazon invoice scam uses $988 iPad order as bait
You open your email and see an invoice from Amazon. It says you bought a new iPad for nearly $1,000. The order has supposedly shipped, and your payment has already gone through. There’s even a customer support number to call if something looks wrong. Your first reaction might be to grab your phone and stop the charge. That’s exactly what makes this fake Amazon invoice scam so dangerous. It uses a realistic-looking receipt and an expensive purchase to make you worry about your money. Then it offers what appears to be an easy solution. Matt, who lives in California, recently sent us one of these suspicious emails. He wanted to help others recognize the warning signs before someone falls for the same trick. After examining the message, we found several clues worth sharing.Missed CyberGuy LIVE? Watch the replay and discover 5 ways to travel smarter and save money.Our free CyberGuy LIVE class, 5 Ways to Travel Smarter and Save Money, has ended, but you can still watch the full replay. Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson walks you through five practical ways to protect your phone and personal information, avoid common travel scams, find better deals, save money on bookings and use technology to make your travels easier and less stressful. No technical experience is needed.Watch the free replay + downloadable checklist now at CyberGuyLive.com.DO NOT CLICK FAKE ‘ACCOUNT RECOVERY’ AMAZON EMAILMatt received the email on Oct. 28. Its subject line addressed him by name and claimed his order had already left the facility. Inside was a professionally formatted invoice featuring Amazon’s familiar logo. The invoice listed an Apple iPad Air 11-inch (M4) with 256GB of storage and cellular connectivity. It showed a price of $973.19. Below that was an additional $14.99 charge labeled “Amazon Protect+ (Auto-Renew).” The grand total came to $988.18.The document also included an invoice number, shipping details and a delivery date. It even displayed Amazon’s corporate address in Seattle. All those details helped create the appearance of a legitimate transaction. However, the email also included a phone number for canceling or modifying the order. That number appeared prominently near the top, again in the payment instructions and once more at the bottom. That’s where the real concern begins. The message appears designed to make someone call before checking whether the purchase actually happened.Let’s look at the warning signs hiding in Matt’s email. Some are obvious once you notice them. Others are more subtle and help explain why these scams can fool people.This is the biggest giveaway. The email claimed to come from someone named Jack Campos. However, the actual sender address used Outlook.com with a different personal name embedded in the address. It had no apparent connection to Amazon. Amazon says its legitimate customer emails come from Amazon domains, including amazon.com. A personal Outlook account claiming to send an official Amazon invoice deserves immediate suspicion. Scammers can write almost anything in the sender’s display name. That’s why I always recommend checking the actual email address before trusting a message.The invoice displayed the same customer support number in three separate locations. It appeared inside a shaded banner, within the payment instructions and again near the bottom. That’s a significant warning sign because the email steers the recipient toward making a phone call. Rather than directing Matt to verify the purchase through his Amazon account, it emphasizes contacting the number printed on the invoice. That number should be treated as unverified and potentially controlled by scammers. We have not independently established who operates it. Amazon warns that fraudulent order confirmations often encourage customers to contact supposed support representatives. Those calls can turn into attempts to obtain payment information or gain access to an account.Look at the amount: $988.18. That’s enough money to get almost anyone’s attention. If you saw that charge for a product you didn’t buy, you’d probably want to fix it immediately. Scammers understand that reaction. They often choose expensive electronics because the potential financial loss feels serious. The detailed iPad description makes the transaction appear more believable. However, the amount on an email invoice proves nothing about your actual bank account. Until you verify the charge independently, treat it as an unsupported claim.Here’s a detail I find especially revealing. The subject line claims the order has already left the facility. Yet the invoice says cancellations are accepted only before dispatch. So which is it? Has the package already shipped, or can the customer still cancel it? The conflicting language creates confusion while encouraging the recipient to seek help quickly. A concerned shopper may decide to call the listed number rather than spend time figuring out the inconsistency.The email addresses Matt by name in the subject line. However, the billing section identifies the customer as “Amazon Account Holder.” The invoice also lacks a clear, personalized billing and shipping address. Instead, it provides broad fulfillment details and an estimated delivery date. Generic customer information alone doesn’t prove fraud. Still, it raises questions when an email claims to document a completed purchase worth nearly $1,000. If the order were genuine, Matt should be able to locate its actual details inside his Amazon account.The invoice uses terms such as “Standard Account Allocation” and “active ledger.” It also claims the authorization has been verified and automated order fulfillment is underway. Those phrases may sound official, but they provide little useful information about how the payment occurred. The email never gives Matt a reliable way to verify the transaction through his account. Scammers sometimes use corporate-sounding language to make a document seem authoritative. Don’t assume unfamiliar financial terminology means the message came from a legitimate company.Alongside the iPad, the invoice lists “Amazon Protect+ (Auto-Renew)” for $14.99. An unexpected recurring charge can create another reason for someone to contact support. Even if they aren’t immediately concerned about the iPad, they might worry about paying for a subscription they never requested. The label alone doesn’t establish whether the service exists or whether Matt was actually charged. However, any unfamiliar subscription on an unexpected invoice deserves verification through the company’s official website.The document features an invoice identifier beginning with “AMZ” followed by additional letters and numbers. It looks technical enough to seem convincing. However, scammers can generate invoice numbers as easily as they can copy a company logo. An unfamiliar invoice identifier should never replace independent verification. Check Amazon’s Your Orders section for a matching purchase instead.The invoice shows October 28, 2026, as both the order date and estimated delivery date. It also claims that fulfillment has already moved forward. Same-day delivery can happen with legitimate Amazon orders, so that detail alone doesn’t establish fraud. Still, the message offers no independently verifiable tracking information. It relies on its own claims about shipment and delivery. The document also lists zero estimated sales tax on the nearly $1,000 transaction. That may have a legitimate explanation depending on the circumstances. However, it adds another detail worth comparing with a real order record.Here’s one of the more interesting details. The invoice includes the Amazon logo and lists Amazon.com Services LLC at 410 Terry Avenue North in Seattle, Washington. That address corresponds to an actual Amazon corporate location. This helps explain why the invoice can look credible. Scammers don’t have to invent every detail. They can copy real company information and place it inside a fraudulent document. A legitimate address on a receipt doesn’t authenticate the sender. The same goes for company logos and polished formatting.IDENTITY THIEVES DON’T NEED YOUR PASSWORD ANYMORE; HERE ARE 6 NEW ACCOUNT TAKEOVER THREATSThe likely goal of this type of scam is to move you from an email conversation to a phone call. Once someone calls, a person posing as customer support may offer to cancel the purchase or reverse the charge. To complete that supposed refund, they might request payment details or account verification information. Some scammers also ask victims to install remote-access software. They may claim the installation is necessary to resolve a billing problem. In reality, that software could give a stranger access to the person’s computer.Amazon specifically warns that its representatives will never ask you to share a one-time password over the phone. The company also cautions customers against providing financial details or granting unexpected remote access. These are documented tactics in Amazon impersonation scams. We haven’t established what would happen if someone called the particular number in Matt’s email. The most important point is that receiving a fake invoice does not mean you’ve actually been charged.”Scammers that attempt to impersonate Amazon put consumers at risk,” an Amazon spokesperson told CyberGuy. “We will continue to invest in protecting consumers and educating the public on scam avoidance. We encourage consumers to report suspected scams to us so that we can protect their accounts and refer bad actors to law enforcement to help keep consumers safe. Please visit our help pages to find additional information on how to identify scams and report them at amazon.com/ReportAScam.”If an unexpected Amazon invoice lands in your inbox, don’t rush to cancel the order or call the number provided. A few simple checks can help you determine whether the purchase is real. And if you’ve already contacted the supposed support team, there are steps you can take to protect your information.Open the official Amazon app or type Amazon.com into your browser. Select Your Orders and look for the alleged purchase. Avoid using links or phone numbers in the suspicious email. Going directly to your account helps you determine whether the order actually exists.Sign in to your Amazon account and look for Your Messages or Message Center under your account options. Amazon says authentic customer emails appear there. When a suspicious message doesn’t appear, that’s another reason to question its legitimacy.Expand the sender details instead of trusting the name displayed in your inbox. Scammers can make an email appear to come from Amazon while sending it through a personal account. Be especially suspicious of unfamiliar domains or addresses that have no connection to the company.A fake customer support number can connect you directly to a scammer. Instead, find customer service through Amazon’s official app or website. Remember, the person who sent the questionable invoice also supplied that phone number.Amazon now lets U.S. customers use Alexa for Shopping on Amazon.com or in the Amazon Shopping app to check suspicious emails, texts and phone calls. Simply ask, “Is this email from Amazon?” and provide details about the message. The tool checks the information against Amazon’s records to determine whether the communication came from the company. If it can’t verify the message, it will let you know. You can also forward suspicious emails to verify@amazon.com for verification.Never share your Amazon password or one-time security codes with someone who contacts you unexpectedly. Consider setting up a passkey or enabling two-step verification for additional protection. These safeguards can make unauthorized account access more difficult, even when someone obtains your password.Strong antivirus protection can help detect malicious links, unsafe websites and harmful downloads that scammers may use to steal information. Choose reputable security software with real-time protection and keep it updated. While antivirus software cannot prevent someone from being tricked over the phone, it adds protection against other threats that often accompany scams. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at CyberGuy.com.Review your bank and credit card transactions through their official apps or websites. Look for unfamiliar purchases or charges that don’t match your records. Contact your financial institution immediately if you discover unauthorized activity. You can also enable transaction alerts to help catch suspicious charges sooner.Scammers may use personal information found on data broker websites to make fraudulent emails more convincing. A personal data removal service can help remove your name, address, phone number and other details from covered people-search sites. Although these services cannot prevent every scam email, reducing your online exposure can make it harder for criminals to research and target you. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.comIdentity theft protection services can help monitor certain types of suspicious activity involving your personal information. Depending on the plan, you may receive alerts about unfamiliar credit activity or signs of identity misuse. Some services also offer professional restoration assistance if your identity becomes compromised. These protections can provide valuable support when criminals obtain sensitive information, although no service can detect every type of fraud. See my tips and best picks on Best Identity Theft Protection at CyberGuy.com.Visit Amazon’s official scam reporting page to report the message. You can also report attempted fraud to the Federal Trade Commission at reportfraud.ftc.gov/. Amazon recommends that people without an Amazon account forward suspicious communications as an attachment to reportascam@amazon.com. Reporting these attempts helps companies and authorities identify fraudulent activity.For additional protection, we’ve also covered how Amazon alerts customers about impersonation scams and the precautions the company recommends.Already called the number on a suspicious Amazon invoice? Your next steps depend on what information you shared and whether you gave anyone access to your device. Here’s how to protect yourself.The sooner you act, the better your chances of preventing additional damage. Even a short conversation with a scammer deserves attention if you shared personal information or allowed access to your device.I appreciate Matt taking the time to share this email with us. It’s a good reminder of how much effort scammers put into making fraudulent communications look credible. What caught my attention was the combination of a detailed invoice and that repeatedly displayed phone number. The message creates concern about a large purchase, then conveniently offers a way to fix it. That’s where people can get pulled into a scam before they realize what’s happening. And here’s something worth remembering: You don’t have to spot every strange detail on an invoice to protect yourself. You only need to recognize that an unexpected charge deserves independent verification. The lesson I take from Matt’s experience is simple. Don’t let a scary email decide whom you call or how quickly you act. Check your account through an official channel before you give anyone access to your money or personal information. I’m glad Matt reached out because sharing these examples gives more people a chance to recognize the warning signs.Have you received a convincing fake Amazon invoice or spoken to someone pretending to be customer support? Tell us what happened by writing to us at CyberGuy.com. Your experience could help someone else avoid becoming a victim.Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy NewsletterCopyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Tell Big Tech and Corporate HQs to Stay Away! (VIDEO)
Texas Built it… We Invited Democrats to Come and Take it… They Did!
Texas became the economic powerhouse of America by doing everything California refused to do. Low taxes. Fewer regulations. Energy independence. Freedom to build, invest, and prosper.
And it worked. Tesla, Oracle, Chevron, Caterpillar, Charles Schwab and dozens of other corporate giants came running.
Texas recruited its own political destruction… just like Colorado did a decade earlier.
The very economic success that made Texas a magnet for American business also brought hundreds of thousands of new residents. And now the Republican strongholds of Collin, Denton, and Tarrant counties have fallen to Democrats.
Look at these staggering numbers from those three counties:
Population increased 13.5% from 2020 to 2025.
Republican gubernatorial votes increased just 5.2% from 2022 to 2026.
Democratic gubernatorial votes skyrocketed 46.6% over those same election cycles!
Think about that. Republican votes barely budged while Democrats added nearly 269,000 votes in just three counties!
Texas’s aggressive corporate recruitment helped create the very political shift we’re witnessing. We rolled out the red carpet for California corporations, their executives, and their technology workers. Many brought their families, their money, and sadly, their political beliefs.
I believe Texas underestimated the political consequences of its own economic success. The huge contribution of these newcomers made to the Democratic vote surge is clear. And it’s seen in the very counties where these big companies put up shop.
Here’s the ultimate irony: Democrats will inherit the economic powerhouse Republicans built, only to dismantle the very policies that made it successful. Texas will be destroyed.
On today’s Stinchfield, we follow the votes, the corporate
The post Tell Big Tech and Corporate HQs to Stay Away! (VIDEO) appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
Grocery Cart Price Check: Walmart, Target, and Publix face off
Shopping at Publix is a pleasure, but how much more is it costing?
Sure, Publix has a lot going for it. The fresh-baked bread, bakery cakes, famous deli subs, fried chicken, and weekly BOGOs have earned the chain a loyal following.
But when the grocery list sticks to everyday staples, does that familiar Publix experience come with a higher checkout bill?
I compared 11 common grocery items at Publix, Walmart, and Target in Central Florida and found that Publix had the highest total, while the same basket at Walmart came in nearly $14 cheaper.
Here’s what the same grocery list cost at each store:
Publix: $53.13
Walmart: $38.96
Target: $42.86
The Publix cart cost $14.17 more than Walmart’s and $10.27 more than Target’s. The Target cart landed $3.90 above Walmart.
In addition, for all but one item, Publix’s price was the highest, and for all but two items, Walmart’s price was the lowest.
Read more: Starbucks is pulling a breakfast sandwich it launched six years ago
The grocery list, item by item
The price check included bananas, Red Baron pepperoni pizza, Ragu pasta sauce, Barilla pasta, Simply Orange juice, large eggs, 80/20 ground beef, Lay’s BBQ chips, Kraft Mac & Cheese, Special K Protein cereal, and Diet Pepsi.
Although prices vary by store location, the comparison reflects the average cost of the same grocery basket across the three stores surveyed in the region.
Here’s how much each item cost at each store:
ItemPublix PriceTarget PriceWalmart PriceBananas$1.04$1.16$0.80Red Baron pepperoni pizza$5.75$4.99$4.82Ragu pasta sauce$3.35$2.49$2.53Barilla pasta$1.99$1.89$1.88Simply Orange juice$5.29$4.99$4.64Dozen large eggs$2.19$1.59$1.6780/20 ground beef$0.47 per oz.$0.46 per oz.$0.43 per oz.Lay’s BBQ chips$4.29$3.29$2.50Kraft Mac & Cheese$1.79$1.39$1.24Special K Protein cereal$5.79$5.29$4.98Diet Pepsi$11.61$8.39$6.97
Package sizes were the same across all three stores. One exception was bananas, which, when sold as bunches, may contain different numbers of the fruit.
Another exception was ground beef, for which I calculated a per-ounce price to enable an apples-to-apples comparison. I also limited this particular comparison to each store’s least expensive variety of 80/20 ground beef.
Shopping at Publix may cost more money, but the brand is built on the overall shopping experience with the motto “where shopping is a pleasure.”Jeff Greenberg / Getty Images
Publix BOGOs can make a difference, but there’s a catch
Buy one, get one free, better known as BOGO deals, are part of what keeps shoppers checking Publix’s weekly ads. The promotions can offer real savings, particularly when a household already needs two of the same product.
But there’s a detail that matters depending on where shoppers live. Publix’s BOGO rules aren’t the same in every state.
In Florida, shoppers must purchase both qualifying items to get the second one free. Buying just one doesn’t qualify for a half-price discount. At Publix stores in other states, shoppers generally have the option of buying two and getting one free or purchasing a single item at 50% off.
That gives shoppers outside Florida more flexibility. Someone who only needs one package of bagels or one box of cereal can still take advantage of the promotion without buying an extra item.
More Retail:
Kroger cuts discounts, promises pricing changes
Walmart gets aggressive when it comes to holiday sales
Costco copies a popular Trader Joe’s collectible
Of course, a BOGO deal isn’t automatically the lowest price. If an item costs $6 at Publix and $2.50 at another store, paying $6 for two items through a BOGO promotion may be a good deal compared with Publix’s regular price, but it still costs more than buying one elsewhere. The best comparison is the price per item, ounce, or pound.
And buying a second product only because it’s free can add to the grocery bill if it wasn’t needed in the first place.
Is the Publix premium worth it?
Shopping at Publix is about the experience. The stores are known for clean aisles, neatly stocked shelves and employees who are willing to stop and help customers find what they’re looking for.
Checkout tends to feel more personal, too, with friendly cashiers and baggers who offer to carry groceries out to the car.
Those small touches can make a routine shopping trip more pleasant, particularly for shoppers who don’t enjoy crowded, hectic stores. At a time when households are watching every dollar, however, the added convenience may be harder to justify.
Some shoppers are willing to pay a little extra for that experience, while others would rather keep the savings.
Related: Read more:
Democrats Are About to Throw Out the Electoral College Without Touching the Constitution
Biden’s Interior Secretary, Who Invoked ‘Indigenous Knowledge’ To Ban Oil Drilling, Wins Governor’s Race in New Mexico, America’s Second-Biggest Oil Producer
The victory in New Mexico’s governor’s race of former president Joe Biden’s interior secretary, Deb Haaland—who famously invoked “indigenous knowledge” to ban oil drilling—presents a major challenge to the state’s sizable oil and gas industry that Haaland, a fierce environmentalist, has vowed to dismantle.
Haaland’s election was cheered by liberals and representation advocates as “historic” because she is the first Native American woman elected to a U.S. governorship. But her election may be more significant in what it represents for the energy industry in New Mexico, the country’s second-largest oil-producing state and third-largest natural gas producer.
“As Interior secretary, Deb Haaland restricted access to energy resources and increased regulatory burdens on American oil and gas producers,” said Jason Isaac, the CEO of the right-leaning American Energy Institute. “Now she will lead America’s second-largest oil-producing state, where energy production supports jobs and funds essential public services.”
“The question is whether Haaland will sacrifice New Mexico’s economy to undermine President Trump’s broader energy agenda,” he told the Washington Free Beacon. “New Mexico’s workers and families cannot afford to become collateral damage in a political fight over American energy.”
Haaland—who spearheaded vast oil and gas drilling bans while serving in the Biden administration—didn’t shy away from rhetoric promising to dismantle oil and gas development during her campaign. She vowed, for example, to set the state on a pathway to eliminate all greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and “go all in on” green energy.
Her Republican opponent, by contrast, promised to back New Mexico’s oil and gas industry and said the state “depends on” the industry. If the state were to scale back oil and gas production as Haaland promised, it would dramatically decrease energy supplies nationwide at a time when the country’s supplies are already strained and prices have surged.
Overall, according to federal data, New Mexico accounts for about 15 percent of total oil production nationwide and 8 percent of total natural gas production. Last year, the industry generated $13.1 billion in state revenue, which was directed to government services and schools. New Mexico’s legislature said the industry plays a “critical role” in the state’s economy.
Haaland’s campaign rhetoric mirrors how she led the Department of the Interior as its secretary between 2021 and 2025.
Haaland notably implemented a sweeping moratorium on federal oil and gas leasing, gutted the nation’s offshore oil drilling program and banned such drilling in all waters except the Gulf of Mexico, prohibited oil drilling across 41 million acres of federal lands, and slashed oil drilling permits by 84 percent.
When Haaland banned drilling across millions of acres in some of America’s most oil-rich land in Alaska, she cited “indigenous knowledge” and said that climate change is “warming the Arctic more than twice as fast as the rest of the planet.”
Perhaps most notably, Haaland issued a 50-year mining and oil drilling ban across thousands of acres in northern New Mexico to protect “important cultural and natural resources” and issued a 20-year oil drilling ban across hundreds of thousands of acres near the Chaco Culture National Historic Park in northwestern New Mexico.
The Chaco ban drew the particular ire of New Mexicans, including members of the Navajo Nation tribe who rely on oil leasing for royalties that help them afford basic necessities. The tribe—which has clashed with Haaland’s rival Laguna Pueblo tribe over the matter—ultimately sued her over the action, arguing it would decrease tribal revenue by millions of dollars and drive many of its members into poverty.
A government watchdog group eventually filed an ethics complaint with the Department of Interior’s inspector general, noting that Haaland’s daughter personally lobbied for federal officials to pursue such a ban. And Congress separately launched its own investigation into the matter.
An oil industry executive with experience in New Mexico’s vast energy industry said that Haaland “for the past decade has defined her career by opposing oil and gas production.” “She’s now going to have to face the reality that voters want affordable gasoline, and she can’t stand in the way,” the executive added.
The post Biden’s Interior Secretary, Who Invoked ‘Indigenous Knowledge’ To Ban Oil Drilling, Wins Governor’s Race in New Mexico, America’s Second-Biggest Oil Producer appeared first on .
El-Sayed Stabs Schumer In The Back, Sends Rare Olive Branch To Trump
El-Sayed Stabs Schumer In The Back, Sends Rare Olive Branch To Trump
Michigan Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed (D-MI) said Senate Democrats need new leadership, a position that rules out his support for Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to continue as the party’s leader in the chamber. El-Sayed named Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) as the Democrat he would prefer to see run for majority leader. Reports have indicated that Van Hollen is weighing a 2028 presidential campaign.
Abdul El-Sayed speaks after winning the state’s US Senate race. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
“I’d love to see him run,” El-Sayed said of Van Hollen. “It seems that he has his sights set on another prize. But I’ve been very clear that I think we need new leadership.”El-Sayed did not commit to any candidate. “But a vote is a choice between two options,” he said of the leadership race. “I don’t know what the options are right now. So let’s see who comes out of the woodwork and is excited to lead.”The incoming senator’s stance puts him at odds with the leader who backed his general election campaign. Schumer did not start out in El-Sayed’s corner. In the Democratic primary, Schumer first supported El-Sayed’s rival, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-MI) of Birmingham. After El-Sayed won the nomination, Schumer threw his support behind him.Frustration with Schumer’s leadership has simmered among Democrats in recent years, even as the party flipped at least seven Republican-held seats. He addressed that criticism Wednesday at a press conference at the headquarters of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.”This is not about me … This is about the American people and what they want and what they need and what we can do to help them. Plain and simple,” Schumer said.El-Sayed is one of at least five newly elected Democrats who have either declined to back Schumer or threatened to withhold their votes, all before taking office. Schumer needs only a majority of the Democratic caucus to keep his post, and current projections put the caucus at 54 to 56 members in 2027.”The issue is not me. I’ll be reelected as majority leader. But the issue is focusing on the American people and what they want,” Schumer told reporters.Senate Democrats hold their leadership elections next month.While El-Sayed is publicly breaking with Schumer, he has extended a rare olive branch to President Donald Trump. He appeared on Morning Joe on Thursday, and host Joe Scarborough asked El-Sayed about Trump’s plan to cut $4 billion in aid to Israel by January. El-Sayed said Americans “have to separate between Judaism and the Jewish people and Israel and its actions. We have to.” He said he would criticize human rights abuses by the government of Egypt, where his immigrant parents came from, just as readily, and would keep that separate from “people who are in Egypt.””I agree with him on that. I don’t think that we should be continuing to subsidize a foreign military that has done the worst things with our money,” El-Sayed said of Trump. “I agree, I’d love to work with him on doing that. In fact, I don’t know that we should be continuing to sell weapons to a country that is, again, using our weapons to do awful things.”Q: What do you think about Trump talking about cutting off aid to Israel?El-Sayed: I agree with him on that. I don’t think we should be continuing to subsidize a foreign military that is again using our weapons to do awful things. I agree. I would love to work with him on… pic.twitter.com/NjqE3dKuzN— Clash Report (@clashreport) November 5, 2026
Tyler Durden
Thu, 11/05/2026 – 14:30
Democrat drops out of race due to health concerns and still wins, opponent says ‘we deserve to know more’
A Democratic candidate who dropped his campaign for health reasons still defeated the Republican candidate in an Iowa state House race.Democrat Eric Armstrong explained in a Sept. 7 Facebook post that he was abandoning his campaign due to health issues.”Running a successful campaign requires immense physical and mental energy. Recently, I have been facing some personal health issues that require my full attention and immediate care,” Armstrong wrote, in part. “Because I must prioritize my health and recovery at this time, I am stepping down from my campaign, effective immediately.”3 INJURED IN SHOOTING AT DES MOINES, IOWA POST OFFICE, SUSPECT DETAINED: POLICE”Our District deserves a representative who can give 100 percent of their energy to this race. Right now, I must focus on healing so that I can continue to serve our community in other ways in the future,” he added.But despite this announcement, Armstrong’s name remained on the ballot, and voters still elected him.Unofficial results indicate that Armstrong received 4,602 votes, while Republican Keith Jones, who is a member of the Pottawattamie County Board of Supervisors, received 3,737 votes.DEMOCRATS SEIZE MAJORITY OF GOVERNORS’ OFFICES IN ELECTION-NIGHT SHIFT”I’m going to do my best to represent” the district, Armstrong stated during a Wednesday phone interview with The New York Times. “But I still have health issues, that’s what I’m struggling with.”Armstrong did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment on Thursday.In part of a statement to Fox News Digital on Thursday, Jones wrote, “Being a member of the Iowa House is highly exhausting. 14-hour days away from home. Is he healthy enough for the job?”He is now a public figure. We should know what his ailment was. If he wasn’t truly sick and quit the race, is he committed enough to represent our district?” Jones asked. “I think we deserve to know more.”DEMS FLIP YET ANOTHER SENATE SEAT IN TRUMP COUNTRY AMID SWEEPING GOP UPSETSThe state House seat is currently held by Democratic state Rep. Josh Turek, who defeated Republican U.S. Rep. Ashley Hinson in the Iowa U.S. Senate race this week.
Justice Department Launches Criminal Investigation Into SCOTUS Dobbs Leak
The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into the Dobbs Roe v. Wade draft leak.
A draft of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked to Politico’s senior legal reporter Josh Gerstein in May 2022.
“The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, according to an initial draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito circulated inside the court and obtained by POLITICO.”
Justice Alito’s opinion is a “full-throated, unflinching repudiation,” Politico reported at the time of the leak.
“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito wrote. “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”
In 2023, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito said he knows who leaked the Dobbs draft to Politico.
“This made us targets of assassination,” Alito said of the draft leak to Politico.
The Supreme Court previously issued a report on the Dobbs draft leak.
The report says the leaker could not be found and that new protocols for drafts have been put in place.
97 Supreme Court staffers were interviewed and signed sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury denying being the Dobbs draft leaker.
Justice Alito said despite this report, he likely knows who the leaker is.
Alito said the leaker’s motive was to stop the Supreme Court from overturning Roe v. Wade.
On Thursday, The New York Times reported that the Justice Department is pursuing a criminal investigation into the Dobbs draft leak.
DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro is spearheading the investigation.
Prosecutors have issued grand jury subpoenas, according to The New York Times.
Breaking News: The Justice Department is actively pursuing a criminal investigation into who leaked the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn the right to abortion. https://t.co/UxnZIEWLmM
— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 5, 2026
The post Justice Department Launches Criminal Investigation Into SCOTUS Dobbs Leak appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.