MMN Editor

The high school football regular season is officially over across the country.As Bill Belichick would say, we’re on to the playoffs.That’s right. Hard to believe, but the postseason is underway for a large portion of the country, with everyone else to follow suit next week. Over the next few weeks, champions will be crowned all over the place.INSANE ILLINOIS HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL GAME SEES 172-POINT EXPLOSION BEFORE DARKNESS FORCES VENUE CHANGEFeels like we just started this journey back in August, and here we are — less than three weeks from Thanksgiving — ready to jump into the postseason. Time flies when you’re having fun!I’ve taken it upon myself here at OutKick to highlight at least one high school football play/ player/ story each and every weekend during the season. These guys are all about to be millionaires with the silly NIL rules, so we might as well get ahead of the curve and start identifying them early.It’s been quite a ride. No matter how old you get, nothing beats high school football. In a world of NIL deals, it’s the last pure form of amateur athletics left.So far this season, we’ve seen a wild Hail Mary in Florida, an entire California team get suspended because the mascot shot the bird to some fans, a giant running back in Kentucky smashing heads, the best running back in the nation out of Tennessee, and just last week, an 88-84 playoff game out of Illinois.88-84!Today, let’s head out to South Dakota (FOOTBALL COUNTRY!) and check in on the wildest walk-off touchdown I’ve personally ever seen.Check out the IQ on this kid:Just the best. Again, it doesn’t get much better than high school football. You guys can have your Saturdays and Sundays. Give me a Football Friday any day of the week.The best part? That game-winner was for a trip to the 9A state title game in South Dakota. Lordy. What a feeling!Let’s dive in …I count three laterals before the final touchdown, which, frankly, isn’t a ton. It’s a pretty tame play in terms of laterals. Pretty short and simple.CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGEUntil, of course, you get to the kid at the end who made a 200 IQ decision to win the game when he acted like it was an incomplete pass. The defense was lulled to sleep and started to celebrate, only for this genius to then scoop the ball up and race down the sidelines for a game-winning score.The ball was very clearly thrown backwards, so there was no real question. The defense obviously had a different angle, so perhaps it looked like a forward pass to them.But that doesn’t matter. You play to the final whistle. You put a helmet on a helmet, and a hat on the ball until the ref makes you stop. Just because the receiver stopped playing doesn’t mean you stop playing.He doesn’t make that decision — the ref does.And how about the stones on the kicker to make that extra-point with everything on the line? Extra points in high school football are no gimme, by the way. I’d say you’d get at least one miss a game, if not more.So this wasn’t a layup, and the kid buried it. Warrior.PS: I hate to point this out, but how about the kid who caught the initial pass getting lit up like a Christmas tree after tossing it back? He was hit so hard, the crowd audibly groaned.Patriot.

An AI image of suspect 2020 election ratios in one US state and the 2026 ratio we witnessed across the country. – via Grok
Please read and study this report thoroughly.
First, some background…
In 2020, after the stolen presidential election, The Gateway Pundit published a report we titled “The Drop and Roll” theory. What we discovered was that in the 2020 election, in state after state, there was a clear pattern of a massive drop of votes to Joe Biden in the middle of the night, and subsequent ballot drops came in perfect ratios of ballots to Trump and Biden, solidifying the results for Democrats.
On November 18, 2020, The Gateway Pundit first posted the impossible numbers that swung the election to Old Joe Biden.
Mysterious late-night ballot drops in battleground states swung the election to Joe Biden. Then, subsequent ballot drops in perfect ratios of ballots to Trump and Biden solidified the results for Democrats. Here are several examples.
Wisconsin:

Michigan:

Georgia:

Every 2020 battleground state followed this same pattern.
The Gateway Pundit called this phenomenon the “Drop and Roll.”
No election expert has ever explained this because they cannot do so without raising the likelihood of fraud.
The numbers don’t lie.
The election was stolen.
On November 18, 2020, just days after the election, TGP put our findings in an easy-to-follow video titled “The Drop and Roll.”
We are reposting this video so you can see how the 2020 election was stolen from the American people.
This video has over 3.8 million views on Rumble.

And here is the video on YouTube—though people are having trouble viewing it for some reason. The YouTube video was hidden from the public (It’s Google after all!) but still has 289,000 views.

The information for this video can be found at The Gateway Pundit. No one has ever been able to explain these numbers from 2020. The report was widely ignored by the mainstream media and election experts. 
Now this…
Earlier today (Friday), TruthIsFreedom on X posted a shocking report on the suspect 2026 election.
According to Truth Is Freedom:
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
Truth Is Freedom posted this theory in a graph.

Truth Is Freedom also tested the theory at the state level.  They all play out!

And here the theory is tested in the state of Kansas. Every county is within range.

THE 15% BAND
Look at this chart.
59 races. Senate and governor.
States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024.
The solid lines are 2024.
The dashed lines are 2026.
The shaded bands are what moved.
One formula fits all of it:
Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024
Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024
For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side.
The numbers:
Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share
Governor: ~86%
Variation explained: 88%
What makes it strange:
It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero.
The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races.
Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853.
Why seats flipped:
At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped.
What this means:
Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere.
A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out.
The numbers raise the question.
The ballots can answer it.
— Truth Is Freedom (@TruthAnswersAll) November 6, 2026

It appears there was a distinct pattern used in the 2026 election to favor Democrats similar to what happened in 2020.
Someone needs to explain this.
Once again we ask, “Are there any honest mathematicians in America today?” Anyone with integrity and courage will do.
We cannot let them get away with this fraud this time!

The post SMOKING GUN: New Report Reveals Algorithmic Pattern on How Dems “Stole” the 2026 Election — Eerily Similar to the Impossible 2020 “Drop and Roll” Pattern Witnessed Across the US appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

The Trump administration is putting a massive $20 MILLION bounty on information about Iran’s nuclear program, offering potential informants not only a staggering financial reward but also the possibility of relocation.
On Friday, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) publicized the State Department’s Rewards for Justice initiative, seeking information about the Iranian regime’s nuclear infrastructure, sensitive equipment, scientists, and the movement of nuclear-related materials and personnel.
The announcement comes as President Donald Trump continues his campaign to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons, following devastating American military strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities.
CENTCOM announced:
“Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $20 million and possible relocation for information about Iran’s nuclear program, including its facilities, equipment, and associated personnel, such as those in the scientific community, or the movement of any of the above.”
The military directed potential informants to the official Rewards for Justice website.

Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $20 million and possible relocation for information about Iran’s nuclear program, including its facilities, equipment, and associated personnel, such as those in the scientific community, or the movement of any of the above.
Submit a tip: https://t.co/A8uRQJSosj
— U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) November 7, 2026

According to the website:

Rewards for Justice is offering a reward of up to $20 million and possible relocation for information about Iran’s nuclear program, including its facilities, equipment, and associated personnel, such as those in the scientific community, or the movement of any of the above.
In 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity, a level that is a short technical step from the 90 percent required for a nuclear weapon. Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce uranium at such a high enrichment level. Experts estimate this quantity, if enriched further, could be enough for several nuclear weapons.
The regime’s lack of compliance with the IAEA on safeguards obligations has led to the agency’s loss of “continuity of knowledge” regarding Iran’s production and inventory of key components like centrifuges.

This bounty comes amid the ongoing conflict that began with U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. President Trump has repeatedly stated that key facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were “completely and totally obliterated” in the June 2025 strikes (Operation Midnight Hammer).
Later assessments varied, with some intelligence indicating significant setbacks rather than total elimination, and Trump has more recently noted that one or two targets may remain. Tehran continues to defy inspectors while pursuing enrichment and supporting proxy attacks across the region.
Rewards for Justice, established in 1984, has paid more than $250 million to over 125 people who provided information that helped disrupt terrorism or protect U.S. interests.
The program is now openly inviting insiders, scientists, or anyone with knowledge of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure and personnel to come forward, with relocation offered as an added incentive for those who cooperate.

The post Trump Administration Offers Whopping $20 MILLION Reward and Possible Relocation for Intelligence on Iran’s Nuclear Program Including Its Secret Facilities, Equipment, and Scientists appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Iranian singer Parastoo Ahmadi – youtube channel screengrab
Beautiful Iranian singer Parastoo Ahmadi was sentenced to 74 lashes after she was seen singing without a hijab.
That’s not all. To make sure she does not put on such an illegal display the brutal regime, or what’s left of the regime, has banned her from singing for two years.
Parastoo sang without a hijab and her arms showing in an online concert on YouTube in 2024.
Now she will pay for her shameful display.
The BBC reported on her failed appeal in September:
Iran’s judiciary launched proceedings against the 29-year-old after the video went viral, gaining millions of views, saying the performance was “in violation of the country’s legal and cultural regulations”.
In June, a criminal court in Qom reportedly found Ahmadi and eight members of her band and production team guilty of charges including “offending public decency” through the publication of “obscene and indecent material”.
In addition to being sentenced to 74 lashes, they were banned from audiovisual activities and from leaving the country for two years.
On Friday, the defendants’ appeal was “rejected” by a higher court without a hearing, according to their lawyers.
“In our view, holding the concert was not a crime at all,” one of the lawyers told the BBC. “The trial court imposed one of the harshest punishments for these charges, although fines and less severe penalties were also available.”
This is the same barbaric regime that slaughters its own kids in the street and beats women bloody for walking in public without their hair covered.
Iran to Head UN Human Rights Forum Weeks After Their Proxy Group Slaughters 1,400 Jews – And Where Women are Beaten Bloody for Not Wearing Hijabs

And never forget about the young woman, Neda, who was shot to death along with several innocent protesters for protesting the brutal regime.
Iranian protester Neda is shot to death by the regime in Tehran in 2009.

The post Beautiful Iranian Female Singer Parastoo Ahmadi Sings Without a Hijab – Sentenced to 74 Lashes and 2 Year Suspension appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.

Author Claims CIA Began Dropping Armed Commandos Into Ukraine In 1947 To Stoke Guerilla Uprising Against Soviets

Stephen Kinzer, the author and Brown University senior fellow, told Bannon’s War Room on Thursday that the CIA began “dropping armed commandos into Ukraine” in 1947 “with the goal of fomenting a guerrilla uprising against the Soviet government,” the opening chapter of what he calls a 75-year American effort to push Ukraine into conflict with Russia. Kinzer was on WarRoom Battleground to discuss his new book Boiling Point. That said, the CIA itself was created in September 1947 (the wartime OSS had been abolished in 1945, and the Central Intelligence Group filled the gap in between). The documented drops came later: Casey Michel, writing in Politico in 2022, dates the first flights over Soviet Ukraine to September 1949, and says the CIA dropped about 85 agents, three-quarters of whom were captured or killed almost immediately. The agency’s program with Ukrainian exiles, AERODYNAMIC, is listed by FOIA Research as running from 1949 to 1970. A passage quoted from the book’s description says CIA officers recruited “their first Ukrainian agents” in the refugee camps of postwar Europe; Kinzer did not say on air what he meant by 1947.Kinzer then ran the rest of the timeline as he tells it. “It stretched all through decades until 1991 when Ukraine finally became independent,” he said, and when Ukraine wrote permanent neutrality into its constitution, “we didn’t like that. And through a series of operations that cost millions and millions of dollars, the CIA worked to change public opinion and change political opinion towards a more favorable approach to the United States.” He said that effort ended in the uprising that overthrew the neutralist government in 2014 and replaced it with “essentially a proxy of the United States,” after which Washington began “to pour weapons into Ukraine.”Kinzer tied that to the late-stage fight John Mearsheimer warned of, which he read as meaning America would be “fighting to the last Ukrainian.” “This is one of the most outrageous parts of the Ukraine war, that the Ukrainians are just roadkill,” Kinzer said, citing U.S. senators who called the aid “the best money we’ve ever spent because we’re killing Russians.”He did not dispute who started the 2022 war. “Russia’s the aggressor and Ukraine is the victim,” he said, but that picture is “the culminating frame in a long movie that lasted 75 years.”Guest host Ben Harnwell then asked whether Washington had deliberately provoked Russia so the defense industry could profit. Kinzer called the question not cynical but “clear,” and offered his own version: planners saw a “win-win” in pushing NATO toward Russia’s border, because if Moscow accepted it, the U.S. could “proceed to the next step, which is trying to subvert Russia itself,” and if it invaded, “we can paint Russia as the brutal aggressor.” He added that “if Joe Biden had just pronounced five words, Ukraine will not join NATO, this whole war might have been avoided.”Kinzer also posed a reverse case: “think what would happen if China and Mexico formed a military partnership,” with Chinese trainers in Mexico and joint maneuvers. “Would we tolerate a Chinese naval base in Veracruz? Of course not.”Near the end, asked about former State Department official Victoria Nuland, he said a group of Eastern European émigrés and their descendants had “penetrated the American foreign policy establishment with the goal of turning the United States into the instrument of their revenge against Russia.” He allowed that they “may have been correct in their passion, but they distorted American policy.” That is Kinzer’s characterization, not an established finding.The CIA’s role in Ukraine is already a live argument on the right: as we reported, Aaron Maté says the agency still runs 12 secret bases along Ukraine’s border.Earlier in the episode, Kinzer walked through the CIA’s 1953 overthrow of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, the subject of his book All the Shah’s Men:If the CIA had not overthrown Mossadegh in 1953, Iran today would be a regular country like Turkey@stephenkinzer @ben_harnwell pic.twitter.com/iwfCvpCuBK— Bannon’s WarRoom (@Bannons_WarRoom) November 5, 2026
Tyler Durden
Sat, 11/07/2026 – 08:30

Britain and France are preparing thousands of European troops for a potential deployment to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire with Russia.
Around 2,800 military personnel from 11 countries are participating in an exercise in Poland designed to test the readiness of a proposed multinational force for Ukraine, according to the British government.
The exercise will focus on command structures, logistics and coordination between participating countries ahead of any possible future deployment.
No ceasefire agreement has been reached between Russia and Ukraine, and European governments have not authorized troops to enter the country.
However, Britain and France have spent months developing plans for a European-led force that could be deployed following an agreement to end or suspend the fighting.
Under proposals previously discussed by European officials, troops would help secure Ukraine and deter Russia from launching another attack.
European forces could also be authorized to defend themselves if attacked by Russian troops.
The prospect raises the possibility of British and French soldiers coming into direct combat with Russian forces if a future ceasefire were to collapse.
Britain’s military would face significant demands from such an operation.
The regular British Army currently has just 74,000 personnel and has struggled with recruitment and retention in recent years.
France has a considerably larger military and, like Britain, possesses nuclear weapons and extensive experience with overseas deployments.
Both countries, however, have historically relied heavily on the U.S. for capabilities including intelligence, surveillance, strategic transport and logistics during major NATO operations.
President Trump has repeatedly ruled out deploying American ground troops to Ukraine, arguing any peacekeeping efforts should be led by European governments.
An attack on British or French forces stationed inside Ukraine would also raise complicated questions about NATO’s collective defense provisions.
Ukraine is not a NATO member, and an attack on NATO troops operating on Ukrainian territory would not necessarily trigger an automatic alliance-wide military response.
For now, the proposed force remains contingency planning.
But the upcoming exercise in Poland represents another step toward preparing European forces for a possible deployment if Russia and Ukraine eventually reach a ceasefire.

The post Britain and France Prepare Thousands of Troops for Possible Ukraine Peacekeeping Mission appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.