Patrick Stewart is being honored by fellow “X-Men” film stars Hugh Jackman and Rebecca Romijn, as well as “Star Trek” stars William Shatner and George Takei, following the announcement of the screen and stage star’s death.
SUCCESS
‘MobLand’ Season 2, Episode 7 Release Time And Preview: Conrad Brings The Fight To Frankie
Find out when MobLand Season 2 Episode 7, “Ace of Spades,” premieres on Paramount+, including its release time, plot synopsis and full episode schedule.
Is Jay-Z The Smart Choice For The 2027 Super Bowl Halftime Show?
Is Jay-Z the best choice for the 2027 Super Bowl halftime show? After Kendrick Lamar and Bad Bunny, the selection raises questions about nostalgia and cultural relevance.
Intel stock plunges 20% as chipmaker warns of tough year ahead
Intel (INTC) shares plunged more than 20% in extended trading on Thursday, Oct. 29, after the chipmaker issued a disappointing fourth-quarter forecast and warned that a slowdown in the PC market could continue into 2027.
The selloff came despite better-than-expected third-quarter earnings, as strong demand for data center processors helped offset weakness in Intel’s PC business.
Investors were also concerned about the company’s spending plans. Intel expects capital expenditures to rise sharply next year and warned that it would not generate positive cash flow in 2027.
Intel has spent years trying to catch up with rivals after falling behind in advanced chipmaking.
The company remains the only U.S.-based manufacturer of leading-edge logic chips, making its recovery important to Washington’s push to bring more semiconductor production back to the U.S.
The Trump administration took a 10% stake in Intel last year. Nvidia (NVDA) and SoftBank also poured billions of dollars into the struggling chipmaker.
Those investments have helped fuel optimism about Intel’s recovery. Its shares had surged roughly 150% this year before Thursday’s earnings report, although the stock had fallen about 20% over the last month amid broader concerns about AI infrastructure spending.
Intel beats Q3 estimates but PC weakness clouds outlook
Intel reported third-quarter adjusted earnings of 52 cents per share, above analysts’ expectations of 40 cents, according to LSEG data pulled by CNBC.
Revenue rose 21% year over year to $16.51 billion, slightly beating Wall Street’s estimate of $16.5 billion.
But the company’s two major businesses told different stories.
Revenue in its client computing and physical AI group fell 5% from a year earlier to $8.1 billion, missing estimates as higher memory prices weighed on PC demand.
Meanwhile, data center and AI revenue jumped 78% to $7.3 billion, reflecting growing demand for server processors.
Related: Analyst revamps SK Hynix stock price target after blockbuster earnings
The weakness in PCs is expected to continue.
For the fourth quarter, Intel forecast adjusted earnings of 25 cents per share on revenue between $15 billion and $16 billion, well below analysts’ expectations of 43 cents per share and $17.1 billion in revenue.
The disappointing forecast reflects broader challenges in the PC industry, where rising costs for memory and other components have pressured manufacturers.
Intel said the pace of the PC market correction has accelerated over the past two months, with manufacturers aggressively managing inventories.
“We see the PC slowdown continuing at least through the first half of next year,” Intel finance chief David Zinsner said in the earnings release.
“We will continue making disciplined investments in capacity and working capital to increase supply and support future growth.”
Management said the next several quarters would remain challenging and that it was “not optimistic” about memory conditions in 2027.
Adding to those pressures, Intel is dealing with the fallout from an explosion at its manufacturing facility in Israel earlier this month that killed two workers and seriously injured another. The incident forced an extended shutdown, disrupting production and shipments of 10-nanometer chips.
Intel expects the disruption to reduce revenue by about $600 million over two quarters, including roughly $300 million in the fourth quarter.
Intel shares had surged roughly 150% this year before Oct. 29’s earnings report.CHENG YU-CHEN / Getty Images
Intel sees 2027 as growth year as AI boosts server demand
While the PC business remains under pressure, Intel sees a more promising outlook for its data center operations.
Management described 2027 as a “growth year” during the earnings call, although it expects the first half to remain “a bit constrained.”
Executives said they were “very optimistic” about the data center business as customer demand signals continue to strengthen, especially with the growing use of agentic AI.
Also read: Meta stock falls despite Wall Street analysts raising price targets
Unlike traditional AI workloads that rely heavily on graphics processing units from Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), agentic AI also requires CPUs to coordinate tasks, manage data and run applications.
That trend could provide a longer-term boost to Intel’s Xeon server processors.
“Despite near-term headwinds affecting the broader PC industry, we continue to see robust demand for CPUs and, more broadly, for all our computing platforms in the long term,” Tan said in a statement.
But strong demand does not mean Intel has enough supply.
Tan said he was “disappointed that we were not able to meet strong customer demand in this quarter.”
“Our Q3 results demonstrate improving execution, meaningful progress expanding supply and continued advancement of our process technology,” Tan said.
“Despite near-term headwinds across the PC industry, demand for our CPUs remains robust, reinforcing our confidence in the long-term growth opportunities for our business. Our immediate priority is to unlock additional supply.”
Intel plans to increase manufacturing investment to address the supply shortage.
The company reaffirmed its 2026 capital expenditure outlook of $20 billion but said spending would rise “up strongly” in 2027.
Management described next year as an “investment year” and warned that Intel would not generate positive cash flow.
The company nevertheless expects to pay down debt in 2027 and remains “confident” in its long-term profitability.
Zinsner said Intel would remain cautious about spending despite the need for additional capacity.
“We will remain disciplined as we invest, and we will not spend $1 of capital unless we have confidence in the health of our products and process technologies, and clear evidence of customer demand,” he said on the call.
Related: Cathie Wood buys $9.1 million of tumbling tech stock
Mark Cuban sends stern warning to everyday stock investors
Mark Cuban has seen a tech mania up close before, and he thinks he is watching another one. The billionaire investor now says the artificial intelligence boom has the makings of a bubble, and he wants investors to keep some powder dry.
His warning lands at a shaky moment for AI stocks. Tech shares slid on October 22 as fears grew that the AI investment boom may have peaked. Shares of the biggest AI names have swung sharply this month. For anyone riding the rally, Cuban’s message is simple, even if acting on it is not.
Cuban says AI data centres could become “pickleball courts”
Cuban first raised eyebrows in July with a joke that stuck. Speaking on the “All-In” podcast, he said AI would likely get cheaper and more power-efficient, and that many of today’s data centres could one day be turned into “pickleball courts,” as reported by 247 Wall St. He compared it to the fibre boom, when networks got so fast there “wasn’t a bandwidth problem anymore.”
Also read: Michael Burry doubles down on his stock market bet
He came back to that idea in a recent interview on “The Diary of a CEO” podcast with Steven Bartlett. Cuban said the pickleball line was a metaphor for infrastructure that could lose its usefulness as the technology becomes more efficient. His advice for investors watching AI stocks climb was blunt: “Just be patient.”
That patience comes with a plan. Cuban said people can put some money into the market but should also “have some cash” ready for when conditions turn, and he admitted he is holding back on some of his own investments while he waits to see what happens. In other words, he is not calling for anyone to sell everything, just to avoid going all in.
Cuban has been sounding this note for months. In July, he warned that committing tens of billions to facilities built to run for a decade or two amounts to “planning for perfection.” He also said the people most exposed were venture capital and private equity firms that had gone all in on AI.
Why Cuban thinks the market has gotten ahead of itself
Cuban knows how these stories can end. He sold Broadcast.com to Yahoo for $5.7 billion in 1999, about eight months before the Nasdaq peaked, according to CNBC. He told host Steven Bartlett that today’s market reminds him of that era, though he sees some key differences.
His biggest complaint is how stocks are being traded. Cuban argued that investors buy and sell based on anticipated news and on what someone else might pay, not on what the underlying business is worth. That kind of trading can send shares soaring or sinking after fairly small developments.
“We’re in a bubble,” Cuban said, while adding that he has no idea what will make it burst. That honesty matters. Plenty of investors have spotted bubbles early and still lost money waiting for a crash that took years to arrive.
He has pointed to specific weak spots, too. In July, Cuban said Nvidia’s role in funding customers’ chip purchases was “so analogous to the dot-com burst,” warning that one breakthrough by a rival chipmaker or one misstep “and it all could crumble.”
Mark Cuban has seen a tech mania up close before, and he thinks he is watching another one.The Dallas Morning News/Hearst Newspapers / Getty Images
Debt is piling up behind the AI build-out
Cuban’s worries go beyond stock prices. Big Tech is pouring money into data centres and leaning harder on debt markets to pay for it. Amazon, Alphabet, Meta and Oracle issued about $194 billion of bonds in 2026 through July 7, up from roughly $108 billion in all of 2025, according to Reuters. Goldman Sachs expects the five biggest hyperscalers, including Microsoft, to issue roughly $400 billion in bonds in 2027.
That borrowing is starting to worry Wall Street. The median spread on hyperscaler bonds maturing in more than 20 years has already widened, raising the cost of future debt and adding a new layer of risk to the AI build-out.
More Mark Cuban:
Mark Cuban sees a new way to compete with China
Mark Cuban exposes a problem with how Meta and Google fund AI
Mark Cuban says the ‘one thing in life you can control’ gives you a huge advantage
Investors have already had a taste of that stress. AI and semiconductor stocks were on course to shed more than $1 trillion in combined value in one week in mid-October as rate-hike fears and worries about AI financing hit sentiment, according to TheStreet.
Still, Cuban is not anti-AI. He calls himself a fan of the technology and pointed to Amazon, which survived the dot-com crash and went on to become enormously valuable. The hard part, he said, is knowing which AI companies will end up as winners.
What everyday investors can take from it
Most households cannot sit on a billionaire’s cash pile, but the idea behind Cuban’s advice still works on a smaller scale. A more practical first step is deciding how much money you need for emergencies and near-term bills, since moving too much of a portfolio into cash while waiting for a downturn can mean missing out on gains. Having that money set aside can keep you from leaning on high-interest debt or selling investments when prices are down.
Plenty of Americans are still short on that cushion. Only 63% of adults said they would cover a $400 emergency expense with cash or its equivalent in 2025, unchanged from the year before, according to the Federal Reserve.
Beyond that, it may be worth checking how much of a 401(k) rides on the same few tech giants, since several funds can hold many of the same stocks. Cuban expects the AI story to produce big winners, just as the dot-com era did. His warning is that nobody, including him, knows exactly which ones, so it pays to stay patient, keep some flexibility and avoid betting the whole nest egg on one corner of the market.
Related: Jim Cramer doubles down on his stock market stand
The $20 Device Every Driver Needs in Their Car
I drive a Tesla, and one of the distinct things about driving one is that there are cameras virtually everywhere on that vehicle. It’s recording everything that happens around it. If you ever find yourself in an accident where fault or responsibility is in question, that video footage is going to be either your best friend or your worst foe — but it will clearly show who is actually responsible.
In many parts of the world, having a camera in your car is standard practice. Yet here in the United States, it’s still surprisingly uncommon.
Most cars on the road today don’t have built-in 360-degree recording like a Tesla. That is why I believe every driver should strongly consider installing a dash cam.
What Does a Dash Cam Cost?
You don’t have to break the bank to protect yourself. You can find basic, functional front-facing cameras starting around $20 to $30.
Whether you go with a bare-bones model or a dual-channel camera, having an objective witness rolling on the dashboard pays for itself the first time something goes wrong.
The Insurance “Split-Fault” Game
Why is a dash cam so important? Because the auto insurance industry plays a game after an accident — even when you did absolutely nothing wrong.
Insurers love to assign you a minimal portion of responsibility — say, 10% or 20%. You might ask yourself: “Why on earth are they holding me 10% responsible when the other driver blew through a red light and hit me?”
Here is the frustrating reality: It’s a two-for-one payday for auto insurers.
If an insurer assigns you even a tiny fraction of fault:
They classify the collision as an at-fault accident for you.
They hit the other driver with an at-fault classification as well.
They now have an excuse to surcharge both drivers’ premiums.
Depending on the state you live in, an at-fault surcharge can hike your rates for three to five years, costing you hundreds — if not thousands — of dollars in higher premiums.
Insurance companies didn’t used to feel like an adversary, but in today’s claims environment, they often are. A dash cam is your best personal insurance policy against your insurance company. Undeniable video evidence completely eliminates the blame game.
Final Thoughts
A dash cam is your buddy. For a tiny, one-time investment of $20 to $50, you get an impartial, unblinking witness that rides shotgun every time you hit the road.
If you want to protect your clean driving record and prevent auto insurers from artificially hiking your rates, go get yourself a dash cam.
The post The $20 Device Every Driver Needs in Their Car appeared first on Clark Howard.
Why This ETF Went From AI Bear to AI Bull in 4 Months
In the summer of 2026, GQG US Equity ETF GQGU looked like a bunker. More than a third of the portfolio sat in regulated utilities and oil producers, with the rest in insurers, tobacco companies, and telecom giants—the kind of steady, dividend-paying businesses investors buy to brace for a storm. It owned no information technology.Four months later, the same fund burst out of the shelter. Technology had gone from zero to 58%, the exchange-traded fund’s largest allocation by a wide margin—and even that understates the shift. Recently bought holdings like Alphabet GOOGL, Amazon.com AMZN, Meta META, and Space Exploration Technologies SPCX elude the official tech classification, yet they rise and fall on many of the sector’s same forces. The utilities were gone, as were ExxonMobil XOM and Chevron CVX. Only two holdings from its midyear portfolio survived the turnover.For a firm that had spent the previous year publicly warning that artificial intelligence looked like the “dot-com bubble on steroids,” the reversal was jarring. It was also entirely on brand for GQG.Forward-Looking Quality, and a Willingness to Change CourseFort Lauderdale, Florida-based GQG Partners, founded in 2016 by Rajiv Jain, managed around $160 billion as of mid-2026. Jain, the firm’s chairman and chief investment officer, describes his approach as buying “forward-looking quality at sensible prices”—financially sturdy, reliably growing businesses bought at reasonable prices. His goal is to lose less than the market when it’s down.What really distinguishes the strategy, though, is its willingness to tear up the portfolio when the facts, or the team’s thinking about them, change. “Everything is temporary,” Jain said in a 2021 podcast, “and the only way to survive long term is to be adaptive.” Rather than wait for a company’s fundamentals to deteriorate, he says he prefers to “force rank every name every day.” The result is a fund that can look nothing like its benchmark, and nothing like it did a year earlier.From ‘Dot-com on Steroids’ to All-InThe portfolio has a record of restlessness. The technology weighting in the strategy, which closely resembles the older mutual fund GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity GQEIX, has swung dramatically over the years, and the most recent swing is among the sharpest yet. Information technology climbed to nearly half the portfolio in early 2024, then fell steadily to about 22% by that year’s end, 5% by the spring of 2025, and zero by early 2026. Though GQG briefly picked up select software names in 2026’s first few months, it purged them shortly thereafter. Energy and consumer staples rose in tech’s place.Jain retreated from tech with trumpets blaring. In a series of research pieces beginning in September 2025, GQG wrote that “for the first time in our firm’s history” many large technology companies represented “backward-looking quality,” a pointed phrase from a shop that boasts it can find the forward-looking kind. It asked clients a deliberately uncomfortable question: “How much of your net worth do you want invested in a cyclical sector” showing “growth deceleration, free cash flow margin deterioration, and increasing competition?” By early 2026, the firm was warning that the debt financing the AI data center boom was beginning to crack.Then it changed its mind. In recent commentaries and webinars, the firm argued that AI had evolved “from a capital expenditure story into an earnings and monetization story.” The rental price of AI chips was climbing instead of slipping, a sign that demand was outrunning supply. Alongside accelerating enterprise adoption driven by agentic AI, some of the big cloud-computing providers said their AI data centers were earning back what they cost in as little as one to two years. What had looked like a peaking cycle, the firm concluded, was starting to look like a supercycle—and it intends to own these names until the data says otherwise.That conviction was evident fast in the ETF. By late October 2026, semiconductors it avoided in June were its largest industry exposure at 23% of assets—Nvidia NVDA, Micron Technology MU, Lam Research LRCX, Intel INTC, Advanced Micro Devices AMD, ASML Holding ASML, Broadcom AVGO, and Marvell Technology MRVL. Software made up another 16%, led by Microsoft MSFT and Palantir PLTR. Add Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon, and businesses tied to technology and internet platforms accounted for nearly three-quarters of the portfolio.The mutual fund version discloses its portfolio far less often than the ETF, so its most recently disclosed holdings, from June 30, still looked defensive. But the firm runs both the same way, so the mutual fund’s current portfolio most likely looks much the same.Conviction Has a PriceMany of Jain’s previous bold, contrarian shifts looked prescient. The team’s move out of technology and into energy starting in 2021 sidestepped the worst of the subsequent year’s selloff; GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity notched one of the Morningstar Category’s best results in 2022. But where Jain had seen something the market hadn’t in past pivots, this time he looks like he’s catching up to a big opportunity he missed.The firm’s all-or-nothing conviction often produces feast-or-famine results. GQG Partners US Select Quality Equity followed that 2022 triumph with a top-4% showing in 2024, then finished dead last in its category in 2025, falling as the market rallied. It has stayed near the bottom in 2026, up only about 3% for the year to date through Oct. 27 as the Morningstar US Large Cap Index climbed nearly 17%.The pattern is even starker at higher frequency. The fund’s rolling three-month category ranking—how it placed against peers over each successive three-month window—has lurched repeatedly from the very top to the very bottom: near the floor through most of 2025, briefly best-in-class in early 2026 as AI names wobbled, then back to the bottom by midyear as they recovered. There were tentative signs the pivot was starting to pay off, though: As GQG rebuilt its technology stake over the third quarter, the fund’s three-month ranking climbed from the bottom of its category in July to the top decile by September. Its investors are rarely in the middle of the pack.The Bottom LineGQG’s recent portfolio overhaul magnified risks in more ways than one. Where the strategy once spread its bets across fundamentally different businesses in utilities, staples, insurers, and tobacco, it now owns a cluster of companies whose fortunes could fall in tandem if investors sour on AI spending, or if rising interest rates make investors less willing to pay up for profits that lie years away.The fortunes of the strategy, whose concentration in its largest five stocks climbed to roughly 41% from 30% in June, now rest on whether AI spending keeps earning the returns GQG says it sees. If those projections fall short, there is little defensive ballast left to buoy the fund.Then again, nothing says Jain won’t reverse course again.
Dave Ramsey has straight answer on whether your 401(k) is enough
Addressing the widespread anxiety American workers feel over whether their retirement savings and investment strategies are truly sufficient, bestselling author Dave Ramsey offers a straightforward answer on whether a 401(k) alone can carry people financially through their post-career years.
“It might be if you have access to a Roth 401(k), solid investment options and are able to invest 15% of your income,” Ramsey wrote. “It might not be if one or more of those above points aren’t true in your case. You may need to look at options outside your workplace retirement plan, like a Roth IRA.”
But Ramsey recommends holding off on retirement savings until one is completely debt-free and has a fully funded emergency reserve. He also advises individuals to pause all investing until every lingering consumer debt is wiped out.
Dat Ngo, CPA at Vetted Prop Firms, explains his perspective on Ramsey’s recommended approach.
“Ramsey’s sequencing works for most people because it accounts for behavior, not just math, and a plan someone will actually follow beats a theoretically optimal one every time,” Ngo told me.
“The one adjustment I’d flag is the employer match: if a workplace plan offers one, it’s often worth capturing that match even while paying down high-interest debt, since it’s close to free money. Once the emergency fund is solid, the Roth IRA’s tax-free growth makes it a logical next step for long-term savers.”
Based on Ramsey’s National Study of Millionaires — research he says is the most extensive survey of its kind — roughly 80% of millionaires credited their 401(k) as the primary engine behind their financial success.
“Those millionaires are the kind of people who live next door to you (teachers, managers, accountants) — they just used their workplace retirement plans,” Ramsey wrote.
“It’s not the most exciting way to invest,” he added. “But it is exciting to become a millionaire.”
Ramsey favors investing 15% of income in 401(k)
As mentioned above, Ramsey recommends investing 15% of one’s gross income in a taxed-advantaged retirement account, often a 401(k) plan through one’s employer.
In my years of reporting on finances, I have found that a 401(k) offers retirement savers an easy, consistent and frictionless entry point into investing, allowing them to automate their contributions straight from each paycheck with a true set-it-and-forget-it approach.
Beyond that effortless automation, 401(k) plans provide a key advantage that makes them a standout wealth-building vehicle: 401(k) plans have higher contribution limits than Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).
In 2026, employees can contribute up to $24,500 to a 401(k), according to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Savers aged 50 and older are permitted an additional $8,000 catch-up contribution, while those between ages 60 and 63 qualify for an expanded catch-up allowance of $11,250.
“The limit on annual contributions to an IRA is increased to $7,500 (in 2026) from $7,000 (in 2025),” wrote the IRS.
Savers age 50 and older get a small boost: The IRA catch-up limit has climbed to $1,100 from the previous $1,000 mark, reflecting the latest cost-of-living adjustment.
Bestselling personal finance author Dave Ramsey offers a straightforward answer on whether a 401(k) alone is sufficient for retirement, breaking down the key factors savers need to consider when investing in their workplace plans.Shutterstock
Fidelity explains tepid participation in Roth 401(k) plans
While the IRS keeps expanding how much workers can stash away, having higher contribution limits doesn’t mean employees know how to optimize them.
Ramsey strongly advocates prioritizing Roth 401(k)s over traditional accounts, but workplace plan data from Fidelity Investments reveals a major disconnect between plan availability and actual saver adoption.
Over 96.5% of the workplace retirement plans managed by Fidelity now feature a Roth 401(k), yet merely 18% of eligible employees actively put money into one, according to Fidelity. Although users represent every demographic and earnings level, the feature proves most popular among savers between the ages of 29 and 44.
The sluggish Roth 401(k) adoption rate can mostly be attributed to limited awareness and a long-standing habit of prioritizing traditional, pre-tax accounts.
“Many people just don’t understand the option so they haven’t chosen it,” said Ellen O’Connell, a vice president and financial consultant at Fidelity. “Some don’t know if their company offers it, some just assume they aren’t eligible, and some are just used to getting that lowered income tax now.”
This article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as individualized tax or investment advice.
More on personal finance:
Charles Schwab, Fidelity alert workers to forced 401(k) rule
Dave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs (he’s not wrong)
Congress research arm sounds alarm on 401(k), IRA penalty
Related: Dave Ramsey sounds another alarm on 401(k)s, Roth IRAs
Amazon’s stock drops — even in the face of a bold new cloud forecast
Modest AWS results and weak advertising growth left Wall Street disappointed in Amazon’s third-quarter earnings
A Starbucks turnaround is brewing — but perhaps not quickly enough for investors
The coffee chain beat expectations on a key sales metric, but its stock was still moving lower.