BUSINESS

TheStreet aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.Why we love this dealIt’s virtually impossible to do any DIY project around the house without a good drill. That’s one of the reasons why DeWalt is a household name. While the brand makes all sorts of tool sets, its power tools are well-respected for their design and durability. Luckily, we found a deal on a DeWalt drill set ahead of Amazon’s Big Spring Sale, and it’s double the fun.The DeWalt Cordless Drill and Impact Driver Kit is available right now for only $139. That’s 46% off the original price of $259. It’s not often you can get twice the drill for roughly half the price, but that’s just what this deal offers.DeWalt Cordless Drill and Impact Driver Kit, $139 (was $259) at Amazon

Courtesy of Amazon

Shop at AmazonDetails to knowThis set will work perfectly for just about any drilling needs you could possibly have. It includes one standard cordless drill, one impact driver, two rechargeable batteries, one charger, and a thick canvas carrying case. Each of the two drills also have three bright LED lights mounted around the bit holder, offering high-visibility even in low-light conditions.Both drills include a convenient two-speed transmission and a powerful 300-watt motor. The single-sleeve, half-inch ratcheting chuck is easy to use and provides a firm lock-down. The quarter-inch hex chuck utilizes one-inch bit tips, making it highly versatile. What’s more, the ergonomic handle on both drills is soft and comfortable, and the compact and lightweight design makes them great for working in small spaces.Amazon customers could not be more excited about this drill set. Over 50,600 of them have given it a perfect rating. One shopper called it “reliable and versatile,” before adding that the “combo kit is a powerhouse!” They ended their review by claiming that they “highly recommend for DIYers and professionals alike!”Related: Craftsman’s cordless power tool kit has a drill, impact driver, circular saw, light, and batteries — all under $170Details to knowIs it battery-powered?: Yes.What’s included?: This kit includes one standard cordless drill, one impact driver, two rechargeable batteries, one charger, and a canvas carrying case.Warranty: 3-year limited warranty.Another buyer described it as the “best value tool set, period,” saying it’s “great for quick jobs around the house or about anything else a hobbyist would need it for. The two batteries included have plenty of life.”Shop more dealsCraftsman V20 Max Power Tool Combo Kit, $168 (was $199) at AmazonBlack+Decker 20V Max 68-Piece Cordless Drill and Home Tool Kit with Storage Bag, $99 (was $119) at AmazonRobustrue Cordless Impact Wrench, $126 (was $160) at AmazonThe DeWalt Cordless Drill and Impact Driver Kit works just as well as a treat to yourself as it does as a gift. At only $139 right now, it’s the perfect deal to get those home projects started. However, getting twice the drill can also make them move twice as fast, so get yours while you still can.

You probably have a strong opinion about billionaires right now, whether you admire their drive, question their influence, or wonder how rich is too rich.A new Pew Research Center survey asked thousands of American adults a deceptively simple question about whether being extremely wealthy is morally wrong.The responses split dramatically across generational lines, revealing a fault line that cuts deeper than political party, religious affiliation, or income level alone.What your generation believes about extreme wealth might genuinely surprise you, especially if you happen to fall on either end of the age spectrum.One-third of young Americans call extreme wealth morally wrongPew Research Center surveyed 3,605 U.S. adults from March 24 to 30 of 2025, as part of a broader study on American morality released this week. Among Americans aged 18 to 29, a full 33% said being extremely rich is morally wrong, the highest share of any age group surveyed.That conviction drops sharply with age, as only 20% of adults aged 30 to 49 agreed, and just 11% of those between 50 and 64. Among Americans 65 and older, only 10% described extreme wealth as morally wrong, making this topic the single widest generational gap that Pew measured.Related: Ramit Sethi’s ‘How to Get Rich:’ 5 proven ways to become a millionairePew defined “extremely rich” as having billions of dollars, a threshold that now applies to more than 3,000 individuals across the globe, per Oxfam data.Most Americans do not see billionaire wealth as an ethical question at allOverall, 63% of all U.S. adults told Pew Research that being extremely rich is simply not a moral issue worthy of any ethical judgment.Another 18% went further and described accumulating billionaire-level wealth as morally acceptable, endorsing the concept of extreme financial success without any reservation or caveat. Only 18% of all respondents described extreme wealth as morally wrong, placing this view well outside mainstream opinion despite growing traction among younger voters.More Personal Finance:Why selling a home to your child for a dollar can backfireElon Musk says ‘universal high income’ is comingFTC, 21 states sue Uber over ‘shady’ subscription billingThat means roughly four out of five American adults today either accept billionaire wealth as ethically neutral or actively view it as a positive outcome. You should understand these numbers if you are making long-term financial decisions in a country where cultural attitudes toward wealth are shifting beneath the surface.The political divide on billionaire wealth runs deeper than you might expectDemocrats are roughly four times as likely as Republicans to say that being extremely rich is morally wrong, according to the Pew data published Thursday.Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, 29% called extreme wealth immoral, compared with only 7% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who shared that position.The generational divide persists within each political party as well, meaning young Democrats and young Republicans both diverge significantly from their older partisan counterparts.Among Democrats aged 18 to 29, a striking 48% called extreme wealth morally wrong, compared with only 15% of Democrats who are 65 or older. Among young Republicans in the same age range, 14% said extreme wealth is morally wrong, nearly triple the 5% share among those 65 and older.Real numbers show why younger Americans feel the wealth gap so personallyFederal Reserve data from the third quarter of 2025 reveals just how concentrated American wealth has become at the very top of the distribution. The top 0.1% of U.S. households now hold approximately $24.89 trillion in total assets out of a national wealth pool of roughly $172.9 trillion.The bottom 50% of American households combined holds roughly $4.25 trillion, which is less than one-fifth of what the richest tenth of a percent controls. The top 1% of households controlled 31.7% of all U.S. wealth in that same quarter, the widest gap since the Federal Reserve began tracking it.The affordability squeeze behind the numbersFor younger workers entering the labor market or saving for a first home, these numbers translate directly into real and unavoidable financial obstacles every day. The median American home now costs roughly five times the median household income, and for adults aged 20 to 34 it approaches eight times.According to the World Economic Forum, the median wage for a bachelor’s degree holder has barely moved from $58,138 in 1990 to $60,000 today. When you combine stagnant wages with surging home prices and rising student debt loads, the moral debate about billionaire wealth becomes a personal financial frustration.Most Americans still want the government to close the growing wealth gapEven Americans who do not consider billionaire wealth morally objectionable want policymakers to take concrete steps toward reducing extreme concentration of wealth across the nation.Related: Parents need a $257K raise to afford child care for two kidsA January 2026 YouGov survey found that 52% of Americans described the wealth gap as a very big problem, with another 28% calling it significant. That means roughly 80% of all Americans surveyed believe wealth inequality represents at least a big problem requiring real attention from elected leaders and institutions.The same survey found that 59% of citizens want the federal government to step in and take direct action aimed at reducing the wealth gap. On the specific question of taxes, 62% of respondents told YouGov the current tax rate on billionaires is either far too low or too low.Key takeaways from the YouGov and Pew surveysRoughly 80% of Americans see wealth inequality as at least a big problem, suggesting broad support for some meaningful form of policy intervention today.A full 62% of Americans believe the current tax rate on billionaires is too low, signaling strong public appetite for targeted reform at the federal level.The generational divide on wealth morality is the widest gap Pew measured across all fifteen behaviors, exceeding the divides on both abortion and divorce.Even some millionaires and billionaires themselves have called for higher taxes on extreme wealth, including signatories of an open letter presented at Davos this year.

For many young people, billionaire wealth is not inspiring. Instead, it highlights the growing distance between opportunity and everyday financial reality.Motortion Films/Shutterstock

How this generational wealth divide could reshape financial planningYou do not need to agree with Gen Z’s moral verdict on billionaires to recognize that shifting public attitudes can produce real changes in policy. Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna introduced a 5% annual wealth tax bill in March 2026 targeting Americans worth over one billion dollars.California’s proposed Billionaire Tax Act would impose a one-time 5% tax on residents worth over $1 billion, payable over five years with added interest charges.If you are building long-term wealth through tax-advantaged accounts, diversified investments, or real estate, you should track these legislative proposals closely and plan accordingly.Practical steps you should consider right nowReview your current tax strategy with a qualified financial advisor, especially if you hold concentrated stock positions or significant unrealized capital gains in your portfolio.Maximize contributions to tax-advantaged retirement accounts like your 401(k), IRA, or Roth IRA before any potential legislative changes alter the existing rules for withdrawals.Consider Roth conversions now while you know your current tax bracket, because future wealth tax proposals could expand the definition of taxable assets beyond income.If you are a younger investor feeling priced out of traditional wealth-building paths, focus on consistent investing in low-cost index funds over speculative alternatives today.Stay informed about state-level wealth tax proposals beyond California, because the outcome of that ballot measure will likely influence similar efforts across progressive states.Where billionaire wealth ranks among the behaviors Americans find most immoralThe Pew survey examined fifteen different behaviors and asked respondents whether each one is morally wrong, morally acceptable, or simply not a moral issue overall. Having an extramarital affair ranked as the most widely condemned behavior in the entire survey, with a full 90% of all U.S. adults objecting morally.Viewing pornography split Americans almost evenly, with 52% calling it morally wrong, while abortion drew a similar divide at 47% who considered it morally wrong. Being extremely rich ranked far lower on the moral objection scale than those three issues, but it produced the single largest age-based gap in responses.White evangelical Protestants were the least likely religious group to call extreme wealth morally wrong, while religiously unaffiliated Americans and atheists were considerably more likely. Democrats were roughly three times as likely as Republicans to call the death penalty morally wrong, and twice as likely to object to spanking children.The bottom line on what Gen Z’s views could ultimately mean for your financesWhether you see billionaire wealth as a moral failing or an aspirational benchmark, the generational divide in this Pew survey is too significant to dismiss. Young Americans are entering the workforce and the voting booth with sharply different views on wealth than their parents and grandparents held at that age.Those views are already shaping real policy proposals at state and federal levels, from California’s billionaire tax act to Senator Sanders’s recurring wealth tax legislation. Your best move is to stay informed, plan proactively, and make sure your financial strategy can absorb potential shifts in tax policy from either direction.Related: Robert Kiyosaki’s best (and worst) tips on building wealth

TheStreet aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.Why we love this dealStoring things in the garage is as simple as getting some tote containers or rolling bins, but when you want storage inside the house, most people want more aesthetically pleasing options. If you’re a fan of farmhouse furniture, you might want to check out Amazon’s sale on the Teenfon Farmhouse Buffet Cabinet, which is currently reduced to $210 from its usual price of $250.A roomy and versatile piece, this cabinet can be used in many different ways. Naturally, it’s a perfect fit in a dining room to hold plates, servingware, and small appliances, or it can be set up as a coffee bar in a kitchen. But it would fit just as well in a living room as a TV stand, or in a kids’ room to hide away toys when not in use.Teenfon Farmhouse Buffet Cabinet, $210 (was $250) at Amazon

Courtesy of Amazon

Shop at AmazonWhy do shoppers love it?This beautiful buffet measures 61 inches wide, 31.5 inches tall, and 15.7 inches deep. It’s equipped with three drawers 18.1 inches in width, providing adequate room for silverware in the dining room, remote controls and video game controllers in the living room, or small toys in the kitchen. At the bottom, you get two roomy cabinets that measure 27.6 inches wide with a single adjustable shelf in each, so you can customize them to fit anything you like.The unit is made of engineered wood and requires assembly, but shoppers say it’s easy to construct. “The assembly was straightforward, with clear instructions and well-labeled parts. The cabinet feels sturdy and well-made, not flimsy at all,” one wrote, while others called the process easy.Available in four colors, including black, white, Antique Oak, and Honey Brown, you have multiple options when it comes to matching your decor. However, it is worth noting that not all the colors are on sale. The white is the best deal at $210, while the Honey Brown is marked down to $219. The Black and Antique Oak finishes are still regular price at $250.Details to knowColors: Black, white, Antique Oak, and Honey Brown.Material: Engineered wood.Measurements: 61 inches wide, 31.5 inches tall, and 15.7 inches deep.Related: Amazon is selling a $160 farmhouse buffet cabinet for $96 ahead of its Big Spring SaleAnother shopper mentioned that it’s a good piece for small spaces. They wrote, “I really like how much storage it offers without looking bulky. It keeps the room feeling clean and uncluttered. Overall, it’s a great combination of style and function, and it looks even better in real time than in the photos.”Shop more deals Garvee Large Buffet Sideboard, $162 (was $180) at AmazonArasyleon Farmhouse Sideboard Cabinet, $155 (was $172) at AmazonShintenchi Modern Farmhouse Sideboard Cabinet, $123 (was $140) at AmazonWhether you use it as a sideboard, coffee bar, TV stand, or for general storage in any room of the house, the Teenfon Farmhouse Buffet Cabinet is a solid deal at just $210.

Americans are buying more SUVs than ever, and car companies are the biggest beneficiaries. But now, thanks to shifting insurance rates, SUVs are also increasingly becoming cheaper to own despite their often higher price tags.Sport utility vehicles accounted for 52% of new vehicle sales in 2025, up from 46% in 2021 and 38% in 2016, per Good Car Bad Car. Full-size SUVs have doubled their market share since 2016, representing 3.5% of the market.The growth in SUV popularity is great news for automakers. Profit margins for SUVs and trucks average 10% to 20% higher than those for smaller cars, since larger vehicles are more expensive, but use many of the same components, according to The Week.The Big 3 U.S. automakers are shifting their production capacity away from less profitable electric vehicles for now and investing in higher-margin vehicles. It’s a move that makes perfect financial sense, according to Bank of America analysts who reinstated coverage on the company with a buy rating on March 4. “We highlight Ford & General Motors (see reports) as OEM top picks as we see potential for upward estimate revisions given the shift away from EVs and emissions mandates that limited profitability over the past several years,” the firm said.”We think Ford is positioned well to capitalize on the significant shift in the regulatory backdrop under the current administration that should enable it to shift focus to its most margin accretive trucks/SUVs.”But while car makers benefit from the rise in popularity of higher-margin, higher-priced models, consumers are benefiting from lower-priced insurance, making it cheaper to own an SUV.

Photo by M. Suhail on Getty Images

The top-3 cheapest cars to insure are all SUVsInsurance companies adjust your rates based on the type of vehicle you own, and they deem safer vehicles as getting lower rates.”Solid, safe and reliable vehicles with low repair costs tend to be cheaper to insure than sports cars, foreign vehicles or cars with a history of costly repairs,” according to analysts at CarInsurance.com who ranked the cheapest cars to own, and found that now SUVs are overtaking sedans in affordability.Related: Consumer Reports names 5 more vehicles with the lowest hidden feesCheapest SUVs to insure in 2026Subaru Crosstrek: $1,150 average six-month premiumJeep Wrangler: $1,154 average six-month premiumHonda CR-V: $1,158 average six-month premiumVolkswagen Tiguan: $1,165 average six-month premiumMazda CX-5: $1,172 average six-month premiumIn fact, sedans now cost on average 10% to 15% more to insure than comparable sedans due to structural design differences and claims data.The Subaru Crosstrek is the most affordable vehicle to insure this year, with an average monthly premium of $192. But it is not alone on the list; the Jeep Wrangler came in tied for second with the Honda CR-V at $193 a month.In fact, 16 of the top 20 cheapest cars to insure on CarInsurance.com’s list were SUVs.The Subaru Crosstrek makes sense, and the Japanese-made SUV is Consumer Reports’ top subcompact SUV pick and one of the best-selling vehicles in the country due to its safety profile.In fact, Subaru has two vehicles on the top-20 insurance list, with the Crosstrek joined by the Outback station wagon. “Repair and replacement costs are a huge factor for insurance rates,” says Zach Lazzari, founder at Cross Border Coverage. “For example, some vehicles have very high repair costs for common fender bender damage. Entire panels may require replacements on one vehicle, while others can be fixed with a simple dent remover and some fresh paint.”The top-5 cheapest SUVs averaged under $1,172 for a six-month premium, while the cheapest sedan (unsurprisingly, a Subaru Legacy) had an average six-month premium of $1,265.SUVs’ size and height offer safety, but there are tradeoffsMany Americans buy SUVs not just due to an affinity for big toys, but also because they believe these vehicles are safer.SUVs are heavier and generally sit higher than sedans. That extra mass can reduce the force transferred to occupants in a head-on collision or side impact, according to Pierce Skrabanek.Related: Consumer Reports names top 5 vehicles with lowest hidden feesAlso, because SUVs’ higher ride height places the bumper above the main reinforcement zones of a sedan, they are less vulnerable to side-impact crashes than their smaller counterparts.They also score better in multi-vehicle accidents.But there are tradeoffs.Smaller vehicles tend to handle better because they are lighter. So they are better at avoiding collisions altogether if the driver can react in time. Also, due to the higher ride height mentioned above, SUVs have a greater rollover risk than sedans.That higher center of gravity also works against the vehicle’s control during sharp turns, swerves, or high-speed crashes. Rollover accidents are particularly dangerous because roof crushes and ejections are common in those situations.Related: Tesla FSD makes terrifying mistake in viral video