SUCCESS

My Chemical Romance returns to No. 1 in the U.K. as Danger Days: The True Lives of the Fabulous Killjoys surges to the top of the rock albums ranking.

TheStreet aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.Why we love this dealOutdoor space is valuable no matter how much you have of it. A small apartment balcony, a front porch, or a corner of the backyard still offer enough space to create a cozy outdoor area. A table and a couple of chairs can turn unused outdoor space into your own personal oasis, perfect for having morning coffee, catching up with friends, or just enjoying the day. Spending time outdoors can not only boost your serotonin, but it can also allow you to use every square inch of space that you pay for, getting the most bang for your buck.Bistro sets and small patio sets continue to offer an easy and affordable way to create your own outdoor area. The Mainstays 3-Piece Bistro Set is a perfect example, offering a small table to have lunch or drinks with friends, and two chairs so you can have company. This set is under $50, offering a super affordable option for any home. Shoppers can save 28% at Walmart. Mainstays 3-Piece Bistro Set, $48 (was $67) at Walmart

Courtesy of Walmart

Shop at WalmartWhy do shoppers love it?This simple setup not only works for smaller spaces when being used, but the whole set can be folded up and leaned against the wall on an apartment patio, or be easily stored in the garage during winter, creating a versatile solution to your needs, especially if your outdoor space serves multiple purposes throughout the week. The table measures 23.6 inches wide and tall, and the chairs each measure 4.4 inches wide, 11.6 inches deep, and 38.8 inches tall, being able to hold up to 250 pounds. Related: Walmart is selling a 4-piece rattan patio set with cushions for just $132The powder-coated steel frame resists rust, while the fabric seating is fade-resistant to help maintain its appearance. The table features a tempered glass top that offers a polished look and an easy-to-clean surface. It’s durable and can withstand daily use by coffee mugs, plates, and laptops. The set also requires no assembly, making it a simple option. When you receive your package, you just need to unfold the table and chairs and find the perfect spot! This set comes in bright blue and white colors that add a pop of fun to your outdoor space without overwhelming the area, and the seats can easily be wiped or hosed off.The pros and cons of this dealProsMaterial: The powder-coated steel and lightweight mesh seating is comfortable and easy to care for.Versatility: The size and ability to fold up make it easy to use this set almost anywhere. Cons Only one color: This set is only available in one color.No cushions included: The mesh is breathable and comfortable, but if you’re looking to add more comfort or flair, you can purchase tie-on cushions separately. “I love this patio set and love the color,” one reviewer said. “There was no assembly, and I loved that. I’m very pleased with my purchase. They are a lot sturdier than what the picture shows. It’s metal, and no plastic. I love it!”Another buyer said, “This is a beautiful set. It’s a great quality for the price, with very comfortable chairs. It’s well worth the price.”Shop more dealsWalsunny 3-Piece Outdoor Patio Set, $70 (was $160) at WalmartHomall 3-Piece Acacia Wood Folding Patio Set, $116 (was $200) at WalmartCostway 3-Piece Wood Folding Bistro Set with Cushions, $140 (was $229) at WalmartThe  Mainstays 3-Piece Bistro Set is versatile, easy to set up, and affordable. The folding design allows it to be easily used in multi-purpose spaces, and the full-height table offers a place to work, eat, and relax, all for just $48.

In March 2023, China opened its first-ever cybersecurity review into a foreign company’s products. The target was Micron, the Idaho-based memory chipmaker, CNBC reported, and the case ended seven weeks later with a ban on the sale of its products to Chinese state infrastructure operators.That precedent matters, now that Beijing has trained the same regulatory tool on Palo Alto Networks (PANW), headquartered in Santa Clara, Calif.The Cyberspace Administration of China said Thursday, Aug. 6, that it has launched a formal security review of products Palo Alto sells in the country, citing the need to protect critical information infrastructure under national security and cybersecurity law.Beijing did not publicly specify which software or hardware lines are under review, which is standard protocol for CAC security audits.Palo Alto operates offices in Beijing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, and its shares fell as much as 4.2% in premarket trading before turning slightly green, according to a Seeking Alpha report.That muted reaction contrasts with how markets treated the Micron review in 2023, when the stock slid for days on fears of a full China exit.Why investors shrugged this time says as much about Palo Alto’s business as it does about Beijing’s intentions.Palo Alto isn’t Beijing’s first cybersecurity review of a U.S. tech companyThe Cybersecurity Review Office used nearly identical language, citing the same national security and cybersecurity laws, when it opened its Micron probe in 2023, according to the South China Morning Post.That review concluded weeks later with a determination that Micron’s products posed security risks, and Chinese operators of critical infrastructure were barred from buying them, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Micron’s China revenue never fully recovered to prior levels.Palo Alto’s exposure looks different on paper. The Asia Pacific region, where China sits alongside Japan, Australia and other markets, made up roughly 12% of Palo Alto’s total revenue in fiscal 2025, according to the company’s annual report filed with the SEC.China itself is a sliver of that regional total, since Beijing has spent years pushing domestic alternatives into critical infrastructure contracts, limiting how much a full exit would actually cost Palo Alto’s bottom line.

China opened a formal cybersecurity review of Palo Alto Networks on Aug. 6, 2026, the third pressure campaign the company has faced from Beijing since January.Bloomberg / Getty Images

The market’s calm reaction says morePalo Alto (PANW) shares have climbed roughly 88% over the past three months, fueled by a blowout fiscal third quarter and CEO Nikesh Arora’s insistence that AI has not disrupted the cybersecurity budget cycle the way some feared, according to CNBC.The stock touched fresh highs this week, and options traders had already priced in an unusually strong August seasonal pattern.Related: IBM just answered a $5 billion cybersecurity questionPalo Alto reports fiscal fourth-quarter results on Sept. 1, giving investors a nearer-term catalyst than a Chinese regulatory review in a market that generates a small fraction of its revenue.That calculus already played out once. When Reuters first reported in January that China had ordered domestic firms to drop cybersecurity software from Palo Alto and more than a dozen other U.S. and Israeli vendors, Palo Alto’s share price stayed virtually flat, while Broadcom fell more than 4%.Investors had already concluded that China represented upside optionality, not a core pillar of the growth story.3 strikes from Chinese government in 7 monthsThe pattern predates the Aug. 6 announcement. A Chinese government directive reviewed by Bloomberg News in January accused Palo Alto of having a “U.S. Western intelligence background,” without offering evidence, and ordered Chinese firms to phase out its products by mid-2026.The following month, Reuters reported that Palo Alto’s own Unit 42 researchers softened a hacking report that had privately linked a major espionage campaign to Beijing, out of concern that naming China could invite retaliation against its offices or clients there.More Tech:ServiceNow’s quiet $1B cybersecurity boomA European rival to SpaceX is chasing a $2B valuationSK Hynix denies Intel Ohio fab deal, but the market didn’t careThat decision briefly became its own story. It suggested Beijing’s pressure was already shaping how a major American cybersecurity firm talks about Chinese state hacking, even before any formal review existed, raising questions about how much other Western vendors self-censor under similar pressure.The Aug. 6 formal probe marks the third strike in this sequence, turning informal pressure into an official state procedure.The review is a lever, not a verdictWhat separates this episode from Micron is intent. Beijing needed no additional leverage over Micron beyond its stated security concerns.With Palo Alto, the review arrives layered on top of an unproven spy accusation, a software phase-out order, and reporting that the company had already tempered its own threat research.That sequence looks less like a routine security audit and more like sustained pressure on a company Beijing has chosen to make an example of in its broader standoff with Washington.Investors are betting the stakes stay contained to a market that barely moves Palo Alto’s revenue. The bigger question is whether Beijing extends this playbook to vendors with far more to lose in China, since a regulatory tool built to police data leaving the country is proving just as effective at squeezing the companies trying to sell into it.Related: BofA downplays China’s threat to Micron’s AI business

The OKX executive says Democrats have little incentive to hand Republicans a crypto victory before the midterms.

After months of public warnings from onchain analysts, the prediction market is moving to time-weighted prices to make artificial price pushes too costly.

The popular default investments may need to be more aggressive in order to fund decades of retirement.

Fidelity Investments lists many 401(k) fund choices from which companies offer their employees to choose, but a new federal lawsuit filed Aug. 4 in the Western District of New York could change those choices in a dramatic way.The surprising lawsuit, which was just called “novel” by an expert, may well have implications beyond the employer involved in this initial case.Let’s cut to the chase on the current legal situation and then get to some background.”A Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. employee filed a novel federal lawsuit arguing that employers must offer fossil-fuel-free retirement investment options as a religious accommodation, creating a new legal test for environmental, social and governance investing,” wrote James Van Bramer on Plansponsor.The lawsuit tests how strictly businesses must accommodate workers’ religious beliefs under a 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that requires approval of such requests unless they cause significant financial hardship. Attorneys argue a win could pave the way for millions of workers to tailor their employer retirement plans to their moral or religious values, such as climate-conscious investing.Fidelity offers ESG 401(k) fundsFidelity gives employers options for their workers who are interested in these investing opportunities, but only a fraction of employers currently offer them as 401(k) choices.In the case of a successful lawsuit, these funds may suddenly jolt to larger significance.Sustainable investing offers another way to evaluate companies.”Sustainable investing offers another way to evaluate companies,” Fidelity writes. “Our active sustainable investment portfolios focus on key factors that our research shows drive financial results. This includes assessing financially-material environmental, social, and governance factors.”These funds include:Fidelity Healthy Future Fund (FAPHX): Invests in companies working to improve life expectancy, enhance people’s lives, and decrease negative environmental impacts.Fidelity Climate Action Fund (FCAEX): Invests in companies that are working to remove, reduce, or mitigate the effects of climate change.Fidelity Water Sustainability Fund (FLOWX): Invests in companies helping to deliver safe, reliable, and easily accessible water.Fidelity Environmental Bond Fund (FFEBX): Invests in the debt of companies and projects that are recognizing, disclosing, and reducing environmental riskFidelity Environment & Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX): Focuses on alternative and renewable energy, energy efficiency, pollution control, water infrastructure, waste and recycling technologies, or other environmental support services.
(Source: Fidelity Investments)
Supreme Court decision on Groff v. DeJoyThe legal background here hinges on the U.S. Supreme Court decision involving Gerald Groff vs. then Postmaster General Louis DeJoy.”Petitioner Gerald Groff is an Evangelical Christian who believes for religious reasons that Sunday should be devoted to worship and rest,” according to the Supreme Court. “In 2012, Groff took a mail delivery job with the United States Postal Service. Groff’s position generally did not involve Sunday work, but that changed after USPS agreed to begin facilitating Sunday deliveries for Amazon.”More on personal finance:Charles Schwab, Fidelity alert workers to forced 401(k) ruleDave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs (he’s not wrong)Congress research arm warns Americans on 401(k), IRA penaltyThe legal ruling in that case decided that Groff’s religious beliefs should be recognized and observed as a matter of law.”In April 2023, the Supreme Court clarified what constitutes undue hardship, ruling that an employer denying a religious accommodation needed to demonstrate that granting it would result in ‘substantial increased costs,'” wrote Brian Roewe for National Catholic Reporter.

A new lawsuit could change the landscape of 401(k) plans from which employees can choose.Shutterstock

The current lawsuit on 401(k) optionsThermo Fisher employee Andrew Hartley is suing the firm after it rejected his request for a religious accommodation: a fossil-fuel-free option for his 401(k).Hartley, saying he is a devout United Methodist, argues that his faith mandates caring for the Earth and forbids profiting from industries that produce greenhouse gas emissions and exacerbate climate change.”Dr. Hartley believes that investing his retirement money in ecologically and socially destructive fossil fuel companies violates his religious beliefs, including his belief that it is deeply immoral to personally profit from and hold an ownership stake in the fossil fuel companies that are contributing to the climate crisis,” the lawsuit states, according to Roewe.In the legal complaint, Hartley formally requested a 401(k) fund free of fossil fuel investments as a religious accommodation in October 2024 and listed some options he had considered. Thermo Fisher allegedly dismissed the request, asserting that it did not satisfy the legal requirements for a faith-based accommodation.”Hartley currently invests for his retirement on his own while using the company 401(k) plan in a limited way,” Roewe wrote.”A spokesman for Thermo Fisher said the company does not comment on pending litigation,” he added.Major financial services firms beyond Fidelity, such as Charles Schwab and Vanguard, also offer ESG options, which may well provide employees with more opportunities in light of the pending legal decision and the publicity it may generate.Related: AARP warns Americans on 401(k), IRA costly mistakes

16 states are offering tax-free shopping holidays throughout the month as back-to-school costs soar to over $800 per student

Murkowski said she couldn’t trust Blanche to “check the worst impulses of this administration.”

When FTX collapsed, the parts of it bound by law survived. Mainstream finance is now converging with digital assets, and the law built to protect it the same way is the one the Senate did not pass this week, argues Bullish’s Randi Abernethy.